资料来源: 实验室的加里 · 斯基、 戴夫 Strohmetz 和娜塔莉 Ciarocco — — 蒙茅斯大学
析因设计是常见的实验有两个或多个独立变量。该视频演示了用来探讨如何自我意识和自尊可能会影响能够破译的非语言信号的 2 × 2 析因设计。这个视频引导学生通过包括,析因设计和什么区别于其他的设计、 析因设计、 重要性和自然的相互作用、 主效应和交互作用的假设的好处以及如何进行析因实验性质的析因设计的基本知识。
1.介绍课题的研究问题
2.关键变量
3.研究假设
4.定义变量
5.建立条件
表 1。析因设计。显示的是的 2 x 2 设计因素的可能组合。
6.测量因变量 (在解码非言语交际的准确性)
7.进行研究
当研究者需要操纵两个或多个自变量与测量对同一研究中单个因变量的影响,将使用析因设计。
例如,如果研究人员想要知道为什么有些人更好地理解另一个人的面部表情,他们将不得不检查可能会影响这种能力的多因素。
而不是测试许多潜在影响在一段时间的一个实验,将析因设计允许内一项实验中的几个变量同步税务检查。这种设计需要较少的与会者,揭示了是否的各种原因进行交互的一种特殊的方式来影响结果。
该视频演示了如何设计和进行一个简单的析因实验,探讨如何自我意识和自尊可能会影响能够破译的非语言信号,以及如何分析结果和审查额外例,使用这种设计。
在这个实验中,使用两两析因设计,组成的两个独立变量 — — 自我意识和自尊 — — 与两个层次,高和低。
操纵自我意识 — — 如何有意识的个体是关于他们自己的想法和感受 — — 参与者完成地理知识问答在高自我意识在镜子前的组,或在低自我的一面镜子没有组。
同时操纵自尊 — — 他们是谁,作为一个人一个人的正面或负面评价 — — 参与者提供虚假反馈对地理知识问答。
高自尊组被告知他们得分最高的 10%,与上级及以上平均性能,而那些低自尊组中学习,他们的得分表演低劣的底部 50%和低于平均水平。
因此,注意到与会者受到四个可能的组合之一: 自我认识自我自尊/高高;低自尊自我/高自我意识;高自我自尊/低自我意识;或低自尊自我/低自我意识。
接到反馈后,参与者被要求查看集众多的眼睛和确定适当的情感表达。在这种情况下,因变量是解码非言语交际的准确性。
由于设计的复杂性,生成几个假说。主要作用假说 — — 那些集中于单一的独立变量的影响 — — 是那些在高水平的每个条件将更准确法官的眼神比那些在低级别的组中。
相比之下,互动假设 — — 一种预测一个独立的变量更改另一个的影响因变量 — — 那是能够准确地检测非言语交际将增强对于那些经验高自我意识,但对于那些经验低自我意识减少自尊的影响。
参与者到来之前,随机组织具有的四个组合的条件,以确保组分配完全基于机会每个数据包。
若要开始实验,满足参与者在实验室里。为他们提供知情同意、 研究的简要说明,程序,潜在的风险和好处的参与和撤回权意识在任何时候。
根据分配的自我意识状况,指导参与者,坐下来单向镜,其反射可见或关闭百叶窗打开,防止自我反省,先做个测试。
下一步,给每个参与者一张带 50 空格上它,让他们列出尽可能多的国家,在欧洲,他们可以在接下来的 2 分钟。
后向参与者说明你正在分析其结果相比,过去的参与者,提供一张纸基于他们随机分配的情况反馈给他们。
然后,坐在电脑前参与者采取另一个测验,要求参与者识别基于模糊眼图像的面部表情。
最后的实验,向与会者汇报,就告诉他们这项研究的性质以及为什么不能事先透露这项研究的真正目的。
分析如何自尊和自我意识影响的能力解读非语言表达方式,平均眼解释测验在每个组中的分数和阴谋手段的条件。
要确定是否发现组之间的差异,请执行双向的方差分析,揭示任何主要或交互的影响。在这种情况下,对自我意识的影响取决于自尊水平。
相反的假设模式,注意高自我意识与低自尊的与会者在破译非言语表达更准确。然而,当暴露于低自我意识,与会者更准确时他们有很强的自尊心。
既然你已经熟悉如何设计和执行由两析因实验,让我们看看一些其他的例子,这种设计。
在一项研究,长时程增强的惊跳反射测量中受到电击的低或高的概率。
另一个独立变量,如酒精或安慰剂,政府允许对休克程度和酒精是如何影响惊吓反应进行调查。
另外一个例子,考虑如何不同的应力可能与行使执行的类型进行交互。若要同时测试所有这些条件,两两析因设计是必需的。
也许在另一种情况,一位研究员是感兴趣的学生在上的执行屏幕与笔试,藉以参加者的性别可能会影响性能。再次,两两析因设计是必要的同步税务检查。
你刚看了朱庇特的析因试验设计简介。
现在你应该有很好地理解如何设计和进行两两的析因试验,以及如何进行了统计分析常见到这些研究结果。你也了解了两两析因设计的使用是有益的几个例子。
谢谢观赏 !
