$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) have gained importance as crop protection agents in the biological control of important agricultural insect pests1,2. The entomopathogens, which occur naturally in soil, cause epizootics in the populations of various pest species3. The species of EPF are host-specific and pose relatively few risks in terms of attacking nontarget species, and they are nontoxic to the environment4. EPF have a unique mechanism for invading their host, as well as for propagating and persisting in their immediate environment1. They attack the host mainly through asexual spores that attach to and penetrate the host cuticle to invade and proliferate in the host hemocoel. The host eventually dies due to depletion of the hemolymph nutrients or as a result of the toxemia caused by the toxic metabolites released by the fungus. Following death, under ideal environmental conditions, the fungus emerges on the outer surface (overt mycosis) of the host cadaver5,6.
Growing concerns regarding the negative effects of chemical residues on human health, environmental pollution, and the development of pest resistance have led to the global drive to reduce inputs of chemical-based insecticides and to find alternative, novel, and sustainable strategies for crop protection and pest control6,7,8. This has provided opportunities to develop microbial-based insecticides for use in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs, which are more ecologically favorable strategies than conventional chemical control3,8.
To develop a successful microbial control agent for an agricultural pest, a suitable organism must first be isolated, characterized, identified and its pathogenicity for the target pest confirmed. However, an easy, cost-effective method for large-scale production of the microbial agent is required to produce a viable product for use in biological control programmes9,10,11,12,13. Mass production of substantial quantities of good-quality entomopathogens depends on the microbial strain, the environment, the target pest, the formulation, the market, the application strategy, and the desired end product14,15,16. EPF can be mass-produced using liquid substrate fermentation to produce blastospores or the solid substrate fermentation process to produce aerial conidia6,17,18. However, the mass production and formulation process of entomopathogens directly influences the virulence, the cost, the shelf life, and the field efficacy of the final product. For successful use in IPM, the production process of the entomopathogens must be easy to run, require minimal labor, produce a high-yield concentration of virulent, viable, and persistent propagules, and be low in cost4,13,14,16.
Understanding the nutritional requirements of entomopathogens is important for mass cultivation with all culturing methods4,12. The nutritional components of the production medium have a significant impact on the attributes of the resulting propagules, including biocontrol efficacy, yield, desiccation tolerance, and persistence8,19,20,21. The optimization of production procedures is designed to address such factors22. For EPF, the main requirements for good growth, sporulation, and mass production of fungal conidia are adequate moisture, optimum growth temperature, pH, gas exchange of CO2 and O2, and nutrition, including good phosphorous, carbohydrate, carbon, and nitrogen sources18.
Jaronski and Jackson18 describe the solid substrate fermentation method as the most efficient and the closest approximation method to the natural process for EPF production relative to the liquid substrate fermentation method because, under natural conditions, the fungal conidium is borne on solid erect structures, like the surface of insect cadavers. Agricultural products and by-products containing starch are mostly used for the mass production of hypocrealean fungi, as the fungi readily decompose starch through secretion of highly concentrated hydrolytic enzymes from their hyphal tips, to penetrate the solid substance, and to access the nutrients present in the substance11,17,18,23. The grain products also provide the requirements for healthy biomass production because, when they are hydrated and sterilized, the substrates can absorb further nutrients from any liquid medium16,18,24.
Previously, several studies attempted to mass culture EPF species like Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuil., Cordyceps fumosorosea (Wize) Kelper B. Shrestha & Spatafora, Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) Viegas and some of the Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschn.) Sorokin species complex isolates on various substrates16,23,24. Such mass-produced and commercially developed isolates include Green Muscle® (strain IMI 330189), developed from M. anisopliae var Metarhizium acridum (Driver & Milner) J.F. Bisch, Rehner & Humber, Metarhizium 69 (Meta 69 strain ICIPE69), and Real Metarhizium 69 (L9281), developed from M. anisopliae, and Broadband® (strain PPRI 5339) and Eco-Bb®, developed from B. bassiana25,26. However, limited attempts have been made to mass culture Metarhizium robertsii J.F. Bisch., S.A. Rehner & Humber and Metarhizium pinghaense Chen & Guo. These two isolates were selected in a previous study as the most effective for the control of the mealybug, Pseudococcus viburni Signoret (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)27. Therefore, the current study aimed to formulate and mass-produce a sufficient number of resilient infective propagules of the local isolates of M. robertsii and M. pinghaense for commercial application against insect pests. The solid substrate fermentation method was used to mass-produce the fungal conidia for both EPF isolates. Two EPF inoculation methods, using conidial suspensions and the liquid fungal culture of blastospores, were used to inoculate the solid substrates.