资料来源: 实验室的加里 · 斯基、 戴夫 Strohmetz 和娜塔莉 Ciarocco — — 蒙茅斯大学
策划一项实验,时,重要的经验引起与会者的最自然反应尽可能。研究人员完成大部分通过他们的实验设置的创作。
很多研究项目集中在两个或更多的人们之间的相互作用。 在这些情况下的环境或设置必须常常是不自然;通常只有一个人可以是真正的参与者和其他研究中需要”同盟军,”那就是,据称无偏参与者,在现实中,根据研究者的方向。
这个视频使用两组实验,看看是否更容易去模仿一个人拥有更多权力与类似权力相比,参与者参与者。 视频还强调了研究同盟军的使用。
心理研究经常在其他科学中使用高比研究的样本量。 大量的参与者有助于更好地确保人口正在研究更好地为代表,即伴随着研究人类行为的误差范围足够占。 像这样的研究进一步、 人类参与者往往是现成和实验是快速和廉价复制所以我们想尽可能的使用尽可能多的参与者。 在本视频中,我们演示本实验使用只是一个参与者。 然而,所代表的结果,我们可以使用共 156 名参与者得出的实验结论的情况。
1.定义的关键变量。
2.进行研究。
3.汇报的参与者。
同盟军或研究的演员,并普遍采用心理学实验的研究与实际科目参加偷偷。
通过使用同盟军,研究人员研究参与者在复杂的社会环境中,可靠地捕获天真反应。
通过纳入的同盟军,该视频演示了如何设计、 执行、 分析和解释,非意识模仿可靠的测量实验。
在这种情况下,研究人员操纵的实验设置来测试参与者是否更有可能模仿一个人一个人与社会的更大权力,与类似的权力。
本实验采用两组设计与关键元素: 雇佣的演员或邦联。邦联行为根据研究者的方向,允许秘密观察。
受试者认为他们正在观察其他参与者的行为,因为他们的工作通过单向镜子的数学问题。在现实中,研究者很感兴趣受试者随后模仿行为表现出来,南军作为他在每个数学问题。
一半的学生参与者告诉邦联是在更有力的位置作为一个头居住厅助理,而另一半被告知邦联是相等的权力,作为一名普通的学生。
参与者被要求分数,他们认为,南军了对或错的问题。在同一时间参加者都得分每个问题,研究者观察他们和吻合因变量 — — 行为模仿数目。
如果南部邦联的知觉的状态影响参与者的反应,那些相信邦联有更高的功率将模仿行为比那些相信邦联具有相等的功率更大一些。
要进行实验,您将需要: 知情同意和期末述职报告、 笔、 一张纸的 GRE 级数学问题、 观察,单向镜子和行为统计图表。
若要开始实验,满足参与者在实验室里。指导所有参与者通过同意过程和讨论会议的总体计划。
用单向镜像引入房间靠窗边的参与者。状态,他们将被视为另一位与会者镜像一边他们完成 GRE 级数学问题。向参与者传达他们需要仔细记住由其他参与者的行为。
虽然参与者在房间里有人出现在另一边等,能满足邦联的演员。指示他们分别从事以下的七个关键行为按顺序用七个数学问题: 玩自己的头发,把笔放在他嘴里,他们用手指在桌子上敲、 摸他们的脸,皱鼻子,口哨声和后靠在椅子上。
现在导致的椅子前面的单向镜子镜子旁的邦联。为他们提供相同的知情同意文件,研究准则,参与者认为邦联是确实另一个正常的参与者。离开房间前,把一张纸的数学问题交给邦联来完成。
后交邦联 GRE 数学问题的表,返回到原始的参与者与一支钢笔和一份复印件的数学问题。告诉他们其他观察的参与者要么是: 在校园里或 (2) 另一个正常学生参与者 (1) 头住所大厅助理。
邦联离开房间后,指示参与者来标记问题,他们认为,南军了正确与一个明星或与十.同时不正确检查参与者模仿南部邦联的行为,当得分每个问题。
在实验结束时,参与者会汇报和解释为什么欺骗是必要的实验。
要分析同盟军是如何影响结果,理货行为模仿为每个条件数目。
数据然后被曲线图绘制行为模仿在每个条件的平均次数。在这个实验中,参与者认为邦联是驻地大厅助理模仿更多的行为比那些认为邦联是一名学生。
既然你已经熟悉心理学实验如何巧妙地实现与共盟者一起,让我们看看如何不同,研究者运用同盟军影响社会行为。
在最近的一项研究,同伙被用于检查对记忆的社会影响。邦联给参与者错误的信息,导致不正确的记忆被召回。因此,同盟军显示使用内存召回是社会性传染的。
在另一个实验中,同伙被用于检查社会线索的吸引力。当男性的邦联与女性邦联婴儿互动时,目睹相互作用的妇女喜欢的就是他比当他忽略了婴儿。
神经学家们有兴趣在我们的大脑是如何处理模仿他人的行为。发现神经生理学相关因素对理解感知和潜在社会认知障碍机制至关重要。
你刚看了朱庇特的介绍如何使用同盟军在实验研究中。现在你应该已经很好地理解如何设计和进行实验,以及分析结果的和适用这一现象。
谢谢观赏 !
