Here, we present a simplified endogenous gene tagging protocol for Drosophila, which utilizes a PCR-based technique for marker-free identification of successful genetic modifications, facilitating the development of stable knock-in lines.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
Here, we present a simplified endogenous gene tagging protocol for Drosophila, which utilizes a PCR-based technique for marker-free identification of successful genetic modifications, facilitating the development of stable knock-in lines.
The study of protein subcellular localization, dynamics, and regulation in live cells has been profoundly transformed by the advent of techniques that allow the tagging of endogenous genes to produce fluorescent fusion proteins. These methods enable researchers to visualize protein behavior in real time, providing valuable insights into their functions and interactions within the cellular environment. Many current gene tagging studies employ a two-step process where visible markers, such as eye color changes, are used to identify genetically modified organisms in the first step, and the visible marker is excised in the second step. Here, we present a one-step protocol to perform precise and rapid endogenous gene tagging in Drosophila melanogaster, which enables screening for engineered lines without the visible eye marker, offering a significant advantage over past methods. To screen for successful gene-tagging events, we employ a PCR-based technique to genotype individual flies by analyzing a small segment from their middle leg. Flies that pass the screening criteria are then used to produce stable stocks. Here, we detail the design and construction of CRISPR editing plasmids and methods for screening and confirmation of engineered lines. Together, this protocol improves the efficiency of endogenous gene tagging in Drosophila significantly and enables studies of cellular processes in vivo.
Fluorescent proteins have emerged as powerful tools for visualizing protein localization, dynamics, and protein-protein interactions in cells within living organisms1,2. Tagging endogenous genes with fluorescent proteins enables long-term live imaging of cellular processes with subcellular resolution. Furthermore, these endogenous gene-labeling techniques have several advantages compared to overexpression and immunostaining approaches. For example, overexpression of proteins might lead to protein misfolding, nonspecific protein-protein interactions, and mislocalization3. To date, resear....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
1. Design and construction of gene editing reagents
NOTE: To carry out endogenous tagging, it is essential to identify the various isoforms of the desired gene. Depending on the specific goals of the experiment, a fluorescent tag can be incorporated either internally or at the N- or C-termini of the selected protein isoform(s). For optimal CRISPR-mediated editing, it's crucial to position the two sgRNAs suitably close to the intended knock-in site. Subsequently, to enable editing through homologous recombination, a donor vector encompassing sequences homologous to the target gene, along with the fluorescent tag, should be prepared. Below ....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
In our experiments, we typically found a success rate of ~20%-30% in screening for various endogenous tagged genes on all chromosomes (X, II, III). The efficiency of this process can vary based on several factors, such as gRNA selection, the nature of the gene, and injection quality. Here, we illustrate the results from our strategy to tag the endogenous period gene with the mNeonGreen fluorophore13. The period gene, positioned on the X chromosome.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The results demonstrate a streamlined, simple one-step CRISPR-based strategy for tagging endogenous genes in Drosophila. In the protocol, we use two gRNAs to induce DNA double-strand break and homologous recombination more efficiently. The gRNAs and the donor plasmid are injected into fruit fly embryos, which express Cas9 enzyme in their germline. These embryos are subsequently cultivated under standard conditions until adulthood, at which point they are crossed with balancer flies to produce the first generatio.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors declare no competing interests.
We thank George Watase and Josie Clowney for discussions during the initial stages of the protocol development. The work was supported by funds from the NIH (grant no. R35GM133737 to S.Y.), Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship (to S. Y.) and McKnight Scholar Award (to S. Y.).
....Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5M EDTA pH8.0 | Invitrogen | AM9260G | |
| 5-alpha Competent E. coli (High Efficiency) | NEB | C2987H | |
| 96-well deep well plate | BRAND | 701354 | |
| Agar | Fisher Scientific | BP1423-500 | |
| BbsI-HF | NEB | R3539S | |
| DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (2X) | Thermo Scientific | K1081 | |
| D-Sucrose | Fisher Scientific | BP220-1 | |
| EcoRI-HF | NEB | R3101S | |
| Hydrochloric Acid | Fisher Scientific | A142-212 | |
| Prolong Glass Antifade Mounting Medium | Invitrogen | P36982 | |
| Proteinase K | QIAGEN | 19131 | |
| Schneider's Drosophila Medium | Gibco | 21720001 | |
| Sodium Chloride | Fisher Scientific | S271-500 | |
| T4 DNA ligase | NEB | M0202S | |
| Tris Base | Fisher Scientific | BP152-500 | |
| XbaI | NEB | R0145S |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.