A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

A Pediatric Concussion Model in Mice: Closed Head Injury with Long-Term Disorders (CHILD)

1.2K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/67667

⸱

February 7th, 2025

 ,  ,  , 

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

Pediatric concussions can result in long-term sequelae with physiological and psychological perturbations. This pediatric concussion mouse model results in long-term neuroinflammation, white matter alterations, and neuronal modifications with behavioral dysfunction. The model can be adapted to differential impact locations or repeated concussions to assess lifetime changes.

Abstract

Concussions and mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) during childhood represent a significant health endangerment, with many patients later in life exhibiting debilitating physiological, neurological, and psychosocial outcomes. The cellular and molecular pathophysiological mechanisms are relatively unknown, and this significant gap effectively precludes investigations into specific therapeutic strategies to mitigate chronic sequelae. No single animal concussion model recapitulates all the features reported in human subjects, and current models are designed to answer specific research questions. We set out to develop a juvenile concussion that recapitulates clinical early, and long-term symptomology encountered, termed Closed Head Injury with Long-term Disorder (CHILD). In this model, a concussive force via an electromagnetic impactor is delivered to the head of a lightly anesthetized unrestrained post-natal day 17 (P17) mouse, allowing free rotation of the head. Mice are placed on a tightly stretched tin foil across a stereotactic device, and the impactor is carefully aligned with the targeted cortical region. The electromagnetic impactor facilitates the selection of impact depth, dwell, and duration to determine injury severity. A strength of this model is that it allows head rotation, an important clinical feature. After impact, mice are immediately monitored for righting time and time to explore their environment, followed by their return to their dam. Increasing the severity of concussion results in intracranial bleeds in a subset of mice. Mice can be routinely monitored for behavior and neuroimaging over their lifespan, as desired. Various injury severities mimic the heterogeneous nature of juvenile concussions. The current standard CHILD model exhibits no skull fracture, no observable conventional neuroimaging change (similar to clinical), but leads to progressive and persistent neuronal death, altered diffusion MRI, modified neuronal activity and plasticity, increased gliosis, and progressive behavioral perturbations with age. In summary, this CHILD model mimics the early and long-term features observed in many clinical concussion patients.

Introduction

Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a major health concern as it represents the leading cause of pediatric emergency medical care visits and is associated with debilitating health outcomes later in life. Even mild TBI (mTBI), which makes up 75% of all TBI cases1, leads to long-term abnormalities, including physiological, psychological, neurological, and cognitive dysfunctions2. Despite the high occurrence of pediatric mTBI and its significant associated health risks, the pathological, cellular, and molecular mechanisms that precede the chronic deficits are still underexplored. This gap in knowledge impedes the development of effective treatments and diagnostic methods for pediatric mTBI.

Adult rodent TBI models include weight drop, controlled cortical impact, and fluid percussion injury and can be titrated to elicit moderate to severe injuries (dependent upon outcome measures)3,4. Many of these adult models have been adapted for pediatric TBI5,6. During the last decade, models of mTBI have been developed in rodents with closed head injury as well as with rotational models7. However, implementation of these models in developing rodents is sparse compared to the adult TBI literature8. To address the clinical relevance, encompassing a wide range of severities that model pediatric clinical heterogeneity, this study developed the Closed Head Injury with Long-term Disorder (CHILD) TBI model. CHILD is a non-surgical, unrestrained concussion model using P17 mice, a developmental age that corresponds to the peak of myelination observed in 2-3-year-old children9. A concussive force is delivered using an electromagnetic impactor over the somatosensory cortex of a lightly isoflurane-anesthetized mouse. Impacting the unrestrained head results in rotational forces on the brain10, as reported in many clinical concussion reports. Consistent with clinical mTBI, the CHILD model does not lead to skull fracture or visible abnormality on conventional neuroimaging.

The CHILD model has several advantages. First, both early and long-term pathological features have been observed in CHILD, mimicking the pathological clinical features observed in juvenile concussion patients. It has been observed at late time points gliosis, altered diffusion tensor MRI, and progressive behavioral perturbations with age10,11, modified neuronal activity, and plasticity11,12. Interestingly, unsuspected peripheral consequences were also found with cardiac abnormalities in the long term after a single pediatric injury13. Second, this model is replicable and showed comparable results between researchers and between labs13. Third, the CHILD model is flexible and can be expanded to encapsulate the heterogeneous nature of TBIs. For instance, previous studies have shown that different speeds and depths of impact result in different severities10,11. Finally, an additional strength of this model is that CHILD can be administered repeatedly and can be easily applied to differential locations to probe responses to repeated injury and identify vulnerable brain regions.