在本研究中表现出的程序重复了 155 次,以便结果反映从 156 占参与者的数据。78 的与会者被告知邦联是头住所大厅助理 (第一个情况) 而其他 78 名参与者被告知同盟有没有这样的权力的立场,即,只是定期学生像参与者 (第二条件)。
数据制成图表,反映出平均的行为模仿同时观察邦联 (图 3) 的参与者。记得,有 7 种可能的行为模仿所以参与者的得分可能范围从 0 到 7。
若要确定是否有高平等的权力条件之间的差异,t 检验进行独立的手段。结果表明,与会者相信,南军有更高的功率模仿更多的行为比那些相信他们有类似的权力。
图 3:行为受到了感知的功率条件下的模仿的平均数。
同盟军是常见的心理学研究。例如,南部邦联可以给与会者具体建议或稍后可以影响记忆的信息。2研究人员也使用同盟军在实地研究中重新创建日常交往中。例如,当男性的邦联互动抱着一个婴儿,妇女喜欢他胜过当他忽略了婴儿。3本研究复制和扩展以往的研究表明,那些想要感觉隶属于另一个人更有可能从事无意识模仿的体现。4大量的因素可能会影响到其中一个人非自觉地模仿另一种的程度。例如,最近的实验诱导参与者感受到一种高傲、 积极,或中性的感觉。5结果表明,与会者感到自豪的人很少去模仿邦联脚振动特性。
Confederates, or research actors, are commonly employed in psychology experiments to secretly participate along with actual subjects.
By using confederates, researchers study participants in complex social settings and reliably capture naïve reactions.
Through the incorporation of confederates, this video demonstrates how to design, perform, analyze, and interpret an experiment where non-conscious mimicry is reliably measured.
In this case, researchers manipulate the experimental setting to test whether a participant is more likely to mimic a person with greater social power versus a person with similar power.
This experiment uses a two-group design with a critical element: a hired actor or confederate. The confederate acts according to the researcher’s directions, which allows for secret observations.
Subjects think that they are observing other participants’ behaviors as they work on math problems through a one-way mirror. In actuality, the researcher is interested in whether or not the subjects subsequently mimic behaviors acted out by the confederate as he works on each math problem.
Half of the student participants are told that the confederate is in a more powerful position as a head residence hall assistant, whereas the other half are told that the confederate is equal in power as a regular student.
The participants are then asked to score the questions that they think the confederate got right or wrong. At the same time participants are scoring each problem, the researcher observes them and tallies the dependent variable—the number of behaviors mimicked.
If the perceived status of the confederate influences the participants’ responses, those who believe the confederate had higher power will mimic a greater number of behaviors than those who believe the confederate has equal power.
To conduct the experiment, you will need: informed consent and final debriefing papers, pens, a sheet of GRE-level math problems, a one-way mirror for observation, and a chart of behaviors to tally.
To begin the experiment, meet the participant in the lab. Guide all participants through the consent process and discuss the overall plan for the session.
Lead the participant into the window side of the room with a one-way mirror. State that they will be viewing another participant on the mirrored side as they complete GRE-level math problems. Convey to the participant that they need to carefully remember behaviors performed by the other participant.
While the participant is waiting in the room for someone to appear on the other side, meet the confederate actor. Instruct them to respectively engage in the following seven key behaviors in order with seven math problems: playing with their hair, putting a pen in their mouth, tapping their fingers on the desk, touching their face, wrinkling their nose, whistling, and leaning back in the chair.
Now lead the confederate to the chair in front of the mirror-side of the one-way mirror. Provide them with the same informed consent papers and research guidelines so that the participant believes the confederate is indeed another normal participant. Before leaving the room, hand a sheet of math problems to the confederate to complete.
After handing the confederate the sheet of GRE math problems, return to the original participant with a pen and a copy of the math problems. Tell them that the other observed participant is either: (1) a head residence hall assistant on campus, or (2) another normal student participant.
After the confederate leaves the room, instruct the participant to mark questions they think the confederate got correct with a star or incorrect with an X. Simultaneously check whether or not the participant imitates the confederate’s behavior when scoring each question.
At the conclusion of the experiment, debrief participants and explain why deception was necessary for the experiment.
To analyze how confederates influence the outcome, tally the number of behaviors mimicked for each condition.
The data are then graphed by plotting the mean number of behaviors mimicked in each condition. In this experiment, participants who believed the confederate was a Resident Hall Assistant imitated a greater number of behaviors than those who believed the confederate was a student.
Now that you are familiar with how psychology experiments are cleverly implemented with confederates, let’s take a look at how various researchers employ confederates to affect social behaviors.
In a recent study, confederates were used to examine social influences on remembering. A confederate gave participants misinformation that led to incorrect memories being recalled. Thus, the use of confederates shows that memory recall is socially contagious.
In another experiment, confederates were used to examine social cues of attraction. When a male confederate interacted with a female confederate’s baby, women who witnessed the interaction liked him better than when he ignored the baby.
Neuroscientists are interested in how our brains process mimicking the actions of others. Discovering the neurophysiological correlates is critical for understanding perception and mechanisms underlying social cognitive disorders.
You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction to using confederates in experimental studies. Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and perform the experiment, as well as analyze results and apply the phenomenon.
Thanks for watching!
Related Videos
Experimental Psychology
18.2K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
29.1K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
8.2K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
5.6K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
10.3K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
13.0K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
72.2K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
22.7K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
22.9K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
73.1K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
11.8K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
8.4K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
11.6K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
8.5K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
17.8K 浏览