A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells

12.3K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/55903

⸱

June 16th, 2017

 ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

Recent advances in the ability to genetically manipulate somatic cell lines hold great potential for basic and applied research. Here, we present two approaches for CRISPR/Cas9 generated knockout production and screening in mammalian cell lines, with and without the use of selectable markers.

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering system has revolutionized biology by allowing for precise genome editing with little effort. Guided by a single guide RNA (sgRNA) that confers specificity, the Cas9 protein cleaves both DNA strands at the targeted locus. The DNA break can trigger either non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology directed repair (HDR). NHEJ can introduce small deletions or insertions which lead to frame-shift mutations, while HDR allows for larger and more precise perturbations. Here, we present protocols for generating knockout cell lines by coupling established CRISPR/Cas9 methods with two options for downstream selection/screening. The NHEJ approach uses a single sgRNA cut site and selection-independent screening, where protein production is assessed by dot immunoblot in a high-throughput manner. The HDR approach uses two sgRNA cut sites that span the gene of interest. Together with a provided HDR template, this method can achieve deletion of tens of kb, aided by the inserted selectable resistance marker. The appropriate applications and advantages of each method are discussed.

Introduction

Stable genetic alterations provide an advantage over transient methods of cellular perturbation, which can be variable in their efficiency and duration. Genomic editing has become increasingly common in recent years due to the development of target specific nucleases, such as zinc-finger nucleases1,2,3,4,5, transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs)6,7,8,9 and RNA-gu....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Identification of Homology Regions Around the Desired Deletion

NOTE: Only necessary if using selection-based editing.

  1. Select two regions, initially 1.5-2 kb, on either side of the desired deletion locus, which will serve as homology arms in the HDR template (Figure 1A). Identify regions that lack BsaI recognition sites on either strand (GGTCTC) to facilitate cloning. If BsaI sites are unavoidable, use an alternate type IIs restriction enzyme (BsmBI, SapI, BbsI) and modify the corresponding sites in the recipient plasmid (pUC19-BsaI), resistance marker donor plasmid (pGolden-Neo or pGolden-Hygro),....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

For the generation of ELAVL1 knockout lines, a robust antibody was available, so editing using single sgRNAs (Figure 1A, left) was performed, followed by dot immunoblot. Three sgRNAs were transfected independently to compare efficiencies and to rule out off target effects in the resulting clones. After collecting and blotting cell lysates from clonal populations onto two nitrocellulose membranes, the blots were probed for both ELAVL1 and PUM2 (as a normalizat.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has allowed for efficient generation of stable genomic modifications, which provide a more consistent alternative to other transient manipulation methods. Here, we have presented two methods for rapid identification of CRISPR/Cas9 gene knockouts in mammalian cell lines. Both methods require little cellular material, so testing can be done in early stages of clonal culture, saving time and reagents. To increase the efficiency of both methods, we recommend testing multiple sgRNAs, as efficiencies var.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Gissell Sanchez, Megan Lee, and Jason Estep for experimental assistance, and Weifeng Gu and Xuemei Chen for sharing reagents.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Competent E. coli cells
plasmid prep kit
pSpCas9(BB) plasmidAddgene42230Ran et al. 2013, cloning sgRNAs
BbsI enzymeThermoFisherFD1014Ran et al. 2013, cloning sgRNAs
T7 DNA ligaseNEBM0318LRan et al. 2013, cloning sgRNAs
Tango BufferThermoFisherBY5Ran et al. 2013, cloning sgRNAs
PlasmidSafe exonucleaseEpicentreE3105KRan et al. 2013, cloning sgRNAs
Q5 hot start high fidelity polymeraseNEBM0494AHA amplification
pUC19-BsaIModified pUC19 plasmid, mutated existing BsaI site and inserted two outward facing BsaI sites after BamHI/EcoRI digestion
pGolden-NeoAddgene51422Resistance cassette
pGolden-HygroAddgene51423Resistance cassette
BsaI enzymeNEBR3535SHomology arm contruction
T7 DNA ligaseNEBM0318L
PlasmidSafe exonucleaseEpicentreE3105K
Toothpicksbacterial PCR
Taq polymerasebacterial colony PCR
HEK293 human cells
DMEMCorning10-013-CV
FBSCorningMT35010CV
Penicillin-Strep (opt.)Gibco15140-122
6 well platesBioLite12556004
TransIT-LTI Transfection ReagentMirusMIR2300for lipofection only
Opti-MEMThermoFisher31985062for lipofection only
G418 (Neomycin)Sigma AldrichA1720-5G
HygromycinSigma AldrichH3274-250MG
96 well platesThermoFisher12556008
Passive Lysis Buffer, 5xPromega
1x SDS loading bufferrecipe decribed in protocol
Nitrocellulose MembraneBio-Rad162-0115
TBSTrecipe decribed in protocol
Dehydrated milk
SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration SubstrateThermoFisher34075for HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies
Extracta DNA prep for PCRQuantabio95091-025
KOD polymeraseNovagen71316

References

  1. Carroll, D. Genome engineering with zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics. 188 (4), 773-782 (2011).
  2. Kim, Y. G., Cha, J., Chandrasegaran, S. Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93 (3), 1156-1160 (1996).<....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Gene KnockoutNonhomologous End JoiningHomology Directed RepairDot ImmunoblotColony PCRClonal IsolationSerial DilutionDrug SelectionWestern Blot