A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Taste Preference Assay for Adult Drosophila

9.5K views

DOI:

10.3791/54403

September 8th, 2016

 , 

Corresponding Authors: Charles R. Tessier <crtessie@iupui.edu>

In This Article

Summary

Taste is an important sensory process which facilitates attraction to beneficial substances and avoidance of toxic substances. This protocol describes a simple ingestion assay for determining Drosophila gustatory preference for a given chemical compound.

Abstract

Olfactory and gustatory perception of the environment is vital for animal survival. The most obvious application of these chemosenses is to be able to distinguish good food sources from potentially dangerous food sources. Gustation requires physical contact with a chemical compound which is able to signal through taste receptors that are expressed on the surface of neurons. In insects, these gustatory neurons can be located across the animal's body allowing taste to play an important role in many different behaviors. Insects typically prefer compounds containing sugars, while compounds that are considered bitter tasting are avoided. Given the basic biological importance of taste, there is intense interest in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying this sensory modality. We describe an adult Drosophila taste assay which reflects the preference of the animals for a given tastant compound. This assay may be applied to animals of any genetic background to examine the taste preference for a desired soluble compound.

Introduction

Animals use chemosensation to distinguish advantageous conditions apart from disadvantageous conditions. This perception can be critical for such things as determining the best food source, avoiding toxic substances or determining the best mating partner1. Chemosensation is often divided into two sensory components: olfactory senses and gustatory senses. A main distinguishing characteristic of these senses is that olfaction (smell) is used to sample the surrounding gaseous chemical environment while gustation (taste) requires physical contact with a nonvolatile substrate. Both sensory modalities stimulate neurological responses which are processed and decod....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Starvation

  1. Prepare fly starvation vials by saturating a cotton ball with 18.2 MΩ water at the bottom of a standard fly vial. Alternatively, similarly saturate a small strip of filter paper with 18.2 MΩ water and place at an angle within the vial.
  2. Collect flies into sets of ~100 animals on a CO2 pad and then add the flies to a prepared vial.
    Note: Best results are obtained with animals that are less than 5 days old. However, the exact age of the animals can be controlled as an experimental variable to determine changes in taste preference over time.
  3. Use a cotton ball or foam stopper to secure the vials clos....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Some typical results from taste preference assays are shown below. In most experiments some variation in intensity of abdominal coloring will be seen (Figure 1). Any coloring in the abdomen whether intense or weak is considered a positive ingestion. It is therefore advisable for researchers to score animals while blind to the experimental condition so as to limit any potential biases.

It is also important to cho.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

We have described a simple but effective protocol for determining taste preference in Drosophila. Versions of this assay are routinely used in experiments to determine the contributions of gustatory receptors (GRs) to perceiving the different qualities (bitter, sweet, sour, salty, and umami) of taste compounds. The Drosophila genome contains approximately 60 genes which encode 68 identified gustatory receptors by alternative splicing8,9. However, other proteins such as ionotropic glutamate re.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank members of the Tessier lab for critical reading of this manuscript and helpful suggestions during the preparation of this protocol.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Blue Food Coloring (Water, Propylene Glycol, FD&C Blue 1 and Red 40, Propylparaben)McCormickN/A
Cryo/Freezer Boxes w/o DividersFisher03-395-455
Dumont #5 ForcepsFine Science Tools11251-20
Glacial Acetic AcidFisherBP2401-500
Leica S6 E Stereozoom 0.63X-4.0X microscopeW. Nuhsbaum, Inc.10446294
Petri dish (100 mm x 15 mm)BD Falcon351029Reuseable if thoroughly washed and dried
Quick-Snap MicrotubesAlkali Scientific Inc.C3017
Red Food Coloring (Water, Propylene Glycol, FD&C Reds 40 and 3, Propylparaben)McCormickN/A
SucroseIBI ScientificIB37160

References

  1. Herrero, P. Fruit fly behavior in response to chemosensory signals. Peptides. 38 (2), 228-237 (2012).
  2. Vosshall, L. B., Stocker, R. F. Molecular architecture of smell and taste in Drosophila. Annu Rev Neurosci. 30, 505-533 (2007).
  3. Harris, D. T., Kallman, B. R., Mullane....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Drosophila Taste AssayTaste Preference TestSucrose Concentration AnalysisFood Coloring QuantificationCO2 Anesthesia MethodPetri Dish SetupIncubator Environmental ControlFreezer Storage TechniqueDissection Microscope ObservationAbdomen Color Grouping