A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation

13K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/53621

⸱

December 18th, 2015

 ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This paper introduces a method for obtaining somatosensory event-related potentials following orofacial skin stretch stimulation. The current method can be used to evaluate the contribution of somatosensory afferents to both speech production and speech perception.

Abstract

Cortical processing associated with orofacial somatosensory function in speech has received limited experimental attention due to the difficulty of providing precise and controlled stimulation. This article introduces a technique for recording somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP) that uses a novel mechanical stimulation method involving skin deformation using a robotic device. Controlled deformation of the facial skin is used to modulate kinesthetic inputs through excitation of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. By combining somatosensory stimulation with electroencephalographic recording, somatosensory evoked responses can be successfully measured at the level of the cortex. Somatosensory stimulation can be combined with the stimulation of other sensory modalities to assess multisensory interactions. For speech, orofacial stimulation is combined with speech sound stimulation to assess the contribution of multi-sensory processing including the effects of timing differences. The ability to precisely control orofacial somatosensory stimulation during speech perception and speech production with ERP recording is an important tool that provides new insight into the neural organization and neural representations for speech.

Introduction

Speech production is dependent on both auditory and somatosensory information. The auditory and somatosensory feedback occur in combination from the earliest vocalizations produced by an infant and both are involved in speech motor learning. Recent results suggest that somatosensory processes contribute to perception as well as production. For example, the identification of speech sounds is altered when a robotic device stretches the facial skin as participants listen to auditory stimuli1. Air puffs to the cheek that coincide with auditory speech stimuli alter participants' perceptual judgments2.

These somatosensor....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The current experimental protocol follows the guidelines of ethical conduct according to the Yale University Human Investigation Committee.

1. Electroenchephalopgaphy (EEG) Preparation

  1. Measure head size to determine the appropriate EEG cap.
  2. Identify the location of the vertex by finding the mid-point between nasion and inion with a measuring tape.
  3. Place the EEG cap on the head using the pre-determined vertex as Cz. Examine Cz again after placing the cap by using a measuring tape as done in 1.2. Note that the EEG cap is equipped with electrode holders and the placement of the 64 electrodes (or holders) is based on a modified 10-20....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

This section presents representative event-related potentials in response to somatosensory stimulation resulting from facial skin deformation. The experimental setup is represented in Figure 1. Sinusoidal stimulation was applied to the facial skin lateral to the oral angle (See Figure 3A as reference). One hundred stretch trials were recorded for each participant with 12 participants tested in total. After removing the trials with blinks and eye movement .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The studies reported here provide evidence that precisely controlled somatosensory stimulation that is produced by facial skin deformation induces cortical ERPs. Cutaneous afferents are known as a rich source of kinesthetic information3,4 in human limb movement5,6 and speech movement7,8,21. Stretching the facial skin in a manner that reflects the actual movement direction during speaking induces a kinesthetic sense similar to the corresponding movement. The current method combining precis.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grants R21DC013915 and R01DC012502, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013 Grant Agreement no. 339152).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
EEG recording systemBiosemiActiveTwo
Robotic decice for skin stretchGeomagicPhantom Premium 1.0
EEG-compatible earphonesEtymotic researchER3A
Software for visual and auditory stimulationNeurobehavioral SystemsPresentation
Electrode gelParker Laboratories, INCSigna gel
Double sided tape3M1522
Disposable syringeMonoject412 Curved Tip
Analog input deviceNational Instuments PCI-6036E
Degital output deviceMeasurement computingUSB-1208FS

References

  1. Ito, T., Tiede, M., Ostry, D. J. Somatosensory function in speech perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106, 1245-1248 (2009).
  2. Gick, B., Derrick, D. Aero-tactile integration in speech perception. Nature. 462, 502-504 (2009).
  3. McCloskey, D. I.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

EEG RecordingRobotic StimulationFacial Skin DeformationSpeech PerceptionMultisensory IntegrationCortical ProcessingElectrophysiological RecordingMechanoreceptor Activation