$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The migration of neuroblasts along the RMS to the final location in the OB is a fundamental step in postnatal neurogenesis. However, the molecular mechanisms controlling this complex process are far from being fully understood.
The experimental procedure described here allows the study of neuroblast migration in vitro. We have adapted a previously published protocol for isolating RMS neuroblasts from early postnatal mouse or rat25. To achieve optimal results it is important to master the dissection step, since it is crucial to keep the time interval between dissection and nucleofection to a minimum. After nucleofection, neuroblasts can be reaggregated, embedded in a three-dimensional matrix and left to migrate over a 24 hr period. Alternatively, for purposes other than migration (e.g. immunofluorescence or western blot analysis), cells can be immediately plated after nucleofection on polyornithine/laminin-coated coverslips, where they survive up to 4-5 days. Mouse and rat neuroblasts migrate in Matrigel to a similar extent, however mouse cells appear to have a stronger tendency to migrate in chains than rat cells.
Depending on the aim of the study, neuroblasts can be nucleofected with different plasmids encoding fluorescent proteins or wild type/mutant proteins of interest. For optimal protein expression plasmids with a CAG promoter (β-actin promoter with CMV enhancer and β-globin poly-A tail)26 are highly recommended. Moreover, siRNA oligos or shRNA plasmids can be nucleofected to knockdown targets of interest. Effective protein depletion can be visualized by immunofluorescence or by western blot (usually lysing embedded aggregates from 1 rat pup with 50 µl of standard lysis buffer).
Nucleofection is a relatively simple method to transfect primary neuroblasts, offers an easier and faster alternative to viral vector-mediated transfection, and can achieve high (~70-80%) transfection efficiency. It is critical to work quickly during the nucleofection procedure, since leaving neuroblasts in the nucleofection solution for a prolonged time drastically reduces cell viability.
The average cell yield from RMS dissection is relatively low for P7 mice (~5 x 105 cells/brain) in comparison to P7 rats (~1 x 106 cells/brain) and at least 3 x 106 cells per nucleofection are required to achieve transfection with ~50% efficiency. Moreover, rat neuroblasts appear to resist better to nucleofection compared to mouse neuroblasts. Therefore, early postnatal (P6-P7) rat pups might represent a convenient neuroblast source, also considering that the organization of rat and mouse RMS are remarkably similar27 and that the extent of rat and mouse neuroblast migration in vitro is also comparable. It is advisable not to keep the reaggregated clusters of nucleofected neuroblasts in suspension for longer than 48 hr to avoid abnormal effects on cell morphology and migration (our unpublished observations).
The 3D assay described here can be used to quantify neuroblast migration at a fixed time point after embedding in matrix (e.g. 24 hr). Aggregates of different sizes can be used in the analysis, since there is no significant correlation between the size of aggregates and migration distance (our unpublished observations). To visualize and further investigate the dynamics of neuroblast migration, time-lapse imaging can be used. It is recommended to carry out the migration analysis within a 24 hr interval after embedding, since the speed of neuroblasts appears to drastically decrease at longer time points (our unpublished observations).
There are some limitations to this protocol. First, nucleofection can so far be used for early postnatal rodent neuroblasts, while infection with viral vectors remains the most efficient transfection method for adult neuroblasts28. Second, the in vitro migration assay does not fully reproduce the complex architecture of the RMS observed in vivo. Indeed, although neuroblasts maintain the ability to migrate in a similar way to their in vivo counterparts, in the experimental setup described here they lack interactions with other RMS components such as astrocytes and blood vessels, which also contribute to regulate their motility9,29,30. This issue may be addressed in the future by optimization of three-dimensional coculture model systems.
In conclusion, combining nucleofection with a 3D migration assay represents a valuable tool to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying neuroblast migration. This experimental procedure provides an initial, fast and relatively simple method to evaluate the role of candidate regulators of neuroblast migration, which can be further validated by other approaches like in vivo postnatal electroporation and time-lapse imaging of brain slice cultures28,31,32.