$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The expression and regulation of RNA transcripts is a complex and dynamic process that is largely responsible for controlling cell behavior and fate. Although the importance of RNA in dictating cell function has been known for some time, it is often difficult to draw clear connections between the two since most RNA analysis tools lack the spatial and temporal resolution required to capture important regulatory events such as transcription bursting, RNA trafficking, and localized RNA processing. This has led to the advent of several techniques that allow individual RNA transcripts to be visualized in living cells in real-time1. Perhaps, the most prominent of these techniques utilizes a GFP-MS2 fusion protein to target RNA that has been engineered to contain tandem repeats of the MS2 binding site in the 3’-UTR2,3. By bringing multiple GFP molecules into close proximity, individual RNA transcripts appear as bright fluorescent spots via fluorescence microscopy. The GFP-MS2 system has provided unprecedented insight into RNA behavior, including direct visualization and measurements of transcriptional bursting4,5, detection of unique sub-cellular localization and processing6-9, and real-time imaging of RNA transport10. However, despite the tremendous potential of the GFP-MS2 system, unbound GFP-MS2 fusion proteins can create a high background fluorescent signal that limits the versatility and dynamic range of this technique. Several approaches have been developed to limit this background signal, including subcellular compartmentalization of unbound GFP-MS210, protein fragment complementation11, and alternative RNA binding proteins and targets12. However, all of these approaches remain sensitive to the relative and total expression of the RNA target and GFP-MS2 fusion protein.
As an alternative to the GFP-MS2 systems, molecular beacons have also been used to detect engineered RNA transcripts with tandem repeats of the complementary binding site in the 3’-UTR13,14. Molecular beacons are hairpin-forming oligonucleotide probes that are labeled at one end with a quencher and at the other end with a fluorescent reporter. When not bound to target RNA the fluorescent reporter and quencher remain in close proximity, resulting in a low-fluorescent state. Upon hybridization, the fluorescent reporter and quencher are forced apart and fluorescence is restored. Similar to the GFP-MS2 system, the binding of multiple molecular beacons onto a single RNA transcript results in a bright fluorescent spot that can be identified by fluorescence microscopy; however, the background fluorescence is expected to be much lower, due to the quenched configuration of unbound molecular beacons. Unfortunately, despite the clever activation mechanism that is incorporated into the molecular beacon design, there is now growing evidence that unhybridized molecular beacons do not remain in the hairpin conformation when introduced into living cells. Consequently, they generate a false-positive signal that significantly reduces the signal-to-background. To overcome this shortcoming, we recently developed a new synthetic probe for imaging RNA in living cells, ratiometric bimolecular beacons (RBMBs; Figure 1A)15,16. RBMBs are composed of two 2’-O-methyl oligonucleotide strands that form a hybrid structure with features from both short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and molecular beacons. The loop and fluorescence activation mechanism is similar to the molecular beacon, while the long double stranded domain with a 3’-UU overhang is more characteristic of shRNA. The shRNA features are designed to drive nuclear export, which we have found increases intracellular lifetime to >24 hr, with minimal observable degradation, and prevents non-specific opening of the loop. As a result RBMBs exhibit a significantly higher signal-to-background than molecular beacons.
It should be noted that RBMBs cannot be prepared using DNA oligonucleotides, since DNA-based probes do not possess the same nuclear export capabilities as RNA-based probes. Structurally, the RBMB loop is typically designed to be between 15 and 21 bases long, to create a balance between specificity and selectivity upon RNA hybridization. The short stem that forms from the two self-complementary domains is usually designed to be 4 bases. If a longer stem is selected, the rate of hybridization between the RBMB loop and target RNA is significantly slowed17,18. Conversely, when a shorter stem sequence is selected the melting temperature is often too low to sustain the stem-loop structure at 37 °C, leading to a high background signal. The specificity of the RBMB is also reduced as the stem length is shortened. Since the sequence of the RBMB stem-loop can also influence RBMB performance, it must be carefully selected19. In particular, ideal loop sequences should have minimal secondary structure, hybridize to RNA sequences with minimal secondary structure, avoid protein binding sites, and avoid off-target binding. Predictions of both RBMB and RNA secondary structure can be obtained using software such as mfold20. Complementary off-target sites can identified using a nucleotide Basic Local Assignment Search Tool (BLAST). However, because of inconsistencies in model predictions and the difficulty in identifying protein-biding sites, the specificity of all RBMBs must ultimately be validated experimentally.
If desirable, an unquenched reference dye that is insensitive to the hybridization state can be added to the RBMB15. The addition of a reference dye can provide a marker for probe delivery and be used for ratiometric imaging, if more accurate measurements of total cellular fluorescence are required. The reference dyes allows measurements to be adjusted for differences in background owing to cell-to-cell variations in delivery. However, when imaging individual RNA transcripts the reference dye is not necessary. Notably, some reference dyes can interfere with the export of RBMBs from the nucleus, leading to a slightly higher background signal in the nucleus.
When designed properly, RBMBs can be used to image individual RNA transcripts in single living cells, if the target RNA is engineered to contain at least four RBMB binding sites (Figure 1B)16. RBMBs can be efficiently delivered into a wide range of cells types via microporation, with little to no effect on cell viability21, and quantitative measurements of gene expression can be acquired within 30 min. Moreover, the methodology is fairly insensitive to RBMB concentration and target RNA levels, since fluorescence from unbound RBMBs is efficiently quenched. Here we provide a detailed description of the methodology used to prepare and purify RBMBs, as well as a general procedure for the delivery of RBMBs into live-cells via microporation and the imaging of single RNA transcripts in real-time.