A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Detection of In Situ Protein-protein Complexes at the Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction Using Proximity Ligation Assay

13.1K views

DOI:

10.3791/52139

January 20th, 2015

In This Article

Summary

This protocol demonstrates how Proximity Ligation Assay can be used to detect in situ protein-protein interactions at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction. With this technique, Discs large and Hu-li tai shao are shown to form a complex at the postsynaptic region, an association previously identified through co-immunoprecipitation.

Abstract

Discs large (Dlg) is a conserved member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase family, and serves as a major scaffolding protein at the larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ) in Drosophila. Previous studies have shown that the postsynaptic distribution of Dlg at the larval NMJ overlaps with that of Hu-li tai shao (Hts), a homologue to the mammalian adducins. In addition, Dlg and Hts are observed to form a complex with each other based on co-immunoprecipitation experiments involving whole adult fly lysates. Due to the nature of these experiments, however, it was unknown whether this complex exists specifically at the NMJ during larval development.

Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) is a recently developed technique used mostly in cell and tissue culture that can detect protein-protein interactions in situ. In this assay, samples are incubated with primary antibodies against the two proteins of interest using standard immunohistochemical procedures. The primary antibodies are then detected with a specially designed pair of oligonucleotide-conjugated secondary antibodies, termed PLA probes, which can be used to generate a signal only when the two probes have bound in close proximity to each other. Thus, proteins that are in a complex can be visualized. Here, it is demonstrated how PLA can be used to detect in situ protein-protein interactions at the Drosophila larval NMJ. The technique is performed on larval body wall muscle preparations to show that a complex between Dlg and Hts does indeed exist at the postsynaptic region of NMJs.

Introduction

Drosophila Discs large (Dlg) is a conserved member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase family of scaffolding proteins that help orchestrate the assembly of large protein complexes at specific sites of the plasma membrane. Originally identified as a tumor suppressor protein, Dlg serves as an important determinant of epithelial apicobasal polarity 1,2,3. Dlg also serves as a major scaffolding module at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) of glutamatergic motor neurons during larval development 4. Dlg plays diverse roles at the larval NMJ, and its pleiotropism relies on its ability to associate with multiple proteins 5,6. One such protein is Hu-li tai shao (Hts), a homologue to the mammalian adducins that have mainly been described in regards to their roles in regulating the actin-spectrin cytoskeleton 7. It has previously been shown that Dlg and Hts can form a complex with each other based on in vitro co-immunoprecipitation experiments involving whole adult fly lysates 8. One shortcoming of these results, however, is that they do not indicate where this complex forms. With the use of immunohistochemistry, the distributions of Dlg and Hts are observed to overlap at the postsynaptic membrane of larval NMJs, but are they in a complex in this region 8? As recently shown and detailed further here, Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) is used to look for an in situ association between Dlg and Hts specifically at the larval NMJ 27.

PLA is a relatively new technique used mostly in cell and tissue culture that can detect protein-protein interactions in situ 9. In this assay, primary antibodies against the two proteins of interest are detected with a pair of species-specific secondary antibodies, termed PLA probes, which are conjugated to oligonucleotides (Figure 1A, B). If the two proteins are in close proximity to each other (i.e. within a few tens of nanometers), the distance between the attached PLA probes can be bridged through hybridization of two additional connector oligonucleotides (Figure 1C). In this conformation, the free ends of the connector oligonucleotides are close enough to make contact with each other, and a closed circular DNA molecule can be formed upon in situ ligation (Figure 1D). The circular DNA molecule serves as a template for in situ rolling circle amplification, which is primed by one of the oligonucleotides conjugated to the PLA probes (Figure 1E). Sequences within the resulting amplified, concatemeric DNA product can then be visualized with fluorescently-labeled, complementary oligonucleotide probes (Figure 1F). Since the amplified DNA remains attached to one of the PLA probes, the subcellular localization of the protein-protein interaction within a tissue can be readily ascertained.