收集数据后从 136 人,双向方差分析 (ANOVA) 进行测试的两个主效应和交互作用。如所示在图 1中,与虚拟模式,当受试者高自我意识,他们是准确的当他们有低自尊;然而,当他们低自我意识,他们却更准确时他们有很强的自尊心。
超越破译一个人眼中的意义及其影响,更多的自我意识可以导致那些自卑,去体验更多的负面情绪,比如心情郁闷。
如果研究者可以确定理解非语言交际中造成更大的准确性的因素,它是可能个人可以了解如何更好地阅读其他的非语言信号。认为的所有上下文中的位置,能够准确地理解一个人的表情会帮助。销售工作,玩体育,面试求职者和约会。真的,非言语交际是无处不在想出办法来更准确地读它只能帮助。
图 1.非言语交际破译的自尊和自我意识。显示整个条件的平均分数。
析因设计心理学实验中都常用。这种设计,有利于各种话题,从药理对恐惧反应的不同程度的应激和运动方式的相互作用的影响。
A factorial design is used when researchers need to manipulate two or more independent variables and measure the effects on a single dependent variable in the same study.
For example, if researchers wanted to know why some people are better at reading another person’s facial expressions, they would have to examine multiple factors that could influence such ability.
Rather than test many potential influences one experiment at a time, a factorial design allows the simultaneous examination of several variables within one experiment. Such design requires fewer participants, and reveals whether the various causes interact in a special way to affect the outcome.
This video demonstrates how to design and conduct a simple factorial experiment to explore how self-awareness and self-esteem may influence the ability to decipher nonverbal signals, as well as how to analyze the results and examine additional cases that use this design.
In this experiment, a two-by-two factorial design is used, consisting of two independent variables—self-awareness and self-esteem—with two levels, high and low.
To manipulate self-awareness—how conscious an individual is about their own thoughts and feelings—participants complete a geography quiz in front of a mirror in the high self-awareness group, or in the absence of a mirror for the low self-awareness group.
To simultaneously manipulate self-esteem—a person’s positive or negative evaluation of who they are as a person—participants are provided with false-feedback on the geography quiz.
Those in the high self-esteem group are told that they scored in the top 10%, with superior and above average performance, while those in the low self-esteem group learn that they scored in the bottom 50%, performing inferior and below average.
Thus, note that participants are subjected to one of four possible combinations: high self-esteem/high self-awareness; low self-esteem/high self-awareness; high self-esteem/low self-awareness; or low self-esteem/low self-awareness.
After receiving feedback, participants are asked to view numerous sets of eyes and identify the proper emotion being expressed. In this case, the dependent variable is the accuracy of decoding the nonverbal communication.
Because of the design complexity, several hypotheses are generated. The main effect hypotheses—those that focus on the effect of a single independent variable—are that those in the high levels of each condition will be more accurate judges of eye expressions than those in the low level groups.
In contrast, the interaction hypothesis—one that predicts an independent variable changes another’s influence on the dependent variable—is that the impact of self-esteem on the ability to accurately detect nonverbal communication will be enhanced for those who experience high self-awareness, but reduced for those who experience low self-awareness.
Before the participant arrives, randomly organize packets with each of the four combinations of conditions to ensure that group assignments are entirely based on chance.
To begin the experiment, meet the participant in the lab. Provide them with informed consent, a brief description of the research, sense of the procedure, the potential risks and benefits of participating, and the right to withdrawal at any time.
Depending on the assigned self-awareness condition, instruct the participant to sit in front of a one-way mirror, with blinds open and their reflection visible or closed to prevent self-reflection, to take a quiz.
Next, give each participant a sheet with 50 spaces on it and ask them to list as many countries in Europe as they can in the next 2 min.
After indicating to the participant that you are analyzing their results compared to past participants, provide feedback to them on a sheet of paper based on their randomly assigned condition.
Then, sit the participant in front of a computer to take another quiz, which asks the participant to discern facial expressions based on ambiguous eye images.
To conclude the experiment, debrief participants by telling them the nature of the study, as well as why the true purpose of the study could not be revealed beforehand.
To analyze how self-esteem and self-awareness influence the ability to decipher nonverbal expressions, average the eye interpretation quiz scores in each group and plot the means by conditions.
To determine if group differences were found, perform a two-way ANOVA to reveal any main or interaction effects. In this case, the effect on self-awareness depends on the level of self-esteem.
Contrary to the hypothesized pattern, notice that participants with high self-awareness and low self-esteem were more accurate at deciphering nonverbal expressions. However, when exposed to low self-awareness, participants were more accurate when they had high self-esteem.
Now that you are familiar with how to design and perform a two-by-two factorial experiment, let’s take a look at some other examples of this design.
In one study, potentiation of the startle reflex was measured during a low or high probability of receiving an electric shock.
Another independent variable, such as the administration of alcohol or placebo, allows for the investigation into how shock level and alcohol influence the startle response.
In another example, consider how different levels of stress could interact with the type of exercise performed. To test all of these conditions simultaneously, a two-by-two factorial design is required.
Perhaps in another situation, a researcher is interested in how students perform on an on-screen versus a written test, whereby participants’ gender may influence performance. Once again, a two-by-two factorial design is necessary for simultaneous examination.
You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction to factorial experimental design.
Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and conduct a two-by-two factorial experiment, as well as how to statistically analyze the results common to these studies. You’ve also been introduced to several examples where the use of a two-by-two factorial design is beneficial.
Thanks for watching!
Related Videos
Experimental Psychology
18.2K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
29.1K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
8.3K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
5.6K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
10.3K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
13.0K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
72.6K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
22.7K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
22.9K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
73.1K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
11.8K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
8.4K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
11.6K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
8.5K 浏览
Experimental Psychology
17.8K 浏览