A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Novel Assay for Cold Nociception in Drosophila Larvae

7.2K views

DOI:

10.3791/55568

April 3rd, 2017

In This Article

Summary

Here we demonstrate a novel assay to study cold nociception in Drosophila larvae. This assay utilizes a custom-built Peltier probe capable of applying a focal noxious cold stimulus and results in quantifiable cold-specific behaviors. This technique will allow further cellular and molecular dissection of cold nociception.

Abstract

How organisms sense and respond to noxious temperatures is still poorly understood. Further, the mechanisms underlying sensitization of the sensory machinery, such as in patients experiencing peripheral neuropathy or injury-induced sensitization, are not well characterized. The genetically tractable Drosophila model has been used to study the cells and genes required for noxious heat detection, which has yielded multiple conserved genes of interest. Little is known however about the cells and receptors important for noxious cold sensing. Although, Drosophila does not survive prolonged exposure to cold temperatures (≤10 ºC), and will avoid cool, preferring warmer temperatures in behavioral preference assays, how they sense and possibly avoid noxious cold stimuli has only recently been investigated.

Here we describe and characterize the first noxious cold (≤10 ºC) behavioral assay in Drosophila. Using this tool and assay, we show an investigator how to qualitatively and quantitatively assess cold nociceptive behaviors. This can be done under normal/healthy culture conditions, or presumably in the context of disease, injury or sensitization. Further, this assay can be applied to larvae selected for desired genotypes, which might impact thermosensation, pain, or nociceptive sensitization. Given that pain is a highly conserved process, using this assay to further study thermal nociception will likely glean important understanding of pain processes in other species, including vertebrates.

Introduction

Drosophila has proven to be highly useful for the identification of novel conserved genes and neuronal circuits that underlie complex behaviors. Flies provide a sophisticated genetic toolkit and a simplified nervous system that allow for precise genetic and neuronal manipulation1,2,3,4 to dissect the cellular and molecular bases of nociception5,6,7. Larvae are particularly useful for these analyses, given that behavioral assays for gentle touch8,9,10, noxious heat11,12,13 and mechanical sensation of noxious stimuli4,11 have already been established, and the transparent larval cuticle allows for live or fixed imaging of the epidermis and underlying sensory neurons. Recently, an assay for noxious cold has also been developed7, which we describe in more detail here.

Using a fine, conical-tipped cold probe, we show that Drosophila larvae exhibit a set of cold-specific reactive behaviors, distinct from behaviors observed during normal locomotion, following gentle touch, or after harsh mechanical or high temperature stimuli7,8,11. The cold-specific behaviors include a robust full-body contraction (CT), a 45-90º raise of the posterior segments (PR) and a simultaneous raise of the anterior and posterior segments into a U-Shape (US). The prevalence of these behaviors increases with decreasing temperatures but each peaks at slightly different cold temperatures. Recent work suggests that CT responses are mediated by different peripheral sensory neurons than those that respond to noxious heat or harsh mechanical stimuli7.

Much like vertebrate nociceptors, Drosophila multiple dendritic (md) peripheral sensory neurons have complex dendritic structures that arborize over the epidermis1. md neurons are present in every larval body segment, projecting their axons to the ventral nerve cord14. md sensory neurons are separated into four different classes (I-IV) based on dendritic morphology and have varying sensory functions4,9,10,15,16,17. While class IV neurons are required for larval lateral body roll responses to high temperatures or harsh mechanical stimuli4, class III neurons are required for gentle touch responses9,10 and are not only activated by cold, but also are required for the cold-evoked behavioral responses7. Both class III and class IV neurons utilize discrete transient receptor potential (TRP) channels to facilitate behavioral responses to noxious7,11,18 and non-noxious stimuli9,10,17,19. Further, larval nociception is sensitized following injury, at the cellular20 and behavioral levels12,21.

The assay described here allows for the quantification of either normal, or potentially altered behavioral responses to cold temperatures ranging from noxious cold (≤ 10 ºC), innocuous cool (11-17 ºC), to ambient temperatures (18-22 ºC). The cold temperatures used in this assay are capable of directly activating class III sensory neurons, eliciting robust, reproducible calcium increases and cold-evoked behavioral responses, which can be qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed7. This assay can be applied to larvae of virtually any genotype as well as to larvae exposed to diverse environmental conditions (altered nutrition, injury, pharmacological agents) to determine both genetic and environmental factors that impact cold nociception, nociceptive sensitization or nociceptive plasticity. Given that thermosensation is ubiquitous across many species, this assay provides a valuable tool for the study of nociception and may uncover novel gene targets or neuronal interactions that will improve our understanding of vertebrate nociception.

