$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Tissue injury in reperfused acute myocardial infarction (repAMI) is the main driving factor for cardiac remodeling and development of heart failure1. Multiple local mediators and resident cardiac cells but also infiltrating immune cells affect its expansion in a complex interaction2,3. Understanding the spatial organization of these processes is essential to gain profound knowledge for the identification of new therapy targets to limit tissue injury after repAMI and improve cardiac function.
Since the heart muscle itself consists of different cell types, detailed analysis of cardiac damage is challenging as every cell type shows its own specific resistance capacity during ischemia and reperfusion injury4,5. One important hallmark in the context of repAMI is a major loss of vasculature accompanied by deterioration of endothelial cell function6. The most established marker used for the depiction of vascular structure and analysis of endothelial dysfunction in mice and humans is CD31 (also known as PECAM-1), an adhesion molecule expressed on the endothelial cell surface7. In different ischemia/reperfusion models, loss of CD31 showed to be a good surrogate marker for the distinction of endothelial tissue damage8,9,10. Furthermore, three major injury compartments are distinguished throughout the whole heart during repAMI. Cardiac tissue not affected by ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury represents the remote area. Myocardium downstream of a vessel occlusion is defined as an area at risk (AAR)11,12. After the onset of reperfusion, a distinct area of cardiac tissue can be differentiated inside the AAR, which was damaged by preceding ischemia (damage area)13. Conventional assessment of cardiac I/R injury in mice uses triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) in serial thick sections displaying decreased metabolic activity of damaged cardiac cells13,14. Simultaneously, ex vivo Evan's blue staining can be added for the determination of AAR15. However, these established methods hold several limitations, including the reduced possibility of co-assessment of immune cell infiltration, distinction of cell-type specific injury, and accurate 3D tissue reconstruction.
Light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) enables the possibility to visualize intact cleared whole mouse organs with fluorescence signal resolution down to the cellular level. Recently, an improved non-toxic tissue-clearing method was introduced using ethyl cinnamate (ECi) for 3D visualization of intact mouse hearts8. To address the limitations of TTC/Evan's blue staining, intravital antibody-based CD31 fluorescence staining was used, revealing cardiac endothelial injury as areas without CD31 staining (CD31neg) during repAMI8. Additional administration of ex vivo retrograde aortic injection with a fluorophore-conjugated anti-CD31 antibody with another fluorescence spectrum as for intravital staining accounts for contemporaneous 3D depiction of AAR. Furthermore, this method can be extended by adding neutrophil staining, allowing cell distribution analysis separated by remote area, AAR, and cardiac endothelial injury volume to improve understanding of neutrophil function during repAMI.