Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove
JoVE Journal Neuroscience

Neuroscience

In-Vivo Calcium Imaging of Sensory Neurons in the Rat Trigeminal Ganglion

Published: February 9, 2024 doi: 10.3791/65978
Automatic Translation
1,2,3, 2,3, 2,3
1Center for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, 2Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3Pittsburgh Center for Pain Research, University of Pittsburgh

Summary

Genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECI) enable a robust, population-level analysis of sensory neuron signaling. Here, we have developed a novel approach that allows for in vivo GECI visualization of rat trigeminal ganglia neuron activity.

Abstract

Genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) enable imaging techniques to monitor changes in intracellular calcium in targeted cell populations. Their large signal-to-noise ratio makes GECIs a powerful tool for detecting stimulus-evoked activity in sensory neurons. GECIs facilitate population-level analysis of stimulus encoding with the number of neurons that can be studied simultaneously. This population encoding is most appropriately done in vivo. Dorsal root ganglia (DRG), which house the soma of sensory neurons innervating somatic and visceral structures below the neck, are used most extensively for in vivo imaging because these structures are accessed relatively easily. More recently, this technique was used in mice to study sensory neurons in the trigeminal ganglion (TG) that innervate oral and craniofacial structures. There are many reasons to study TG in addition to DRG, including the long list of pain syndromes specific to oral and craniofacial structures that appear to reflect changes in sensory neuron activity, such as trigeminal neuralgia. Mice are used most extensively in the study of DRG and TG neurons because of the availability of genetic tools. However, with differences in size, ease of handling, and potentially important species differences, there are reasons to study rat rather than mouse TG neurons. Thus, we developed an approach for imaging rat TG neurons in vivo. We injected neonatal pups (p2) intraperitoneally with an AAV encoding GCaMP6s, resulting in >90% infection of both TG and DRG neurons. TG was visualized in the adult following craniotomy and decortication, and changes in GCaMP6s fluorescence were monitored in TG neurons following stimulation of mandibular and maxillary regions of the face. We confirmed that increases in fluorescence were stimulus-evoked with peripheral nerve block. While this approach has many potential uses, we are using it to characterize the subpopulation(s) of TG neurons changed following peripheral nerve injury.

Introduction

Somatosensation, the neural encoding of mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli impinging on the skin or other bodily structures, including muscles, bone, and viscera, starts with activity in primary afferent neurons that innervate these structures1. Single unit based electrophysiological approaches have provided a wealth of information about the afferent subtypes involved in this process as well as how their stimulus-responses properties may change over time1,2,3. However, while there remains strong evidence in support of the labeled line theory, which suggests specific sensory modalities are conveyed by specific subpopulation(s) of neurons, the ability of many subpopulations of neurons to respond to the same types of mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli suggests the majority of somatosensory stimuli are encoded by multiple subpopulations of neurons4,5. Thus, a better understanding of somatosensation will only come with the ability to study the activity of 10's, if not hundreds, of neurons simultaneously.

Advances in optical approaches with the relatively recent advent of confocal and, subsequently, multiphoton and digital imaging techniques have facilitated the ability to perform relatively non-invasive population-level analyses of neuronal activity6,7. One of the last hurdles in the application of this technology has been the development of tools to enable the optical assessment of neural activity. Given the speed of an action potential that can start and end in less than a millisecond, a voltage-sensitive dye with the capacity to follow changes in membrane potential at the speed of an action potential would be the ideal tool for this purpose. But while there has been tremendous progress in this area7,8,9,10, the signal-to-noise ratio for many of these dyes is still not quite high enough to enable a population analysis of hundreds of neurons at the single cell level. As an alternative approach, investigators have turned to monitoring changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i). The limitations with this strategy have been clear from the start and include the fact that an increase in [Ca2+]i is an indirect measure of neural activity11; that an increase in [Ca2+]i may occur independently of Ca2+ influx associated with the activation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs)12,13; that the magnitude and duration of a Ca2+ transient may be controlled by processes independent of VGCC activity11,12,14; and that the time-course of Ca2+ transients far exceeds that of an action potential15. Nevertheless, there are a number of significant advantages associated with the use of Ca2+ as an indirect measure of neural activity. Not the least of these is the signal-to-noise ratio associated with most Ca2+ indicators, reflecting both the magnitude of the change in intracellular Ca2+ and the fact that the signal is arising from the three-dimensional space of the cytosol rather than the two-dimensional space of the cell membrane. Furthermore, with the development of genetically encoded Ca2+ indicators (GECI's), it is possible to take advantage of genetic strategies to drive the expression of the Ca2+ indicators in specific subpopulations of cells, facilitating population-level analyses in intact preparations (e.g., see16).

