Pioneering studies by Katz1 in 1930 revealed that the mammalian left ventricle initiates filling by being a mechanical suction pump, and much effort since then has been devoted to unraveling the workings of diastole. For many years, invasive methods were the only options available for clinical or research assessment of diastolic function (DF)2-16. In the 1970s, however, technical advancements and developments in echocardiography finally gave cardiologists and physiologists practical tools for noninvasive characterization of DF.
Without a unifying causal theory or paradigm for diastole regarding how the heart works when it fills, researchers proposed numerous phenomenologic indexes based on correlation with clinical features. The curvilinear, rapidly rising and falling shape of the transmitral blood flow velocity contour during early, rapid filling, for example, was approximated as a triangle and diastolic function indexes were defined from geometric features (height, width, area, etc.) of that triangle. Technical advancements in echocardiography have allowed tissue motion, strain, and strain rate during filling to be measured, for example, and each technical advancement brought with it a new crop of phenomenological indexes to be correlated with clinical features. However, the indexes remain correlative and not causal and many indexes are different measures of the same underlying physiology. It’s not surprising, therefore, that currently employed clinical indexes of DF have limited specificity and sensitivity.
To overcome these limitations the Parametrized Diastolic Filling (PDF) formalism, a causal kinematic, lumped parameter model of left ventricular filling that is motivated by and incorporates the suction-pump physiology of diastole was developed and validated17. It models diastolic function (as manifested by the curvilinear shapes of transmitral flow contours) in accordance with the rules of damped harmonic oscillatory motion. The equation for damped harmonic oscillatory motion is based on Newton’s Second Law and can be written, per unit mass, as:
Equation 1
This linear 2nd order differential equation has three parameters: k- chamber stiffness, c- viscoelasticity/relaxation, and xo- the oscillator’s initial displacement/preload. The model predicts that the different clinically observed diastolic filling patterns are the result of variation in the numerical value of these three model parameters. Based on the PDF formalism and classical mechanics, E-waves can be classified as being determined by under-damped or over-damped regimes of motion. Numerous studies17-21 have validated that clinically recorded E-wave contours and PDF model predicted contours show superb agreement and have elucidated the hemodynamic/physiologic analogues of the three PDF parameters21. The process for extracting model parameters from clinically recorded E-wave data is detailed in the methods below.
Unlike typical indexes of DF in current clinical use, the PDF model’s three parameters are causality based. As discussed in the methods below, additional indexes of diastolic physiology can be derived from these fundamental parameters and from application of the PDF formalism to aspects of diastole other than transmitral flow. In this work, methods of PDF-based analysis of transmitral flow and the physiologic relations that can be drawn from the PDF approach, its parameters and the derived indexes are described. Additionally, it is shown that the PDF parameters or indexes derived from them can tease apart intrinsic chamber properties from the external effects of load can provide correlates to traditional invasively defined parameters and can differentiate between normal and pathologic groups.