$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Drosophila behavior is tightly regulated by genetic and environmental factors. We, and others, have previously used the assays described here to gather data to examine genes related to fly behaviors and to human neurodegenerative diseases modeled in Drosophila5-19. For the crawling assay, careful selection of 3rd instar larvae is a critical step. If treating with a drug, it will take 10-15 minutes (or more depending on the type and nature of the drug) to achieve maximal effect if it has good solubility. Therefore, we routinely feed flies the drug for 15 minutes, and then wait an additional 15 minutes before testing. It is important, however, to keep drug concentrations in solution, and exposure times, between treatment groups the same for accurate comparison. CNS active drugs will usually have a maximal effect lasting ~45 minutes. The larvae should be washed well after selection (or dug feeding) to remove the fly food and allowed acclimatized for 1 minute before starting the crawling assay. The agar plate should be kept at room temperature (~22° C) for an hour, as low temperature can influence larval crawling ability. Although the larval crawling assay can provide important information regarding activity levels, it is not suitable for analysis of subtle coordination deficits. Therefore, as a screening platform it is most appropriate for a first pass examining gross activity deficits.
An adult behavior that involves fine motor coordination is courtship and mating. This behavior has been used to examine aspects of behaviors relevant to human diseases, and involves sensory processing (olfactory, visual, acoustic) in addition to fine motor control18. When a male notices a female, he initiates the courtship ritual that progresses in a stereotype pattern beginning with orientation behavior (turning toward and chasing the female). This is followed by wingsong, licking and tapping of the female genetalia, curling of the abdomen towards the female, and culminates in copulation, which can last several tens of minutes20-22. Because many of the aspects of courtship involve visual cues, dark conditions lead to a degradation of mating performance, and assays should be performed with enough light so that flies can see one another. Accordingly, white-eyed flies usually have extremely poor performance in our described assay and readers are advised against planning experiments utilizing them with this protocol. If treating the flies with a drug, put the drug into the medium the flies are isolated on (e.g. 1% agarose + 10% sucrose + drug instead of standard food when treating with drug to avoid any possible degradation of the drug by microorganisms in the food). Generally the flies are isolated into 5 ml test tubes that have 300-500 ml of food in them, plugged with cotton. Do NOT anesthetize the flies for transfer to the mating wheel. It is absolutely CRITICAL to wash the mating wheel very well between uses to remove any residual pheromones (warm water with small amount of alconox soap over night with shaking, then washed for a minimum 48 hours in deionized water with shaking, and numerous changes of water). Another consideration when performing the assay we describe is the weather. In our experience flies will not court if it is raining or looks like it will rain. They perform best on bright sunny days, regardless if the laboratory has windows or not. Our current theory is that this phenomenon is related to atmospheric pressure, but we have not investigated this.
The traditional negative geotaxis assay relies on measuring how many flies climb above a predetermined height in 10 seconds (described in http://www.jove.com/details.php?id=2504). We believe that the RING assay has certain advantages over the traditional assay. One is throughput, as six independent replicates can be measured simultaneously compared to the one of the standard assay, and the system is generally scalable. Another is sensitivity, because the average height climbed in a defined time period is quantified, rather than a pass/fail number for absolute height. Using this approach, more subtle deficits may be observed. Because of the level of throughput, the assay is more suited to screens than the more tedious traditional negative geotaxis assay. Further, Garagano et al. (2005) describe a computerized scoring method that if employed would further increase throughput. Primary considerations for this assay are that it is imperative that the flies are not anesthetized before testing, and that fresh vials are used after a given set of trials before a new batch of flies are tested.