Given the number of genetic tools now available in mice, it should be no surprise that GECI's have been used most extensively in this species. Mouse lines with constitutive GECI expression in subpopulations of sensory neurons have been developed7,16,17. With the development of mouse lines expressing recombinases in specific cell types, it is possible to use even more sophisticated strategies to control GECI expression15. However, while these tools are ever more powerful, there are a number of reasons why other species, such as rats, might be more appropriate for some experimental questions. These include the larger size, facilitating a number of experimental manipulations that are difficult, if not impossible, in the smaller mouse; the ease of training rats in relatively complex behavioral tasks; and at least some evidence that biophysical properties and expression patterns of several ion channels in rat sensory neurons may be more similar to that observed in human sensory neurons than are the same channels in mouse relative to the human18.

While the transduction of somatosensory stimuli generally occurs in the peripheral terminals of primary afferents, the action potential initiated in the periphery must pass through the structure that houses primary afferent somata, referred to as dorsal root (DRG) or trigeminal (TG) ganglia before reaching the central nervous system19. While there is evidence that not every action potential propagating along a primary afferent axon will invade the cell body20, a consequence of the fact the primary afferent somata are connected to the main afferent axon via a T-junction19, the majority of action potentials initiated in the periphery appear to invade the soma21. This confers three experimental advantages when using GECIs to assess population coding in primary afferents: the large size of the cell body relative to the axons further increases the signal to noise when using [Ca2+]i as an indirect measure of afferent activity; the DRG are generally easy to access; and assessing activity at a site that is spatially remote from the afferent terminals minimizes the potential impact of the surgery needed to expose the ganglia on the stimulus-response properties of the afferent terminals. However, because TG are located beneath the brain (or above the palette), they are far more difficult to access than DRG. Furthermore, while there are many similarities between DRG and TG neurons, there is a growing list of differences as well. This includes the roughly somatotopic organization of neurons in the TG22, unique structures innervated, different central terminal termination patterns23,24,25,26, and now a growing list of differences in both gene expression27,28 and functional receptor expression29. In addition, because we are interested in the identification of peripheral mechanisms of pain, the relatively large number of pain syndromes that appear to be unique to the trigeminal system (e.g., migraine, trigeminal neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome) that appear to involve aberrant activity in primary afferents30,31,32, suggests that the TG needs to be studied directly.

Thus, while stimulus-response properties of TG neurons have been studied with GECIs in the mouse16, because the reasons listed above suggest that the rat may be a more appropriate species to address a variety of experimental questions, the purpose of the present study was to develop an approach to use GECIs to study TG neurons in the rat. To achieve this, we utilized a viral approach to drive the expression of the GECI GCaMP6s in the peripheral nervous system. We then removed the forebrain to allow access to the TG. Finally, mechanical and thermal stimuli were applied to the face while neuronal responses were assessed under fluorescent microscopy. Together, these data support a role for utilizing the rat to investigate changes in the TG under many states, expanding the toolkit for investigators interested in sensory coding in the trigeminal system.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

All experiments involving the use of animals in research were performed in accordance with standards put forth by the National Institutes of Health and the International Association for the Study of Pain and were approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #22051100). At the end of each experiment, rats were euthanized via exanguination with cardiac perfusion of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), an approach approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association and the University of Pittsburgh IACUC.

1. GCaMP induction

  1. Order time-pregnant Sprague Dawley rats so that pups can be injected at the appropriate time after birth.
  2. Spray the gloves with 70% EtOH before handling each rat pup. This will deter the dam from cannibalizing the young.
  3. Swab rat pups (P1-2) with 70% EtOH and anesthetize on ice for 3 min.
  4. Inject 15 µL of AAV9-CAG-WPRE-GCaMP6s-SV40 (Addgene) intraperitoneally using a 25 µL sterile, gas-tight Hamilton syringe.

