Irrigation Water Detection
Irrigation Water Detection - Related Videos
07:25
Detection of Phytophthora capsici in Irrigation Water using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification
0 Views •
Cited by 4 •
2020
We developed a method to detect Phytophthora capsici zoospores in water sources using a filter paper DNA extraction method coupled with a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay that can be analyzed in the field or in the lab.
13:32
VirWaTest, A Point-of-Use Method for the Detection of Viruses in Water Samples
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2019
Here we present VirWaTest, which is a simple, affordable and portable method for the concentration and detection of viruses from water samples at the point of use.
12:50
Colorimetric Paper-based Detection of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes from Large Volumes of Agricultural Water
0 Views •
Cited by 24 •
2014
A protocol involving integrated concentration, enrichment, and end-point colorimetric detection of foodborne pathogens in large volumes of agricultural water is presented here. Water is filtered through Modified Moore Swabs (MMS), enriched with selective or non-selective media, and detection is performed using paper-based analytical devices (µPAD) imbedded with bacterial-indicative colorimetric substrates.
12:32
EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. Part III. Virus Detection by RT-qPCR
0 Views •
Cited by 13 •
2016
Here we present a procedure to quantify enterovirus and norovirus in environmental and drinking waters using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. Mean virus recovery from groundwater with this standardized procedure from EPA Method 1615 was 20% for poliovirus and 30% for murine norovirus.
07:42
Detecting the Water-soluble Chloride Distribution of Cement Paste in a High-precision Way
0 Views •
Cited by 3 •
2017
A protocol for obtaining a water-soluble chloride profile by using a high precision milling method is presented.
FAQs
The central approach is comparative and time-based. Researchers examine changes in soil moisture, surface-water conditions, or chemical and isotopic signatures, then evaluate how those changes relate to rainfall and other natural hydrological processes. Patterns that cannot be explained by natural inputs can indicate irrigation, helping separate agricultural water applications from background environmental variability.
Three measurement categories support identification: soil moisture shows changes within agricultural soils, surface-water conditions reveal effects in visible water bodies or connected areas, and chemical or isotopic signatures provide compositional clues. Researchers can use one category or compare several over time, depending on whether they need to assess field conditions, water availability, or environmental movement.
A single observation may not show whether a water change resulted from irrigation, rainfall, or natural hydrology. Tracking conditions over time provides a basis for comparison and helps clarify when agricultural inputs influence soil and surface water. This temporal perspective supports evaluation of water use, resource availability, drought conditions, groundwater recharge, and contaminant movement.
A basic workflow begins by selecting relevant indicators, such as soil moisture, surface-water conditions, or chemical and isotopic signatures. Researchers then track those indicators over time and compare observed changes with rainfall and natural hydrological processes. Interpreting the combined patterns can identify irrigation inputs and show how they relate to water availability or environmental change.
They are useful when researchers need to understand how agricultural water applications affect available water within fields or across a watershed. Irrigation tracking can contribute to drought assessment by clarifying water use during changing conditions, while watershed management benefits from evidence about resource availability and the connections among irrigation, soil, surface water, and groundwater recharge.
Reliable detection creates evidence about where and when irrigation affects agricultural land and connected environmental conditions. That information can help evaluate water-use efficiency, support agricultural compliance, and identify consequences for soil and surface water. In environmental programs, the same evidence can strengthen decisions about resource management and clarify possible contaminant movement associated with irrigation.