This protocol outlines the procedure for inducing acne inflammation in rat skin with oleic acid and Cutibacterium acnes.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
This protocol outlines the procedure for inducing acne inflammation in rat skin with oleic acid and Cutibacterium acnes.
Acne vulgaris is a prevalent chronic skin condition characterized by the presence of comedones, papules, and pustules on the face, neck, and chest. To simulate the inflammation of acne vulgaris, this protocol details an approach to establish a compound acne rodent model by inducing acne inflammation in rat ears using oleic acid and Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes). Rats were randomly divided into four groups: the normal control group (NC), ears treated with oleic acid group (OA), ears treated with C. acnes group (C. acnes), ears treated with oleic acid and C. acnes (OA + C. acnes). To mimic excessive sebum production, oleic acid was smeared on the ears of rats in OA and OA + C. acnes groups for 25 days.
From days 21 to 25, C. acnes suspension was injected intradermally into the ears of rats in the C. acnes and OA + C. acnes groups to aggravate the acne inflammation. Ear thickness was measured weekly as a gauge of inflammation severity. Gross observation, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were conducted and the results showed that the ears of the OA group and the OA + C. acnes group were thickened and indurated, accompanied by erythema and the presence of comedones. Additionally, papules were observed in C. acnes and OA + C. acnes groups. The histopathology exhibited hyperkeratinization and expanded infundibulum of the hair follicles in OA and OA + C. acnes groups. Infiltration of inflammatory cells and abscesses were found in the dermis of C. acnes and OA + C. acnes groups. The IHC results confirmed increased levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the dermis of C. acnes and OA + C. acnes groups. All the above results collectively indicated the successful establishment of the compound acne rodent model.
Acne vulgaris is a common chronic skin disease characterized by the presence of comedones, papules, and pustules on the face, neck, and chest, which, in severe cases, may progress to nodules, cysts, and permanent scars1. Epidemiological studies report that acne impacts 9.4% of the global population while its resulting symptoms pose severe physical and psychosocial challenges2,3.
The pathogenesis of acne is multifactorial, including four critical processes: excess sebum production, comedone formation, follicular colonization by skin microbiota, and the release of inflammatory mediators around the pilosebaceous unit4,5. Increased sebum secretion, resulting in the accumulation of excess unsaturated free fatty acids (UFFAs), contributes to the abnormal reproduction of skin microbiota, one of which is Cutibacterium acnes, as shown in genomic studies6. Meanwhile, skin microbiota decomposes the sebum and increases the concentration of UFFAs, leading to a vicious circle7. In addition, excess UFFAs cause hyperkeratinization in hair follicles, which in turn triggers acne8. Skin microbiota and increased sebum both activate Toll-like receptors (TLRs) to produce multiple proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1 and TNF-α9,10. This cascade of inflammation, coupled with increased sebum and microbial overgrowth, culminates in pronounced hyperkeratosis of the hair follicle and the onset of acne11.
The rapid development in the field of acne research and related clinical requirements has driven the creation of a series of animal models of acne inflammation on the rat ear, the backs of rats or mice, and rabbit ear12,13,14,15. The methods include intradermal injection of C. acnes, the application of oils on the skin to simulate the abnormal secretion of the sebaceous glands and hyperkeratinization, or a combination of both to accelerate the skin inflammation to form acne16,17,18,19. However, the usage and dosage of chemical agents and biological agents vary among previous studies, which may confuse researchers intending to establish an appropriate acne model. This study aimed to establish an easy-to-operate and effective method to form a compound acne rodent model and provide a model reference for researchers studying acne vulgaris.
This protocol has received ethical approval from the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (No.2023033103-1183). Twelve male Sprague-Dawley rats (weight, 208 g ± 5 g) were used in this protocol and divided into four groups: NC group (n = 3), OA group (n = 3), C. acnes group (n = 3) and OA + C. acnes group (n = 3).
1. Developing the acne model
2. Tissue collection and analysis
3. Statistical analysis
Thickness and skin appearance
From day 7 to day 21, the ears in the OA group and the OA + C. acnes group were significantly thicker than that of the NC and C. acnes groups. On day 25, the ears in the OA group, C. acnes group, and OA + C. acnes group were significantly thicker than those of the NC group (p < 0.05). The average thickness of the ears during the experiment is shown in Figure 2 and Table 2.
From day 7 to day 25, the ears in the OA group and the OA + C. acnes group were thickened and indurated, accompanied by erythema, scales, and comedones. The rats were observed to be scratching their ears from time to time, which caused bleeding. On day 25, papules were found in the ears of the C. acnes group and the OA + C. acnes group (Figure 3).
