$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The recommended volume for a miRNA probe-based assay qPCR reaction is 20 µl. NOTE: We have confirmed that a reaction volume of 5 µl is able to produce results similar to those achieved using 20 µl volume4,7,30. Lowering the reaction volume to 5 µl allows for a 75% decrease in reagent costs without appreciable loss in sensitivity. As presented in Figure 2, reaction volumes of 20 µl and 5 µl show a strong co-relation up until 39 cycles (with r2 of 0.92, p = 0.0002).
Microfluidics array provides a tool for obtaining data on 754 miRNAs expressed in a sample in around 5 hrs (for Card A and Card B), which is a more efficient way of analyzing multiple samples as compared to conventional 96 well plate PCRs. We compared miRNA microfluidics array cards for the same sample (Sample A and Sample A repeat). Figure 3A-B shows a Bland-Altman plot (3A) and Correlation plot (3B) for all 754 miRNAs tested for these samples. There are 3 different control miRNAs (U6, RNU44 and RNU48) placed randomly on both the cards (Card A and B) in multiple locations. When U6 cycle threshold (Ct) values are compared between the 2 runs, we did not observe significant differences between the values (Table 4). It is also important to note here that U6 is expressed at greater abundance (lower Ct value) in the sample assessed. We then compared all miRNAs that have Ct values between 0-19.99 in both the runs (n = 150), which had similar expression of miRNAs overall with a co-efficient of determination of 98% (Figure 3C-D). Of all the 277 miRNAs that have Ct values between 20 and 29.99 in both the runs, 16 miRs differed significantly between the original and repeat runs (Figure 3E-F). The number of miRNAs with significant difference between the runs increased (89 of 327) when the Ct values were selected between 30-40 for both runs (Figure 3G-H).
The nanofluidics array platform provides data for 754 miRNAs from each serum/plasma sample tested, as represented in Figure 4A. It is important to examine these amplification curves – as it is with all qPCR – to ensure that the result is indicative of true amplification. Each of the 48 subarrays (Figure 1) also contains an assay for the three most popular “housekeeping” ncRNAs: U6, RNU44 and RNU48. Figure 4B illustrates a typical clustering of U6 replicates from a single sample. These replicates display low standard deviation (SD <0.5) and so are an indicator of reliability. Alternatively, Figure 4C demonstrates the increased variability of U6 replicates (SD >0.5) in a second sample. This does not negate the validity of the remaining assays, although it does necessitate a more thorough critique. U6, as with most “housekeeping” miRNAs in biological fluids, can have a variable expression. It should be noted that one of the samples, outlined in Figure 4C, displays 4-fold less U6 content than that presented in Figure 4B. Since the level of U6 in sample presented in 4C is 75% less to begin with than the one presented in panel 4B, greater technical variability is expected due to the Poisson distribution of transcripts, which is exacerbated by the small reaction volume17.
Another useful tool is the Quality control (QC) images, available for export once the run has completed. A selection of these uses the fluorescence of ROX, the passive dye found in the qPCR reagent mix, to confirm that each through-hole has been correctly loaded (Figure 5). A through-hole, or indeed an entire subarray, may not load due to insufficient sample volume, evaporation, bubbles present in the wells of the 384-well sample plate, failure to completely remove the sample plate seal, or defects within the Accufill system or its tips. Any unloaded through-holes must be identified to avoid labelling miRNAs as “undetectable”, when in reality the assay was never loaded. If this problem is encountered, confirm that at least 5 µl of sample/mastermix is loaded into each well of the 384-well sample plate, the sample plate is properly centrifuged prior to loading, the foil seal is completely removed, and the loaded OpenArray slide is sealed and run within the allotted time for all successive runs. If loading issues still persist, these may be more likely pertaining to specific batch or lot of the arrays or related consumables and further assistance should be sought through the manufacturer.

Figure 1: Layout of samples for the Nanofluidics Array workflow: (A) Each 384-well sample plate can hold samples for up to 8 nanofluidics arrays. (B) Diluted, pre-amplified cDNA is placed into 8 wells (2 columns by 4 rows), with Pool A and Pool B in adjacent 8-well groups. Each circle represents one well. (C) Each well of the sample plate will be loaded into one subarray of the nanofluidics array. Each small square represents one subarray.

Figure 2: Co-relation analysis for conventional 96-well PCR platforms: Co-relation between 20 µl and 5 µl reaction volumes on TaqMan Real-time qPCR using a standard 96-well plate platform in CT values (39 cycles). We compared 4 different microRNAs (miR-375, miR-30c, miR-30d and miR-7) in 4 different human serum and plasma samples. Only 11 data points are plotted since the others were undetectable. R2 = 0.92, p = 0.0002.

