A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Induction of an Isoelectric Brain State to Investigate the Impact of Endogenous Synaptic Activity on Neuronal Excitability In Vivo

7.6K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/53576

⸱

March 31st, 2016

 ,  ,  ,  , 
1Inserm U1127, 2CNRS UMR 7225, 3UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Sorbonne Universités, 4Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM)

In This Article

Summary

This procedure performs long-lasting in vivo intracellular recordings from single neurons during physiologically relevant cerebral states and after complete abolition of ongoing electrical activities, resulting in an isoelectric brain state. The physiological constants of the animal are carefully monitored during the transition to the artificial comatose condition.

Abstract

The way neurons process information depends both on their intrinsic membrane properties and on the dynamics of the afferent synaptic network. In particular, endogenously-generated network activity, which strongly varies as a function of the state of vigilance, significantly modulates neuronal computation. To investigate how different spontaneous cerebral dynamics impact single neurons' integrative properties, we developed a new experimental strategy in the rat consisting in suppressing in vivo all cerebral activity by means of a systemic injection of a high dose of sodium pentobarbital. Cortical activities, continuously monitored by combined electrocorticogram (ECoG) and intracellular recordings are progressively slowed down, leading to a steady isoelectric profile. This extreme brain state, putting the rat into a deep comatose, was carefully monitored by measuring the physiological constants of the animal throughout the experiments. Intracellular recordings allowed us to characterize and compare the integrative properties of the same neuron embedded into physiologically relevant cortical dynamics, such as those encountered in the sleep-wake cycle, and when the brain was fully silent.

Introduction

In the absence of any environmental stimuli or behavioral tasks, the "resting" brain generates a continuous stream of electrical activity that can be recorded from the scalp, as electroencephalographic (EEG) waves. The intracellular correlate of this endogenous cerebral activity is characterized by background membrane voltage fluctuations (also known as "synaptic noise"), which are composed of a combination of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic potentials that reflect the ongoing activity of afferent networks 1,2. This spontaneous activity varies in frequency and amplitude with the different states of vigilance. Elucidating the impact of network activity on the excitability and responsiveness of single neurons is one of the major challenges of neurosciences 3,4.

Many experimental and computational studies have explored the functional impact of ongoing synaptic activity on the integrative properties of neurons. However, the role of the different neuronal parameters impacted by the background synaptic noise remains elusive. For instance, the mean level of membrane depolarization has been found positively 5,6 or negatively 7-9 correlated with the ability of sensory inputs to trigger action potentials. Moreover, whereas some investigations suggest that fluctuations of the membrane potential, resulting from a continuously varying stream of afferent synaptic inputs, strongly affect the responsiveness of single neurons by modulating the gain of their input-output relationship 3,10-13, others indicate that changes in membrane input conductance mediated by shunting inhibition are sufficient to modulate the neuronal gain regardless of the magnitude of membrane fluctuations 14,15. Finally, recent studies performed on awake animals stressed how the processing of sensory information in single neuron critically depends upon the state of vigilance and the current behavioral demand 16,17.

A straightforward strategy to elucidate the functional role of a given process in a highly interconnected system is to determine how its absence specifically alters the functioning of the system. This method has been extensively used in neuroscience research, for example using experimental lesions or inactivation of different brain areas 18-21, or pharmacological blockade of specific ion channels 22,23. Notably, it has been applied in vivo to unveil how functional connectivity and network dynamics affect single cell computation 24-27. However, to date local manipulations intended to block the firing of neurons and/or perturb their basic biophysical properties can be partially effective and are limited to relatively small brain volumes 28.

To overcome these limitations, we developed a new in vivo experimental approach in the rat to compare the electrophysiological properties of single neurons recorded in a given brain state, i.e., embedded in a particular network dynamic, to those obtained after complete suppression of the whole brain synaptic activity 29. In the control conditions, two distinct cortical dynamics could be generated. Sleep-like electrocorticographic (ECoG) patterns were induced by injection of moderate doses of sodium pentobarbital. Alternatively, fast ECoG waves of small amplitude comparable to the cortical activity underlying the waking state (waking-like pattern) could be produced by injection of fentanyl. Subsequently, while maintaining the same ECoG and intracellular recording, a complete silencing of endogenous brain electrical activity was obtained by systemic injection of a high dose of sodium pentobarbital, characterized by isoelectric ECoG and intracellular activities. Because the induction of such an extreme comatose could potentially have fatal consequences on biological functions, a careful and continuous monitoring of the physiological variables was essential. Therefore, we meticulously followed the heart beat frequency, the end-tidal CO2 concentration (EtCO2), the O2 saturation (SpO2) and core temperature of the rat throughout the experiments.