2. Trigeminal ganglion exposure surgery

  1. Administer anesthetic cocktail (55 mg/kg ketamine, 5.5 mg/kg xylazine, 1 mg/kg acepromazine) intraperitoneally based on body weight to 6-8 week-old rats (approximately 150-200 g).
    NOTE: This is generally sufficient to maintain a surgical plane of anesthesia as assessed by the absence of a withdrawal reflex to noxious pinch of a hindpaw. However, supplement with isoflurane via a nose cone if the animals become light.
  2. Once fully anesthetized, shave the hair and whiskers of the head and face.
  3. Mount the rat to a stereotaxic frame with ear bars and place a heating pad (~37 oC) underneath to maintain body temperature.
  4. Monitor vital signs (heart rate, respiration rate, blood oxygen saturation) with a mouse oximeter or comparable.
    NOTE: Body temperature is monitored by a rectal probe and maintained by placing rats on a feedback controlled circulating water blanket.
  5. Place gauze dipped in ice-cold saline on the head to constrict blood vessels to minimize bleeding. Using a size 15 scalpel, make a midline incision of the skin and muscle over the skull.
  6. Use blunt dissection of the skin and muscle to expose the skull.
  7. Using a ¼ round drill bit, carefully perforate the skull cap to expose the forebrain. Then, use rongeurs (2.5 mm cup) to carefully cut through the skull.
  8. Using a size 15 scalpel, make an incision into the brain (Bregma: -3.80) and the olfactory bulb.
    NOTE: Cutting more caudally past this point will result in rat death
  9. Use a spatula to carefully disconnect the dura from the skull and gently lift the severed brain to reveal the TG and the base of the skull.
    NOTE: Additional use of ice-cold saline perfusion throughout the extraction will minimize bleeding and optimize the following dissection field.
  10. Using a cautery pen, stem any bleeding resulting from the extraction.
    ​NOTE: Cutting the dura will result in inevitable bleeding. It is best to prepare ice-cold aCSF (119 mM NaCl, 26.2 mM NaHCO3, 2.5 mM KCl, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 1.3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, 2.5 mM CaCl2) to bathe the skull cavity to help constrict blood vessels while maintaining neuronal health.

3. GCaMP6s imaging

NOTE: Given the size and density of these neurons, the imaging and data acquisition system used (objective, microscope, light source, camera) will determine the number of GECI+ cells visualized. The light source, objective, and camera will also determine the parameters used for image acquisition, including exposure time and image capture rate. While multiphoton and confocal techniques can be used depending on the experiment's parameters, epifluorescence microscopy may be sufficient to resolve many cells. Any image acquisition package can be used. Ideally, the stimulus application is time-locked with the image acquisition software package.

  1. Place the skull cavity underneath the objective and bring the TG into focus using visible light.
  2. The excitation wavelength of GCaMP6s is 496 nm, and its emission wavelength is 513 nm; thus, use the appropriate dichroic and filter cubes to locate GCaMP+ cells. Adjust the focus to locate and resolve the area of the ganglia in which neurons are responding to stimuli applied to the receptive field of interest.
  3. Use a 10x objective to enable visualizations of most neurons in the TG responsive to mechanical stimuli applied to a 1 cm2 region of the face16. Use a 20x dry objective with a long working distance (10.8 mm) to increase resolution.
  4. Use acquisition software (e.g., Metamorph) to collect fluorescence data over time and in response to stimulus application.
    1. To minimize photo-bleaching of the neurons, use as short exposure time as possible to detect baseline and evoked increases in fluorescence. With the 20x, 0.40 NA air objective, a 120 W mercury halide light source, and a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera used in the present study, an exposure time of 300 ms, and an image acquisition rate of 3 Hz, obtain stable baseline recordings for >90 min.
      NOTE: 1) These image acquisition parameters must be determined empirically. 2) Mechanical (brush, punctate, vibration, pinch), thermal (heat and cold), and chemical (capsaicin, menthol, inflammatory mediators) may be applied to the receptive field. A relatively inexpensive subjective approach is to apply the stimuli by hand. More objective and reproducible approaches are recommended, however, where feedback-controlled actuators can be used for repeated application at a known force. While feedback-controlled Peltier devices are useful for controlled heating and cooling, they are not ideal for the thermal stimulation of a curved face. Feedback-controlled infrared light sources are an alternative for heating, and cold spray is a less than ideal alternative for cooling.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

Because we have previously had success with the AAV9 serotype for the infection of rat sensory neurons15, we used this serotype for the expression of GCaMP6s in rat TG neurons. We therefore first sought to assess the sensory neuron infection efficiency of AAV9-CAG-GCaMP6s-WPRE-SV40 (AAV9-GCaMP) when this virus was administered to neonatal rat pups20. This virus utilizes the CAG promoter, which drives and maintains high levels of gene expression. Furthermore, AAV9 has been shown to efficiently infect sensory neurons when administered to neonatal rats33. The first injections utilized 5 µL in postnatal day 5 (p5) pups, resulting in approximately 51.66% ± 14.33% efficiency (Figure 1A). To increase the infection rate, we eventually used a larger volume of virus (15 µL) in younger rats (p2), keeping the virus titer of 2.4 x 1014 the same. This strategy resulted in 91.84% ± 3.18% (n = 8) of neurons infected (Figure 1B).