Figure 3: Circulating miRNA profiling using microfluidics array cards. Using 2 microfluidics cards (card-A and card-B), a profile of 754 miRNAs is generated (A-B). As shown here, we used same sample for 2 microfluidics array runs to check reproducibility of the microfluidics card results. We observed a similar expression of miRNAs overall, with Ct values between 0-19.99 (C-D). There are few miRNAs (16 of 277) with Ct values between 20-29.99 and significant differences between repeat runs (E-F). Eighty nine of 327 microRNAs with higher Ct values (30-40) exhibited significant differences between both runs (G-H). Data are analysed using paired T test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Representative Profile of PCR ProductAmplification Curves: Is a representative figure of the combined (A) amplification curves of all miRNA targets for a human plasma sample. An assay for U6 (a common control ncRNA) is placed in every subarray. The sample in (B) demonstrates low variability (SD <0.5) while (C) shows high standard deviation (SD >0.5) within U6 replicates. Both samples are total RNA isolated from human plasma. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: QC Analysis of Nanofluidics Arrays: Quality control (QC) images of a correctly loaded nanofluidics array (left) and an incorrectly loaded nanofluidics array (right). The passive dye, ROX (present in the qPCR reagent mix), fluoresces to indicate a correctly loaded through-hole. The array on the right has several subarrays/through-holes that are not loaded with the qPCR reagent mix and these should be identified as false-negative PCR reactions.
| Components | Volume per 5 µl reaction (µl) |
| RT buffer (10x) | 0.5 |
| dNTPs (100 mM) | 0.05 |
| RNase inhibitor | 0.6 |
| Nuclease-free water | 1.39 |
| Reverse Transcriptase | 0.33 |
| Total volume | 2.33 |
Table 1A: RT reagent mix components in a 5 µl RT reaction preparation for TaqMan Real-time qPCR using a standard 96-well plate platform.
| Components | Volume per 5 µl reaction (µl) | Volume per 20 µl reaction (µl) |
| Fast PCR mastermix (2x) | 2.5 | 10 |
| TaqMan qPCR assay (20x) * | 0.25 | 1 |
| Nuclease-free water | 1.45 | 5.8 |
| Total Volume: | 4.2 | 16.8 |
*assay component based on the selected miRNA tested.
Table 1B: qPCR reagent mix components in a 5 or 20 µl qPCR reaction preparation for TaqMan Real-time qPCR using a standard 96-well plate platform.
| Components | Volume per reaction (µl) |
| Megaplex RT Primers (10x) | 0.8 |
| dNTPs with dTTp (100 mM) | 0.2 |
| Multiscribe Reverse Transcriptase (50 U/µl) | 1.5 |
| 10X RT Buffer | 0.8 |
| MgCl2 (25 mM) | 0.9 |
| RNase Inhibitor (20 U/µl) | 0.1 |
| Nuclease-free Water | 0.2 |
| Total | 4.5 |
Table 2A: RT reagent mix components in a 5 µl RT reaction preparation for TLDA miRNA panel.
| Components | Volume per reaction (µl) |
| TaqMan PreAmp Mastermix (2x) | 12.5 |
| Megaplex PreAmp Primers (10x) | 2.5 |
| Nuclease-free water | 7.5 |
| Total | 22.5 |
Table 2B: PreAmp reagent mix components in a 25 µl pre-amplication reaction preparation for TLDA miRNA panel.
| Components | Volume per reaction (µl) |
| Megaplex RT Primers (10x) | 0.75 |
| dNTPs with dTTp (100 mM) | 0.15 |
| Multiscribe Reverse Transcriptase (50 U/µl) | 1.5 |
| 10X RT Buffer | 0.75 |
| MgCl2 (25 mM) | 0.9 |
| RNase Inhibitor (20 U/µl) | 0.09 |
| Nuclease-free Water | 0.35 |
| Total | 4.5 |
Table 3A: RT reagent mix components in a 5 µl RT reaction preparation for probe-based nanofluidics miRNA panel.
| Components | Volume per reaction (µl) |
| TaqMan PreAmp Mastermix (2x) | 12.5 |
| Megaplex PreAmp Primers (10x) | 2.5 |
| Nuclease-free water | 7.5 |
| Total | 22.5 |
Table 3B: PreAmp reagent mix components in a 25 µl pre-amplication reaction preparation for probe-based nanofluidics miRNA panel. NOTE: The interactive supplementary excel spreadsheets provided for the three platforms, already accounts for the 5% addition to compensate for pipetting error.
| Sample A | Sample A repeat |
| 15.535 | 16.156 |
| 15.471 | 15.652 |
| 15.623 | 16.063 |
| 15.963 | 15.889 |
| 14.006 | 13.993 |
| 14.502 | 14.623 |
| 14.907 | 14.384 |
| 13.732 | 14.946 |
Table 4: Circulating miRNA U6 profiling using microfluidics array card. Using two microfluidics array cards (A and B). Ct-values of U6 control miRNA from Sample A (total = 8). Consistent U6 control miRNA abundance observed between the runs.