Histopathology
Parakeratosis and hyperkeratosis were observed in the hair follicles, along with hypertrophy of the granular layer and spinous layer, and dilation of the hair follicle infundibulum in the ears of the OA group and the OA + C. acnes group. The dermis of the C. acnes and OA + C. acnes groups showed mixed inflammatory cell infiltration, including lymphocytes and neutrophils. Also, the dermis exhibited a significant presence of erythrocyte extravasation and abscesses in C. acnes and OA + C. acnes (Figure 4). As shown in Figure 5, the pathological scoring revealed an increase in the C. acnes group and OA group compared to the NC group and the score was significantly higher in the OA + C. acnes group than in the NC and OA groups (p < 0.05).
IHC
As shown in Figure 6, TNF-α was highly expressed in the dermis of the C. acnes and OA + C. acnes groups.

Figure 1: Sample images of pathological scores. Inflammatory cells are marked with red arrows. Refer to Table 1 for the scoring assignment. (A) Score = 0, no horn in infundibulum; (B) score = 1, epithelial hyperplasia and a dense, consistent accumulation of horn distending the follicular canal, though not severe; (C) score = 1, a small number of inflammatory cells around the follicles; (D) score = 2, widespread infiltration of inflammatory cells in the dermis; (E) score = 3, accumulation of dense horn that expands the infundibulum and extends into the sebaceous ducts, resembling the comedones of clinical cases; (F) presence of abscesses around the infundibulum that can potentially result in papules or pustule. Scale bars = 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: The changing trends of ear thickness from day 0 to day 25. The NC group is indicated by the red line, the OA group is indicated by the blue line, the C. acnes group is indicated by the green line, and the OA and C. acnes group is indicated by the yellow line. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Gross appearance of ears. The comedones and papules are denoted by red arrows. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Histology of rat ears. (▲) Hyperkeratosis; (■) parakeratosis; (•) expanded infundibulum of the hair follicle; (♦) Infiltration of inflammatory cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Pathological score. @ indicates a statistically significant difference between the NC group and the C. acnes group; # indicates a significant difference between the NC group and the OA + C. acnes group; * indicates a significant difference between the OA + C. acnes group and the OA group (p < 0.05). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: IHC images of TNF-α expression in rat ears. (♦) Infiltration of inflammatory cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Score | Characteristics | ||
| 0 | Non-comedogenic. (see Figure 1 A) | ||
| 1 | Epithelial hyperplasia and a dense, consistent accumulation of horn beginning to distend the follicular canal. (see Figure 1 B) | ||
| 1 | The presence of a small number of inflammatory cells, especially around the follicles or sebaceous ducts. (see Figure 1 C) | ||
| 2 | Widespread infiltration of a large number of inflammatory cells. (see Figure 1 D) | ||
| 3 | The presence of accumulation of dense horn that expands the infundibulum and extends into the sebaceous ducts, along with notable hyperplasia of follicular epithelium. (see Figure 1 E) | ||
| 3 | The presence of abscesses. (see Figure 1 F) | ||
Table 1: Pathological score assignment. Sample images are shown in Figure 1.
| Time | NC group (mm) | OA group (mm) | C. acnes group (mm) | OA + C. acnes group (mm) |
| Day 0 | 0.4000±0.0250 | 0.4167±0.0144 | 0.4500±0.0000 | 0.4667±0.0382 |
| Day 7 | 0.5250±0.0661 | 0.7667±0.0878*▲ | 0.4500±0.0000 | 0.7917±0.0764*▲ |
| Day 14 | 0.5083±0.0289 | 0.8167±0.1233*▲ | 0.6083±0.0382 | 0.9333±0.0804*▲ |
| Day 21 | 0.5250±0.0433 | 1.0667±0.2241*▲ | 0.5583±0.0144 | 0.9417±0.0722*▲ |
| Day 25 | 0.5750±0.0500 | 0.8250±0.1392* | 0.9500±0.1639* | 1.0583±0.0804* |
Table 2: Thickness of the ears. Data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation. Symbol "*" indicates a statistically significant difference compared with the NC group; Symbol "▲" indicates a statistically significant difference compared with the C. acnes group (p < 0.05).
As the methodology and evaluation criteria for an acne model were not clear, this protocol aimed to provide a reference for researchers studying acne. Due to the small size of the mouse ear and the interference caused by growing hair on the back, the use of depilatory cream and a shaver, the ear of the rat may be a better alternative to establish a rodent model of acne. We had attempted to create the acne model on the back skin of rats, but the effect was not as good as those observed on the rat ear.