To visualize the TG neurons innervating the vibrissal pad, we next developed a surgical strategy to expose the TG in-vivo. Approximately 60% of the forebrain can be removed without affecting major respiratory centers. This corresponds to brain tissue rostral to Bregma -3.80. A schematic of the exposed TG (left) and the innervation territory of the infraorbital nerve (ION, right) are shown in Figure 2. The region of the TG giving rise to the innervation of the vibrissal pad was determined with the application of light mechanical stimulation (brush) to the vibrissal pad while monitoring changes in fluorescence at 20x. As predicted, the V2 region of the TG, which innervates the maxillary division of the face, was the only area activated. That is, while not studied systematically, there were no changes in fluorescence detected in response to stimuli applied to V1 (skin on the forehead) or V3 (skin on the mandible) regions when the neurons under study could be activated with stimuli applied to the vibrissal pad. Changes in fluorescence at baseline and in response to stimuli applied to the vibrissal pad were then monitored. The region of interest (V2) is demarcated in Figure 3A. Consistent with previous reports of relatively low levels of resting activity in sensory neurons34, resting fluorescence was relatively low in most neurons, and there was little evidence of spontaneous increases in fluorescence (Figure 3B). The criteria used to identify stimulus-evoked activity in neurons in the periphery6,16,21 and CNS12,35,36 is an evolving field with several sophisticated workflow packages that have been made freely available37,38. A full discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the various approaches employed is beyond the scope of the present manuscript. As this was not the focus of the present study, we used relatively arbitrary and subjective criteria based on the peak response observed in regions of the ganglia in which there were no clearly detectable neurons (based on the ability to see the nucleus), such that a neuron was considered responsive to a stimulus if the increase in fluorescence was time-locked to the stimulus application (increase in fluorescence detected within 1 s of stimulus application (based on the assumption that an action potential initiated in the slowest conducting axons (0.2 m/s) initiated at a site no more than 3 cm from the cell body should reach the cell body in less than a second), and was >6 times the standard deviation of the peak response (ΔF/F) detected a control site (Figure 3C). Next, we characterized the response properties of these neurons to natural stimuli: brush, punctate, heat, and cold. Examples of responses to each of these stimuli are shown in Figure 4. Notably, the response to punctate stimulation, which is most often used in pain-related studies, has the most robust response (Figure 4B,F).

Our goal in developing this technique was to be able to assess changes in population coding in TG neurons. Thus, we adapted the chronic constriction injury to the ION (CCI-ION), as previously employed29, to study rats 2 weeks after nerve injury. Following the induction of the model, we exposed the TG and assessed resting and evoked activity in TG ipsilateral and contralateral to the site of injury. Interestingly, the magnitude of the peak evoked response to brush was increased ~2-fold on the nerve-injured side relative to the peak response to the same stimulus applied to the contralateral side (Figure 5A-C). Furthermore, when two brush stimuli were applied in series (with an inter stimulus-interval of 10 s), there was a significant amplification of the magnitude of the response to the second stimulus on the injured but not uninjured side (Figure 5D).

Finally, as an initial control experiment to confirm that the stimulus-evoked increase in fluorescence was due to action potentials initiated in the periphery, we assessed the impact of tetrodotoxin (1 µM) on stimulus-evoked responses. TTX was injected in a volume of 200 µL percutaneously as described previously28 so as to target the infraorbital nerve. As shown in Figure 6, evoked activity was almost completely eliminated. Taken together, these results demonstrate the utility of using AAV9-GCaMP to interrogate TG population responses in-vivo.

