Craniofacial cartilages develop in close contact with other tissues and are difficult to manipulate in live animals. We are using electroporation to deliver molecular tools during growth of the craniofacial skeleton while bypassing early embryonic effects. This approach will allow us to efficiently test candidate molecules in vivo.
Electroporation is an efficient method of delivering DNA and other charged macromolecules into tissues at precise time points and in precise locations. For example, electroporation has been used with great success to study neural and retinal development in Xenopus, chicken and mouse 1-10. However, it is important to note that in all of these studies, investigators were not targeting soft tissues. Because we are interested in craniofacial development, we adapted a method to target facial mesenchyme.
When we searched the literature, we found, to our surprise, very few reports of successful gene transfer into cartilaginous tissue. The majority of these studies were gene therapy studies, such as siRNA or protein delivery into chondrogenic cell lines, or, animal models of arthritis 11-13. In other systems, such as chicken or mouse, electroporation of facial mesenchyme has been challenging (personal communications, Dept of Craniofacial Development, KCL). We hypothesized that electroporation into procartilaginous and cartilaginous tissues in Xenopus might work better. In our studies, we show that gene transfer into the facial cartilages occurs efficiently at early stages (28), when the facial primordium is still comprised of soft tissue prior to cartilage differentiation.
Xenopus is a very accessible vertebrate system for analysis of craniofacial development. Craniofacial structures are more readily visible in Xenopus than in any other vertebrate model, primarily because Xenopus embryos are fertilized externally, allowing analyses of the earliest stages, and facilitating live imaging at single cell resolution, as well as reuse of the mothers 14. Among vertebrate models developing externally, Xenopus is more useful for craniofacial analysis than zebrafish, as Xenopus larvae are larger and easier to dissect, and the developing facial region is more accessible to imaging than the equivalent region in fish. In addition, Xenopus is evolutionarily closer to humans than zebrafish (˜100 million years closer) 15. Finally, at these stages, Xenopus tadpoles are transparent, and concurrent expression of fluorescent proteins or molecules will allow easy visualization of the developing cartilages. We anticipate that this approach will allow us to rapidly and efficiently test candidate molecules in an in vivo model system.
Part 1A. Equipment
Microscope: upright stereo-dissecting scope with low power objective
- Voltage/Pulse Generator: BTX ECM 830 Square Wave Electroporation System
- Pipette puller: P-87 Micropipette Puller (Sutter Instrument Company, CA)
- Manipulator: coarse, or combined coarse and fine depending on preparation.
- Micropipette holder: Fine Science Tools
- Electrode: homemade
- Electroporation chamber: homemade
- Cut 8 cm of high-purity 0.4 mm tungsten wire (Goodfellow) and affix at midpoint a 1ml syringe using putty (we use Blu-Tack). Leave 4 cm tungsten wire exposed from the tip of the syringe and bend tip into L-shape, 1 cm from end (Fig. 1A).
- Trim tip so that the end measures 0.5 mm in length. This tip is the electrode terminus.
- Run excess tungsten wire parallel to syringe and use it to connect the electrode pulse generator.
- Repeat process making a pair of electrodes.
- Attach electrodes to square wave pulse generator via DC cables.
- Line bottom of 90 mm dish with ∼5 mm non-toxic plasticine.
- Fill dish with electroporation media.
- Using No. 5 watchmaker's forceps carve a T-shaped well (Fig. 2). The long well should measure ∼2 mm x 2 mm x 10 mm and the short ∼2 mm x 2 mm x 5 mm. The electroporation dish can be washed and reused.
Part 1B. Reagents
DNA or charged macromolecules
- Micropipettes: 1 mm wide 4" long borosilicate glass capillaries (WPI, TW100-F)
- Culture media: Normal Amphibian Media (NAM)
- >10 X stock: 1100 mM NaCl, 20 mM KCL, 10 mM Ca(NO3)2•4H2O, 1 mM EDTA.
- Autoclave and store at 4 °C.
- 1 X NAM: Dilute from 10x stock, buffer with 0.1 mM NaHCo3 and 0.2 mM Na3PO4.
- Xenopus laevis tadpoles, stage 28
- Prepare expression plasmids using standard protocols.
- Resuspend DNA to a final concentration of 1 μg/μl in nuclease free H20.
* We have had success with vectors containing a strong CMV promoter, such as pCS2+ . For lineage analysis, we usually include DNA encoding green fluorescent protein (pCS2+GFP) at a final concentration of 0.1 μg/μl. [DNA concentrations between 0.1-3 μg/μl were also tested. We found that concentrations below 0.8 μg/μl inefficiently labelled cells, whereas DNA concentrations greater than 2 μg/μl did not improve electroporation efficiency.]