Several methods are commonly used to detect protein-protein interactions including in vitro techniques such as co-immunoprecipitation, pull-down assays and yeast two-hybrid screening, and in vivo techniques such as Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) and Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC). A pitfall of the in vitro techniques is that they do not identify where the interaction is endogenously occurring, while the aforementioned in vivo techniques involve the artificial expression of fusion proteins that may not reflect the native behavior of their endogenous counterparts. One major advantage of PLA is that it is capable of determining within a tissue the subcellular localization of endogenous protein interactors that are in close proximity to each other and likely forming a complex, with the degree of closeness required to generate a signal being comparable to FRET and BiFC. PLA can detect interactions with high specificity and sensitivity due to the coupling of antibody recognition and DNA amplification. Thus, the assay can generate discrete, bright signals in the form of puncta that reveal the exact position of the interaction. In addition, scarcely visible antigens can be detected. Finally, PLA is a relatively simple technique to perform, and it takes no longer than a standard immunohistochemical procedure to complete. Therefore, PLA provides a technical advantage over other protein-protein interaction assays that are often plagued with long preparation times and extensive troubleshooting.

This protocol demonstrates how PLA can be applied to the Drosophila larval NMJ for the purpose of detecting endogenous protein-protein interactions in situ. Here, PLA is performed on larval body wall muscle preparations where Dlg and Hts are shown to indeed exist in a complex at the postsynaptic region of NMJs. PLA has not been previously used to study the larval NMJ, and there are at present only a handful of published papers that have used this assay in Drosophila tissue. It is hoped that further exposure of PLA to the Drosophila community will result in its increased use as an additional tool to complement other, more commonly used protein-protein interaction assays.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Body Wall Preparation

NOTE: Preparation of third instar larval body walls (for study of the NMJs which innervate the body wall muscles) was performed as previously described in Brent et al. 10, or Ramachandran and Budnik 11,12, but with some modifications.

  1. Dissection
    1. Raise fly stocks and crosses at 25 °C for five to six days using standard procedures 13.
    2. Pick crawling third instar larvae from vials or bottles using fine forceps.
    3. Wash the larvae in a small Petri dish containing Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) to remove any food particles.
    4. Place a single larva onto a sylgard disc and immerse it in a few drops of ice-cold PBS. Using ice-cold PBS will help stun the larva making it easier to manipulate. Throughout the dissection, ensure that the preparation is always submerged in PBS to prevent it from drying.
    5. Position the larva with its dorsal side facing up so that the two tracheal tracts are visible under a dissecting microscope (Figure 2A). Using the forceps to grasp a minutien pin, pin the larva down at the posterior end near the spiracles (Figure 2B). With another pin, pierce through the cuticle at the anterior end near the mouth hooks. Gently stretch the larva out lengthwise, then pin it down (Figure 2B).
    6. Using microdissection scissors, pinch the posterior end near the pin to create a small opening. The incision should be superficial enough to just pass through the cuticle.
    7. Placing the tip of the bottom blade of the scissors into the incision, cut along the entire length of the dorsal midline between the two tracheal tracts (Figure 2C). Point the scissor blades slightly upwards when cutting to avoid damaging the ventral body wall muscles.
    8. Make a small horizontal incision slightly anterior to the posteriorly-placed pin (Figure 2C). Make another similar incision slightly posterior to the anteriorly-placed pin (Figure 2C). The incisions should just pass through the cuticle.
      NOTE: The three incisions from steps 1.1.7 and 1.1.8 combined should resemble an "Inductor symbol diagram; circuit design; electronic schematic representation; educational use." when completed, i.e., a left- and right-hand flap on the dorsal side of the larval body should be produced.
    9. Carefully clean out the internal organs with the forceps. Adding a few forceful drops of PBS will help displace the organs out of the larval body, thus making it easier to remove them. Avoid poking the larval body as it will cause damage to the body wall muscles.
    10. Unfurl the larval body open and pin the corners down (Figure 2D). When pinning, stretch the body wall both horizontally and vertically to form an evenly-tensioned rectangle (see Figure 2G for the shape), taking care not to tear the body wall muscles in the process.
    11. Finish removing any remaining internal organs (Figure 2E).
  2. Fixation and Permeabilization
    1. Immerse the pinned body walls in several drops of Bouin's Solution. Incubate for 15 min on ice. Alternatively, use 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) as an alternative fixative; incubate for 30 min.
    2. Rinse three times with Phosphate Buffer Saline with Triton (PBT).
    3. Using fine forceps, carefully remove the pins and transfer the body walls by their corners into a siliconized 0.65 ml microcentrifuge tube.
    4. Store the body walls in PBT at 4 °C until ready for PLA. For optimal results, start immunostaining the body walls within a day or two of dissection.
      NOTE: To save on reagents and to ensure that all body walls are treated equally during the assay, different genotypes can be placed into a single tube. Genotypes can be distinguished by cutting the corners of the body walls differently (see Figure 2F for examples).

