Waiting
Procesando inicio de sesión ...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove
JoVE Journal Chemistry

Chemistry

Confocal Imaging of Confined Quiescent and Flowing Colloid-polymer Mixtures

Published: May 20, 2014 doi: 10.3791/51461
Automatic Translation
*1, *1, 1
1Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department, University of Houston
* These authors contributed equally

Summary

Confocal microscopy is used to image quiescent and flowing colloid-polymer mixtures, which are studied as model systems for attractive suspensions. Image analysis algorithms are used to calculate structural and dynamic metrics for the colloidal particles that measure changes due to geometric confinement.

Abstract

The behavior of confined colloidal suspensions with attractive interparticle interactions is critical to the rational design of materials for directed assembly1-3, drug delivery4, improved hydrocarbon recovery5-7, and flowable electrodes for energy storage8. Suspensions containing fluorescent colloids and non-adsorbing polymers are appealing model systems, as the ratio of the polymer radius of gyration to the particle radius and concentration of polymer control the range and strength of the interparticle attraction, respectively. By tuning the polymer properties and the volume fraction of the colloids, colloid fluids, fluids of clusters, gels, crystals, and glasses can be obtained9. Confocal microscopy, a variant of fluorescence microscopy, allows an optically transparent and fluorescent sample to be imaged with high spatial and temporal resolution in three dimensions. In this technique, a small pinhole or slit blocks the emitted fluorescent light from regions of the sample that are outside the focal volume of the microscope optical system. As a result, only a thin section of the sample in the focal plane is imaged. This technique is particularly well suited to probe the structure and dynamics in dense colloidal suspensions at the single-particle scale: the particles are large enough to be resolved using visible light and diffuse slowly enough to be captured at typical scan speeds of commercial confocal systems10. Improvements in scan speeds and analysis algorithms have also enabled quantitative confocal imaging of flowing suspensions11-16,37. In this paper, we demonstrate confocal microscopy experiments to probe the confined phase behavior and flow properties of colloid-polymer mixtures. We first prepare colloid-polymer mixtures that are density- and refractive-index matched. Next, we report a standard protocol for imaging quiescent dense colloid-polymer mixtures under varying confinement in thin wedge-shaped cells. Finally, we demonstrate a protocol for imaging colloid-polymer mixtures during microchannel flow.

Introduction

This paper demonstrates (a) confocal imaging of quiescent and flowing confined colloid-polymer mixtures in two and three dimensions and (b) particle-tracking and correlation analyses of the resultant images to obtain quantitative information on the phase behavior and flow properties.

Colloidal suspensions with attractive interparticle interactions appear ubiquitously in technological applications as materials for directed assembly1-3, drug delivery4, improved hydrocarbon recovery5-7, and energy storage8. A common feature of these applications is that the particles must be flowed through fine geometries, such as nozzles, print heads, microchannels, or porous media, and/or be shaped into thin films or rods. Techniques used to probe the structure of micron-sized colloids in confined geometries, including electron microscopy17,18, x-ray microscopy19, and laser-diffraction microscopy20, can be used to measure the structure and dynamics of particles on the microscale. These techniques, however, do not allow access to the trajectories of individual particles, from which structural and dynamic metrics can be computed for direct comparison to numerical simulations21,22.

Confocal microscopy is a variant of fluorescence microscopy that enables imaging of thin sections of a fluorescent sample. For colloidal science10, this technique is particularly useful for imaging deep within dense suspensions or in three dimensions. Particle-tracking algorithms23 applied to two- or three-dimensional time series of confocal micrographs yield the trajectories of all visible particles. As a result, the combination of confocal microscopy and particle-tracking has been applied to study the phase behavior, structure, and dynamics of colloidal suspensions, including ordered crystals24-27 and disordered glasses28-31 and gels32-35.

Other image analysis algorithms can be applied to measure particle dynamics from time series of confocal micrographs. For example, diffusive particle dynamics can be studied by analyzing the fluctuations in intensity over time using confocal differential dynamic microscopy36. When the particle displacements are larger than the interparticle spacing, image correlation37 based on particle image velocimetry38-40 can be applied to measure velocity profiles of the particles. The combination of tracking and correlation algorithms has allowed colloidal dynamics to be measured in systems undergoing slow and fast flow11-16,41-45.

We use colloid-polymer mixtures as models for attractive colloidal suspensions9. In these mixtures, the range and strength of the attractive interparticle potential are controlled via the ratio of the polymer radius of gyration to the particle radius and the concentration of the polymer and the electrostatic repulsion is controlled via the addition of a monovalent organic salt46. Because the interparticle interactions can be carefully tuned, the solidification of these mixtures has been extensively studied with confocal microscopy 34,47-51.

Here we demonstrate confocal imaging and image analysis37 of quiescent and flowing colloid-polymer mixtures, in which the colloid volume fraction is held fixed at Φ = 0.15, that probe the effect of confinement on the phase behavior and flow properties of these mixtures. These techniques are widely applicable to particulate systems that are refractive index-matched and in which the particles and/or solvent can be labeled with a fluorescent dye.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

1. Preparation of Colloid-polymer Mixtures

Note: This protocol uses poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) particles, sterically stabilized using poly (12-hydroxystearic acid) and labeled with a fluorescent dye (such as Nile Red, rhodamine B, or fluorescein), that were synthesized following a standard recipe52.