Figure 1
Figure 1: High Efficiency of GCaMP6s infection in TG neurons with neonatal AAV injection. (A) P5 rat pups were injected with 5 µL of pAAV9-CAG-GCaMP6s-WPRE-Sv40 (titer: 2.4 x 1014) virus intraperitoneally: GCaMP6s expression was detected in 51.7 ± 14.3% of TG neurons (n = 3 slices per animal, 7 rats). (B) Increasing injection volume to 15 µL in younger animals (p2) improved the infection efficiency: GCaMP6s expression was detected in 91.8 ± 3.2% of TG neurons (n = 3 slices per animal, 8 rats). Panels on the left were stained for GCaMP6s. Panels in the middle were stained with NeuN, a neuron-specific marker. Panels on the right are a merged image of the GCaMP6s and NeuN panels. The scale bar in the first panel is the same for all subsequent panels. The graph at the right is a plot of GCaMP6s expression (mean ± SEM) as a percentage of the total number of neurons per slice per animal, where the individual points are the data for each animal. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Location of trigeminal ganglion (TG), infraorbital nerve (ION), and area of the face (vibrissal pad) stimulated. (A) The forebrain was removed to enable access to the TG. (B) Area of the face in which natural stimuli were applied relative to the ION and TG. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Stimulus-evoked increase in GCaMP6s fluorescence. (A) Total visual field under 20x magnification. Ophthalmic (V1) and maxillary (V2) divisions of the TG are indicated. (B,C) The region in the box is shown in panels B and C, which are fluorescence images before and after brush stimulation of the vibrissal pad, respectively. White circles are comparator regions of interest. Neurons were considered responsive to a stimulus based on the peak change in fluorescence observed in comparator regions of interest as described in the text. The scale bar in the first panel is the same for both panels. (D) Representative changes in fluorescence of neurons shown in B and C in response to a brush stimulus applied to the face. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Classification of neurons based on their response to stimuli applied to the face. Representative images of TG neurons before (top panels - Baseline) and after (middle panel - Stimulation) of responses to a 1 cm camel-hair brush (A - Brush), 1 cm2 grid of monofilaments (B - Punctate), heating (C - Heat) and cooling (D - Cold) applied to the same region of the face. The scale bar in the first panel is the same for all subsequent panels. Orange circles denote an example of a responsive neuron. White circles are comparator regions of interest. (E-H) Representative traces of each response per stimulus. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Nerve injury increases brush-evoked responses in TG neurons. Typical responses of TG neurons to brush applied two times to the rat face on the side contralateral to a chronic constriction injury of the infraorbital nerve (A, Contra) or to the side ipsilateral to the nerve injury (B, Ipsi). (C) Analysis of pooled data from responsive neurons from six rats (data plotted are per rat) confirmed that the difference in the magnitude of the first response to brush was significant (paired t-test). (D) When the peak response to the first and second stimulus application was analyzed as a ratio (R2/R1), analysis of the pooled data confirmed that the increase in the response ratio on the nerve-injured side, was significant. ** p < 0.01 Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6
Figure 6: Block of evoked activity in TG neurons with tetrodotoxin (TTX). (A) Fluorescence data from TG neurons ipsilateral to a nerve injury following injection of TTX (200 µL, 1 µM) adjacent to the infraorbital nerve following application of a brush stimulus (blue bar). (B) Pooled peak response data from three rats. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Here, we demonstrate a quick, non-invasive way of generating a GECI rat for imaging the TG. We chose a CAG promotor to drive and maintain high levels of gene expression. While previous studies suggest that other AAV serotypes may efficiently drive gene expression in DRG neurons39, our results are consistent with a recent study involving intraperitoneal injection of AAV in neonates32, indicating that the AAV9 serotype is highly efficient in the infection of rat neonatal sensory neurons.

Through troubleshooting this technique, it is worth noting some pitfalls that may prevent optimal infection. The main variable to keep in mind is the age of the pups. The rat nervous system develops rapidly over the first 7 days postnatally40. We attempted infections at later time points (e.g., p4-7), which resulted in variable and poor efficiency. Earlier time points (p1-4) produce more robust and consistent efficiency, with p1-2 producing the highest infection rates. The second variable is the volume of injection. Regardless of age, a minimum of 15 µL was required to produce greater than 70% efficiency in the TG or DRG with a titer of 2.5 x 1014. We found that, even at p2, intraperitoneal injections of less than 10 µL produce very little expression in the adult. It is possible that more localized injections, i.e., directly into the receptive field of interest, at lower volumes would produce similar effects. However, this approach would require pups to be fully anesthetized and may cause trauma to the tissue of interest. Finally, it is possible that smaller volumes could be used with higher titers.

Exposing the TG for GECI imaging has been previously performed in mice16. However, translating this approach to the rat revealed several issues worth considering. First, the thickness of the skull and dura in the rat is much greater than in a mouse. Therefore, removing the skull cap may pose challenges. We found that a small drill is an effective way of perforating the skull cap, which can then be removed with rongeurs. A second issue is bleeding once the brain has been removed. This may be a continued issue for both the longevity of the preparation as well as the clarity of the imaging, if not the properties of the neurons. Gauze dipped in ice-cold CSF can be applied to the exposed surface of the brain to help close the main arteries. The use of a small cautery pen may also be effective in stemming further bleeding. Finally, Gelfoam situated on the contralateral side of the imaging window may also help prevent blood and CSF from causing imaging problems. A third consideration is the amount of brain to be removed. We found that removing brain caudal to ~Bregma -3.80 will result in death within an hour of removal. Thus, the brain should be removed in small sections, keeping as much as possible while exposing as much of the TG as possible.