2. Immunohistochemistry

NOTE: Immunostaining of third instar larval body walls was performed as previously described in Brent et al. 14 and Ramachandran and Budnik 11, but with some modifications 11,14.
NOTE: Perform all steps at room temperature and with gentle agitation unless otherwise stated.

  1. Blocking
    1. Wash the body walls with PBT three times for 10 min each.
    2. Block with 1% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) for 1 hr.
  2. Immunostaining
    1. Incubate the body walls with mouse and rabbit primary antibodies against the two proteins of interest (diluted in 1% BSA) for 2 hr at room temperature, or overnight at 4 °C. In this case, use 1:10 mouse anti-Dlg and 1:250 rabbit anti-HtsM 15,16. Antibodies against markers that are not made in mouse or rabbit can also be included — e.g., use 1:200 goat anti-Hrp to delineate the neuronal membranes.
    2. Wash with PBT three times for 10 min each.
    3. Incubate with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies to detect the markers (diluted in 1% BSA) for 2 hr at room temperature, or overnight at 4 °C. As the PLA signal is later visualized with a red fluorophore, another fluorophore must be used to detect the marker — e.g., use 1:200 FITC-conjugated anti-goat to detect the goat anti-Hrp antibody. Due to the use of light-sensitive reagents, keep the tubes in the dark from this point onwards.
      NOTE: The kit that is used allows for PLA to be performed between primary antibodies raised in mouse and rabbit, with the signal visualized on the red channel under confocal microscopy. If desired, other kits are available that allow the assay to be done with primary antibodies raised in other species, and the signal visualized on other channels.

3. Proximity Ligation Assay

NOTE: Perform all steps at room temperature and with gentle agitation unless otherwise stated.

  1. PLA Probes
    1. Wash the body walls with PBT three times for 10 min each.
    2. Incubate with PLA probes (1:5 dilution each in 1% BSA) for 2 hr at 37 °C. In this case, use 40 µl of PLA probe anti-mouse MINUS, 40 µl of PLA probe anti-rabbit PLUS and 120 µl of 1% BSA to ensure the proper immersion and mixing of 5-10 body walls. Up to a 1:25 dilution of the PLA probes can still result in an adequate signal-to-noise ratio (i.e., for this experiment).
  2. Ligation
    1. Wash the body walls with Wash Buffer A twice for 5 min each.
    2. Incubate with Ligation solution (1:40 dilution of Ligase in Ligation buffer) for 1 hr at 37 °C. In this case, use 5 µl of Ligase, 40 µl of 5 Ligation buffer and 155 µl of high purity water to ensure the proper immersion and mixing of 5-10 body walls.
  3. Amplification
    1. Wash the body walls with Wash Buffer A twice for 2 min each.
    2. Incubate with Amplification solution (1:80 dilution of Polymerase in Amplification buffer) for 2 hr at 37 °C. In this case, use 2.5 µl of Polymerase, 40 µl of 5 Amplification buffer and 157.5 µl of high purity water to ensure the proper immersion and mixing of 5-10 body walls.
  4. Preparation for Imaging
    1. Wash the body walls with Wash Buffer B twice for 10 min each.
    2. Wash with 0.01x Wash Buffer B once for 1 min.
    3. Equilibrate in a few drops of mounting solution for at least 30 min before mounting, or store overnight at 4 °C.
    4. Using fine forceps, carefully transfer the body walls onto a platform slide with their cuticles facing down. Position the body walls in rows and in the same orientation within a drop or two of mountant. Place a 22 mm x 40 mm coverslip over the preparation taking care not to generate air bubbles, then seal the slide with clear nail polish.
    5. Store the slides in the dark at -20 °C until ready for confocal imaging.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

In wild-type third instar larval NMJs, Dlg is predominately found at the postsynaptic membrane of type I glutamatergic boutons, with Dlg immunoreactivity levels being more pronounced in type Ib boutons than type Is boutons (Figure 3A) 4. Hts is present throughout the muscle but concentrates at the postsynaptic region with Hts immunoreactivity levels appearing equal in both type I boutons, and is also found presynaptically (Figure 3A') 8,17. Note tha...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