  1. Prepare a 3:1 w/w mixture of cyclohexyl bromide (CXB) and decahydronaphthalene (DHN) as a stock solvent. This mixture nearly matches the density and index of refraction of the particles. Add an organic salt, tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBAC)46, to the solvent at a concentration of 1.5 mM to partially screen the charges on the particles.
  2. To precisely determine the density of the particles, prepare a suspension at approximate particle volume fraction Φ = 0.10 in the CXB:DHN solvent. Centrifuge the suspension at 800 x g for 75 min and add CXB or DHN dropwise to improve the buoyancy matching. In these experiments, the density of the PMMA particles was measured to be ρ = 1.223 g/ml.
  3. Prepare a concentrated stock suspension of PMMA particles (here, Φ = 0.40) in the CXB:DHN solvent mixture.
  4. Prepare a concentrated solution of linear polystyrene (PS) in the CXB:DHN solvent mixture. Here, a solution of PS of molecular weight Mw ≈ 3,000,000 (radius of gyration rg = 15 nm) is prepared at concentration cp ≈ 50 mg/ml.
  5. Mix appropriate weights of the particle, polymer, and solvent stock mixtures to formulate suspensions at the desired concentrations of particles and polymers.
    Note: Here, suspensions of monodispersed particles are prepared at constant colloid volume fraction Φ = 0.15 and variable polymer concentration in the free volume53 cp = 0–25 mg/ml, and bidispersed suspensions containing two sizes of colloidal particles, with each size bearing a distinct fluorescent label, are prepared at fixed total colloid volume fraction Φ = 0.15, volume fraction ratio of small particles r = 0.50, and polymer concentration in the free volume of 5 or 25 mg/ml.
  6. After each suspension is prepared, add CXB or DHN dropwise and centrifuge the samples at 800 x g for at least 75 min to confirm that the particles and clusters within the suspension remain buoyancy matched.
  7. Equilibrate all samples for at least 24 hr prior to imaging experiments.

2. Quiescent Sample Experiments: Phase Behavior

  1. To determine the bulk phase behavior, fabricate rectangular chambers from glass coverslips (Figure 1a). For the colloid-polymer mixtures in this study, chambers of thickness h = 1 mm (set by the thickness of a microscope slide) give bulk behavior.
  2. To access multiple confinements in a single microscopy experiment, fabricate thin wedge-shaped chambers, using a single coverslip as a spacer on one wedge (Figure 1b). The opening angle of the chamber is <0.5°, so that in a single field of view the walls are very nearly parallel. A representative chamber allows access to confinement thicknesses of h = 6 to >100 µm.
  3. Build chambers on a coverslip base for imaging on an inverted microscope and seal with UV-curable epoxy, which does not dissolve in the CXB-DHN solvent mixture.
  4. Image samples using a confocal microscope. This protocol demonstrates imaging with a line-scanning confocal attached to an inverted microscope equipped with a 100X oil immersion lens of numerical aperture NA = 1.40.
  5. Excite the dyes using a laser source. Here wavelengths λ = 491 or 561 nm are used to excite the fluorescein and rhodamine/Nile Red dyes, respectively.
  6. In the point-scanning system, generate an image by rapidly scanning the focal point across the sample (in the x-y plane) using the confocal software. A two-dimensional image of 512 pixels x 512 pixels, covering approximately 50 μm x 50 μm, can be acquired in 1/32 sec. Improve the image quality by averaging multiple images or increasing the acquisition time.
  7. Locate the bottom of the chamber (z = 0), for example by focusing on particles adhered to its bottom. In this setup, the height (z) increases with increasing focus into the chamber.
  8. As an example, characterize the effect of confinement on the dynamics of the particles by acquiring a 2-D time series of images (in the x-y plane) at the midplane of the chamber. In a typical experiment, 500 images of dimension 512 pixels x 512 pixels are acquired at a frame rate of 1 frame/sec (time spacing ∆t = 1 sec).
  9. As a second example, characterize the 3-D structure of particles by acquiring a three-dimensional series of images (x,y,z). In a typical experiment, two-dimensional images (512 pixels x 512 pixels) are acquired at multiple z positions within the chamber, with a constant spacing of ∆z = 0.2 µm between consecutive images set by a piezo. A volume stack covering a thickness of h = 30 µm thus contains 151 images.
  10. Locate and track particles over time in 2-D or 3-D using particle-tracking software written in IDL23,54-56, MATLAB57,58, LabView59, or Python60. These algorithms typically allow the centers of the particles to be resolved within 40–50 nm. Successful particle tracking requires that the particles move less than the interparticle spacing between consecutive frames.
  11. From the particle positions, calculate structural and dynamic metrics. Three convenient metrics shown here are the 3-D pair correlation function g(r)61, the 2-D mean-squared displacement (MSD)58,62, and the 2-D self part of the van Hove correlation function Gs(x,t)58. The latter two metrics can be also calculated in 3-D.

