$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common, age-related, progressive neurological disorders and one of the leading causes of death worldwide1,2. Learning, memory, and cognition impairment, along with neuropsychiatric disorders, are the common symptoms manifested in AD3. Although the etiology of AD has not been fully elucidated, the available genetic, biochemical, and experimental evidence indicates that gradual deposition of Aβ is a definitive biomarker for AD4. This misfolded protein accumulates in intracellular and extracellular spaces and is thought to be involved in synaptic loss, increased neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration in the cortical and hippocampal regions in brain affected by AD5. Therefore, histochemical detection of Aβ in AD tissue is a crucial first step in developing non-toxic, anti-amyloid drugs to prevent AD progression.
During the past few decades, several dyes and antibodies have been used by many research laboratories to label and image Aβ plaques in brain tissue, but some of these methods are time consuming and the dyes or antibodies used are expensive, requiring several accessory chemicals. Therefore, the development of an inexpensive means of detection of Aβ plaques in the AD brain would be a welcome new tool. Many laboratories started using Cur, a promising anti-amyloid natural polyphenol, for labeling and imaging Aβ, as well as a therapeutic agent for AD6,7,8,9. Its hydrophobicity and lypophilic nature, structural similarities with classical amyloid binding dyes, strong fluorescent activity, as well as strong affinity to bind with Aβ makes it an ideal fluorophore for labeling and imaging of Aβ plaques in AD tissue10. Cur binds with Aβ-plaques and oligomers and its presence is also detected in intracellular spaces7,11,12,13. In addition, it has been shown that minimal amounts (1−10 nM) of Cur can label Aβ plaques in 5x familial Alzheimer's disease (5xFAD) brain tissue7. Although the 1 nM concentration does not provide the optimal fluorescence intensity for counting of Aβ plaques, a 10 nM or higher concentration of Cur does. Ran and colleagues14 reported that doses as low as 0.2 nM of difluoroboron-derivatized Cur can detect in vivo Aβ deposits nearly as well as an infrared probe. Whether this dose is sufficient to label Aβ plaques in tissue is still not clear. Most previous studies have used 20−30 min for staining Aβ plaques using Cur, but optimal staining may require much less time.
The present study was designed to test the minimum time required by Cur to label Aβ plaques in AD brain tissue and to compare the sensitivity for labeling and imaging of Aβ plaques in brain tissue from the 5xFAD mice after staining with Cur with other conventional Aβ-binding dyes, such as Thioflavin-S (Thio-S), Congo red (CR), and Fluoro-jade C (FJC). The Aβ labeling capability of these classical amyloid binding dyes was compared with Cur staining in paraffin-embedded and cryostat coronal brain sections from 5xFAD mice and from aged-matched human AD and control brain tissue. The findings suggest that Cur labels Aβ plaques in a manner similar to Aβ-specific antibodies (6E10) and moderately better than Thio-S, CR, or FJC. In addition, when intraperitoneal injections of Cur to 5xFAD mice were administered for 2−5 days, it crossed the blood-brain barrier and bound with Aβ plaques7. Interestingly, nanomolar concentrations of Cur have been used to label and image Aβ plaques in 5xFAD brain tissue7,14. Moreover, morphologically distinct Aβ plaques, such as core, neuritic, diffuse, and burned-out plaques can be labeled by Cur more efficiently than with any of the other conventional amyloid binding dyes7. Overall, Cur can be applied to label and image Aβ plaques in postmortem brain tissue from AD animal models and/or human AD tissue in an easy and inexpensive way, as a reliable alternative to Aβ-specific antibodies.