We evaluate single neurons properties during these different states using sharp microelectrodes, which are particularly suited for long and stable recordings in vivo. The procedure described here, can be combined with other electrophysiological and imaging approaches and could be extended to other animal models.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All procedures were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the European Union (directive 2010/63/EU) and approved by the Charles Darwin Ethical Committee on Animal Experimentation. We describe here the procedure we routinely use in our laboratory, however most steps can be adapted to match everyone's specific needs.

1. Surgical Preparation

Note: All incision and pressure points should be repeatedly infiltrated with local anesthetic (lidocaine or bupivacaine). The present procedure is terminal, if an aseptic preparation is required several modifications should be implemented.

  1. Anesthetize a rat with sodium pentobarbital (40 mg/kg) and ketamine (50 mg/kg) in two locally separated intraperitoneal (IP) injections.
  2. Let the animal go under general anesthesia and repeatedly verify that a surgical plane of anesthesia is attained (no reaction to toe pinching). Place the rat on a feedback heating blanket and insert a rectal probe to maintain core temperature around 37 °C.
  3. Place a catheter in the peritoneal cavity to facilitate subsequent injection of anesthetic agents and to avoid perforating organs by repeated needle punctures 30.
    1. Clip the hair over a small (~2 - 3 mm) area above a region located within the stomach's lower right or left quadrant.
      Note: Depilatory cream can also be used. 
    2. Make a 2 - 3 mm incision on the skin with sharp scissors or a scalpel. Using blunt dissection, remove fat and muscle layers until the peritoneal cavity is observed.
    3. Insert about 1 - 2 cm of a small catheter in the cavity and close the wound with surgical glue.
      Note: The diameter and the total length of the catheter should be minimal (e.g., 2 French - corresponding to 0.043 mm inside diameter) to reduce dead volumes. Polyurethane tubes are most suited.
    4. Make a loop and suture the catheter to the skin to secure it in place.
  4. Install a tracheal tube to control ventilation during artificial respiration.
    1. As for the previous step, prepare the area of interest (1 - 2 cm over the trachea right above the manubrium), remove the hair and incise the skin.
    2. Blunt dissect the first layers of fat and muscles, then move the salivary gland aside and expose the trachea by gently dissecting the last layer of muscles.
    3. Carefully remove the tissues over the trachea and slide a thread below it using small forceps. Make a surgeon's knot with the thread but do not tight it yet.
    4. Incise the trachea transversally between two cartilaginous rings. Swab blood in the trachea if any.
    5. Insert a tracheal tube with the appropriate diameter and tighten the thread's knot to secure the tube steady. For additional stability the thread can further be attached at a higher point of the trachea tube.
    6. Suture the wound close or use surgical staples. Avoid surgical glue here if the tracheal tube is intended to be reused.
  5. Install the animal in a stereotaxic frame and carefully monitor the following physiological variables: ECoG, SpO2, EtCO2, heart rate (via an electrocardiogram, ECG) and internal temperature. Monitor and adjust these variables to keep a proper depth of anesthesia and physiological state. Specifically, supplement anesthesia with a small dose (10 mg/kg) of sodium pentobarbital if necessary.
  6. Apply eye ointment on both eyes to avoid desiccation. Clip the hair over the scalp, make a longitudinal incision (~2 cm) and resect the connective tissues overlying the skull using a scalpel or a curette.
  7. Make a small (~1.5 mm diameter) craniotomy over the region of interest with a dental drill.
    Note: Here, the barrel field of the primary somatosensory cortex is targeted ( 7 - 8 mm anterior to the interaural line, 4.5 - 5.5 mm lateral to the midline 31). Rinse repeatedly to dissipate heat.
  8. Use extra fine forceps to gently make a small hole in the dura. Reserve a ~0.5 mm region within the cranial trepanation to place the ECoG electrode (see next step). Permanently keep the cortex moist with 0.9% NaCl solution (or artificial cerebro-spinal fluid).
  9. Place a low impedance (~60 kΩ) silver electrode (the ECoG electrode) on the dura, avoiding the cortical region not covered by the meninges, and place the reference electrode on a scalp muscle on the other side of the head.
  10. At this stage (30 min after the last sodium pentobarbital injection), maintain the anesthesia by repeated injections of sodium pentobarbital (10-15 mg/kg/h) or fentanyl (3-6 µg/kg/h) via the IP catheter. The former will result in a slow oscillatory, sleep-like, ECoG pattern whereas the latter will result in a desynchronized, waking-like, cortical profile.
  11. Adjust the artificial ventilation system so that the respiratory frequency and volume are similar to those of the rat's spontaneous breathing (normal range 70 - 115 breath/min 32). Then, connect the mechanical ventilation to the tracheal tube and verify the proper thoracic cage inflation (on both sides). If not, adjust the position of the ventilation tubing in the tracheal axis. If necessary, suck up the secretion present in the trachea with a catheter connected to a syringe or a vacuum pump.
  12. If all physiological variables 32–35 and ECoG 29,36 patterns reflect a stable surgical plane of anesthesia, do an intramuscular injection of gallamine triethiodide in each leg to paralyze the rat, 40 mg/kg for the first injection and then 20 mg/kg, every 2hr 19,29,36,50.