The custom-built cold probe (see cold probe, Table of Materials) utilizes a closed loop temperature controlled Peltier device, which cools the aluminum shaft and conical tip through thermal conduction. A thermistor is embedded inside the aluminum conical tip reports the real-time temperature on the control unit. A heat sink and fan are attached to the thermoelectric module to regulate the Peltier effect's heat load (Qc) so the desired temperature range of (22-0 °C) can be achieved (see Thermal Control Unit, Table of Materials). The noxious cold stimulus of the cold probe tip is applied by hand to the dorsal midline, to segment(s) equidistant from anterior and posterior ends (roughly segment A4, see Figure 1A) of the larva. In response to cold stimuli, larvae generally produce one of three cold-evoked behaviors within a 10 s cutoff: a full body contraction (CT), a 45-90º raise of anterior and posterior segments into a U-Shape (US), or a raise of the posterior segments (PR) (described in Results). None of these behaviors are performed during normal peristaltic locomotion or foraging behavior. These behaviors are also distinct from gentle touch responses and the aversive rolling response to high temperature or noxious mechanical stimuli.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Preparation of Larvae

  1. Raise stocks or genetic crosses in a 25 ºC incubator.
    1. If culturing a cross, use 20-25 virgin females and 15-20 males per vial containing regular cornmeal fly media. Allow females to lay eggs for approximately 48 h before transferring them to a new vial of food.
  2. 4-5 days after egg lay, collect 3rd instar larvae of the desired genotype by gently squirting a stream of water into the mushy food and larvae, and pour out the contents into a medium-sized, clean petri dish (60 mm x 15 mm).
  3. Next, gently sort larvae by size using forceps or a paintbrush to preclude larger "wandering 3rd instar" or small sickly larvae from being tested. Discard larvae containing any undesired genetic markers or balancers.
  4. Have a fellow lab member label dishes or containers where sorted larvae will be placed so that the experimenter can be "blind" to the experimental condition or genotype of the larvae if applicable. The experimenter can apply decoded labels to collected data after the experiment using a key generated by a lab-member.
  5. Using a scoopula, transfer a dime-sized amount of fresh food into a (35 mm x 10 mm or 60 mm x 15 mm) clean, labeled Petri dish filled half-way with room temperature water.
  6. Gently move the sorted larvae onto the food (to prevent starvation or desiccation if testing is anticipated to take more than 20 min) using forceps or paintbrush.

2. Cold Probe Assay

  1. Turn on the cold probe unit allowing a few min for it to cool to the desired temperature. If setting to lower temperatures, condensation will likely form along the probe.
  2. Wipe away any excess moisture with a laboratory wipe before application to the larva. When not in immediate use, place insulating cap on probe to both insulate and to keep the tip clean and prevent damage.
  3. Place a mid 3rd instar larva onto a thin piece of dark moveable vinyl (typically, use a small piece cut from a notebook binder) under a bright field microscope. The black vinyl aids in contrast visualization and in moving the larva without touching it to align it properly with the probe.
  4. Adjust the microscope (see Table of Materials) and light unit (see Table of Materials) to medium brightness (50-75% max brightness) to provide contrast and prevent the larva from drying out too quickly.
  5. Discard any larvae that do not first exhibit normal peristaltic locomotion as they could confound the results. The larva should be moist from the Petri dish of water otherwise the larva will stick to the vinyl inhibiting normal locomotion. Water should not puddle around the larva.
  6. Advance the probe by hand towards the larva at a 90º angle to the anteroposterior body axis, using the vinyl to move the larva into correct position (see Figure 1A).
  7. Orient the tip of the probe to gently lay across the mid dorsal surface of the larva with the probe at approximately a 45º angle to the microscope stage.
  8. Upon probe contact, start a laboratory timer. Apply enough downward pressure to slightly indent the surface of the larval cuticle while still allowing forward or backward movement.
  9. Hold the probe in place for up to 10 s or until a cold-evoked behavioral response is observed - whichever occurs first. Then remove the probe.
  10. Record the observed behavioral response and the response latency. Larvae that do not respond within 10 s are considered "non-responders". Latency can also be recorded for responders and used to measure changes in response robustness/amplitude.
  11. Discard larva and prepare the next.
  12. Repeat steps 2.3-2.11 until the desired number of test larvae is reached (three sets of n = 20-40 larvae were used here).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Drosophila larvae move with a peristaltic motion that includes occasional pauses, head turns, and changes in direction22. In response to focal application of a noxious cold stimulus however, larvae exhibit a set of unique behaviors, unlike the aversive lateral roll to noxious heat and mechanical stimuli. These behaviors are also different from responses to gentle touch8,9,

