Wong-baker Faces
Wong-baker Faces - Related Videos
09:53
Mitochondrial Transformation in Baker's Yeast to Study Translation and Respiratory Complex Assembly
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2024
This work explains how to transform yeast mitochondria using a biolistic method. We also show how to select and purify the transformants and how to introduce the desired mutation in the target position within the mitochondrial genome.
08:33
Labelling and Visualization of Mitochondrial Genome Expression Products in Baker's Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
0 Views •
2021
Baker’s yeast mitochondrial genome encodes eight polypeptides. The goal of the current protocol is to label all of them and subsequently visualize them as separate bands.
06:53
Quantification of γH2AX Foci in Response to Ionising Radiation
0 Views •
Cited by 23 •
2010
Quantification of DNA double-strand streaks using γH2AX formation as a molecular marker has become an invaluable tool in radiation biology. Here we demonstrate the use of an immunofluorescence assay for quantification of γH2AX foci after exposure of cells to radiation.
12:17
Construction and Implantation of a Microinfusion System for Sustained Delivery of Neuroactive Agents.
0 Views •
Cited by 4 •
2008
As neuroscience inquiry becomes more sophisticated, investigation of brain structures and circuitry requires improved levels of accuracy and higher resolution. We have developed a method for the preparation and implantation of a chronic infusion system within the brain utilizing a borosilicate microcannula with a tip diameter of 50 microns.
08:48
Quantitation of γH2AX Foci in Tissue Samples
0 Views •
Cited by 7 •
2010
Quantitation of DNA double-strand breaks on the basis of γH2AX foci has become an invaluable tool, particularly in radiation biology, for the evaluation of tissue radiosensitivity and effects of radiation modifying compounds. Here we demonstrate the use of an immunofluorescence assay for quantitation of γH2AX foci in tissue samples.
FAQs
The faces are paired with increasing pain scores, commonly ranging from 0 for no hurt to 10 for the worst hurt. This pairing converts a patient’s selected visual description into a score that clinicians can record and compare. The result provides a consistent reference point for discussing pain intensity during medical assessment and later follow-up.
A visual sequence can make pain communication easier when verbal descriptions or numerical ratings are difficult. The patient can match the face that best corresponds to the experienced pain rather than finding precise words or selecting an abstract number. This supports participation in assessment while keeping the reported intensity connected to the patient’s own experience.
The selected face communicates the patient’s perceived pain intensity at that point in time. It does not replace the patient’s report with an externally assigned judgment; instead, it gives the patient a structured way to express the experience. Clinicians can then use the associated score when discussing the assessment and documenting changes.
A baseline score creates an initial reference for the patient’s reported pain. Later scores can be considered alongside that starting point to identify whether the reported intensity has changed after treatment or during follow-up. In medicine, this helps organize repeated pain assessments and gives healthcare teams a shared measure for discussing the patient’s course.
Clinicians can present the sequence, explain the score range when needed, and ask the patient to select the face that best matches the current experience. The associated score can then be recorded as part of the assessment. Repeating the process during treatment and follow-up provides comparable points for reviewing reported pain over time.
The scale is especially useful when patients have difficulty communicating pain through verbal descriptions or numerical ratings. Its visual format offers another route for reporting intensity without requiring a lengthy description. This can support pain assessment across medical encounters and help clinicians include the patient’s report when establishing a starting score or reviewing subsequent changes.
A selected face and its associated score give different participants a common reference for discussing reported pain. Patients can indicate their experience visually, while families and healthcare professionals can refer to the recorded score during assessment, treatment, and follow-up. This shared reference supports clearer communication without removing the patient’s role in reporting intensity.
Follow-up scores allow clinicians to compare the patient’s current reported pain with the earlier baseline. An increase, decrease, or unchanged score can show how the reported experience differs across assessments. These comparisons help organize conversations about treatment and ongoing care, while preserving the fact that the score comes from the patient’s selected description of pain.