2. Intracellular Recordings

  1. Pull a glass micropipette (sharp microelectrode) with a ~0.2 µm tip such as its resistance ranges between 50 and 80 MΩ once filled with 2 M potassium acetate (KAc).
  2. Place the pipette in a specific holder with a silver/silver-chloride (Ag/AgCl) wire to connect the pipette solution to an intracellular amplifier (via a head stage). The holder should be attached to a micromanipulator. Place a Ag/AgCl reference electrode on the rat's neck muscles.
  3. Slowly insert the pipette in the brain down to the region of interest and verify its resistance by monitoring the voltage drops in response to current steps. Use the buzz (or zap) button of the amplifier to clear the pipette if needed.
  4. Use cotton swabs or synthetic absorption triangles to dry the craniotomy (be careful not to touch the ECoG or intracellular electrodes) before covering it with silicone elastomer or 4% agarose to reduce brain movements.
  5. Lower the pipette in 1 - 2 µm steps until its resistance increases when approaching a cell. Then use the buzz function of the amplifier to penetrate into the neuron.

3. Induce the Isoelectric State

  1. Perform the appropriate experimental protocol (e.g., firing responses to intracellularly injected currents, current-voltage relations, sensory stimuli responses) at this stage while monitoring simultaneously the neuron's membrane potential, the ECoG and the physiological variables.
  2. Ensure that the intracellular electrode is stable in the cell by analyzing the steadiness of both the membrane potential and the action potential properties throughout the recording session. If not, do not go to the next step and wait until the recording becomes stable again or search for another neuron.
  3. Inject a high but infra-lethal dose of sodium pentobarbital (~90 mg/kg, can be as low as 35 mg/kg from the pentobarbital initial condition and up to 155 mg/kg from the fentanyl initial condition) via the IP line.
    Note: Within 15 - 20 min the intracellular and ECoG waveforms should slow down with intermittent electrical silences to transiently reach the so called "burst-suppression" profile 37,38, which progressively collapses to a complete isoelectric state. It is expected that the heart rate significantly slows down (by ~10 - 20%) but the SpO2 and EtCO2 should stay relatively steady.
  4. If the isoelectric state is not reached, inject a small amount of sodium pentobarbital (~10% of the step 3.1 dose). Wait 15 min before adding more anesthetic if the isoelectric state is still not achieved.
  5. Repeat the experimental protocol to compare the impact of the network dynamics on the recorded neuron's integrative properties.
    Note: After cessation of anesthetic injections, the electrical brain activity should fully recover within 3 to 4 hr.
  6. At the end of the experiment, inject a lethal dose of sodium pentobarbital (200 mg/kg, IP) to euthanize the rat.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Inducing and maintaining an isoelectric brain state is a delicate in vivo experimental procedure. It has been proved to be a powerful tool to directly study the impact of cortical network activity on neuronal excitability and transfer function 29. Figure 1 shows the multi-parameter monitoring, including ECoG and vital constants, of the animal's physiological state before (Figure 1A) and after (Figure 1B) induction of t...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