This report demonstrates how PLA can be applied to the Drosophila larval NMJ. The assay is performed on larval body wall muscle preparations for the purpose of detecting endogenous protein-protein interactions present at the NMJ. With this technique, Dlg and Hts are shown to be in close proximity to each other, and thus exist in a complex, specifically at the postsynaptic region 27. In support of this result, a previous study has provided evidence of their association with the following data: 1) the i...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for providing fly stocks. We also thank the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank and Dr. Lynn Cooley (Yale University) for providing antibodies. A special thanks goes to AhHyun Yoo for her help on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Krieger), the William and Ada Isabelle Steel Fund (Krieger), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Harden).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Forceps (fine #5)AlmedicA10-704
Sylgard DiscWorld Precision InstrumentsSYLG184Mix elastomer base and curing agent in a 10:1 ratio. Set for 30 min. Pour into a mold (e.g. use a 12-well cell culture plate). Let cure for at least 24 hr. Adhere to the lid of a 60 x 15 mm Petri dish lid when dissecting.
Minutien Pins (0.0125 mm tip diameter)Fine Science Tools26002-10
Microdissection Scissors (ultra fine)Fine Science Tools15200-00
Platform SlidesGlue two 22 x 22 mm2 coverslips onto a microscope slide with clear nail polish, leaving a <20 mm gap in between for sample mounting.
w1118Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center3605
hts01103Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center10989Stock was re-balanced over a GFP balancer so that homozygous mutants can be selected based on the absence of GFP signal.
1x PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline): 3 mM NaH2PO4, 7 mM Na2HPO4, 130 mM NaCl, pH 7.0NaH2PO4 (Caledon Laboratories - 8180-1), Na2HPO4 (Caledon - 8120-1), NaCl (Caledon - 7560-1)
Bouin's SolutionSigma-AldrichHT10132
4% PFA (Paraformaldehyde): 4% PFA in 1x PBSPFA (Anachemia Science - 66194-300). See doi:10.1101/pdb.rec9959 Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2006 for instructions on how to make the solution.
[header]
1x PBT (Phosphate Buffered Saline with Triton): 1x PBS with 0.01% TritonTriton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich - T8787)
1% BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin): 1% BSA in 1x PBTBSA (Bioshop Canada - ALB001). Store at 4 °C.
mouse anti-Dlg (Discs large)Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank4F3Use at a 1:10 dilution in 1% BSA.
rabbit anti-HtsM (Hu-li tai shao)Provided by Dr. Lynn Cooley (Yale University). Use at a 1:250 dilution in 1% BSA.
rabbit anti-Pak (p21-activated kinase)Provided by Dr. Nicholas Harden (Simon Fraser University). Use at a 1:500 dilution in 1% BSA.
mouse anti-Wg (Wingless)Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank4D4Use at a 1:5 dilution in 1% BSA.
goat anti-Hrp (Horseradish peroxidase)Jackson              ImmunoResearch123-065-021Use at a 1:200 dilution in 1% BSA.
FITC-conjugated donkey anti-goatJackson             ImmunoResearch705-095-003Use at a 1:200 dilution in 1% BSA.
Duolink In Situ PLA Probe anti-mouse MINUSSigma-AldrichDUO92004
Duolink In Situ PLA Probe anti-rabbit PLUSSigma-AldrichDUO92002
Duolink In Situ Detection Reagents RedSigma-AldrichDUO92008
1x Wash Buffer A: 0.01 M Tris, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.4Sigma-AldrichDUO82049Tris (Caledon Laboratories - 8980-1), NaCl (Caledon - 7560-1), Tween 20 (Fisher Scientific - BP337)
1x Wash Buffer B: 0.2 M Tris, 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.5Sigma-AldrichDUO82049Tris (Caledon Laboratories - 8980-1), NaCl (Caledon - 7560-1)
0.01x Wash Buffer B: 2 mM Tris, 1 mM NaCl, pH 7.5Sigma-AldrichDUO82049Tris (Caledon Laboratories - 8980-1), NaCl (Caledon - 7560-1)
Duolink In Situ Mounting Medium with DAPISigma-AldrichDUO82040

