This protocol streamlines the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke effectively, which leads to a significant reduction of process times. Interdisciplinary teamwork and communication are crucial for the success of this procedure. Regular team meetings including a review of achieved process times and the discussion of problems and potential solutions are important. All neuroradiologists, technicians, neurologists, anesthesiologists, and nurses involved have to be regularly trained to maintain good performance. Regular meetings and training should also focus on sustaining an increased awareness of the importance of swift reperfusion. It is conceivable that an increased sense of urgency could also have influenced EVT itself, as EVT duration was shorter after implementation of the first version of the SOP, independently from the devices used8. Potentially, the increased awareness of how important a swift reperfusion is for clinical outcomes motivated all the staff involved in EVT to perform the necessary steps faster. However, the effects of increased awareness are difficult to measure.
Primary imaging modalities used for the detection of early ischemic changes and the exclusion of intracranial hemorrhage in the proposed protocol are, respectively, FDCT and conventional CT. FDCTA and CTA, respectively, are used to identify LVO and to evaluate collateral status. However, the protocol can be modified so that patients who are not eligible for the one stop management approach receive a cerebral MRI scan for diagnosis. In addition to that, the 6 h cut-off value for the one stop management approach could be extended into the future. Preliminary results from the "Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) or Computerized Tomography Perfusion (CTP) Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention" (DAWN) trial19 suggest that selected stroke patients could benefit from EVT even though they were admitted to the hospital more than 6 hours after symptom onset20. Results from the currently ongoing "Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3" (DEFUSE 3) trial, which investigates EVT performed in patients 6–16 h after stroke onset, could provide further insight on this issue.
The SOP is designed for a comprehensive stroke center equipped with a latest generation angiography system allowing for high quality FDCT imaging and EVT. Primary stroke centers without the ability to perform EVT can follow the protocol according to Scenario B. If intracranial hemorrhage has been excluded with conventional non-enhanced CT, the administration of rtPA should be started in the primary stroke center. Then, the patient should be transferred to a comprehensive stroke center for EVT immediately under ongoing rtPA-therapy ("drip-and-ship").
The proposed protocol has some limitations. First, the reliable exclusion of hemorrhagic stroke with FDCT is required for implementing a one stop management approach. In the past, inaccurate detection of intracranial hemorrhage was the biggest hurdle in using FDCT for stroke diagnosis21,22. This situation seems to be improved when FDCT is performed with the latest generation of angiography systems23. Leyhe et al. reported not only high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of intracranial hemorrhage, but also demonstrated the feasibility of gray-white differentiation in the supratentorial region with the latest generation of FDCT24. However, the possibility of detecting infratentorial bleeding or perimesencephalic subarachnoidal hemorrhage with FDCT is still limited due to beam hardening artifacts and the low soft tissue resolution of FDCT25. Hence, a neuroradiologist with experience in evaluating FDCT images should carefully review the images for absence of intracranial hemorrhage and ultimately clear the patient for rtPA treatment. Considering these aspects, the proposed one stop management is limited to hospitals equipped with a latest generation angiography system and with staff experienced in interpretation of FDCT and FDCTA always available. Otherwise, the sole use of FDCT and FDCTA for reliably excluding hemorrhage and determining large artery occlusion carries the risk of misdiagnosis. Another limitation of FDCTA compared to a conventional CTA is that it covers the extracranial vessels to a lesser extent. While the extracranial carotid artery and the carotid bifurcation are covered, and can be evaluated, the aortic arch is not included at the moment, but will be in the future. The decreased door to reperfusion times we observed show that this potential issue does not lead to any major delays during the intervention. Finally, the protocol is tailored to the conditions in our hospital and may not work equally well in different settings. However, we think that a similar one stop approach can be implemented in other hospitals, despite structural differences.
Fast reperfusion is crucial for the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Every 30 min delay in time to reperfusion reduces the likelihood of achieving an independent level of functioning by 10%26. A recent meta-analysis of the five randomized trials that demonstrated the benefits of EVT showed that earlier treatment with EVT plus medical treatment was associated with a better outcome compared to medical treatment alone6. Hence, the Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable included the optimization of patient management in order to reduce time from hospital admission to reperfusion as one priority for future research in EVT27. Moreover, the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery suggested ideal time metrics for stroke processes28. The median time from hospital admission to groin puncture achieved with the revised SOP described above was within the suggested ideal of <60 min. Additionally, the median time from admission to reperfusion for patients managed with the one stop approach is largely within the ideal of <90 min. However, this ideal process time was not met in patients managed with the initial approach including conventional CT, CTA and CTP, as the median time from admission to reperfusion was 106 min in this subgroup.
As the initial observations of a significant reduction of time hospital from admission to reperfusion with the streamlined protocol above are promising, a larger prospective trial to further evaluate this approach is currently being planned.