Method Article

Measuring Active and Passive Tameness Separately in Mice

DOI:

10.3791/58048

August 10th, 2018

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Tameness in animals includes a reduction of avoidance responses to humans (passive tameness) and an increase in active approaches to humans (active tameness). Here, we describe detailed protocols for three behavioral tests (active tameness, passive tameness, and stay-on-hand tests) to separately measure the active and passive tameness of mice.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Domesticated animals such as dogs and laboratory mice show a high level of tameness, which is important for humans to handle them easily. Tameness has two behavioral components: a reluctance to avoid humans (passive tameness) and a motivation to approach humans (active tameness). To quantify these components in mice, we previously developed behavioral tests for active tameness, passive tameness, and the willingness to stay on a human hand, each designed to be completed within 3 min. The data obtained were used for selective breeding, with a large number of mice analyzed per generation. The active tameness test measures the movement of the mouse toward a human hand and the contact it engages in. The passive tameness test measures the duration of time that a mouse tolerates human touch. In the stay-on-hand test, a mouse is placed on a human hand and touched slowly using the thumb of that hand; the duration of time that the animal remains on the hand is measured. Here, we describe the test set-up and apparatus, explain the procedures, and discuss the appropriate data analysis. Finally, we explain how to interpret the results.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Selective breeding during domestication has changed the characteristics of domesticated animals to make them better adapted for living with humans1,2,3. "Tameness" is a common behavioral trait observed in domesticated animals. The studies of selective breeding for tameness in animals reveal how their phenotypes have changed in the course of domestication. In a famous study, foxes were selectively bred for tameness and a group of foxes that exhibited a high level of tameness was established2. The foxes also showed other phenotype changes involving morphology, reproduction, coat color, and physiological traits. Selective breeding for tameness in mice, a popular laboratory animal, can help reveal the mechanism underlying the change in a variety of phenotypes during domestication.

Tameness has two behavioral components: active approaches to humans (active tameness) and a reduction in the avoidance of humans (passive tameness)4. In a previous study, we established three behavioral tests to characterize the tameness levels in mice: active tameness, passive tameness, and stay-on-hand tests5. The first test was designed to quantify a mouse's active tameness by measuring the latency of its spontaneous approach toward a human and the time it spent in contact with a human hand. The second test was designed to quantify passive tameness by measuring how long a mouse tolerated being touched by a human hand. The stay-on-hand test was intended to quantify behavioral avoidance of being stroked mildly by a human hand. These three assessments require only an open-field apparatus, a digital camera, and a large pair of tweezers. They can be completed sequentially within 3 min, enabling a large quantity of data to be collected per day.

In the previous study, we characterized and compared tameness behaviors using a series of inbred mouse strains: 10 wild strains, one Japanese fancy mouse-derived strain, and six laboratory strains5. Most domesticated strains showed a significantly higher passive tameness than wild strains, but the active tameness did not differ between the two groups. From these results, we concluded that the domesticated mice that are the founders of laboratory strains were predominantly selected for their passive tameness, but not for active tameness, in their breeding history.

We next conducted selective breeding with eight wild mouse strains to generate a genetically heterogeneous population6. We chose the animals that scored high on the active tameness test and successfully increased their active tameness in successive generations, compared with a control group. This outcome indicated that the tests reliably measure the tameness in mice.

Here, we describe the comprehensive method for measuring behavioral indices using the three behavioral tests. First, we explain the set-up and necessary apparatus. Next, we detail the step-by-step procedure for running the experiments, collecting data through video, and analyzing said data using freeware that we developed. Finally, we show representative results comparing the pool of selectively bred mice with a control group.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines for animal experiments from the National Institute of Genetics (NIG), and all procedures were approved by the NIG Committee for Animal Care and Use (approval no. 26-9).

1. Animals

  1. Selective breeding
    1. Create wild-derived heterogeneous stock (WHS)6 mice by crossing 8 inbred strains (MSM, HMI, BLG2, PGN2, KJR, CHD, NJL, and BFM/2) while avoiding any inbreeding (mating between siblings or cousins)7. Conduct a selective breeding, starting in the third generation (G3), by selecting mice that display longer “contact time” (selected group, 16 families of mating pairs) according to the active tameness test (see step 3.1).
    2. Generate the non-selected control group (also 16 families of mating pairs) via random mating from G3 onward. For a representative experiment, use mice obtained from selected (S1) and non-selected (C1) groups of WHS mice to show the pattern of both active and passive tameness using the three tameness tests (see step 3.1 - 3.3). For the experiments, use 10 G15 mice per group (S1 and C1).
  2. Representative subject animals
    1. Wean all mice from their parents at 3 weeks of age and house them in same-sex groups with littermates, using standard-size plastic cages containing wood chips, until the test. Maintain all animals at an NIG animal facility under a 12/12 h light/dark cycle (lights on from 06:00 to 18:00) and a constant temperature (23 ± 2 °C).
    2. Ensure that food and water are available ad libitum. Test the mice at 6 weeks of age during the light period to analyze their interactions with humans during the part of the day when humans are typically active.
  3. Handling protocol
    1. Use large tweezers covered with silicon tubes to transfer the mice to new cages by picking them up gently by their tails. Use the tweezers to separate them from their parents at weaning and move them during the experiments. None of the mice should receive handling before the tameness tests.
    2. Transfer the mice to an experimental room just before the tameness tests.
    3. Keep the male mice separated from one another after the test, to avoid inter-male aggression in WHS mice.