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The assay described here can be used to qualitatively and quantitatively assess nociception or nociceptive sensitization in larvae of various genetic backgrounds, environmental influences, and/or damage-induced conditions. Since this assay allows for focal application of a cold stimulus, with this tool one can assess the function of a subset of peripheral sensory neurons specifically in responding to cold temperatures. Interestingly, these cold-evoked behaviors seem to utilize different classes of sensory neurons th...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

A United States patent application (CL) is pending on the design of the cold probe. Additional information on details of cold probe part numbers and construction, as well as additional consulting on tool design will be provided upon request.

Acknowledgements

We thank Sarah Wu and Camille Graham for developing early phases of the cold probe assay, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for fly stocks, and Galko lab members for critically reading the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH NRSA (NIH F31NS083306) to HNT, and by NIH R01NS069828, R21NS087360 and a University of Texas MD Anderson Clark Fellowship in Basic Research to MJG.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Cold ProbePro-Dev EngineeringCustom-built on demandPart numbers and construction details can be provided on request
Thermal Control UnitTE TechnologyCustom Built enclosurePart numbers and construction details can be provided on request
Zeiss Stemi 2000 microscopeZeissNT55-605
Fiber-Lite MI-150 High Intensity IlluminatorDolan-Jenner Industries.A20500
Schott Dual Gooseneck 23 inch Fiber Optic Light GuideSchott North America, Inc.Schott A08575
ForcepsFSTFS-1670Used to sort and handle larvae. Be sure to smooth and blunt forceps tips slightly to lower the risk of accidently puncturing or injuring the larvae
PaintbrushDick Blick Art Materials06762-1002Used to sort and handle larvae. It is helpful if the paintbrush is damp during use.
35 mm x 10 mm Polystyrene Petri dishFalcon351008
60mm x 10 mm Polystyrene Petri dishFalcon351007
Piece of black vinyl (at least 2 inches x 2 inches)Used to provide contrast and orient larvae to the cold probe
Fisherbrand Scoopula SpatulaFisher Scientific14-357QUsed to move food
Kimtech Science KimwipesFisher Scientific06-666AUsed to dry the larvae and cold probe if there is excess moisture

