Contingent Attentional Capture
Contingent Attentional Capture - Related Videos
08:52
The Attentional Blink
0 Views •
2023
Source: Laboratory of Jonathan Flombaum—Johns Hopkins University In order for recognition of a certain stimulus to take place, visual attention needs to be directed towards said stimulus. To the earliest parts of the visual system, objects are not objects, they are collections of visual features-lines, corners, changes in texture, color, and light. Attention is the resource that is necessary for later processing in order to recognize what a given bundle of features adds up to. This makes...
01:29
Contingency Table
0 Views •
2023
A contingency table provides a way of portraying data that can facilitate calculating probabilities. It is a method of displaying a frequency distribution as a table with rows and columns to show how two variables may be dependent (contingent) upon each other; The table helps determine conditional probabilities quite quickly and can help systematically organize, analyze and quantify data. The table displays sample values concerning two variables that may be dependent or contingent on one...
07:12
A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2025
We present development of a gaze-contingent display framework designed for perceptual and oculomotor research simulating central vision loss. This framework is particularly adaptable for studying compensatory behavioral and oculomotor strategies in individuals experiencing both simulated and pathological central vision loss.
01:20
Contingent Liabilities
0 Views •
2025
Companies often face uncertain situations that could result in future financial obligations. These are known as contingent liabilities—potential debts dependent on the outcome of future events. While not always recorded on the balance sheet, contingent liabilities are essential for financial transparency and risk management.Recognition and Disclosure CriteriaContingent liabilities are recognized only if the obligation is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If either condition...
12:39
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
0 Views •
Cited by 8 •
2020
Using multimodal sensors is a promising way to understand the role of social interactions in educational settings. This paper describes a methodology for capturing joint visual attention from colocated dyads using mobile eye-trackers.
FAQs
Attentional control settings translate a current goal into a search template, a mental specification of what information matters. When an incoming stimulus shares the template’s relevant properties, it can trigger rapid orienting even if that stimulus is irrelevant to the immediate response. This mechanism links goal-directed selection with moment-to-moment changes in visual attention.
Capture depends on the active search template rather than on the distractor alone. A stimulus may disrupt performance when it matches properties currently sought, yet have little effect when those properties are outside the task’s attentional settings. This explains why identical visual events can produce different behavioral consequences across tasks.
Contingent attentional capture emphasizes an interaction between top-down control and incoming stimulus information. The observer’s goal determines which properties become relevant, while the stimulus supplies information that may or may not match those settings. Attention therefore reflects both the event’s characteristics and the task-dependent criteria used to evaluate it.
The critical factor is whether the irrelevant event shares features or other properties included in the person’s current search template. Matching information can produce rapid orienting, whereas nonmatching information is more likely to be ignored. Thus, the observer’s immediate goal changes the conditions under which a distractor interferes with selection.
A behavioral study can establish a search goal, present visual information that includes an irrelevant event, and compare performance when that event matches or fails to match the active attentional setting. Differences in orienting or task performance reveal whether the distractor was selected under the current goal, connecting visual-search conditions with measurable behavior.
Evidence includes rapid orienting toward an irrelevant stimulus and disruption of performance when its properties correspond to the current search template. In contrast, a nonmatching distractor should be more likely to remain ignored. Comparing these outcomes helps researchers evaluate how strongly top-down settings control distractor interference during visual selection.
The phenomenon helps explain selective attention in both laboratory tasks and everyday behavior, where the same visual event may matter in one situation but not another. It also informs models of visual search, distractor interference, and cognitive control by showing how current goals shape responses to competing information.