2. Equipment

  1. Use an open-field apparatus (400 x 400 x 400 mm, grayish polyvinylchloride).
  2. Illuminate the open field using a clip light with a neutral white bulb (100 lux) fixed at a height of 450 mm above the open field (Figure 1).
  3. Record all behaviors using a commercially available compact digital camera fixed at 850 mm above the open field using a tripod (Figure 1).
  4. Wear cloth gloves under latex gloves to protect the hands from being bitten at during the passive tameness test (a rare reaction).
  5. Measure the test period using a stopwatch.

3. Tests

Note: The first two tests (active tameness and passive tameness) were conducted for 1 min each, and the stay-on-hand test was conducted for less than 1 min. All three tests were conducted in the open-field apparatus and recorded using a digital camera. Iodophore disinfection procedure should be performed on all apparats before any behavior studies.

  1. Procedures for active tameness test
    1. Turn on the digital camera and start recording.
    2. Pick up a mouse gently by the tail using a pair of large tweezers (see step 1.3.1) and transfer it from the home cage to the center of the open-field apparatus.
    3. Start the stopwatch.
    4. Place the left hand on the lower left corner of the apparatus.
    5. Keep the palm facing up and move the fingers slowly and steadily to ensure that the mouse connects the hand to a human. The average time to move all four fingers from the little finger to the index finger should be approximately 0.5 s, with a continuously repeated movement cycle.
    6. Move the hand toward the mouse slowly, at an average speed of about 13 cm/s, stopping at 10 cm from the side of the mouse’s body.
    7. Maintain the same distance if the mouse attempts to move away. If the mouse approaches, keep the hand in the same position and continue to move the fingers slightly. If the mouse attempts to climb up the arm, return it to the field using the free hand.
    8. Conclude the test after 1 min, withdraw the hand, and proceed to the passive tameness test.
  2. Procedures for passive tameness test
    1. Follow the same steps as for the active tameness test, but instead of stopping 10 cm away from the mouse’s body, slowly touch the mouse with the fingertips.
    2. Leave the fingers in the same position, contacting the mouse, until the mouse moves away. When the mouse attempts to break contact, follow it, moving at an average speed of about 23 cm/s, and reinitiate the touch.
    3. Conclude the test after 1 min. Restart the stopwatch immediately to begin the stay-on-hand test.
  3. Procedures for stay-on-hand test
    1. Lift the mouse by the tail using a pair of large tweezers and place it gently on the left palm. Keep the hand close to the floor of the open-field apparatus.
    2. Stroke the mouse gently at an average speed of 0.5 s/stroke using the left thumb until it leaves the hand.
    3. Repeat steps 3.3.1 - 3.3.2 3x.
    4. After the third trial, stop the video recording; all tameness tests are now concluded.
  4. Post-experimental procedures
    1. Weigh the mouse and count the number of feces and urine left in the open field.
    2. Mark the mouse individually via an ear punch.
    3. Wipe the apparatus and experimenter gloves with a paper towel soaked in 0.2% Iodophor sanitizer.
    4. Clean the apparatus with a dry paper towel.

4. Behavioral analyses

Note: Video recordings were scored using tanaMove version 0.01 (Windows 7), event-recording software for behavioral analyses (Figure 2). The software is freely available (Supplemental Materials 1) and from our website (http://www.mgrl-lab.jp/MGRL_software.html). An individual who was blind to the test conditions scored all footage. The duration of all behavioral indices was measured in 0.1-s increments. During the scoring, the observer pressed the appropriate letter on the keyboard (see step 4.1) upon noting a given behavior.