Some researchers only adopt a single methodology to cause acne inflammation, such as applying oils or injecting microbes14,16. However, studies have shown that increased sebum secretion will promote the excessive proliferation of C. acnes in clogged follicles, while C. acnes in turn stimulates the abnormal secretion of sebaceous glands; the interplay between both may exacerbate acne inflammation. Therefore, the compound model induced by oils and C. acnes may be more consistent with the clinical lesions of acne10,21,22. To objectively assess the pathological alterations across different experimental groups, we devised a scoring system inspired by prior research, which includes the keratin accumulation and the resulting enlargement of hair follicle canals and epithelial proliferation, the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the dermis, and even the further development of abscess (Table 1 and Figure 1)16,23. Utilizing this scoring method, along with histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses, we found that the application of C. acnes and oleic acid to the ears led to more significant dermal disorder and inflammation. These findings mirror the symptoms observed in moderate cases of human acne, underscoring the value of this composite model in mimicking the development of acne (Figure 4 and Figure 5)24.
To better evaluate the model, it is necessary to record the thickness of the ears before applying oil and C. acnes. Considering that the external and internal thickness of the ear are different, we recorded two specific points to ensure that the results were better to represent the thickness of the ears and two operators collaborated while measuring the ears. When applying oleic acid to the ear, attention should be paid to the fact that the fluidity of oleic acid makes it easily flow into the ear canal and irritate the rats; hence, it is necessary to tilt the head of rats to avoid oleic acid going into the ear canal.
Comedones were observed on day 7, and the lesions continued to be aggravated until the end of the experiment. The stimulation with C. acnes is another important factor affecting acne. C. acnes not only promotes lipid synthesis in sebaceous glands but also reacts with inflammatory cells around the hair follicle and sebaceous glands in the dermis to induce inflammatory factors; this further aggravates inflammatory response6,25. Therefore, we use intradermal injection of C. acnes to accelerate the inflammation. Considering that the ears of rats are extremely thin, micro needles are needed to avoid piercing them. To ensure proper intradermal injection, the needle should be punctured at an angle of 10 to 15 degrees, with a depth of approximately 1 mm. In addition, when one operator carries out the intradermal injection, another operator must fix the head of the rats to prevent the ears from being pierced. To prevent hemorrhage, the injection site must avoid the superficial blood vessels of the rats. After being injected with C. acnes, the ears were significantly rougher, redder, and more swollen and found with papules (Figure 3).
The applications of sebum/sebum components and C. acnes vary in different experiments. Some researchers adopted the method of injection with C. acnes once and then application with sebum for seven days, which induced abscess, erythema, and induration on the back of rats19. Some other researchers injected C. acnes for 4 days and smeared sebum for 30 days on the ears of rats18. There is no unified standard because acne inflammation is related to the application of sebum/sebum components, the activity and concentration of C. acnes, and the tissues for the model. In this experiment, instead of artificial sebum, oleic acid was used for simulating sebum, considering that oleic acid not only induces keratinization of hair follicles, stimulates epidermis inflammation, but also promotes the growth of C. acnes6,7,8. In the experiment, 7 days after the application of oleic acid, the rats' ears showed redness and swelling. From day 7 to day 14, the rat ears began to display scales and comedones. From day 15 to day 21, comedones increased, but no further acne symptoms were observed. On day 21, we began to intradermally inject 1 × 107 CFU C. acnes, a widely used approach documented in previous studies19.
At first, the effects were not obvious, but later, we found papules in the ears of the rats injected with C. acnes. Given that the ear thickness did not show significant variation over time among the groups, we decided to terminate the experiment on day 25 (Figure 2 and Table 2). This protocol still has some limitations. The small size of the ear area may affect follow-up drug treatment. C. acnes is not the only microbiota involved in the pathological process of acne, so it may be better to use a variety of bacteria to induce acne to mimic the clinical condition26.
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81974572 and No.82274523) and the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (No.202310026002).
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anaero-indicator | Mitsubishi, Japan | C-22 | |
| AnaeroPack | Mitsubishi, Japan | C-11, C-41 | |
| Columbia blood agar plate | BeNa Cuture Collection, China | BNCC330605 | |
| Constant temperature incubator | SHANGCHENG, China | 303-0 | |
| Cotton swab | HYNAUT, China | _ | |
| Cutibacterium acnes | BeNa Cuture Collection, China | BNCC330605 | |
| Dako REAL EnVision Detection System, Peroxidase/DAB+, Rabbit/Mouse | DAKO, Denmark | K5007 | |
| disposable sterile injection needle | Zhejiang Oujian Medical Apparatus, China | _ | |
| Electronic scale | JINXUAN, China | A017 | |
| Electronic vernier caliper | Deli, China | DL90150 | |
| Oleic acid (Analytical reagent, AR) | Fangzheng, China | _ | |
| Sodium chloride injection | CR Double CRANE, China | Y2212241 | |
| SPSS Statistics | IBM, USA | 26.0 | |
| sterile hypodermic syringes | Shandong weigao group medical polymer, China | _ | |
| TNF Alpha Monoclonal antibody | Proteintech Group,int, USA | 60291-1-lg |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission