Live Dead Discrimination
Live Dead Discrimination - Related Videos
02:55
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
0 Views •
2020
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
06:41
Testing for Odor Discrimination and Habituation in Mice
0 Views •
Cited by 66 •
2015
This manuscript describes a protocol to examine the olfactory system of rodents. The olfactory habituation/dishabituation test will allow investigators to determine whether a mouse habituates to a repeatedly presented odor and whether the mouse demonstrates dishabituation when presented a novel odor.
09:48
Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2017
We have developed a novel protocol for studying heterocellular population dynamics in response to perturbations. This manuscript describes an imaging-based platform that produces quantitative datasets for simultaneous characterization of multiple cellular phenotypes of heterocellular populations in a robust manner.
01:25
Price Discrimination under Monopoly
0 Views •
2024
Price discrimination under monopoly refers to the practice where a monopolist charges different prices for the same product or service to different customers or in different markets. This strategy allows the monopolist to capture more consumer surplus, turning it into additional profits. For price discrimination to be effective, three conditions must be met: 1) the firm must have market power, 2) the firm must have the ability to separate markets or customers, and 3) the firm faces different...
09:58
An Optimized LIVE/DEAD Assay Coupled with Flow Cytometry for Quantifying Post-Stress Survival in Yeast Cells
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2025
Here, we present a protocol to quantify post-stress survival in yeast samples. The assay employs two fluorescent dyes, SYTO 9 and propidium iodide (PI), to quantify plasma membrane integrity. It uses flow cytometry to provide quantitative and reproducible estimates of the live, dead, and damaged cell fractions for post-oxidative-stress samples.
FAQs
The contrast arises from different access to the cell interior. A membrane-permeable dye can label cells with intact membranes, whereas a membrane-impermeable dye enters cells whose membranes are damaged and produces a different signal. Comparing these signals allows researchers to distinguish membrane-intact, membrane-damaged, and nonviable portions of a sample.
Metabolic measurements can add evidence about whether detected cells are biologically active, rather than relying only on membrane condition. This distinction matters because environmental samples may contain organisms that are present but injured or inactive. Combining metabolic information with membrane-based signals can produce a more informative viability profile for microbial communities.
A cell count indicates how many organisms are detected, but it does not by itself show whether those organisms are active, injured, or no longer viable. Live-dead discrimination adds that functional context by separating detected cells according to viability-related signals. Together, the measurements provide a clearer assessment of biological activity and environmental health.
A basic workflow begins with an environmental sample such as water, soil, sediment, or a biofilm. Researchers apply an appropriate combination of membrane-permeable and membrane-impermeable fluorescent dyes, then compare the resulting signals to classify the detected cells. The classifications can be summarized as a viability profile for the sampled community.
The approach can be applied to microbial communities in water, soil, sediments, and biofilms. It is especially useful when researchers need to examine how a community responds to pollutants or to a treatment process. Comparing viability profiles across samples or conditions can reveal changes in biological status that simple detection alone may miss.
Researchers can compare the proportions or patterns of viable, injured, and nonviable organisms before and after exposure to a pollutant or treatment. A shift in these categories provides evidence of altered microbial condition and biological activity. This makes viability profiling useful for evaluating environmental stress and the effects of treatment processes on microbial communities.