Overall, the CHILD model replicates clinical pediatric mTBI and concussion and serves as a research tool to facilitate the understanding of the pathophysiological characteristics of pediatric mTBI. While no model encapsulates every aspect of the features described in real-life TBI cases, this model can address many of the outstanding research questions that remain unanswered.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Experiments were reproduced on 2 sites, the University of Bordeaux (France) and the University of California Riverside (CA, USA).

In Bordeaux, all experiments were performed on male and female P17 C57Bl6J mice bred in the University animal facility. Initial breeders were obtained from a commercial source and raised under standard conditions with a 12/12-h dark/light cycle, a temperature of 21 °C ± 1 °C, and a humidity of 55% ± 10%, and food and water provided ad libitum. Experimental procedures are in accordance with the University of Bordeaux Animal Care Committee regulations, French laws governing laboratory animal use (authorization #29324-2021012118549817 v3), the European Council directives (86/609/EEC), and the ARRIVE guidelines. This protocol, being a mild model of traumatic brain injury, does not produce pain or distress. As such, it does not necessitate any specific pain management outside of regular pain management. Weaning of the pups (TBI, Shams) was effective at P25.

At Riverside, E13 pregnant C57Bl6J female mice were commercially obtained, and all experiments were performed on the resultant litters in both male and female pups aged P17. Animals were raised with an automated 12/12-h dark/light cycle and a temperature of 21 °C. Dams and pups had ad libitum access to food and water. All experimental procedures were approved by the University of California, Riverside Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and complied with the Animal Welfare Act and Public Health Service policy. All pups (TBI, Sham) in that facility were weaned on P21.

The details of the animals, reagents, and equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Preliminary steps

  1. To prevent hypothermia, warm up the chamber for anesthesia induction and the recovery cages in advance with warming pads.
  2. Set the stereotaxic apparatus with the impactor mounted at a 90° angle.
  3. Verify that all parts are properly tightened and secured and that the piston is firmly screwed to the impactor.
  4. Cut an aluminum sheet that will fit the stereotaxic apparatus (in this case, 18 cm x 30 cm). The aluminum used here is of standard aluminum quality. Wrap the stereotaxic frame with the foil to form a pad on which the animal will be laid on. Secure the position and tension of the foil with regular lab tape in order to sustain the weight of the animal.
  5. Turn on the impactor controller and, in the function of the severity of the injury, set the speed of impact to 2 m.s-1 for grade 1 (G1) or 3 m.s-1 for grade 2 (G2) for a more severe impact (modifying this parameter will impact the severity of the concussion).
  6. Weight out the animals. At P17, the weight of the animals must be over 5.9 g for C57Bl6 mice. Animals that fall under that weight are excluded.
    NOTE: For some studies, CD1 mice were used, and for P17, the threshold was fixed to be over 6.5 g (personal data).

2. Juvenile mild traumatic brain injury procedure

  1. Anesthetize the mouse with a 5 min exposure to isoflurane. Set the gas composition to a 2.5% mixture (in this case, the carrier is a synthetic air mixture with 21% oxygen) with a flow rate of 1.5 L/min.
    NOTE: From this step, all the actions must be done swiftly, as unimpacted animals will wake up within 5 min.
  2. Position the mouse head under the impactor. The pup should be spread out at all lengths. The tip is 3 mm in diameter and covered with rubber to minimize the effect of the metal on the skull.
  3. Lower the impactor by switching the knob to the Extend position.
  4. Roughly lower the impactor and position the mouse so that the impactor is just between the ears. Then, slide the mouse so that the piston tip is moved forward to the equivalent of one piston tip, and one piston tip to the left of the animal (see Figure 1).
    NOTE: Sham animals are positioned slightly away from the piston (no part of the animal should be impacted).
  5. Lower the impactor so that it contacts the head of the animal (Figure 1E2).
  6. Set the impactor to Retract (Figure 1E3).
  7. In order to determine the severity of the injury, move the piston 1 mm down for grade 1 (G1). For more severe impact grade 2 (G2), move the piston 3 mm down (Figure 1E4).
  8. Set the dwell time to 0.1 s regardless of the severity (modifying this parameter will not impact the severity of the concussion).
  9. Press Impact on the right knob (Figure 1E5).
  10. Rapidly set the left knob to the off position so that the system doesn't overheat. See the flow chart for more information (Figure 2).

