$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
A myocardial infarction (MI) is defined as the interruption of blood to a region of the heart caused by the occlusion of a major coronary artery. The damage resulting from an MI is due to the remodeling of the viable heart tissue into non-functional scar tissue, which decreases the ability of the heart or, more specifically, the left ventricle, to beat properly. This results in a decrease in the volume of blood that can be delivered to the body with every heartbeat, known as the stroke volume, and the percentage of blood that is pumped out of the heart with each heartbeat, known as the ejection fraction6. These, along with other diminished functions, increases the strain on the rest of the heart to maintain adequate function. Often, this increased strain can become so severe that it causes a second heart attack, a phenomenon seen in approximately 10% of individuals7.
While medical practices have evolved to treat the immediate aftermath of an MI, no technique has been developed to halt, slow, or reverse the negative side effects of tissue remodeling. Stem cell therapies have emerged as a possible avenue for such a treatment, however, despite their promising potential, stem cells have not proven successful in the clinical setting. One theory for their shortcomings is the inability to ensure the beneficial cells remain at the site of infarction long enough to generate favorable results5. It has been shown that no more than 24% of cells that are simply injected into the site of infarction survived and remained at the damaged site 1 day post-delivery2. A possible prospect for addressing this issue of cell retention is to develop biocompatible hydrogel systems that encapsulate either cells or therapeutics, which can be delivered to the damaged site. The hydrogel of choice in this protocol is a poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate due to its previous use in cell encapsulation procedures, however, any hydrogel capable of encapsulation may be used8. The delivery of the patch directly to the site of injury ensures cell-to-tissue contact over an extended period of time, increasing the length of time the cells can provide beneficial factors to the underlying myocardium.
A bottleneck to the patch approach is the difficulty of adhering the patch to the heart surface. Many groups have overcome this through a variety of techniques, the most prevalent being a simple suture to tie the construct to the heart surface9,10. This has proven successful in a number of cases in which the construct is made of a stiffer material, but fails when attempted on a hydrogel system, due to the high water concentration and delicate nature of the patch construct. To overcome this, we have utilized a fibrin glue external adhesive system that mimics the chemistry of clot formation. Fibrin glue has been used in numerous medical surgeries, including dura tears, bronchial fistulas, and corneal transplantation, highlighting the biocompatibility of the product as a wound sealant11-13. Additionally, fibrin has been used for a variety of cardiac purposes, including surgical treatment of left ventricular ruptures and coronary artery bypass surgeries, however, its use as an adhesion glue for a cardiac patch is not commonly used14-17. A simple formulation of thrombin and fibrinogen results in a biocompatible glue that can be placed directly on the outside of an external cardiac patch, providing a viable adhesion system to ensure patch to heart interaction.