Morpholino oligonucleotide preparation:
(Note: MOs need to be fluoresceinated (3'-carboxyfluorescein modified) or otherwise charged.)
- Resuspend morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs) (Genetools, www.genetools.com) at a concentration of 2 mM in nuclease free H20.
- Heat aliquot of stock solution at 65°C for 5 minutes.
- Dilute to final concentration of 0.5 mM in nuclease free water.
* 0.1-1mM MO solutions were tested. 0.5 mM MO solutions were sufficient for electroporation of many mesenchymal cells.
- Prepare micropipettes from borosilicate glass capillaries (1 mm wide, 4" long, WPI no. TW100-F). Use needle puller to prepare micropipettes with an 8-12 mm long taper and fine tip.
- Crush tip ∼2 mm from tip using forceps, creating a jagged break.
- Incubation media: Prepare fresh 3/4 Normal Amphibian Media (NAM) from 1x stock. Add 0.025 mg/ml gentamycin.
- Electroporation media: as above, with 0.1% Benzocaine (Sigma, 06950).
- Fill micropipette with ∼1 μl injection solution.
- Secure micropipette in micromanipulator and attach to microinjector (Picospritzer II).
- Angle micropipette at 50° from the tabletop.
- Set injection pressure at 20 PSI.
- Calibrate micropipette to inject 30 nl per pulse.
- Anesthetize stage 28 Xenopus larvae by incubating in electroporation media for 5 minutes.
- Transfer anaesthetised tadpole into electroporation chamber filled with electroporation media. Position embryo within the long well so that the head rests in the T-junction with dorsal side down and ventral side exposed. The head should be slightly elevated compared to the tail.
- Using forceps, gently secure tadpole in well with surrounding plasticine. (Note: If the tadpole is not secured, it may twitch and contact electrode during electroporation. In this case discard the tadpole as facial tissues will be severely damaged.)
- Insert micropipette tip immediately posterior to the cement gland and into facial mesenchyme.
- Inject 30 nl solution into mesenchyme.
- Retract micropipette.
- Quickly align electrode tips parallel to the head of the embryo (Fig. 3).
- Apply 8 50 ms, 20 V square pulses.
- Retract electrodes.
- Using forceps carefully release tadpole from well and transfer to 3/4 NAM, 0.025 mg/ml gentamycin.
- Tadpoles can be incubated in 3/4 NAM, 0.025 mg/ml overnight, or longer.
- Screen embryos for efficient electroporation by fluorescence microscopy after 24 hours.
3. Representative Results:
The use of fluorescent molecules allows easy screening of electroporated embryos. Figure 4 shows a typical batch of MO electroporated tadpoles ∼12, 48 and 96 hours after electroporation, incubated at 14.5°C. Using fluorescence microscopy, MOs can be visualised immediately after electroporation and persist for several days after electroporation. In our experience, fluorescence is weakly evident at stage 46 (∼5 days later). In the cartilages, fluorescence decreases dramatically after the onset of differentiation (∼st 42); however, MO fluorescence persists more strongly in other cell types such as the pharyngeal endoderm. Fluorescence microscopy shows that oligonucleotides are incorporated into several craniofacial tissues including cartilage. Oligonucleotide fluorescence can often be visualised in tissue on either side of the head. This is likely due to rapid diffusion of the injection solution throughout the loose craniofacial mesenchyme prior to electroporation.
Figure 1 Homemade electrodes. L-shaped tungsten wire is attached to a 1 ml syringe using non-toxic clay or putty. (A) The electrode terminus measures 5 mm. (B) Attach a pair of electrodes, such that the termini run parallel. Electrodes are attached to pulse generator by DC cables.
Figure 2 Electroporation chamber. (A) 90 mm dish lined with plasticine is filled with media and a T-shaped chamber carved with No 5 watchmaker's forceps. (B) The long side measures 2 mm X 2 mm X10 mm whilst the short measures 2 mm X 2 mm X 5 mm. The head of the embryo rests in the T-junction, ventral side up.
Figure 3 Schematic illustrating electroporation procedure. St. 28 tadpole is placed in electroporation chamber, ventral side up. Micropipette is inserted into facial mesenchyme underlying cement gland. Inject. Micropipette is removed and L-shaped electrodes are aligned parallel flanking the head. Apply eight 50 ms, 20 V square pulses. Retract electrodes. Grow tadpoles to desired stages. Visualise MOs or GFP expression using fluorescence microscopy.