References

  1. Woods, D. F., Bryant, P. J. The discs-large tumor suppressor gene of Drosophila encodes a guanylate kinase homolog localized at septate junctions. Cell. 66, 451-464 (1991).
  2. Yamanaka, T., Ohno, S. Role of Lgl/Dlg/Scribble in the regulation of epithelial junction, polarity and growth. Front Biosci. 13, 6693-6707 (2008).
  3. Humbert, P. O., et al. Control of tumourigenesis by the Scribble/Dlg/Lgl polarity module. Oncogene. 27, 6888-6907 (2008).
  4. Lahey, T., Gorczyca, M., Jia, X. X., Budnik, V. The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene dlg is required for normal synaptic bouton structure. Neuron. 13, 823-835 (1994).
  5. Ataman, B., Budnik, V., Thomas, U. Scaffolding proteins at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Int Rev Neurobiol. 75, 181-216 (2006).
  6. Thomas, U., Kobler, O., Gundelfinger, E. D. The Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction as a model for scaffold complexes at glutamatergic synapses: benefits and limitations. J Neurogenet. 24, 109-119 (2010).
  7. Matsuoka, Y., Li, X., Bennett, V. Adducin: structure, function and regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 57, 884-895 (2000).
  8. Wang, S., et al. Drosophila adducin regulates Dlg phosphorylation and targeting of Dlg to the synapse and epithelial membrane. Dev Biol. 357, 392-403 (2011).
  9. Soderberg, O., et al. Characterizing proteins and their interactions in cells and tissues using the in situ proximity ligation assay. Methods. 45, 227-232 (2008).
  10. Brent, J. R., Werner, K. M., McCabe, B. D. Drosophila larval NMJ dissection. J Vis Exp. (24), (2009).
  11. Ramachandran, P., Budnik, V. Immunocytochemical staining of Drosophila larval body-wall muscles. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010, (2010).
  12. Ramachandran, P., Budnik, V. Dissection of Drosophila larval body-wall muscles. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. , (2010).
  13. Ashburner, M. Drosophila: A Laboratory Manual. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Cold Spring, NY. (1989).
  14. Brent, J., Werner, K., McCabe, B. D. Drosophila larval NMJ immunohistochemistry. J Vis Exp. (25), (2009).
  15. Parnas, D., Haghighi, A. P., Fetter, R. D., Kim, S. W., Goodman, C. S. Regulation of postsynaptic structure and protein localization by the Rho-type guanine nucleotide exchange factor dPix. Neuron. 32, 415-424 (2001).
  16. Petrella, L. N., Smith-Leiker, T., Cooley, L. The Ovhts polyprotein is cleaved to produce fusome and ring canal proteins required for Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 134, 703-712 (2007).
  17. Pielage, J., Bulat, V., Zuchero, J. B., Fetter, R. D., Davis, G. W. Hts/Adducin controls synaptic elaboration and elimination. Neuron. 69, 1114-1131 (2011).
  18. Spradling, A. C., et al. The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project gene disruption project: Single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes. Genetics. 153, 135-177 (1999).
  19. Bokoch, G. M. Biology of the p21-Activated Kinases. Annu Rev Biochem. 72, 743-781 (2003).
  20. Bahri, S., et al. The leading edge during dorsal closure as a model for epithelial plasticity: Pak is required for recruitment of the Scribble complex and septate junction formation. Development. 137, 2023-2032 (2010).
  21. Albin, S. D., Davis, G. W. Coordinating structural and functional synapse development: postsynaptic p21-activated kinase independently specifies glutamate receptor abundance and postsynaptic morphology. J Neurosci. 24, 6871-6879 (2004).
  22. Koles, K., Budnik, V. Wnt signaling in neuromuscular junction development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 4, (2012).
  23. Packard, M., et al. The Drosophila Wnt, wingless, provides an essential signal for pre- and postsynaptic differentiation. Cell. 111, 319-330 (2002).
  24. Weibrecht, I., et al. Proximity ligation assays: a recent addition to the proteomics toolbox. Expert Rev Proteomics. 7, 401-409 (2010).
  25. Thymiakou, E., Episkopou, V. Detection of signaling effector-complexes downstream of bmp4 using PLA, a proximity ligation assay. J Vis Exp. (49), (2011).
  26. Maglione, M., Sigrist, S. J. Seeing the forest tree by tree: super-resolution light microscopy meets the neurosciences. Nat Neurosci. 16, 790-797 (2013).
  27. Wang, S., et al. Phospho-regulated Drosophila adducin is a determinant of synaptic plasticity in a complex with Dlg and PIP2 at the larval neuromuscular junction . Biol. Open. 3 (12), 1196-1206 (2014).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Drosophila Larval NMJProtein-protein InteractionConfocal MicroscopyImmunofluorescencePostsynaptic MembraneDlg Hts ComplexPLA ProbesRolling Circle AmplificationBody Wall Preparation