3. Flowing Experiments: Flow Properties

  1. Fabricate a simple flow cell using a glass microcapillary with square cross-section (100 μm x 100 μm) that is affixed to Teflon tubing. Use glass coverslips to support the capillary and provide mechanical rigidity, as shown in the schematic in Figure 7.
  2. Load the colloid-polymer mixture into a glass syringe. Attach the syringe to a syringe pump or a pneumatic fluid dispensing system.
  3. Mount the flow cell setup onto the inverted microscope. Keep the syringe, flow cell, and outlet at the same height to minimize the effect of gravity on the flow profile.
  4. Control the flow rate of the suspension through the flow cell by the volumetric flow rate (for the syringe pump) or the applied pressure (for the pressure box). The average velocity of the suspension in the microchannel also depends upon the suspension formulation. Typical values of the maximum velocity in the square microchannel measured here are 200–2,000 μm/sec.
  5. During flow, acquire a 2-D confocal time series at fast frame rates. Here, 500 images of dimension 512 pixels x 512 pixels are acquired at 32 frames/sec (time spacing Δt = 1/32 sec) at different heights above the bottom of the microchannel (z = 0 µm) ranging from z = 5–50 µm. Each image covers roughly half of the lateral dimension (y) of the microchannel, as shown in the inset to Figure 7. If the particles appear elliptical, increase the frame rate of acquisition.
  6. As in quiescent experiments, locate the particles in 2-D using standard algorithms for locating and tracking particles in IDL or MATLAB. For slow flows, in which particles move less than the average interparticle distance between frames, use tracking algorithms to obtain the trajectories.
  7. Use image correlation to calculate the velocity profiles for fast flows.
    1. Subdivide the image into horizontal images of constant height (y) along the direction of flow (x). For two sequential images I1(x,y) and I2(x,y) shift the latter image by a factor Δx and then calculate the cross-covariance between I1(x,y) and I2(x+Δx,y).
    2. Identify the peak position of the histogram of Δx values that maximize the cross-covariance between each pair of images to obtain the mean advection velocity at each lateral position y. If this distribution is not strongly peaked, acquire images at a faster frame rate.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

To demonstrate confocal imaging and particle-tracking, we investigated the effect of confinement on the phase behavior of colloid-polymer mixtures63-65. For these experiments the colloid diameter was 2a = 0.865 μm. The colloid volume fraction was fixed at Φ = 0.15 and the concentration of polymer cp was varied from 0 to 23.6 mg/ml. Representative confocal images are shown in Figure 263, left column. From the particle positions obtained using tracking algorithms, we calculated representative structural and dynamic metrics, including the pair correlation function (Figure 2, center column) and the mean-squared displacement (Figure 2, right column). The images and the structural and dynamic metrics allowed us to distinguish between colloidal gels (Figure 2, top row), fluids of clusters (Figure 2, middle row), and fluids (Figure 2, bottom row).

These metrics allowed us to quantitatively assess confinement-induced changes in particle structure and dynamics. For example, the first peak in the pair correlation function of a sample with polymer concentration cp = 16.6 mg/ml moves to shorter separations as the confinement thickness is decreased (Figure 363). Similarly, the self part of the van Hove correlation function for a sample with cp = 16.6 mg/ml narrows as the confinement thickness is decreased and at the smallest confinement exhibits the highly non-Gaussian profile of an arrested gel (Figure 463). Even for a sample with cp = 23.6 mg/ml, which is an arrested gel at all confinements, decreasing the confinement thickness leads to a narrower and more non-Gaussian profile. These changes suggested that confinement indirectly induced an increase in the effective interparticle attraction.

These techniques could also be applied to assess the effects of confinement in bidispersed mixtures of particles bearing distinct fluorescent labels. Representative images of a mixture of large particles (diameter 2aL=1.48 µm) and small (diameter 2aS = 0.73 µm) particles, with a total particle volume fraction Φtot = 0.15 and a volume fraction ratio of small particles r = 0.50, show that decreasing the confinement thickness induces the formation of a solid-like colloidal gel phase containing both large and small particles (Figure 565). This effect is especially pronounced for suspensions that are bulk fluids (Figure 5a-d). The MSDs of the large particles decrease as the system is increasingly confined: for a sample with cp = 5 mg/ml, the MSDs become dynamically arrested, consistent with the solidification transition (Figure 6a65). For a sample with cp = 25 mg/ml, which forms an arrested gel, strong confinement induces slowed dynamics (Figure 6b); the differences between the most-confined and least-confined sample are larger than the resolution of this technique (~40 nm, which we determine from the y-intercept of the MSD in a very dilute concentration of particles with Φ < 0.01).

Confocal microscopy and image analysis also enable differences between the flow properties of weakly and strongly attractive particles during confined flow to be characterized66. For these experiments, suspensions of particles of diameter 2a = 1.55 µm were concentrated to a volume fraction of Φ = 0.15 with a polymer concentration of either cp = 5 mg/ml, corresponding to a weak interparticle attraction, or cp = 25 mg/ml, corresponding to a strong interparticle attraction. Representative images are shown in Figure 8 for quiescent and flowing suspensions.