As noted in the Introduction, [Ca2+]i is an indirect measure of neuronal activity, and consequently, an increase in [Ca2+]i does not necessarily mean that there is an increase in neural activity. Thus, control experiments are critical to confirm that what is considered evoked activity is actually activity per se. For example, electrically evoked stimuli should produce a time-locked increase in [Ca2+]i, which is on a similar scale to that of naturally evoked stimuli. Importantly, this activity should be eliminated with the block of the nerve (i.e., TTX). However, it is also important to note that despite these important controls, it is still possible that some of the apparently evoked increases in [Ca2+]i are due to signaling within the ganglia, for example, due to transmitter release within the ganglia41, rather than due to an action potential initiated in the periphery that has invaded the cell soma.

While our results confirm that of previous investigators16,42,43 indicating the signal-to-noise ratio associated with changes in GCaMP fluorescence in sensory somata is sufficient for use with a standard epifluorescence microscope, manipulations such as the nerve injury used in the present study may be associated with such dramatic changes in neuronal activity and Ca2+ signaling34, that responses throughout the ganglia may be associated with such a large increase in apparent background, that the responses of individual neurons may be artificially attenuated. While imaging processing approaches have been developed that may help address this limitation44, confocal or multiphoton imaging may be needed to most effectively solve this problem.

Taken together, this technique provides an approach for investigating the stimulus-response properties of TG neurons in the rat at a population level. Our results with the CCI of the ION confirm the feasibility of detecting changes in these stimulus-response properties. While only mechanical and thermal stimuli were employed in the present study, this preparation should be amenable to the application of chemical stimuli to fully define the stimulus-response properties of TG neurons. Similarly, while we focused on stimulus-response properties of cutaneous afferents, because of the emergence of such phenomena as dynamic mechanical allodynia following traumatic injury to a cutaneous nerve, it should also be possible to detect changes in the properties of afferents innervating other craniofacial structures such as the temporomandibular joint (in response to innocuous vs. noxious jaw movements), cornea or tongue. Peripheral injection of the AAV9 serotype allows for neuron-specific induction of GCaMP that is PNS-specific. A major benefit of this strategy is that viral labeling provides a robust, persistent expression in post-mitotic cells (i.e., neurons) but not in mitotic cells (e.g., epithelial cells). Additionally, preliminary screening of different PNS tissues indicates that this viral strategy can be used to investigate para/sympathetic ganglia, the DRG, and enteric nervous systems, as well (data not shown).

This in vivo preparation also provides the foundation to explore many comparisons that are lacking in the current literature. In vivo population studies between rat TG and DRG, rat vs. mouse TG, have yet to be conducted. The data presented here illustrates the new feasibility of these important experiments to be conducted.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

Dr. Gold was receiving grant support from Grunenthal during the development of this preparation. There was no overlap in the focus of the Grunenthal study and the preparation described in this manuscript. Neither of the other authors has any other potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Drs. Kathy Albers and Brian Davis for the use of their Leica Microscope and Metamorph program, Charles Warwick for helping to build our thermal Peltier device, and Dr. Raymond Sekula for helping with troubleshooting the surgical preparation. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health: F31NS125993 (JYG), T32NS073548 (JYG), and R01NS122784 (MSG and RS).

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
AAV9-CAG-WPRE-GCaMP6s-SV40  Addgene 100844-AAV9 AAV9-GCaMP6s virus
ACEpromazine maleate Covetrus 11695-0095-5 10 mg/mL
AnaSed (Xylazine) injection AKORN Animal Health 23076-35-9 20 mg/mL
CTR5500 Electronics box Leica 11 888 820 Power Supply
Cutwell burr drill bit Ransom & Randolph ¼ round
DM 6000 FS Leica 11 888 928 Base Stand
EL6000 Leica EL6000 Light source with 120 W mercury bulb
Forceps FST 11252-00 Dumont No. 05
Friedman rongeurs FST 16000-14 2.5 mm cup size
Friedman-Pearson rongeurs FST 16021-14 1 mm cup size
Heating pad (Temperature therapy pad) STRYKER 8002-062-022
Ketamine hydrochloride Covetrus 1695-0703-1 100 mg/mL
Plan Fluor 20x/0.40 Leica MRH00105 20x objective, 0.4 NA10.8 mm WD
Power handle high-temp cautery pen Bovie HIT1 handheld Change-A-Tip cautery pen
Prime 95B Photometrics Prime 95B CMOS Camera
Saline Fisher Scientific NC0291799 0.9% Sterile Saline
Scalpel blade Fisher Scientific 22-079-701 size 15 disposable blade
Spatula BRI 48-1460 brain spatula
Spring scissors FST 91500-09 Student Vannas, 5 mm cutting edge
Spring scissors FST 15012-12 Noyes, 14 mm cutting edge
STP6000 Smart touch panel Leica 11 501 255 Control Panel
Syringe Hamilton 80201 25 μL Model 1702 Luer Tip syringe
Water heater Adroit HTP-1500

