$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Mitochondrial disorders (MDs) are a group of multisystem syndromes caused by an impairment in mitochondrial functions due to mutations in either nuclear (nDNA) or mitochondrial (mtDNA) DNA1. They are among the most common inherited metabolic diseases, with a prevalence of 1:5,000. mtDNA-associated diseases follow the rules of mitochondrial genetics: maternal inheritance, heteroplasmy and threshold effect, and mitotic segregation2. Human mtDNA is a double-stranded DNA circle of 16.6 kb, which contains a short control region with sequences needed for replication and transcription, 13 protein-coding genes (all subunits of the respiratory chain), 22 tRNA, and 2 rRNA genes3.
In healthy individuals, there is one single mtDNA genotype (homoplasmy), whereas more than one genotype coexists (heteroplasmy) in pathological conditions. Deleterious heteroplasmic mutations must overcome a critical threshold to disrupt OXPHOS and cause diseases that can affect any organ at any age4. The dual genetics of OXPHOS dictates inheritance: autosomal recessive or dominant and X-linked for nDNA mutations, maternal for mtDNA mutations, plus sporadic cases both for nDNA and mtDNA.
At the beginning of the mitochondrial medicine era, a landmark experiment by King and Attardi5 established the basis to understand the origin of a mutation responsible for an MD by creating hybrid cells containing nuclei from tumor cell lines in which mtDNA was entirely depleted (rho0 cells) and mitochondria from patients with MDs. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques were not available at that time, and it was not easy to determine whether a mutation was present in the nuclear or mitochondrial genome. The method, described in 1989, was then used by several researchers working in the field of mitochondrial medicine6,7,8,9; a detailed protocol has been recently published10, but no video has been made yet. Why should such a protocol be relevant nowadays when NGS could precisely and rapidly identify where a mutation is located? The answer is that cybrid generation is still the state-of-the-art protocol to understand the pathogenic role of any novel mtDNA mutation, correlate the percentage of heteroplasmy with the severity of the disease, and perform a biochemical investigation in a homogeneous nuclear system in which the contribution of the autochthonous nuclear background of the patient is absent11,12,13.
This protocol describes how to obtain cytoplasts from confluent, patient-derived fibroblasts grown in 35 mm Petri dishes. Centrifugation of the dishes in the presence of cytochalasin B allows the isolation of enucleated cytoplasts, which are then fused with rho0 cells in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG). The resulting cybrids are then cultivated in selective medium until clones arise. The representative results section shows an example of molecular characterization of the resulting cybrids to prove that the mtDNA is identical to that of the donor patients' fibroblasts and that the nDNA is identical to the nuclear DNA of the tumoral rho0 cell line.