We describe here a new method to suppress in vivo spontaneous cerebral electrical activity at both network and cellular levels. This procedure leads to an extreme brain state, known as isoelectric comatose 41. From a clinical point of view, such an electrocerebral inactivity is the most severe abnormality that can be seen on the EEG. It is mostly associated with an irreversible coma, with all patients either dying or continuing in a persistent vegetative state 42, but can be at least partia...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Fondation de France, the Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, the Pierre & Marie Curie University and the program 'Investissements d'avenir' ANR-10-IAIHU-06.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Sodium PentobarbitalCentravetPentobarbital
Ketamine 500MerialImalgène 500
Fentanyl Janssen-CilagFentanyl
XylocaineCentravetXylovet
Gallamine triethiodideSigmaG8134
ECoG amplifierA-M SystemsAC amplifier, Model 1700
Intracellular amplifierMolecular DevicesAxoclamp 900A
Data acquisition interfaceCambridge Electronic DesignCED power 1401-3 
Data analysis softwareCambridge Electronic DesignSpike2 version 7
micromanipulatorScientificaIVM-3000
Capillary PullerNarishigePE-2
Borosilicate glass capillariesHarvard ApparatusGC150F-10
Silver wire 0.125 mm (intracellular recording)WPIAGT0525
Ag-AgCl referencePhymepE242
Silver wire 0.25 mm (ECoG recording)WPIAGT1025
Artificial respiration systemMinerveAlpha Lab
Physiological parameters monitoringDigicareLifeWindow Lite
Heating BlanketHarvard Apparatus507215
StereomicroscopeLeicaM80
ScissorsFST15005-08
Forceps Dumont #5FST11295-10
Forceps Dumont #5SFFST11252-00
IP Polyurethane catheter - 0.43x0.69 mm  InstechBTPU-027
Silicon elastomereWPIKWIK-CAST
Dental drillNSKY1001151 and P496
Surgical glue3Mvetbond

