Dip-and-wipe Method
Dip-and-wipe Method - Related Videos
07:22
Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives
0 Views •
Cited by 7 •
2017
Optimized sampling protocols and the development of new wipe materials can be facilitated by standardized measurements of collection efficiency from wipe-sampling. Our approach for sampling trace explosives uses an automated device to control speed, force, and distance during wipe-sampling followed by extraction of collected explosives.
05:59
Nasal Wipes for Influenza A Virus Detection and Isolation from Swine
0 Views •
Cited by 19 •
2015
The authors present a protocol to collect swine nasal wipes to detect and isolate influenza A viruses.
06:26
Experimental Implementation of a New Composite Fabrication Method: Exposing Bare Fibers on the Composite Surface by the Soft Layer Method
0 Views •
Cited by 3 •
2017
A protocol to expose bare fibers on the composite surface by eliminating resin rich area is presented. The fibers are exposed during fabrication of the composites, not by the post surface treatment. The exposed carbon composites exhibit high electrical conductivity in the through-thickness direction and high mechanical property.
05:28
MALDI Sample Preparation: the Ultra Thin Layer Method
0 Views •
Cited by 32 •
2007
This video demonstrates the preparation of an ultra-thin matrix/analyte layer for analyzing peptides and proteins by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-MS).
08:00
A Buoyancy-based Method of Determining Fat Levels in Drosophila
0 Views •
Cited by 19 •
2016
Here we present a method to measure organismal fat levels in the third instar (L3) larval stage of Drosophila melanogaster. This method exploits the comparatively low density of fat tissue to differentiate between larvae with altered fat stores. Buoyancy-based analysis is a valuable tool for rapid, reproducible, and economical screening.
FAQs
Immersion establishes contact between the substrate and liquid formulation, while wiping determines how much solution remains on the surface. Separating these stages gives the operator two distinct points of process control rather than treating deposition as a single action. In practice, that distinction helps connect the retained coating to the chosen substrate and formulation before drying or curing.
The technique is adaptable because both the substrate and liquid formulation can vary within the process framework. Those choices determine which material is being treated and what surface modification is being introduced, while the immersion and wiping stages provide a consistent sequence for handling them. This flexibility supports use across different biomaterials, laboratory devices, and interface preparations.
Wiping removes excess liquid and regulates the retained film. Its role is therefore not merely cleanup: it sets the amount of formulation left on the substrate before later processing. Maintaining this as a deliberate step supports controlled deposition and helps improve reproducibility when preparing treated surfaces for subsequent bioengineering work.
Drying or curing follows wiping so the retained formulation can undergo the intended finalization step after excess liquid has been removed. Keeping this stage after film regulation preserves the sequence on which controlled deposition depends. In bioengineering workflows, the resulting treated surface can then be taken forward for subsequent biological testing in the intended workflow.
A typical workflow begins by selecting the substrate and liquid formulation, immersing the material to establish contact, and wiping away excess. The retained film is then subjected to drying or curing. This ordered sequence keeps material preparation, deposition control, and final surface treatment distinct, making the method straightforward to implement and reproduce in laboratory bioengineering workflows.
The approach is characterized by relatively simple equipment rather than a complex setup. The essential process elements are a substrate, a liquid formulation, a means to immerse the material, and a wiping step that removes excess. This limited equipment requirement makes the technique practical when researchers need adaptable surface treatment without elaborate instrumentation.
Bioengineers may choose it when they need to prepare coated biomaterials, laboratory devices, or interfaces for subsequent biological testing. Its value lies in combining adaptable substrate and formulation choices with straightforward process control. The method is especially practical for workflows that require surface modification but favor simple equipment and a procedure that can be reproduced across preparations.