$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This working heart model enables assessment of ventricular performance with full control of ventricular preload and afterload, oxygen tension of the perfusate, as well as heart rate. Among other factors, it permits assessment of the intrinsic myocardial effects of inotropic medications independent of afterload and preload, which ways that are not possible using an in vivo model. Because this model utilizes a crystalloid perfusate, it permits assessment the myocardium without interference from hemoglobin, simplifying spectroscopic analysis of myocardial energy states, for example.14 In this model, the right atrium is not cannulated as part of our instrumentation, though it is possible to do so. We intentionally chose not to do so in order to facilitate sampling of coronary sinus flow for the assessment of myocardial oxygen consumption. Importantly, though, the right heart still performs pressure and volume work in this model as it pumps the coronary sinus flow into the pulmonary artery cannula. Providing some right ventricular preload improves positioning of the ventricular septum and enhances left ventricular performance, and is an important component of this model.15
There are several experimental pitfalls to mention. The first is the initial retrograde cannulation, which should be performed expediently (i.e., in less than 2 min) to minimize the period of ischemia. The most important skill to master is the efficient isolation, preparation and handling of the ascending aorta. It is important that the aortic stump not be cut excessively short, leaving insufficient room for cannulation above the aortic valve. However, it is also important that the aortic stump not be too long, which can cause torqueing of the aorta around the cannula. It is also important that the aorta cannula and aortic root be appropriately size-matched. An excessively large aorta on a small cannula can also lead to torqueing of the aortic root on the cannula. The right subclavian artery typically takes off from the ascending aorta approximately 7 mm above the aortic valve. Identifying the brachiocephalic vessels (approximately 1 mm in diameter) during dissection and trimming of the aorta serve as important landmarks for the transverse aortic incision. Trimming the aorta just below the takeoff of the first brachiocephalic artery is advisable. Inclusion of this vessel in the trimmed aortic root typically leads to a leakage of KHB, and loss of aortic root pressure upon transitioning into working heart mode.
Another technically challenging aspect of cannulation is the left atrial cannulation. Although it is feasible to cannulate the left atrial appendage, we found that the cannula frequently gets stuck within the appendage, and does not pass easily into the body of the left atrium. Thus, we prefer to make the incision in the body of the left atrium, approximately 2 mm superior to the atrioventricular groove. It is important to position the left atrial cannula in the proper plane before insertion in order to avoid tearing the thin-walled atrium when securing the cannula.
We found that the ideal size of the left atrium incision was approximately 3 mm. Creating too small of an incision may also make the placement of the left atrial cannula more difficult, and may lead to tearing of the left atrium. We use a straight, 8 mm, beveled piece of oxygen-impermeable tubing (inner diameter 2.9 mm) on the left atrial block. We have found that using this, rather than a cannula with a beveled edge, leads to most consistent atrial cannulation and facilitates the process of securing the left atrial block. Regardless of the tubing used, it is important to ensure that the end of the tubing is not occluded by the atrial septum or the mitral valve (as depicted above, we found that the left atrial pressure tracing was helpful in this regard), as even subtle movement of the atrial cannula can significantly alter left ventricular preload and resulting hemodynamic measurements. For the same reason, it is important to ensure that the left atrium does not leak following after opening the left atrial block. It is important regardless of the type of tubing used to ensure that the tubing within this system is oxygen impermeable to ensure adequate oxygen delivery to the heart.
Another technically challenging aspect of the procedure was the placement of the pressure-volume (PV) catheter. We initially favored a retrograde placement of the catheter through the aortic block. Though technically feasible, we found it to be much simpler and expedient to place the PV catheter via transapical puncture. Care must be taken to monitor the position of the catheter throughout the duration of the experiment, as at times the catheter may move in or out of the left ventricle. This can be done by monitoring the pressure and volume tracings over time.
Finally, care should be taken to ensure that KHB solution is created fresh for each experiment. It is possible to weigh out the constituents of KHB and store them in conical tubes in powdered form ahead of time. On the day of experimentation, these may be mixed with sterile, filtered water, carbon dioxide/oxygen, and then calcium added to the mixture. It is also important to wash the system with enzyme active powdered detergent such as Tergazyme (or similar) and replace the perfusate filter regularly.
Several limitations of this experimental preparation should be noted. First, similar to all crystalloid-perfused Langendorff preparations, KHB and other asanguinous perfusates have a significantly diminished oxygen carrying capacity relative to blood. Although this is partially compensated for through coronary vasodilation and supraphysiologic coronary flow, the preparation is not entirely physiologic for this reason. Second, because of the nearly infinite compliance of the Windkessel chamber used in this instrument, the systolic and diastolic pressures are only minimally separated (see Figure 2A) and thus the coronary perfusion pressure is non-physiologic. This may be overcome in future models by incorporating an elastance component to the afterload block. Third, as with all isolated heart preparations, the heart undergoes a defined period (2 - 3 min) of warm ischemia which is likely to create myocardial injury or dysfunction. Minimizing this injury through practice of the technique is of utmost importance to representative results. Further, although necessary for animal welfare, inhaled anesthetics may serve as a myocardial suppressant early in the reperfusion process, though it is expected that this effect is quickly abolished as the heart is reperfused with KHB.
The working heart system described allows for a wide variety of physiologic investigations relevant to patient care, research and teaching. With a few additional modifications, the system can also be used to simulate important physiology relevant to congenital heart disease, including pulmonary hypertension and single ventricle physiology. Limitations include that it is an ex vivo preparation, that the heart is being perfused by a buffer instead of a higher-oxygen content blood.