As antimicrobial agents have been widely used to prevent bacterial infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a global public health problem1. Combating AMR is the current main mission of monitoring AMR of epidemiological pathogens and synergistic therapy of sensitive antimicrobial agents and lytic bacteriophages2.
In vitro antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AST) is the mainstay for monitoring therapy and detecting the level of AMR. It is an important part of antimicrobial pharmacology and the critical basis for clinical medication. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) of the United States and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) have formulated and revised international criteria of AST and continuously modified and supplemented AST methods and the breakpoints to determine the MIC of one certain "organism-antimicrobial agent" combination as sensitive (S), resistant (R) or intermediate (I)3,4.
From the 1980s to the 1990s, automatic micro broth dilution instruments were rapidly developed and applied to clinical practice, with examples including Alfred 60AST, VITEK System, PHOENIXTM, and Cobasbact5,6,7. However, these instruments were expensive, required high-cost consumables, and their detection ranges were designed for clinical patient medication5,6,7. For these reasons, they are not suitable for veterinary clinical examination and detection of large quantities of highly resistant strains. In this study, an intelligent high-throughput AST/phage screening system, including a 96-dot matrix inoculator (Figure 1), image acquisition converter (Figure 2), and corresponding software8, was developed to conduct AST for a batch of bacteria strains against multiple antimicrobial agents at one time by the agar dilution method. Moreover, the system was also used to detect and analyze the lysis patterns of phages against antimicrobial-resistant bacteria9, and lytic phages were selected efficiently from the phage library. This system was found to be efficient, affordable, and easy to operate.

Figure 1: Structural diagram of the 96-dot matrix inoculator. 1: Inoculation pin plate; 2: Mobile carrier; 3: Seed block; 4: Incubated plate; 5: Base; 6: Operating handle; 7: Limit pin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Structural diagram of the image acquisition converter. 1: Shell; 2: Display screen; 3: Image acquisition room; 4: Detection board base; 5: Detection board in and out of warehouse; 6: Control board; 7: Image acquisition conversion device; 8: Light source; 9: Image scanner. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.