References

  1. Fatt, P., Katz, B. Some observations on biological noise. Nature. 166 (4223), 597-598 (1950).
  2. Brock, L. G., Coombs, J. S., Eccles, J. C. The recording of potentials from motoneurones with an intracellular electrode. J. Physiol. 117 (4), 431-460 (1952).
  3. Destexhe, A., Rudolph, M., Fellous, J. M., Sejnowski, T. J. Fluctuating synaptic conductances recreate in vivo-like activity in neocortical neurons. Neuroscience. 107 (1), 13-24 (2001).
  4. Silver, R. A. Neuronal arithmetic. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11 (7), 474-489 (2010).
  5. Azouz, R., Gray, C. M. Cellular mechanisms contributing to response variability of cortical neurons in vivo. J. Neurosci. 19 (6), 2209-2223 (1999).
  6. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., Nowak, L. G., McCormick, D. A. Membrane Mechanisms Underlying Contrast Adaptation in Cat Area 17 In Vivo. J. Neurosci. 222 (11), 4267-4285 (2000).
  7. Petersen, C. C. H., Hahn, T. T. G., Mehta, M., Grinvald, A., Sakmann, B. Interaction of sensory responses with spontaneous depolarization in layer 2/3 barrel cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (23), 13638-13643 (2003).
  8. Sachdev, R. N. S., Ebner, F. F., Wilson, C. J. Effect of Subthreshold Up and Down States on the Whisker-Evoked Response in Somatosensory Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 92 (6), 3511-3521 (2004).
  9. Hasenstaub, A., Sachdev, R. N. S., McCormick, D. A. State Changes Rapidly Modulate Cortical Neuronal Responsiveness. J. Neurosci. 27 (36), 9607-9622 (2007).
  10. Chance, F. S., Abbott, L. F., Reyes, A. D. Gain modulation from background synaptic input. Neuron. 35 (4), 773-782 (2002).
  11. Shu, Y., Hasenstaub, A., Badoual, M., Bal, T., McCormick, D. A. Barrages of synaptic activity control the gain and sensitivity of cortical neurons. J. Neurosci. 23 (32), 10388-10401 (2003).
  12. Mitchell, S. J., Silver, R. A. Shunting inhibition modulates neuronal gain during synaptic excitation. Neuron. 38 (3), 433-445 (2003).
  13. Prescott, S. A., De Koninck, Y. Gain control of firing rate by shunting inhibition: roles of synaptic noise and dendritic saturation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (4), 2076-2081 (2003).
  14. Graham, L. J., Schramm, A. In Vivo Dynamic-Clamp Manipulation of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Conductances: Functional Roles of Shunting Inhibition and IBK in Rat and Cat Cortex. Dynamic-clamp: From principles to applications. , (2009).
  15. Fernandez, F. R., White, J. A. Gain control in CA1 pyramidal cells using changes in somatic conductance. J. Neurosci. 30 (1), 230-241 (2010).
  16. Polack, P. O., Friedman, J., Golshani, P. Cellular mechanisms of brain state-dependent gain modulation in visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 16 (9), 1331-1339 (2013).
  17. Zhou, M., Liang, F., et al. Scaling down of balanced excitation and inhibition by active behavioral states in auditory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 17 (6), 841-850 (2014).
  18. Contreras, D., Destexhe, A., Sejnowski, T. J., Steriade, M. Spatiotemporal Patterns of Spindle Oscillations in Cortex and Thalamus. J. Neurosci. 17 (3), 1179-1196 (1997).
  19. Charpier, S., Mahon, S., Deniau, J. M. In vivo induction of striatal long-term potentiation by low-frequency stimulation of the cerebral cortex. Neuroscience. 91 (4), 1209-1222 (1999).
  20. Constantinople, C. M., Bruno, R. M. Effects and Mechanisms of Wakefulness on Local Cortical Networks. Neuron. 69 (6), 1061-1068 (2011).
  21. Poulet, J. F. A., Fernandez, L. M. J., Crochet, S., Petersen, C. C. H. Thalamic control of cortical states. Nat. Neurosci. 15 (3), 370-372 (2012).
  22. Hille, B. Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes, Third Edition. , Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Mass. (2001).
  23. Sakmann, B., Neher, E. Single-Channel Recording. , Springer. (2009).
  24. Ferster, D., Chung, S., Wheat, H. Orientation selectivity of thalamic input to simple cells of cat visual cortex. Nature. 380 (6571), 249-252 (1996).
  25. Paré, D., Shink, E., Gaudreau, H., Destexhe, A., Lang, E. J. Impact of spontaneous synaptic activity on the resting properties of cat neocortical pyramidal neurons In vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 79 (3), 1450-1460 (1998).
  26. Destexhe, A., Paré, D. Impact of network activity on the integrative properties of neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 81 (4), 1531-1547 (1999).
  27. Kara, P., Pezaris, J. S., Yurgenson, S., Reid, R. C. The spatial receptive field of thalamic inputs to single cortical simple cells revealed by the interaction of visual and electrical stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (25), 16261-16266 (2002).