Mouse brain impact experiment; diagram with piston positions and measurements; injury model setup.
Figure 1: Positioning of the impactor tip. (A) The impactor tip is first positioned on the midline between the ears. (B) The tip is then moved 3 mm forward (the equivalent of a tip diameter). (C) Finally, the piston tip is moved 3 mm on the left side of the mouse. (D,E) Possible positions of the impactor tip in regard to the magnetic barrel. (D) The impactor has 3 positions in relation to the piston body (neutral, retracted, or extended/impact) with 5 mm range between them. (E) Positions of the impactor tip in relation to the skull surface at the different stages of the procedure. (1) Position of the impactor in the neutral position; (2) the piston is moved to gently touch the skull of the animal (step 2.5); (3) the impactor is then set to retract (step 3.6); (4) the whole body of the impactor is moved of x mm down (step 2.7). For G1 grade, a speed of impact (y) of 2 m.s-1 with 1 mm depth (x) for G1 or a speed of impact (y) of 3 m.s-1 with 3 mm (x) depth for G2. (5) Once the lever impact is pressed, the impactor tip moves x mm below the skull surface at a y speed during dwell time upon moving back to the neutral position. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Stereotactic impactor setup for brain injury induction in mice; diagram of procedural steps and controls.
Figure 2: CHILD flow chart. Flow chart detailing the steps to induce CHILD in PND17 mice color-coded to denote different phases of concussion induction. Photographs of the setup include (A) the entire CHILD induction setup (anesthesia device is not visible), including the Impact controller, the stereotactic device with the impactor and tip positioned above taut tin foil, and the recovery box located on top of a heating pad. (B) Rubber impact tip (3 mm) with scale. (C) The stereotactic device with tin foil stretched across the stereotactic frame and the impactor solenoid with the impact tip positioned above the foil. (D) Recovery chamber sitting on the heat pad. (E) The impact controller with two control switches, highlighted as in the flow chart (red box = extend/retract/off; purple box= impact toggle). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

3. Post-trauma follow-up

NOTE: The following steps can be videorecorded for offline analysis, allowing the experimenter to perform CHILD on multiple animals in a row. Nonetheless, regular and repeated assessments of animal well-being should be performed.

  1. Note the duration of apnea, if present (immediately after impact), and if there was a head rotation during impact.
  2. Position the mouse on its right flank in a recovery cage.
  3. Note the righting time of the mouse (rearing on 4 legs) and the time of resuming an exploratory behavior. Typically, sham mice awake within 3-4 min and resume an exploratory behavior 3-4 min later (Figure 3). CHILD mice awake within 7-12 min after impact (Figure 3A) and resume exploration within 12-18 min after impact (Figure 3B), according to the sex and impact severity (Figure 3A,B).
    NOTE: If the impacted animal doesn't resume its exploratory behavior within 30 min, the animal is excluded.
  4. Once fully recovered, return the animals to their home cage. At this point, the behavior of sham and CHILD mice (G1 or G2 severity) should be exactly similar, and animal groups shouldn't be distinguishable within the litter.
    NOTE: The animals can be maintained up to 18 months post-injury14 in conditions indicated at the beginning of the methods. Behavioral outcomes assessments can be performed using a battery of tests in association with MRI measurements, miniscope imaging, histology, and immunohistochemistry12. Immunohistochemistry for GFAP and NeuN can be used at early time points to validate the model and the presence of tissue changes.

4. Immunohistochemistry

NOTE: One day post-injury, animals from the G2 and sham groups (n = 4 mice for G2 and n = 4 for Sham) were anesthetized and transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) 0.1 M, pH 7.4 at 4 °C. Brains were extracted10 from the skull and immersed in the same PFA solution overnight, and then transferred to PBS with sodium azide (0.1%) before cutting. Coronal sections were then prepared at 50 µm thickness using a vibratome. For long storage, sections were placed in cryoprotective medium (30% ethylene glycol and 20% glycerol in PBS) at -20 °C until use. To characterize the impact of the concussion on brain gliosis and neuronal loss, immunohistochemistry targeting GFAP and NeuN was performed as described here below.

