Method Article

Subcutaneous Administration of Muscarinic Antagonists and Triple-Immunostaining of the Levator Auris Longus Muscle in Mice

13.3K views

DOI:

10.3791/3124

September 8th, 2011

In This Article

Summary

We describe procedures for repeated administration of inhibitors of muscarinic signaling to the levator auris longus (LAL) muscle of young adult mice and for subsequent immunostaining of its neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) in wholemounts. The LAL muscle has unique advantages for revealing in vivo pharmacological effects on NMJs.

Abstract

Hind limb muscles of rodents, such as gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior, are frequently used for in vivo pharmacological studies of the signals essential for the formation and maintenance of mammalian NMJs. However, drug penetration into these muscles after subcutaneous or intramuscular administration is often incomplete or uneven and many NMJs can remain unaffected. Although systemic administration with devices such as mini-pumps can improve the spatiotemporal effects, the invasive nature of this approach can cause confounding inflammatory responses and/or direct muscle damage. Moreover, complete analysis of the NMJs in a hind limb muscle is challenging because it requires time-consuming serial sectioning and extensive immunostaining.

The mouse LAL is a thin, flat sheet of muscle located superficially on the dorsum of the neck. It is a fast-twitch muscle that functions to move the pinna. It contains rostral and caudal portions that originate from the midline of the cranium and extend laterally to the cartilaginous portion of each pinna. The muscle is supplied by a branch of the facial nerve that projects caudally as it exits the stylomastoid foramen. We and others have found LAL to be a convenient preparation that offers advantages for the investigation of both short and long-term in vivo effects of drugs on NMJs and muscles. First, its superficial location facilitates multiple local applications of drugs under light anesthesia. Second, its thinness (2-3 layers of muscle fibers) permits visualization and analysis of almost all the NMJs within the muscle. Third, the ease of dissecting it with its nerve intact together with the pattern of its innervation permits supplementary electrophysiological analysis in vitro9,5. Last, and perhaps most importantly, a small applied volume (˜50μl) easily covers the entire muscle surface, provides a uniform and prolonged exposure of all its NMJs to the drug and eliminates the need for a systemic approach1,8.

Protocol

1. Subcutaneous administration of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonists

  1. Prepare under aseptic conditions the appropriate dose of mAChR antagonist, (cf., Table) by dissolving the drug in sterile physiological saline in 1.5mL reaction tube. The following antagonists were used: atropine, Methoctramine, 4-DAMP, AFDX-116, AFDX-384, MT 7.
  2. Draw 50μl of solution into a1cc insulin syringe and use a separate syringe for each mouse. Also prepare syringes containing physiological saline only for each mouse in the control group. Keep syringes on ice until ready to inject.
  3. Anesthetize mice with ketamine-xylazine cocktail (120 mg/kg....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The method presented here permits investigation of previously unrecognized roles of subtype-specific mAChR signaling in the stability and maintenance of mammalian NMJs. This method will also be useful to test the effects of neurotrophic factors and pharmacological agents. For example, our laboratory found that Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF) elicited sprouting from nearly all LAL nerve terminals in adult mice1. This result contrasted with prior studies of CNTF-treated hind limb muscles, which reported moder.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

No conflicts of interest declared.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Muscular Dystrophy Association, NIH (NS062320).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
ketamineHospira Inc.NDC0409-2051-05Dose: 120mg/kg
xylazineLloyd, Inc.LA33806Dose: 8mg/kg
atropineSigma-AldrichA0132(>98% purity); Dose: 0.2mg/kg — 20mg/kg
atropineVoigt Global DistributionAT105Pharmaceutical grade
MethoctramineSigma-AldrichM105Dose: 100 - 400M
4-DAMPSigma-AldrichD142Dose: 2.5mg/kg
AFDX-116Tocris Bioscience1105250M
AFDX-384Tocris Bioscience134550M - 500M
MT 7Peptides InternationalPMT-4340-s0.1M - 1M
1X Phosphate Buffered Saline, pH 7.4Invitrogen10010049
ParaformaldehydeFisher ScientificT353-500Make 10% solution first by dissolving 10g/100mL de-ionized distilled water; make 4% with 1X PBS, adjust pH to 7.4
Sodium pentobarbitolVirbac Animal HealthNDC-051311-050-01Dose: 390mg/kg
SylgardDow CorningPart # 184Follow instructions that come with kit, can use multiple sized culture dish (30mm, 60mm, 100mm) depending on needs
0.1M GlycineSigma-AldrichG-7126Add 0.185g to 25mL of 2% BSA/PBS
2% Bovine serum albumin (2% BSA)Sigma-AldrichA3059-100gDissolve 2g BSA into 100mL of 1X PBS
0.2% Triton X100 in 2% BSA/PBS (Blocking Buffer)Sigma-AldrichT9284-100mLDissolve 0.2ml/100mL 2% BSA/PBS
α-bungarotoxinInvitrogenT1175Use at concentration of 1:200
SMI-312Sternberger Monoclonals Inc.SMI312Use at concentration of 1:1000
SV2Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankSV2-SupernatantUse at concentration of 1:10
S100DakoZ0311Use at concentration of 1:400
FITC- goat anti-mouse IgG1Roche Group03117731001Use at concentration of 1:200, but if background is high, try 1:400
Alexa-Fluor 647 conjugated goat anti-rabbitInvitrogenA21244Use at concentration of 1:200
Vectashield fluorescent mounting mediaVector LaboratoriesH-1000This is not a hard-set media, you will need to secure the cover slip with clear nail polish.
Small Spring ScissorsFine Science Tools15002-08
Dissection forcepsFine Science Tools11295-51

References

  1. Wright, M. C., Son, Y. J. Ciliary neurotrophic factor is not required for terminal sprouting and compensatory reinnervation of neuromuscular synapses: re-evaluation of CNTF null mice. Exp Neurol. 205, 437-448 (2007).
  2. Gurney, M. E., Yamamoto, H., Kwon, Y.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Confocal MicroscopyNeuromuscular JunctionsMouse ModelDrug AdministrationImmunohistochemical MethodsMorphological Analysis

Related Articles