Number density profiles revealed differences between the distribution of particles in weakly- and strongly-attractive suspensions during flow (shown for a flow rate of 10 µl/hr in Figure 966): those of a weakly-attractive suspension (cp = 5 mg/ml, Figures 9a and 9b) increase more dramatically towards the center of the microchannel than those of a strongly-attractive suspension (cp = 5 mg/ml, Figures 9c and 9d).

Similarly, weakly and strongly attractive suspension exhibited differences in the shape of velocity profiles (shown for a flow rate of 8 µl/hr in Figure 1066). The velocity profiles for suspensions with a weak attraction (cp = 5 mg/ml, Figures 10a and 10b) are close to those predicted for a Newtonian fluid flowing in a square microchannel. By contrast, the velocity profiles for suspensions with a stronger attraction (cp = 25 mg/ml, Figures 10c and 10d) deviate significantly from the Newtonian profile near the lateral walls of the microchannel (near y/L = 0).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of chambers for quiescent experiments. (a) Rectangular chamber, with a constant thickness of 1 mm set by the thickness of a glass slide. (b) Wedge-shaped chamber, with a variable thickness ranging from 6-170 µm. The maximum thickness is set by that of a glass coverslip.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Distinguishing features of fluids, fluids of clusters, and gels. Left column: Confocal micrographs. Center column: Particle pair correlation function g(r) as a function of the normalized separation r/2a. Right column: Normalized mean-squared displacement MSD/4a2 as a function of lag time. From top to bottom the images and correlation functions show representative examples of a gel (cp = 23.6 mg/ml and h/2a = 8.7), a fluid of clusters (cp = 16.6 mg/ml and h/2a = 17), and a colloidal fluid (cp = 0 mg/ml and h/2a > 116). The particle diameter is 2a = 0.865 µm. This figure has been modified from Spannuth and Conrad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 028301 (2012). Copyright 2012 by the American Physical Society.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Pair correlation function indicates structural changes in confinement. Pair correlation function for a sample with cp = 16.6 mg/ml at h/2a > 116 and h/2a = 69, 35, 17, and 8.7 from top to bottom. Sample is a fluid of clusters at all h except h/2a = 8.7, which is a gel. Colors indicate the phase as in Figure 2. The particle diameter is 2a = 0.865 µm. This figure has been modified from Spannuth and Conrad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 028301 (2012). Copyright 2012 by the American Physical Society.

Figure 4
Figure 4. van Hove correlation function and the mean-squared displacement indicate changes in confinement. Self part of the van Hove correlation function and (inset) mean-squared displacement for samples with (a) cp = 16.6 mg/ml and (b) cp = 23.6 mg/ml as a function of confinement (h/2a = 69 (circles), 17 (squares), and 8.7 (triangles)). In (a), the sample is a fluid of clusters for h/2a = 69 and 17, but a gel for h/2a = 8.7. In (b), the sample is a gel for all h. The particle diameter is 2a = 0.865 µm. This figure has been modified from Spannuth and Conrad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 028301 (2012). Copyright 2012 by the American Physical Society.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Representative confocal micrographs of bidispersed mixtures. Confocal micrographs of small and large particle populations (both shown in gray, with larger particles having greater intensity), for suspensions with a constant total volume fraction Φtot = 0.15, volume percent of small particles r = 0.50, concentration of depletant polymer cp (a-c) 5 mg/ml or (d-f) 25 mg/ml, (a,d) in bulk or (b-c, e-f) confined to a normalized height h/2aL of (b,e) 20, or (c,f) < 5.5. The large and small particle diameters are 2aL = 1.48 µm and 2aS = 0.73 µm, respectively. The scale bar is 10 µm.

Figure 6
Figure 6. Mean-squared displacement of large particle population exhibits confinement-induced slowing. Normalized mean-squared displacement as a function of lag time τ of large particles in binary suspensions with volume percent of small particles r = 0.50 and varying concentration of depletant polymer of (a) cp = 5 mg/ml or (b) cp = 25 mg/ml. Confinement thicknesses h/2aL: bulk (star), 41 (triangle), 20 (diamond),and <5.5 (side). The dashed lines indicate a slope of 1. The large particle diameter is 2aL = 1.48 µm. This figure has been modified from Pandey and Conrad, Soft Matter, 9, 10617-10626 (2013). Reproduced by permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry (http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c c3sm51879e).

Figure 7
Figure 7. Schematic of device for microchannel flow experiments. The device consists of a glass microcapillary that is attached to a syringe pump using Teflon tubing. The schematic as shown is inverted compared to the experimental setup, which uses an inverted microscope. The coordinate system is indicated: x is oriented along the direction of flow, y is oriented along the width of the microchannel, and z is oriented along the vertical direction. Inset: schematic of imaging protocol. 2-d movies are acquired of half the width of the microchannel at ten different heights above its bottom surface. This figure has been modified from Pandey and Conrad, Soft Matter 8, 10695-10703 (2012). Reproduced by permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry (http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2sm25935d).