  1. Wash the brain sections 4 times for 10 min in PBS.
  2. Transfer the sections in blocking solution (1% BSA, 0,3% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 10 min at room temperature (RT).
  3. Incubate sections overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution: chicken anti-GFAP (1:3000) and rabbit anti-NeuN (1:500).
  4. Wash the slices 4 times for 10 min in PBS under agitation.
  5. Then, transfer the sections in blocking solution containing the secondary fluorescent antibodies diluted 1:1000 for 1 h at RT, Alexa-Fluor-488-nm goat anti-rabbit, and Alexa-Fluor-568-nm goat anti-chicken.
  6. Wash then the sections 4 times for 10 min in PBS under agitation.
  7. Mount the sections on slides using a mounting medium and add a cover slip. Keep the slides at 4 °C until the image acquisition.
  8. Aquire immunofluorescence using an epifluorescence microscope and micromanager software. Use a stitching plugin with a 10x lens to obtain tiled images of ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres.
    NOTE: Negative control staining where the primary antibody or secondary antibody was omitted showed no detectable labeling. For more detailed image analysis, Fiji software15 can be used to quantify the immunostaining parameters in various regions of interest16.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The CHILD model is a relatively rapid and reproducible model of mTBI in pediatric mice, also allowing for variations in severity and location. The CHILD mice, as expected, exhibited significantly longer recovery times from closed head injury (Figure 3). When cohorts (n = 36 female sham, n = 140 male sham, n = 30 female G1, n = 55 male G1, n = 32 female G2, n = 141 male G2) were aggregated, a delay in righting time was observed (Figure 3A, 3-way ANOVA p ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Critical steps in the protocol
The CHILD protocol described here requires the use of an electromagnetic impactor (Figure 2A) that (1) standardizes the impact parameters (speed, depth, duration), (2) ensures reproducibility within and across laboratories, and (3) is readily available commercially. Another critical component is the impactor tip that strikes the rodent's head. A variety of possibilities can be used, ranging from silicone to metal tips, but this protoc...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This method paper was funded by Eranet Neuron Neuvasc (Badaut), Agence Nationale de la Recherche Nanospace (Badaut), CNRS IRP IINOVAtion (Badaut) and NIH NINDS Grant No. 1R01NS119605 (Obenaus, Badaut) and 1RF1NS138032 (Obenaus, Territo). Figure 1 is created with BioRender.com.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
BSASigma Aldrich Chimie S.a.r.l
80 Rue de Luzais
L'lsle-d'Abeau Chesnes - BP701
38297 Saint-Quentin-Fallavier Cedex
France
A7030
C57Bl6J mice Charles River Laboratory France CRLF 9 All. Moulin Berger, 69130 Écully, FranceBordeaux
Electromagnetic impactorLeica Biosystems, Richmond, IL USAImpact One stereotaxic impactor
Epifluorescence microscopeOlympus, BX41, Center Valley, PA
Ethylen glycolSigma Aldrich Chimie S.a.r.l
80 Rue de Luzais
L'lsle-d'Abeau Chesnes - BP701
38297 Saint-Quentin-Fallavier Cedex
France
102466
GFAP primary antibodyMillipore, Billerica, MAAB5541chicken anti-GFAP
GFAP secondary antibodyMolecular Probes, InvitrogenA11034goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor  488
GlycerolSigma Aldrich Chimie S.a.r.l
80 Rue de Luzais
L'lsle-d'Abeau Chesnes - BP701
38297 Saint-Quentin-Fallavier Cedex
France
G5516
Heavy duty aluminium foilKirklandRK611obtained at Cosco
Micromanager software (NIH, USA
NeuN primary antibodyAbCam, Discovery Drive, Cambridge
Biomedical Campus,
Cambridge, CB2 0AX, UK
AB128886rabbit anti-NeuN
NeuN secondary antibodyMolecular Probes, InvitrogenA11041goat anti-chicken AlexaFluor 568
PBSSigma Aldrich Chimie S.a.r.l
80 Rue de Luzais
L'lsle-d'Abeau Chesnes - BP701
38297 Saint-Quentin-Fallavier Cedex
France
P5493
PFASigma Aldrich Chimie S.a.r.l
80 Rue de Luzais
L'lsle-d'Abeau Chesnes - BP701
38297 Saint-Quentin-Fallavier Cedex
France
1.04003
Sodium azideSigma Aldrich Chimie S.a.r.l
80 Rue de Luzais
L'lsle-d'Abeau Chesnes - BP701
38297 Saint-Quentin-Fallavier Cedex
France
26628-22-8
Stereotaxic frame - baseKOPF instruments 7324 Elmo St, Tujunga, CA 91042, États-Unis900-C
Stereotaxic frame - electrode manipulatorKOPF instruments 7324 Elmo St, Tujunga, CA 91042, États-Unis960
Stereotaxic frame - u-frameKOPF instruments 7324 Elmo St, Tujunga, CA 91042, États-Unis900-U
Triton x-100Sigma Aldrich Chimie S.a.r.l
80 Rue de Luzais
L'lsle-d'Abeau Chesnes - BP701
38297 Saint-Quentin-Fallavier Cedex
France
X100
VectashieldVector laboratoriesH-1000-10Mounting medium
VibratomeLeica Biosystems, Richmond, IL USAVTS1000
Jackson laboratory The Jackson Laboratory 600 Main Street Bar Harbor, ME USA 04609UCR