  1. Assignment of keys for video analysis
    1. Assign keys for each behavior index. Using appropriate keys for each behavioral index is critical to summarize the data automatically in step 4.3.
      Note: The assignments used in this study are shown in Figure 3.
  2. Video analysis
    1. Analyze each video recording 3x for different behavioral indices (Figure 3B). Self-grooming behavior was not scored. Make sure the built-in speaker of the computer is switched on in order to hear the timer sound in the video.
    2. Launch tanaMove.
    3. Drag and drop the video file to be analyzed into the window of tanaMove. Confirm that the file is loaded and that the path and name of the outputted CSV file in the Data File [.csv] box is correct.
    4. Click the Ready button. This activates a new window to enter the assigned keys.
    5. Click the Play button to start the video file. Click the Stop button to pause the video file.
    6. Press key A when the mouse is observed “heading” toward or approaching the hand, including standing to sniff. Press key R when the mouse is observed “locomoting” without heading toward the hand during the active tameness test.
    7. Press key W for at least 0.3 s (at least three intervals in the window) when the timer sound is heard at 60 s.
    8. Initiate the analysis of the passive tameness test after the left hand enters the video. Press key A when the mouse is observed heading toward or approaching the hand and key R when the mouse is observed traveling without heading toward the hand during the passive tameness test.
    9. Press key W for at least 0.3 s (at least three intervals in the window) when the timer sound is heard at 60 s.
    10. Press key T when the mouse is observed “staying” on the hand in the stay-on-hand test.
    11. After the stay-on-hand test, click the Stop button to stop the video observation.
    12. Click the Back button and type a new file name for the CSV data output.
    13. Click the Ready button to activate a new window to enter the assigned keys.
    14. Click the Play button to restart the video footage and initiate the observation of the active tameness test.
    15. Press key T when the mouse is observed “contacting” the human, which includes all voluntary contacting behavior but not accidental contacts, such as landing on a palm after jumping, during the active tameness test.
    16. Press key W for at least 0.3 s (at least three intervals in the window) when the timer sound is heard at 60 s.
    17. Press key T when the mouse allows the experimenter to touch its body during the passive tameness test.
    18. Press key W for at least 0.3 s (at least three intervals in the window) when the timer sound is heard at 60 s.
    19. Click the Stop button to stop the video.
    20. Click the Back button and type a new file name for the CSV data output.
    21. Click the Ready button to activate a new window to enter the assigned keys.
    22. Click the Play button to restart the video footage and initiate the observation of the active tameness test.
    23. Press key J when the mouse is observed “jumping” during the active tameness test.
    24. Press key W for at least 0.3 s (at least three intervals in the window) when the timer sound is heard at 60 s. Then start the observation of the passive tameness test.
    25. Press key J when the mouse is observed “jumping” during the passive tameness test.
    26. Click the Stop button to stop the video observation when the timer sound is heard at 60 s.
    27. Click the Back button and type a new file name for the CSV data output.
  3. Summarize the data
    1. Save all the raw data files (CSV) in the same folder with the Supplementary 2.xlsm file (Supplemental Materials 2).
    2. Open the Supplementary 2.xlsm file and click the Summarize button.
    3. Save the results as a separate file and use it for further analysis of the tameness behavior.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We previously conducted selective breeding for active tameness in miceandsuccessfully produced mice that showed a high level of active tameness6. The representative results of the tameness tests for the selected and non-selected groups of mice at the 15th generation (G15) are shown in Figure 4. Mice from the selected group scored higher on the active tameness test, exhibiting a significantly longer duration of contact with a...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The representative results cover nine behavioral indices from the active tameness, passive tameness, and stay-on-hand tests. A comparison of the scores between the selected and control groups revealed clear differences in tameness. These results show that the three tests are valid for measuring tameness in mice.

Tameness levels in animals can be difficult to quantify empirically. Several methods have been developed for evaluating tameness in deer, mice, and rats8,<...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) as follows: 15H05724, 16H01491, and 15H04289.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
open-field apparatusO’Hara & Co. Ltd.OF-3102400×400×400 mm, grayish polyvinylchloride
compact digital cameraRicoh Company, Ltd.CX-5production in the company is over
latex pure glovesAS ONEBioLab, IKG-8002
stopwatchSEIKOSSBJ018
Iodophor sanitizerEcolab G.K. (CLEA Japan)CL-4123Mikro Klene

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Albert, F. W., et al. Phenotypic differences in behavior, physiology and neurochemistry between rats selected for tameness and for defensive aggression towards humans. Hormones and Behavior. 53 (3), 413-421 (2008).
  2. Belyaev, D. K. Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. Journal of Heredity. 70 (5), 301-308 (1978).
  3. Trut, L. Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment. American Scientist. 87 (2), 160-169 (1999).
  4. Price, E. O. Animal Domestication and Behavior. , CABI Publishing. New York, NY. (2002).
  5. Goto, T., Tanave, A., Moriwaki, K., Shiroishi, T., Koide, T. Selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice. Genes, Brain and Behavior. 12 (8), 760-770 (2013).
  6. Matsumoto, Y., et al. Selective breeding and selection mapping using a novel wild-derived heterogeneous stock of mice revealed two closely linked loci for tameness. Scientific Reports. 7, 4607(2017).
  7. Koide, T., Goto, T., Takano-Shimizu, T. Genomic mixing to elucidate the genetic system of complex traits. Experimental Animals. 61 (5), 503-509 (2012).
  8. Albert, F. W., et al. Genetic architecture of tameness in a rat model of animal domestication. Genetics. 182 (2), 541-554 (2009).
  9. Cottle, C. A., Price, E. O. Effects of the nonagouti pelage-color allele on the behavior of captive wild Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 101 (4), 390-394 (1987).
  10. Hayssen, V. Effects of the nonagouti coat-color allele on behavior of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus): a comparison with Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 111 (4), 419-423 (1997).
  11. Arakawa, T., et al. A male-specific QTL for social interaction behavior in mice mapped with automated pattern detection by a hidden Markov model incorporated into newly developed freeware. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 234, 127-134 (2014).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Active TamenessMouse BehaviorTameness TestingBehavioral AnalysisVideo RecordingData AnalysisSelective BreedingStay On Hand TestTanaMove Software

Related Articles