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Gold, M. S., Gebhart, G. F. Nociceptor sensitization in pain pathogenesis. Nat Med. 16 (11), 1248-1257 (2010).
  2. Gold, M. S., Caterina, M. J. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. , Academic Press. (2008).
  3. Lawson, S. N., Fang, X., Djouhri, L. Nociceptor subtypes and their incidence in rat lumbar dorsal root ganglia (DRGs): focussing on C-polymodal nociceptors, Aβ-nociceptors, moderate pressure receptors and their receptive field depths. Curr Opin Physiol. 11, 125-146 (2019).
  4. Handler, A., Ginty, D. D. The mechanosensory neurons of touch and their mechanisms of activation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 22 (9), 521-537 (2021).
  5. Jankowski, M. P., et al. Cutaneous neurturin overexpression alters mechanical, thermal, and cold responsiveness in physiologically identified primary afferents. J Neurophysiol. 117 (3), 1258-1265 (2017).
  6. Shannonhouse, J., Gomez, R., Son, H., Zhang, Y., Kim, Y. S. In vivo calcium imaging of neuronal ensembles in networks of primary sensory neurons in intact dorsal root ganglia. J Vis Exp. 192, 64826 (2023).
  7. Anderson, M., Zheng, Q., Dong, X. Investigation of pain mechanisms by calcium imaging approaches. Neurosci Bull. 34 (1), 194-199 (2018).
  8. Grienberger, C., Konnerth, A. Imaging calcium in neurons. Neuron. 73 (5), 862-885 (2012).
  9. Iseppon, F., Linley, J. E., Wood, J. N. Calcium imaging for analgesic drug discovery. Neurobiol Pain. 11, 100083 (2022).
  10. Tada, M., Takeuchi, A., Hashizume, M., Kitamura, K., Kano, M. A highly sensitive fluorescent indicator dye for calcium imaging of neural activity in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Neurosci. 39 (11), 1720-1728 (2014).
  11. Lu, S. G., Zhang, X., Gold, M. S. Intracellular calcium regulation among subpopulations of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Physiol. 577 (Pt 1), 169-190 (2006).
  12. Warwick, C., et al. Cell type-specific calcium imaging of central sensitization in mouse dorsal horn. Nat Commun. 13 (1), 5199 (2022).
  13. Scheff, N. N., Yilmaz, E., Gold, M. S. The properties, distribution and function of Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchanger isoforms in rat cutaneous sensory neurons. J Physiol. 592 (Pt 22), 4969-4993 (2014).
  14. Scheff, N. N., Gold, M. S. Trafficking of na+/ca2+ exchanger to the site of persistent inflammation in nociceptive afferents. J Neurosci. 35 (22), 8423-8432 (2015).
  15. Hartung, J. E., Gold, M. S. GCaMP as an indirect measure of electrical activity in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons. Cell Calcium. 89, 102225 (2020).
  16. Ghitani, N., et al. Specialized mechanosensory nociceptors mediating rapid responses to hair pull. Neuron. 95 (4), 944-954 (2017).
  17. Cichon, J., et al. Imaging neuronal activity in the central and peripheral nervous systems using new Thy1.2-GCaMP6 transgenic mouse lines. J Neurosci Methods. 334, 108535 (2020).
  18. Zhang, X., et al. Nicotine evoked currents in human primary sensory neurons. J Pain. 20 (7), 810-818 (2019).
  19. Devor, M. Unexplained peculiarities of the dorsal root ganglion. Pain. Suppl 6, S27-S35 (1999).
  20. Amir, R., Devor, M. Electrical excitability of the soma of sensory neurons is required for spike invasion of the soma, but not for through-conduction. Biophys J. 84 (4), 2181-2191 (2003).
  21. Wang, F., et al. Sensory afferents use different coding strategies for heat and cold. Cell Rep. 23 (7), 2001-2013 (2018).
  22. Gregg, J. M., Dixon, A. D. Somatotopic organization of the trigeminal ganglion in the rat. Arch Oral Biol. 18 (4), 487-498 (1973).
  23. Dessem, D., Moritani, M., Ambalavanar, R. Nociceptive craniofacial muscle primary afferent neurons synapse in both the rostral and caudal brain stem. J Neurophysiol. 98 (1), 214-223 (2007).
  24. Dessem, D., Luo, P. Jaw-muscle spindle afferent feedback to the cervical spinal cord in the rat. Exp Brain Res. 128 (4), 451-459 (1999).