Figure 8
Figure 8. Representative confocal micrographs of particles during microchannel flow. Confocal micrographs of colloidal suspensions with polymer concentration cp of (a-c) 5 mg/ml and (d-f) 25 mg/ml. Images (a) and (d) show the quiescent sample; images (b-c) and (e-f) were acquired during flow at a height (z) of (b,e) 5 µm and (c,f) 50 µm above the bottom surface of the microchannel. The edge of the channel is at the left-hand side of each image in (b-c) and (e-f), and flow is in the downward direction as indicated. The scale bar is 10 µm. The particle diameter is 2a = 1.546 µm. This figure has been modified from Pandey and Conrad, Soft Matter 8, 10695-10703 (2012). Reproduced by permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry (http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2sm25935d).

Figure 9
Figure 9. Strength of attraction modifies the number density profile of particles. Number of particles as a function of normalized lateral position across the microchannel y/L for suspensions with volume fraction Φ = 0.15 and polymer concentration cp of (a,b) 5 mg/ml and (c,d) 25 mg/ml, acquired at normalized downstream positions x/L = (a,c) 50 and (b,d) 200. Data are shown for two normalized heights, z/L = 0.05 (dark red triangle) and 0.50 (light blue side). The flow rate was 10 µl/hr. The lines shown are guides to the eye, and the error bars indicate the standard deviation of the measurements. The particle diameter is 2a = 1.546 µm. This figure has been modified from Pandey and Conrad, Soft Matter 8, 10695-10703 (2012). Reproduced by permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry (http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2sm25935d).

Figure 10
Figure 10. Strength of attraction modifies the velocity profiles. Normalized velocity profiles as a function of normalized lateral position across the microchannel y/L for suspensions with volume fraction Φ = 0.15 and polymer concentration cp of (a,b) 5 mg/ml and (c,d) 25 mg/ml, acquired at normalized downstream positions x/L = (a,c) 50 and (b,d) 200. Data are shown for two normalized heights, z/L = 0.05 (dark red) and 0.50 (light blue). The flow rate was 8 µl/hr. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of the measurements. The dotted lines indicate fits to the Newtonian flow profile expected for flow in a square microchannel. This figure has been modified from Pandey and Conrad, Soft Matter 8, 10695-10703 (2012). Reproduced by permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry (http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2sm25935d).

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Colloidal suspensions are widely studied as models for confined phase behavior, because micron-sized colloidal particles exhibit significantly slower dynamics than atoms and molecules and thus can be readily imaged and tracked over time10. For these fundamental studies, understanding the effect of interparticle attractions on confined phase behavior offers the opportunity to explore phenomena such as capillary condensation and evaporation21,22,67. In addition, confined attractive suspensions appear ubiquitously in industrial and technological applications. For these applied studies, understanding the effect of suspension formulation on confined flow may lead to improved formulations of feedstocks and inks for rapid prototyping1-3, drug delivery4, enhanced oil recovery5-7, and energy storage applications8.

Other techniques used to probe the structure of micron-sized colloids in thin geometries include electron microscopy17,18, x-ray microscopy19, and laser-diffraction microscopy20. The combination of confocal microscopy and image analysis algorithms offers two key advantages for studies of confined colloidal suspensions. First, confocal microscopy allows imaging deep within dense and fluorescent suspensions. Second, particle trajectories obtained from the confocal micrographs can be used to calculate dynamic and structural metrics for individual micron-sized colloidal particles. These measurements facilitate direct comparison with simulations21,22. Other image analysis algorithms, such as image correlation37 based on particle image velocimetry38, can be applied to confocal micrographs in which the particle displacements are larger than the interparticle spacing to probe the dynamics.

We have demonstrated protocols for imaging quiescent and flowing colloid-polymer mixtures in confined geometries using confocal microscopy. Using the representative metrics outlined in this paper, we identified a solidification transition in quiescent suspensions that is induced by confinement63,64. We also showed that changing the strength of attraction modifies the extent of particle migration and consolidation during flow of colloid-polymer mixtures in microchannels66.

For flow experiments, one limitation of this protocol is the difficulty in imaging in 3-D during fast microchannel flow, as particles typically move large distances between consecutive frames. This limitation can be avoided at slower flow rates by imaging a thin 3-D slice. Repeated experiments at distinct vertical positions within the channel can thus yield the full three-dimensional velocity and density profiles. This approach has been successfully applied by other research groups to suspensions of nearly-hard-sphere colloids that form glasses13,14 or crystals41 but have not yet been applied to the less concentrated colloidal gels such as those presented here.

Both image analysis methods described (particle-tracking and image correlation) exhibit limitations. For particle tracking algorithms, resolutions of one-tenth of the pixel size have been reported23 for well-separated particles. The resolution increases with increased signal-to-noise. Both the Gaussian fitting algorithm and a newer algorithm that calculates the points of maximal radial symmetry achieve tracking resolutions that are close to the theoretical maximum68. The resolution in our experiments was somewhat less (one-fourth of the pixel size); because the particles in gels are in close contact, the center of intensity in a local region is thus not necessarily located at the particle centroid. The resolution in the tracking of particles in gels can be improved by labeling only the cores of the particles69-71. For particle image velocimetry, the methods reported here yield accurate measurements of displacement even for large displacements of several hundred pixels37, so long as regions of near-constant advective velocity are correlated. These methods cannot be used when particles undergo significant relative motion or non-affine motion; in this case displacements are limited to a fraction of the particle size.