References

  1. Grueber, W. B., Jan, L. Y., Jan, Y. N. Tiling of the Drosophila epidermis by multidendritic sensory neurons. Development. 129 (12), 2867-2878 (2002).
  2. Gao, F. B., Brenman, J. E., Jan, L. Y., Jan, Y. N. Genes regulating dendritic outgrowth, branching, and routing in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 13 (19), 2549-2561 (1999).
  3. Sweeney, S. T., Broadie, K., Keane, J., Niemann, H., O'Kane, C. J. Targeted expression of tetanus toxin light chain in Drosophila specifically eliminates synaptic transmission and causes behavioral defects. Neuron. 14 (2), 341-351 (1995).
  4. Hwang, R. Y., et al. Nociceptive neurons protect Drosophila larvae from parasitoid wasps. Curr Biol. 17 (24), 2105-2116 (2007).
  5. Im, S. H., Galko, M. J. Pokes, sunburn, and hot sauce: Drosophila as an emerging model for the biology of nociception. Dev Dyn. 241 (1), 16-26 (2012).
  6. Milinkeviciute, G., Gentile, C., Neely, G. G. Drosophila as a tool for studying the conserved genetics of pain. Clin Genet. 82 (4), 359-366 (2012).
  7. Turner, H. N., et al. The TRP Channels Pkd2, NompC, and Trpm Act in Cold-Sensing Neurons to Mediate Unique Aversive Behaviors to Noxious Cold in Drosophila. Curr Biol. , (2016).
  8. Kernan, M., Cowan, D., Zuker, C. Genetic dissection of mechanosensory transduction: mechanoreception-defective mutations of Drosophila. Neuron. 12 (6), 1195-1206 (1994).
  9. Tsubouchi, A., Caldwell, J. C., Tracey, W. D. Dendritic filopodia, Ripped Pocket, NOMPC, and NMDARs contribute to the sense of touch in Drosophila larvae. Curr Biol. 22 (22), 2124-2134 (2012).
  10. Yan, Z., et al. Drosophila NOMPC is a mechanotransduction channel subunit for gentle-touch sensation. Nature. 493 (7431), 221-225 (2013).
  11. Tracey, W. D. Jr, Wilson, R. I., Laurent, G., Benzer, S. painless, a Drosophila gene essential for nociception. Cell. 113 (2), 261-273 (2003).
  12. Babcock, D. T., Landry, C., Galko, M. J. Cytokine signaling mediates UV-induced nociceptive sensitization in Drosophila larvae. Curr Biol. 19 (10), 799-806 (2009).
  13. Chattopadhyay, A., Gilstrap, A. V., Galko, M. J. Local and global methods of assessing thermal nociception in Drosophila larvae. J Vis Exp. (63), e3837(2012).
  14. Grueber, W. B., et al. Projections of Drosophila multidendritic neurons in the central nervous system: links with peripheral dendrite morphology. Development. 134 (1), 55-64 (2007).
  15. Hughes, C. L., Thomas, J. B. A sensory feedback circuit coordinates muscle activity in Drosophila. Mol Cell Neurosci. 35 (2), 383-396 (2007).
  16. Zhong, L., Hwang, R. Y., Tracey, W. D. Pickpocket is a DEG/ENaC protein required for mechanical nociception in Drosophila larvae. Curr Biol. 20 (5), 429-434 (2010).
  17. Xiang, Y., et al. Light-avoidance-mediating photoreceptors tile the Drosophila larval body wall. Nature. 468 (7326), 921-926 (2010).
  18. Neely, G. G., et al. TrpA1 regulates thermal nociception in Drosophila. PLoS One. 6 (8), e24343(2011).
  19. Zhou, Y., Cameron, S., Chang, W. T., Rao, Y. Control of directional change after mechanical stimulation in Drosophila. Mol Brain. 5, 39(2012).
  20. Im, S. H., et al. Tachykinin acts upstream of autocrine Hedgehog signaling during nociceptive sensitization in Drosophila. Elife. 4, e10735(2015).
  21. Babcock, D. T., et al. Hedgehog signaling regulates nociceptive sensitization. Curr Biol. 21 (18), 1525-1533 (2011).
  22. Berrigan, D., Pepin, D. J. How Maggots Move - Allometry and Kinematics of Crawling in Larval Diptera. J. Insect Physiol. 41 (4), 329-337 (1995).
  23. Galko, M. J., Krasnow, M. A. Cellular and genetic analysis of wound healing in Drosophila larvae. PLoS Biol. 2 (8), E239(2004).
  24. Burra, S., Wang, Y., Brock, A. R., Galko, M. J. Using Drosophila larvae to study epidermal wound closure and inflammation. Methods Mol Biol. 1037, 449-461 (2013).
  25. Dar, A. C., Das, T. K., Shokat, K. M., Cagan, R. L. Chemical genetic discovery of targets and anti-targets for cancer polypharmacology. Nature. 486 (7401), 80-84 (2012).
  26. Pandey, U. B., Nichols, C. D. Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev. 63 (2), 411-436 (2011).
  27. Gill, R. D. Multistate life-tables and regression models. Math Popul Stud. 3 (4), 259-276 (1992).
  28. Mantel, N. Ranking procedures for arbitrarily restricted observation. Biometrics. 23 (1), 65-78 (1967).
  29. Breslow, N. A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Biometrika. 57 (3), 579-594 (1970).
  30. Gehan, E. A. A generalized wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika. 52, 203-223 (1965).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Noxious Cold AssayBehavioral ResponseCold ProbeThermal NociceptionGenetic AnalysisBehavioral AssaysGene ExpressionFluorescent Imaging