The protocol described here shows how to culture SGN explants on MEA and assess SGN activity by extracellular non-invasive recordings. This platform and the protocol we have recently developed 5 allow for identification of novel stimulation protocols and electrode materials resulting in reduced energy requirements to activate SGN, with potential interest for further implementation of cochlear implants and other neuro-prosthetics. Several precautions in the presented procedure are fundamental for the accomplishment of accurate and reproducible experiments.
Careful dissection of the spiral ganglion and further handling of the primary tissue requires particular caution. These experiments have been performed using C57/Bl6 mice between 5 and 7 days old. Similar results were obtained using Wistar rats in the same age range, (data not shown). We believe this is the best age for fine dissection as the cochlear bone is still soft enough for easy removal by forceps, and the spiral ganglion and organ of Corti can be easily separated without rupturing dendrite processes or SGN somas. At earlier ages the tissue is too soft and the chances to rip the SGN somas together with the organ of Corti is higher, while at later stages, the hardening of the bony capsule of the cochlea increases the risk of damaging the tissue while dissecting. Proper isolation of the SG as well as careful cutting of the explants is critical. These should be in the range of 200-500 µm in size to maximize attachment to the MEA surface and to have sufficient number of SG somas in the explants, from which neurites will regrow. To increase neurotrophic support in the initial days of culture, fresh BDNF is added daily and the organ of Corti is placed in co-culture.
The speed of dissection is also important. All steps should be performed swiftly and using ice cold solutions in order to minimize tissue deterioration. The time between euthanasia and placing the explant on the MEA should be between 10-15 min and is crucial for successful cultures. Have all tools ready, to avoid delays in culture plating.
All steps, including fine dissection, maintenance of the culture and preparation of medium and equipment are performed under sterile conditions. When coating the MEA with the ECM solution it is important to thaw it on ice and to use ice-cold pipette tips and ice-cold medium as the ECM mix gels at higher temperatures. When placing the explants on MEAs, first add the medium to the electrode areas, subsequently place the explants. If the medium is added in a second step, explants tend to detach from the MEA due to shearing stress. Because small volumes of medium are applied to the culture in first 5 days, evaporation of the culture medium has to be minimized. Therefore it is highly recommended to create a humidified chamber using small petri dishes containing PBS in close proximity to the MEAs.
The experiments described here were performed using commercially available MEA electrodes with specific electrode dimensions, coating materials and intra electrode distance (as described in point 2, Note). The culture conditions have been optimized here in order to maximize neuronal coverage of the specific electrode grid design. It is possible that other configurations of electrode spacing, geometries and surfaces may require different coatings or cell densities. These steps may require initial troubleshooting in order to achieve high-density cultures.
Concerning the electrophysiological recordings, before starting the recordings the culture is transferred from culture medium at 37 °C to extracellular solution at RT. In order to avoid unstable recordings, wait for approximately 10 min to allow the culture to stabilize. When stimulating the culture, particular caution should be used in selecting the stimulus as large amplitudes (>3 V) and durations may cause damage to the culture. For a reference concerning stimulation pulse shapes and duration see reference 5.
For data acquisition and processing homemade hardware (recording chamber, connections to the amplifiers and amplifiers) were used and specific analysis programs were selected (see Material Table, point 7). However, other commercial MEA setups and other software packages are suited as well for these operations. We have previously assessed the responses of our cultures at 3 different time points and showed an increased activity with prolonged culture time 5. Here we suggest 18 days in vitro for recordings. MEA systems allowing for continuous recordings in sterile, humidified chambers, could facilitate the identification of the optimal time points for each culture type.
A major drawback of this bioassay is the high variation in the number of electrodes per culture that show responses to stimulation. This rate of responses to stimulation mainly depends on four factors: the density of the neurites in the culture, the contacts between the neurites and the electrodes, the diameter of the neurites or neurites bundles, and the impedance of the electrodes. Regarding the neurite density, only neurites that grow over at least two electrodes can be used for stimulation experiments. The contact between neurites and electrodes depends on the surrounding tissue that can on the one hand isolate the neurites from the electrode, and thus worsen the contact, or, on the other hand, isolate the neurites and the electrode from the surrounding bath and thus improve the contact. Tissue density, as well as neurite size, are defined by the explant used and the culture conditions. Dissociated neuronal cultures have also been successfully tested but neuronal density in these cultures is much lower, resulting in a reduced number of recording electrodes. Therefore the cell culture should be adapted to the specific scientific question to be addressed.
Finally, the impedance of the electrodes is mainly given by the size and the surface of the electrodes. Materials, creating a large surface such as black platinum, as shown in Figure 3, decreasing the impedance of the electrodes may also improve the coupling between electrodes and neurites 7-9.
Strategies to improve the success rate of stimulation therefore include the optimization of the culture conditions, the increase of the number of total electrodes or electrodes density and the modulation of the electrode surface 10.
Up to now, electrophysiological characterization of SG neurons had been performed using patch clamp techniques. This allows for intracellular recordings of action potentials and detailed analysis of intracellular ionic currents from single neurons. Here we present an in vitro bioassay that can be used to study activity profiles of spiral ganglion neurons by analyzing spontaneous activity or responses to extracellular stimulation of many neurons simultaneously. Additionally, the interaction between electrode and spiral ganglion neurons can be studied and optimized by application of modified or new materials. Finally, even if not shown here, this platform can be used in combination with an external electrode, mounted on a micromanipulator as recently shown by our group 5, in order to study the relationship between the distance of the stimulating electrode and culture activity. All these novel aspects allow for the mimicking of key features of cochlear implant electrodes may lead to the design of novel prosthetic devices.
Our model is a very useful in vitro tool to investigate strategies to improve the efficacy of stimulation of auditory neurons and further optimize CI technology. Once the technique is mastered, one could envision screening for modification of a number of variables: a) different neuronal populations, b) different electrode materials/size/impedances c) perform chronic experiments to test material toxicity or electrode-stimulation induced toxicity, which could shed light on safer and more effective stimulation protocols by in vivo electrode arrays.