These protocols can be applied to studies of the phase behavior, structure, dynamics, and flow properties of a wide variety of colloidal suspensions, including particles with shape or chemical anisotropy and solvents that are non-Newtonian fluids, in 2-D and 3-D confinements. Applying these techniques requires further increase in the imaging rate in 2-D and 3-D, new algorithms to analyze images of anisotropic particles, and advances in fabrication of realistic confining geometries and interfaces.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication was supported by a University of Houston New Faculty Grant, a seed grant from the Texas Center for Superconductivity, and the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (52537-DNI).

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Cyclohexyl bromide Sigma Aldrich 135194 CAS Number  108-85-0, Molecular wt. = 163.06, Used in stock solvent
Decahydronapthalene Sigma Aldrich D251 CAS Number 91-17-8, Molecular wt. = 138.25, Used in stock solvent
Nile Red Sigma Aldrich 72485 Fluorescent dye
Fluorescein 5(6)-isothiocyanate Sigma Aldrich F3651 Fluorescent dye
Rhodamine B Sigma Aldrich 83689 Fluorescent dye
Dynamic Light Scattering  Brookhaven Instruments BI-APD DLS equipment used for particle size measurement
Polystyrene  Varian/Agilent PL20138-23 Polystyrene (polymer) for inducing depletion attraction
Tetrabutyl(ammonium chloride) (TBAC) Sigma Aldrich 86870 monovalent salt
UV Adhesive Norland Adhesive NOA 68T Part Number 68T01 (UV cured adhesive)
VT Eye Visitech VT Eye confocal scanner
VT Infinity Visitech VT Infinity confocal scanner
Microscope  Leica DMI3000B Inverted Microscope
Centrifuge Thermo Scientific Sorvall ST 16 1-5,000 rpm
Teflon tubing smallparts SLTT 26-72 Zeus PTFE Sublite Wall Tubing 26 AWG 0.016" ID x 0.003" Wall
Epoxy Devcon DA051 5 min epoxy
Syringe Micromate/Cadence 5004 glass syringe with metal luer lock tip
Syringe tips  Nordson 7018462 32 GA precision tips 
Syringe pump  New Era Pump system Inc. NE1002X Programmable microfluidic pump (syringepump.com)
Weigh balance Mettler Toledo AB204-S 0.0001-220 g
PMMA particles synthesized poly(methylmethacrylate) colloidal particles

