A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Effectiveness of the Air Stripping in Two Salmonid Fish, Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) and Brown Trout (Salmo Trutta Morpha fario)

7.6K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/56894

⸱

September 16th, 2018

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

The principal aim of this study is to standardize and test the pneumatic method (air stripping) of collecting eggs in rainbow trout and brown trout. This method allows effective and simple collection of the eggs without the necessity of fish abdomen massage.

Abstract

Egg collection is one of the most crucial procedures during fish reproduction in salmonid hatcheries. Classic methods involve the use of hand massage on fish abdomens to expel the eggs. An alternative method uses the pressure of gas injected into the body cavity, which causes the subsequent release of the eggs. This method is believed to have less negative effects on both the welfare and egg quality of the broodstocks. Herein, we compare the results of air and hand stripping methods with respect to one-year survival and egg quantity and quality in two salmonid fish, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and brown trout (Salmo trutta morpha fario). Our results indicate that air stripping yielded a better quality of eggs and higher one-year survival rate in rainbow trout. In addition, air stripping resulted in lower mortality rate than the group subjected to hand stripping (25% vs. 35%). The pH and hatching rate of the hand stripped group was lower than those of the air stripped group. In the case of brown trout, the quality of eggs obtained by both hand and air-stripping methods was similar; however, the one-year losses in fish were higher in air stripped group (15% compared to 0% in hand stripped fish). Although the advantages of air stripping method over hand stripping in terms of egg quality might not be observed in all salmonid species, the air-stripping procedure might be a promising option to be adopted in hatcheries as it ensures a high level of reproducibility and efficiency.

Introduction

The rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and brown trout (Salmo trutta morpha fario) belong to the Salmonidae family of Salmoniformes1. The production of these two species in global aquaculture has gained rapid growth, owing to their commercial and recreational importance. In Poland, production of salmonid fish stands at around 20 000 tonnes, with rainbow trout being the dominant species. On the other hand, the brown trout represents a major source of freshwater fish resources in Europe because of its commercial value in aquaculture and importance for angling. In many aquatic ecosystems, the existence....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Procedures were carried out in accordance with the Local Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments in Olsztyn, Poland.

1.Equipment Preparation

  1. Use a syringe and needle for injection of the gas into the fish body cavity.
  2. Set the gas pressure at 0.5 bar, and maintain this pressure to be below 1 bar throughout.
  3. Control the air flow. For the salmonid fish, 1.5 L/min is the most efficient speed of gas exhaustion. Maintain the optimum speed because higher speed might not obtain all the eggs while a slower speed might unnecessarily prolong the procedure.
  4. Connect the syringe with a screwed needle (0.8-1....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Mature males and females of rainbow trout (age 2+, 1700 ± 328 g) and brown trout (age 3+, 1900 ± 435 g) were obtained from the Salmonid Fish Hatchery (Rutki-Żukowo, Inland Fishery Institute in Olsztyn, Poland). The males and females were placed in separate tanks with a volume of about 5 m3. The water temperature was 12±1 °C. Before manipulation, fish were anesthetized with 0.2% Propiscin. The fish were divided into two groups. Part of them underwent a traditional m.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The pneumatic method of egg collection from fish, although more time-consuming than the traditional method (hand stripping), can secure a high quality of matured oocytes (this work). This is related to the low risk of mechanical disruption of the eggs while applying this procedure. High pH of the ovary fluid, as well as an increase in the fertilization rate, attest to the usefulness of the pneumatic method. Overall, the air stripping method of egg collection in fish reproduction could be a promising option in terms of st.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The presented study was supported by Project "Pneumatic method of fish stripping - possible application, influence on the gametes' quality and quantity and the welfare of fish" (acronym: PNEUFISH) financed under "Operational Program Development of the Fisheries Sector and Coastal Areas 2007-2013" (OR-61724-OR1400001/10), funds appropriated to Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research Polish Academy of Sciences, Olsztyn, Poland, and support by COST Office (Food and Agriculture COST Action FA1205: AQUAGAMETE). We would like to thank, Stanley Ifeanyi Ugwu for great support in English editing. We want to acknowledge also the animation producers "Studio Filmowe Ru....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Glycine pure P.A.AVANTOR527560117sperm activating buffer
Trizma baseSigma AldrichT1503sperm activating buffer
Sodium chloride BioreagentSigma AldrichS5886sperm activating buffer
Calcium chloride anhydrousSigma AldrichC4901sperm activating buffer
Propiscin (0.2% etomidate solution)IRS Olsztyn, Polandnot indicated
compressorThomas  Sheboigan WI USA DT/SR 070800001882
reduction valveCamozzi cRJUS U7J
air hoseZEC T.P.U. SH.98 
syrgineEFD7012118
Air spawning stageBiopasz, PolandPNEU001
Orion Ross Ultra electrodeThermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA8102BNUWP

References

  1. Nelson, J. S. Fishes of the World. , 4th, JohnWiley and Sons, Inc. Hoboken, NJ, USA. (2006).
  2. García-Marín, J. L., Sanz, N., Pla, C. Proportions of native and introduced brown trout in adjacent fished and unfished Spanish rivers. Conservation Biology. 12, 313-319 (1998).
  3. Dietrich, G. J., Wojtczak, M., Slowinska, M., Dobosz, S., Kuzminski, H., Ciereszko, A.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Hand StrippingEgg CollectionGas PressureFish SpawningEgg QualityOne-Year Survival