References

  1. Dewan, M. C., et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 130 (4), 1080-1097 (2018).
  2. Rivara, F. P., et al. Persistence of disability 24 to 36 months after pediatric traumatic brain injury: a cohort study. J Neurotrauma. 29 (15), 2499-2504 (2012).
  3. Fesharaki-Zadeh, A., Datta, D. An overview of preclinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI): Relevance to pathophysiological mechanisms. Front Cell Neurosci. 18, (2024).
  4. Panchenko, P. E., Hippauf, L., Konsman, J. P., Badaut, J. Do astrocytes act as immune cells after pediatric TBI. Neurobiol Dis. 185, 106231(2023).
  5. Kochanek, P. M., Wallisch, J. S., Bayır, H., Clark, R. S. B. Pre-clinical models in pediatric traumatic brain injury-challenges and lessons learned. Childs Nerv Syst. 33 (10), 1693-1701 (2017).
  6. Smith, A. M., Grayson, B. E. A strike to the head: Parallels between the pediatric and adult human and the rodent in traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Res. 102 (7), e25364(2024).
  7. McNamara, E. H., Grillakis, A. A., Tucker, L. B., McCabe, J. T. The closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA) as an application for traumatic brain injury pre-clinical research: A status report. Exp Neurol. 333, 113409(2020).
  8. Bodnar, C. N., Roberts, K. N., Higgins, E. K., Bachstetter, A. D. A systematic review of closed-head injury models of mild traumatic brain injury in mice and rats. J Neurotrauma. 36 (11), 1683-1706 (2019).
  9. Semple, B. D., Blomgren, K., Gimlin, K., Ferriero, D. M., Noble-Haeusslein, L. J. Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species. Prog Neurobiol. 106-107, 1-16 (2013).
  10. Rodriguez-Grande, B., et al. Gliovascular changes precede white matter damage and long-term disorders in juvenile mild closed head injury. Glia. 66 (8), 1663-1677 (2018).
  11. Ichkova, A., et al. Early cerebrovascular and long-term neurological modifications ensue following juvenile mild traumatic brain injury in male mice. Neurobiol Dis. 141, 104952(2020).
  12. Badaut, J., et al. Endocannabinoid-mediated rescue of somatosensory cortex activity, plasticity and related behaviors following an early in life concussion. bioRxiv. , (2024).
  13. Leyba, K., et al. Neurovascular hypoxia after mild traumatic brain injury in juvenile mice correlates with heart-brain dysfunctions in adulthood. Acta Physiol. 238 (2), e13933(2023).
  14. Obenaus, A., et al. Progressive lifespan modifications in the corpus callosum following a single juvenile concussion in male mice monitored by diffusion MRI. bioRxiv. , (2023).
  15. Schindelin, J., et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 9 (7), 676-682 (2012).
  16. Clément, T., et al. Juvenile mild traumatic brain injury elicits distinct spatiotemporal astrocyte responses. Glia. 68 (3), 528-542 (2020).
  17. Drieu, A., et al. Persistent neuroinflammation and behavioural deficits after single mild traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 42 (12), 2216-2229 (2022).
  18. Obenaus, A., et al. A single mild juvenile TBI in male mice leads to regional brain tissue abnormalities at 12 months of age that correlate with cognitive impairment at the middle age. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 11 (1), 32(2023).
  19. Ryan, E., et al. Traumatic brain injury in children: Glial fibrillary acidic protein and clinical outcomes. Pediatr Emerg Care. 38 (3), e1139-e1142 (2022).
  20. Czeiter, E., et al. Blood biomarkers on admission in acute traumatic brain injury: Relations to severity, CT findings and care path in the CENTER-TBI study. EBioMedicine. 56, 102785(2020).
  21. Edwards, K. A., et al. Serum GFAP, NfL, and tau concentrations are associated with worse neurobehavioral functioning following mild, moderate, and severe TBI: A cross-sectional multiple-cohort study. Front Neurol. 14, 1223960(2023).
  22. Smith, A. M., et al. High-fat diet consumption negatively influences closed-head traumatic brain injury in a pediatric rodent model. Exp Neurol. 379, 114888(2024).
  23. Hunniford, V. T., et al. A systematic assessment of preclinical multilaboratory studies and a comparison to single laboratory studies. eLife. 12, e76300(2023).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryCHILD ModelJuvenile Mouse ModelElectromagnetic ImpactorDiffusion MRINeuronal DeathBehavioral AssessmentImmunofluorescence Microscopy