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Shereda, L. T., Larson, R. G., Solomon, M. J. Local stress control of spatiotemporal ordering of colloidal crystals in complex flows. Physical Review Letters. 101, 038301-0310 (2008).
  2. Conrad, J. C., et al. Designing colloidal suspensions for directed materials assembly. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science. 16, 71-79 (2011).
  3. Lewis, J. A. Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Advanced Functional Materials. 16, 2193-2204 (2006).
  4. Mishra, B., Patel, B. B., Tiwari, S. Colloidal nanocarriers: a review on formulation technology, types and applications toward targeted drug delivery. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine. 6, 9-24 (2010).
  5. Maitland, G. C. Oil and gas production. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 5, 301-311 (2000).
  6. Kelessidis, V., Maglione, R., Tsamantaki, C., Aspirtakis, Y. Optimal determination of rheological parameters for Herschel–Bulkley drilling fluids and impact on pressure drop, velocity profiles and penetration rates during drilling. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 53, 203-224 (2006).
  7. Ponnapati, R., et al. Polymer-functionalized nanoparticles for improving waterflood sweep efficiency: Characterization and transport properties. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 50, 13030-13036 (2011).
  8. Duduta, M., et al. Semi-solid lithium rechargeable flow battery. Advanced Energy Materials. 1, 511-516 (2011).
  9. Poon, W. C. K. The physics of a model colloid-polymer mixture. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 14, (2002).
  10. Prasad, V., Semwogerere, D., Weeks, E. R. Confocal microscopy of colloids. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 19, 113102-1110 (2007).
  11. Kogan, M., Solomon, M. J. Electric-field-induced yielding of colloidal gels in microfluidic capillaries. Langmuir. 26, 1207-1213 (2010).
  12. Frank, M., Anderson, D., Weeks, E. R., Morris, J. F. Particle migration in pressure-driven flow of a Brownian suspension. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 493, 363-378 (2003).
  13. Isa, L., Besseling, R., Morozov, A. N., Poon, W. C. K. Velocity oscillations in microfluidic flows of concentrated colloidal suspensions. Physical Review Letters. 102, 058302-0510 (2009).
  14. Isa, L., Besseling, R., Poon, W. C. K. Shear zones and wall slip in the capillary flow of concentrated colloidal suspensions. Physical Review Letters. 98, (2007).
  15. Semwogerere, D., Morris, J. F., Weeks, E. R. Development of particle migration in pressure-driven flow of a Brownian suspension. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 581, 437-451 (2007).
  16. Semwogerere, D., Weeks, E. R. Shear-induced particle migration in binary colloidal suspensions. Phys. Fluids. 20, (2008).
  17. Ramiro-Manzano, F., Bonet, E., Rodriguez, I., Meseguer, F. Layering transitions in confined colloidal crystals: The hcp-like phase. Physical Review E. 76, 050401-0510 (2007).
  18. Ramiro-Manzano, F., Meseguer, F., Bonet, E., Rodriguez, I. Faceting and commensurability in crystal structures of colloidal thin films. Physical Review Letters. 97, 028304-0210 (2006).
  19. Hilhorst, J., et al. hree-dimensional structure and defects in colloidal photonic crystals revealed by tomographic scanning transmission X-ray microscopy. Langmuir. 28, 3614-3820 (2012).
  20. Luo, Y. -Y., Hu, S. -X., Lu, Y., Mai, Z. -H., Li, M. Real time observation of partial dislocations in thin colloidal crystals. Applied Physics Letters. 95. 174107, (2009).
  21. Binder, K., Horbach, J., Vink, R. L. C., De Virgiliis, A. Confinement effects on phase behavior of soft matter systems. Soft Matter. 4, 1555-1568 (2008).
  22. De Virgiliis, A., Vink, R. L. C., Horbach, J., Binder, K. From capillary condensation to interface localization transitions in colloid-polymer mixtures confined in thin-film geometry. Physical Review E. 78, 041604-0410 (2008).
  23. Crocker, J. C., Grier, D. G. Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179, 298-310 (1996).
  24. Gasser, U., Weeks, E. R., Schofield, A. B., Pusey, P. N., Weitz, D. A. Real-space imaging of nucleation and growth in colloidal crystallization. Science. 292, 258-262 (2001).
  25. Alsayed, A. M., Islam, M. F., Zhang, J., Collings, P., Yodh, A. G. Premelting at defects within bulk colloidal crystals. Science. 309, 1207-1210 (2005).
  26. Leunissen, M. E., et al. Ionic colloidal crystals of oppositely charged particles. Nature. 437, 235-240 (2005).
  27. Nagamanasa, K. H., Gokhale, S., Ganapathy, R., Sood, A. K. Confined glassy dynamics at grain boundaries in colloidal crystals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108. , 11323-11326 (2011).
  28. Kaya, D., Green, N. L., Maloney, C. E., Islam, M. F. Normal modes and density of states of disordered colloidal solids. Science. 329, 656-658 (2010).
  29. Weeks, E. R., Crocker, J. C., Levitt, A. C., Schofield, A. B., Weitz, D. A. Three-dimensional direct imaging of structural relaxation near the colloidal glass transition. Science. 287, 627-631 (2000).
  30. Sarangapani, P. S., Schofield, A. B., Zhu, Y. Direct experimental evidence of growing dynamic length scales in confined colloidal liquids. Phys. Rev. E. 83, 030502-0310 (2011).
  31. Sarangapani, P. S., Schofield, A. B., Zhu, Y. Relationship between cooperative motion and the confinement length scale in confined colloidal liquids. Soft Matter. 8, 814-818 (2012).
  32. Dibble, C. J., Kogan, M., Solomon, M. J. Structure and dynamics of colloidal depletion gels: Coincidence of transitions and heterogeneity. Phys. Rev. E. 74, 041403-0410 (2006).
  33. Dibble, C. J., Kogan, M., Solomon, M. J. Structural origins of dynamical heterogeneity in colloidal gels. Phys. Rev. E. 77, 050401-0510 (2008).
  34. Lu, P. J., et al. Gelation of particles with short-range attraction. Nature. 453, 499-504 (2008).
  35. Hsiao, L. C., Newman, R. S., Glotzer, S. C., Solomon, M. J. Role of isostaticity and load-bearing microstructure in the elasticity of yielded colloidal gels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109. , 16029-16034 (2012).