Figure 4 Representative tadpoles 12 (A), 48 (B), and 96 (C) hours post electroporation (stages 30, 34 and 44 respectively). (A"-B") Fluorescent MO can be visualised within craniofacial mesenchyme at stages 30 and 34. Fluorescence can be detected in cartilages at stage 44 (arrowhead, C'-C"). The gut is highly autofluorescent.
In this video, we have demonstrated the feasibility of electroporation-mediated gene delivery into the facial mesenchyme of Xenopus tadpoles. Using this approach, we can bypass early developmental effects of manipulating gene function allowing us to target specific tissues at later time points. Our studies show that heterogenous populations of craniofacial mesenchymal cells can be affected, allowing us to examine lineage of electroporated cells as well as cell autonomous requirements for proteins of interest. Combined with live imaging, we can use this approach to study gene function, over time, during craniofacial development. This novel method highlights the tractability of Xenopus for the study of organogenesis. We anticipate that this method can be broadly adapted to study morphogenesis and differentiation of other tissues as well.
The authors have no conflict of interests.
We are grateful to Nancy Papalopulu and Boyan Bonev for assistance with Xenopus electroporation. We also thank Marc Dionne for critical reading, Jeremy Green and John Wallingford for helpful discussions and members of the Liu lab for their support. This work was funded by grants from the BBSRC (BB/E013872/1) and the Wellcome Trust (081880/Z/06/Z) to KJL.
- Bonev, B., Pisco, A., Papalopulu, N. MicroRNA-9 reveals regional diversity of neural progenitors along the anterior-posterior axis. Dev. Cell. 20, 19-32 (2011).
- Haas, K. Single-cell electroporation for gene transfer in vivo. Neuron. 29, 583-591 (2001).
- Calegari, F. Tissue-specific RNA interference in post-implantation mouse embryos using directional electroporation and whole embryo culture. Differentiation. 72, 92-102 (2004).
- Drinjakovic, J. E3 ligase Nedd4 promotes axon branching by downregulating PTEN. Neuron. 65, 341-357 (2010).
- Falk, J. Electroporation of cDNA/Morpholinos to targeted areas of embryonic CNS in Xenopus. BMC. Dev. Biol. 7, 107-107 (2007).
- Hewapathirane, D. S., Haas, K. Single Cell Electroporation in vivo within the Intact Developing Brain. J. Vis. Exp. (17), e705-e705 (2008).
- Kuriyama, S. Tsukushi controls ectodermal patterning and neural crest specification in Xenopus by direct regulation. of BMP4 and X-delta-1 activity. Development. 133, 75-88 (2006).
- Mende, M., Christophorou, N. A., Streit, A. Specific and effective gene knock-down in early chick embryos using morpholinos but not pRFPRNAi vectors. Mech. Dev. 125, 947-962 (2008).
- Neumann, E. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. Embo. J. 1, 841-845 (1982).
- Price, S. R. Regulation of motor neuron pool sorting by differential expression of type II cadherins. Cell. 109, 205-216 (2002).
- Grossin, L. Direct gene transfer into rat articular cartilage by in vivo electroporation. Faseb. J. 17, 829-835 (2003).
- Khoury, M. A comparative study on intra-articular versus systemic gene electrotransfer in experimental arthritis. J. Gene. Med. 8, 1027-1036 (2006).
- Takahashi, D. Down-regulation of cathepsin K in synovium leads to progression of osteoarthritis in rabbits. Arthritis. Rheum. 60, 2372-2380 (2009).
- Sive, H. L., Grainger, R. M., Harland, R. M. Early Development of Xenopus laevis: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratories Press. (2000).
- Wheeler, G. N., Brandli, A. W. Simple vertebrate models for chemical genetics and drug discovery screens: lessons from zebrafish and Xenopus. Dev. Dyn. 238, 1287-1308 (2009).
- Turner, D. L., Weintraub, H. Expression of achaete-scute homolog 3 in Xenopus embryos converts ectodermal cells to a neural fate. Genes. Dev. 8, 1434-1447 (1994).
Formal Correction: Erratum: Electroporation of Craniofacial Mesenchyme
Posted by JoVE Editors on 06/28/2013. Citeable Link.
The units for the voltage were incorrectly entered in, Electroporation of Craniofacial Mesenchyme, in two places.
- Apply 8 50 ms, 20mV square pulses.
- Apply eight 50 ms, 20 mV square pulses.
These were corrected to:
- Apply 8 50 ms, 20 V square pulses.
- Apply eight 50 ms, 20 V square pulses.