  25. Sessle, B. J., Dubner, R., Greenwood, L. F., Lucier, G. E. Descending influences of periaqueductal gray matter and somatosensory cerebral cortex on neurones in trigeminal brain stem nuclei. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 54 (1), 66-69 (1976).
  26. Shammah-Lagnado, S. J., Negrão, N., Silva, B. A., Ricardo, J. A. Afferent connections of the nuclei reticularis pontis oralis and caudalis: a horseradish peroxidase study in the rat. Neuroscience. 20 (3), 961-989 (1987).
  27. Korczeniewska, O. A., et al. Differential gene expression changes in the dorsal root versus trigeminal ganglia following peripheral nerve injury in rats. Eur J Pain. 24 (5), 967-982 (2020).
  28. Megat, S., et al. Differences between dorsal root and trigeminal ganglion nociceptors in mice revealed by translational profiling. J Neurosci. 39 (35), 6829-6847 (2019).
  29. Pineda-Farias, J. B., Loeza-Alcocer, E., Nagarajan, V., Gold, M. S., Sekula, R. F. Jr Mechanisms underlying the selective therapeutic efficacy of carbamazepine for attenuation of trigeminal nerve injury pain. J Neurosci. 41 (43), 8991-9007 (2021).
  30. Burchiel, K. J., Baumann, T. K. Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: new evidence from a trigeminal ganglion intraoperative microneurographic recording. Case report. J Neurosurg. 101 (5), 872-873 (2004).
  31. Jääskeläinen, S. K. Is burning mouth syndrome a neuropathic pain condition. Pain. 159 (3), 610-613 (2018).
  32. Ashina, M., et al. Migraine and the trigeminovascular system-40 years and counting. Lancet Neurol. 18 (8), 795-804 (2019).
  33. Yang, O. J., et al. Evaluating the transduction efficiency of systemically delivered AAV vectors in the rat nervous system. Front Neurosci. 17, 1001007 (2023).
  34. Gemes, G., et al. Calcium signaling in intact dorsalroot ganglia: New observations and the effect of injury. Anesthesiology. 113 (1), 134-146 (2010).
  35. Xu, Q., Dong, X. Calcium imaging approaches in investigation of pain mechanism in the spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 317, 129-132 (2019).
  36. Wu, W., et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of mouse spinal cord through an optically cleared intervertebral window. Nat Commun. 13 (1), 1959 (2022).
  37. Cantu, D. A., et al. EZcalcium: Open-source toolbox for analysis of calcium imaging data. Front Neural Circuits. 14, 25 (2020).
  38. Romano, S. A., et al. An integrated calcium imaging processing toolbox for the analysis of neuronal population dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol. 13 (6), e1005526 (2017).
  39. Mason, M. R., et al. Comparison of AAV serotypes for gene delivery to dorsal root ganglion neurons. Mol Ther. 18 (4), 715-724 (2010).
  40. Sharma, N., et al. The emergence of transcriptional identity in somatosensory neurons. Nature. 577 (7790), 392-398 (2020).
  41. Matsuka, Y., Neubert, J. K., Maidment, N. T., Spigelman, I. Concurrent release of ATP and substance P within guinea pig trigeminal ganglia in vivo. Brain Res. 915 (2), 248-255 (2001).
  42. Hu, M. Visualization of trigeminal ganglion neuronal activities in mice. Curr Protoc Cell .Biol. 83 (1), e84 (2019).
  43. von Buchholtz, L. J., et al. Decoding cellular mechanisms for mechanosensory discrimination. Neuron. 109 (2), 285-298 (2021).
  44. Giovannucci, A., et al. CaImAn an open source tool for scalable calcium imaging data analysis. elife. 8, e38173 (2019).

Tags

Neuroscience
<em>In-Vivo</em> Calcium Imaging of Sensory Neurons in the Rat Trigeminal Ganglion
Play Video
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Gedeon, J. Y., Pineda-Farias, J. B., … More

Gedeon, J. Y., Pineda-Farias, J. B., Gold, M. S. In-Vivo Calcium Imaging of Sensory Neurons in the Rat Trigeminal Ganglion. J. Vis. Exp. (204), e65978, doi:10.3791/65978 (2024).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter