$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a molecular imaging technique commonly used in research as well as in clinical settings. Due to the development of various PET tracers, PET can be used to study disease pathophysiology and monitor disease progression and response to treatments1. One of the most widely used radiotracers is 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG), which allows for the imaging of glucose metabolism, indicative of cellular activation. It is utilized in oncology for diagnosis, staging, and prognosis; in neurology, commonly in the context of neurodegenerative diseases such as dementia; and in cardiology, to diagnose conditions like sarcoidosis, to name just a few examples1,2,3.
Assessment of metabolic brain connectivity, obtained from [18F]FDG PET data, refers to the functional relationships between tracer uptake in different brain regions. This approach enables the computation of a "connectivity matrix" by selecting a set of brain regions, which can provide insights into how different parts of the brain interact and function together. This type of analysis is particularly useful for studying brain function in health and disease, including conditions such as dementia, epilepsy, and other neurological disorders4,5.
The first study assessing metabolic brain connectivity already dates back to the 1980s6, but researchers mainly explored structural brain connectivity, also known as the "connectome"7, by means of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). Furthermore, functional connectivity using techniques such as functional MRI (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and magnetoencephalography (MEG) has been widely investigated for multiple decades8,9.
Recently, there is a regained interest in studying metabolic brain connectivity using [18F]FDG PET, not only on its own, but also in combination with other forms of brain connectivity10. However, due to the inherent "static" nature of PET images (in contrast to, e.g., functional MRI), the vast majority of brain network PET-based results are based on group-level analysis, where correlations between brain regions are calculated at the intersubject level. This limitation makes a within-subject analysis of PET images impossible, which is essential for longitudinal studies that can track changes over time within the same individual4. Therefore, the development of methods that allow single-subject analysis, such as dynamic PET-based molecular connectivity, is an important research direction in brain research investigating network disorders, since it opens the door to the use of molecular network analysis in clinical practice. Hence, dynamic PET data were used in our preclinical study.
Our research groups are currently conducting a study that examines changes in metabolic connectivity following an intracerebral hemorrhage on an intrasubject level across multiple time points using the rat collagenase model11. To investigate intrasubject metabolic brain connectivity, temporal information of the tracer uptake in different brain regions is required, which can be obtained through dynamic PET. In the following sections, we give a detailed description of the data acquisition and analysis protocol.