  28. Lomber, S. G. The advantages and limitations of permanent or reversible deactivation techniques in the assessment of neural function. J. Neurosci. Meth. 86 (2), 109-117 (1999).
  29. Altwegg-Boussac, T., Chavez, M., Mahon, S., Charpier, S. Excitability and responsiveness of rat barrel cortex neurons in the presence and absence of spontaneous synaptic activity in vivo. J. Physiol. 592 (16), 3577-3595 (2014).
  30. Miner, N. A., Koehler, J., Greenaway, L. Intraperitoneal injection of mice. Appl. Microbiol. 17 (2), 250-251 (1969).
  31. Paxinos, G., Watson, C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates (2nd edn). , Academic Press. (1986).
  32. Wolfensohn, S. Handbook of Laboratory Animal Management and Welfare. , Wiley-Blackwell. (2013).
  33. Bester, H., Chapman, V., Besson, J. M., Bernard, J. F. Physiological Properties of the Lamina I Spinoparabrachial Neurons in the Rat. J. Neurophysiol. 83 (4), 2239-2259 (2000).
  34. Greene, S. A. Veterinary Anesthesia and Pain Management Secrets. , Elsevier Health Sciences. (2002).
  35. Morgan, B. J., Adrian, R., Bates, M. L., Dopp, J. M., Dempsey, J. A. Quantifying hypoxia-induced chemoreceptor sensitivity in the awake rodent. J. Appl. Physiol. 117 (7), 816-824 (2014).
  36. Mahon, S., Deniau, J. M., Charpier, S. Relationship between EEG potentials and intracellular activity of striatal and cortico-striatal neurons: an in vivo study under different anesthetics. Cereb. Cortex. 11 (4), 360-373 (2001).
  37. Ganes, T., Lundar, T. The effect of thiopentone on somatosensory evoked responses and EEGs in comatose patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 46 (6), 509-514 (1983).
  38. Schmid-Elsaesser, R., Schröder, M., Zausinger, S., Hungerhuber, E., Baethmann, A., Reulen, H. J. EEG burst suppression is not necessary for maximum barbiturate protection in transient focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. J. Neurol. Sci. 162 (1), 14-19 (1999).
  39. Cummins, T. R., Jiang, C., Haddad, G. G. Human neocortical excitability is decreased during anoxia via sodium channel modulation. J Clin Invest. 91 (2), 608-615 (1993).
  40. Gu, X. Q., Kanaan, A., Yao, H., Haddad, G. G. Chronic High-Inspired CO2 Decreases Excitability of Mouse Hippocampal Neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 97 (2), 1833-1838 (2007).
  41. Lehembre, R., Gosseries, O., et al. Electrophysiological investigations of brain function in coma, vegetative and minimally conscious patients. Arch Ital Biol. 150 (2/3), 122-139 (2012).
  42. Husain, A. M. Electroencephalographic assessment of coma. J Clin Neurophysiol. 23 (3), 208-220 (2006).
  43. Fink, E. L., Alexander, H., et al. An Experimental Model of Pediatric Asphyxial Cardiopulmonary Arrest in Rats. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 5 (2), 139-144 (2004).
  44. Lukatch, H. S., McIver, M. B. Synaptic mechanisms of thiopental-induced alterations insynchronized cortical activity. Anesthesiology. 84, 1425-1434 (1996).
  45. Kroeger, D., Amzica, F. Hypersensitivity of the anesthesia-induced comatose brain. J Neurosci. 27, 10597-10607 (2007).
  46. Kroeger, D., Florea, B., Amzica, F. Human brain activity patterns beyond the isoelectric line of extreme deep coma. PLoS ONE. 8 (9), e75257(2013).
  47. Margrie, T. W., Brecht, M., Sakmann, B. In vivo, low-resistance, whole-cell recordings from neurons in the anaesthetized and awake mammalian brain. Pflugers Arch. 444 (4), 491-498 (2002).
  48. DeWeese, M. Whole-Cell Recording In Vivo. Current Protocols in Neuroscience. , (2007).
  49. Schramm, A. E., Marinazzo, D., Gener, T., Graham, L. J. The Touch and Zap Method for In Vivo Whole-Cell Patch Recording of Intrinsic and Visual Responses of Cortical Neurons and Glial Cells. PLoS ONE. 9 (5), e97310(2014).
  50. Mahon, S., Charpier, S. Bidirectional Plasticity of Intrinsic Excitability Controls Sensory Inputs Efficiency in Layer 5 Barrel Cortex Neurons in Vivo. J. Neurosci. 32 (33), 11377-11389 (2012).
  51. Destexhe, A., Rudolph, M., Paré, D. The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4 (9), 739-751 (2003).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Sodium PentobarbitalIntracellular RecordingElectrocorticogramCerebral InactivitySynaptic Activity SuppressionComatose StateMembrane PotentialBurst Suppression
Induction of an Isoelectric Brain State to Investigate the Impact of Endogenous Synaptic Activity on Neuronal Excitability In Vivo
Contact Us
Recommend to Library

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved.