Source: Lara Al Hariri and Ahmed Basabrain at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA
In this experiment, you'll use column chromatography to separate green food coloring into its component blue and yellow dyes, called erioglaucine and tartrazine. First, you'll use 95% ethanol to elute the dye with a weaker affinity for silica gel. Then, you'll flush the second dye from the column with water. To recover the purified dyes, you will collect each band of dye as it leaves the column. These collected volumes are called fractions.
Color | Volume (mL) | |
Ethanol fraction | ||
Water fraction |
In this experiment, you saw that ethanol eluted the blue erioglaucine in a timely manner, but it wasn't an effective eluent for the yellow tartrazine. Paper chromatography of the green dye shows similar results. Thus, we conclude that erioglaucine has a lower affinity for silica gel than tartrazine does.
Now, consider the advantages of using two solvents to elute the dye separately. Water is more polar than ethanol, so we assume that it would elute both dyes faster than ethanol alone would. While you also would have used less solvent overall if you had only used water, the separation would have been worse, making it harder to collect pure fractions.
Alternatively, you could have kept using ethanol after you collected the erioglaucine, but it would have taken a long time and a lot of ethanol to elute tartrazine that way. Switching the eluent to water after eluting erioglaucine saved time and minimized solvent waste without sacrificing purity.