  36. Lu, P. J., et al. Characterizing concentrated, multiply scattering, and actively driven fluorescent systems with confocal differential dynamic microscopy. Physical Review Letters. 108, 218103-2110 (2012).
  37. Besseling, R., Isa, L., Weeks, E. R., Poon, W. C. K. Quantitative imaging of colloidal flows. Advances In Colloid and Interface Science. 146. , 1-17 (2009).
  38. Wereley, S. T., Meinhart, C. D. Micron-resolution particle image velocimetry. Microscale Diagnostic Techniques. , 1-62 (2005).
  39. Angele, K. P., Suzuki, Y., Miwa, J., Kasagi, N. Development of a high-speed scanning micro PIV system using a rotating disc. Measurement Science and Technology. 17, 1639-1646 (2006).
  40. Klein, S. A., Posner, J. D. Improvement in two-frame correlations by confocal microscopy for temporally resolved micro particle imaging velocimetry. Measurement Science and Technology. 21, 105409-1010 (2010).
  41. Derks, D., Wu, Y. L., Van Blaaderen, A., Imhof, A. Dynamics of colloidal crystals in shear flow. Soft Matter. 5, 1060-1065 (2009).
  42. Ballesta, P., Besseling, R., Isa, L., Petekidis, G., Poon, W. C. K. Slip and flow of hard sphere colloidal glasses. Physical Review Letters. 101, 258301-2510 (2008).
  43. Rajaram, B., Mohraz, A. Microstructural response of dilute colloidal gels to nonlinear shear deformation. Soft Matter. 6, 2246-2259 (2010).
  44. Rajaram, B., Mohraz, A. Dynamics of shear-induced yielding and flow in dilute colloidal gels. Physical Review E. 84, (2011).
  45. Rajaram, B., Mohraz, A. Steady shear microstructure in dilute colloid–polymer mixtures. Soft Matter. 8, 3699-3707 (2012).
  46. Yethiraj, A., Van Blaaderen, A. A colloidal model system with an interaction tunable from hard sphere to soft and dipolar. Nature. 421, 513-517 (2003).
  47. Campbell, A. I., Anderson, V., Van Duijneveldt, J. S., Bartlett, P. Dynamical arrest in attractive colloids: The effect of long-range repulsion. Physical Review Letters. 94, 208301-2010 (2005).
  48. Klix, C. L., Royall, C. P., Tanaka, H. Structural and dynamical features of multiple metastable glassy states in a colloidal system with competing interactions. Physical Review Letters. 104, 165702-1610 (2010).
  49. Sedgwick, H., Egelhaaf, S. U., Poon, W. C. K. Clusters and gels in systems of sticky particles. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 16, 10-1088 (2004).
  50. Zhang, T. H., Klok, J., Tromp, R. H., Groenewold, J., Kegel, W. K. Non-equilibrium cluster states in colloids with competing interactions. Soft Matter. 8, (2012).
  51. Dinsmore, A. D., Prasad, V., Wong, I. Y., Weitz, D. A. Microscopic structure and elasticity of weakly aggregated colloidal gels. Physical Review Letters. 96, (2006).
  52. Antl, L., et al. The preparation of poly(methyl methacrylate) latices in nonaqueous media. Colloid Surf. 17, 67-78 (1986).
  53. Aarts, D. G. A. L., Tuinier, R., Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Phase behaviour of mixtures of colloidal spheres and excluded-volume polymer chains. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 14, 7551-7561 (2002).
  54. Crocker, J. C., Weeks, E. R. Particle tracking using IDL. , (2011).
  55. Grier Grier, D. G. Lab Downloadable Software. , (2012).
  56. Smith, R., Friendly Spalding, G. U. ser- Freeware Image Segmentation and Particle Tracking. , (2005).
  57. Blair, D. L., Dufresne, E. R. The Matlab Particle Tracking Code Repository. , (2008).
  58. Kilfoil, M. L. Biological Physics Software. , (2009).
  59. Milne, G. Particle Tracking. , (2006).
  60. Caswell, T. trackpy: A pure python implementation of Crocker-Grier for single particle tracking. , (2012).
  61. Weeks, E. R. IDL routines to calculate the pair correlation function g(r). , (2005).
  62. Breedveld, V., Crocker, J. C., Weeks, E. R. M. S. D. , (2005).
  63. Spannuth, M., Conrad, J. C. Confinement-induced solidification of colloid-polymer depletion mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, (2012).
  64. Spannuth, M., Conrad, J. C. Dynamics of confined colloid-polymer mixtures. AIP Conf. Proc. 1518, 351-356 (2013).
  65. Pandey, R., Conrad, J. C. Dynamics of confined depletion mixtures of polymers and bidispersed colloids. Soft Matter. , (2013).
  66. Pandey, R., Conrad, J. C. Effects of attraction strength on microchannel flow of colloid–polymer depletion mixtures. Soft Matter. 8, 10695-10703 (2012).
  67. Gelb, L., Gubbins, K. E., Radhakrishnan, R., Sliwinska-Bartkowiak, M. Phase separation in confined systems. Reports on Progress in Physics. 62, 1573-1659 (1999).
  68. Parthasarathy, R. Rapid accurate particle tracking by calculation of radial symmetry centers. Nature Methods. 9, 724-726 (2012).
  69. Peng, B., vander Wee, E., Imhof, A., Van Blaaderen, A. Synthesis of monodisperse, highly cross linked, fluorescent PMMA particles by dispersion polymerization. Langmuir. 28, 6776-6785 (2012).
  70. Elsesser, M. T., Hollingsworth, A. D., Edmond, K. V., Pine, D. J. Large core-shell poly(methyl methacrylate) colloidal clusters: synthesis, characterization, and tracking. Langmuir. 27, 917-927 (2011).
  71. Dullens, R. P. A., Derks, D., van Blaaderen, A., Kegel, W. K. Monodisperse core-shell poly(methyl methacrylate latex colloids). Langmuir. 19, 5963-5966 (2003).

Tags

Confocal Imaging Confined Colloidal Suspensions Attractive Interparticle Interactions Rational Design Of Materials Directed Assembly Drug Delivery Hydrocarbon Recovery Flowable Electrodes Energy Storage Fluorescent Colloids Non-adsorbing Polymers Polymer Radius Of Gyration Interparticle Attraction Colloid Fluids Clusters Gels Crystals Glasses Confocal Microscopy Fluorescence Microscopy Spatial Resolution Temporal Resolution Three Dimensions Focal Volume Optical System
Confocal Imaging of Confined Quiescent and Flowing Colloid-polymer Mixtures
Play Video
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Pandey, R., Spannuth, M., Conrad, J. … More

Pandey, R., Spannuth, M., Conrad, J. C. Confocal Imaging of Confined Quiescent and Flowing Colloid-polymer Mixtures. J. Vis. Exp. (87), e51461, doi:10.3791/51461 (2014).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter