$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (ULM) represents a transformative advancement in ultrasound imaging, enabling super-resolution visualization of the microvasculature beyond the conventional diffraction limit. This discussion highlights the critical steps in the ULM protocol, addresses potential modifications and troubleshooting strategies, explores the limitations of the method, evaluates its significance compared to alternative imaging modalities, and considers its importance and potential applications in biomedical research.
Critical steps in the ULM protocol
Several steps are crucial to the successful implementation of ULM, and their influence is illustrated in Figure 7. One of the most important steps is the administration of microbubbles, as both the concentration and delivery quality directly affect imaging outcomes. An optimal concentration is necessary to balance spatial resolution and detectability. Inadequate delivery, such as poor catheter placement or extravasation, can result in very low vascular signal and incomplete reconstructions, as shown in Figure 7B, where only a sparse number of microbubbles reach the bloodstream. High-frame-rate imaging, typically in the kilohertz range, is essential for capturing the rapid movement of microbubbles and enabling reliable tracking across frames. Any instability during the acquisition, such as motion introduced by breathing, poor fixation, or insufficient anesthesia, can degrade the localization accuracy. An example of this is illustrated in Figure 7C, where excessive motion during the acquisition results in a blurred and unusable density map.
Microbubble localization and tracking depend on advanced image processing algorithms that detect individual bubbles, perform subpixel localization, and reconstruct trajectories with sub-diffraction precision. Even with proper acquisition and processing, anatomical factors such as skull-induced aberrations can still affect image quality. In transcranial imaging, particularly in older mice, skull thickening can introduce acoustic distortion. This leads to characteristic shadowing artifacts beneath the sagittal suture, where no microbubbles are detected, as depicted in Figure 7D. Such aberrations reduce signal-to-noise ratio and can obscure vascular structures unless corrected with adaptive filtering or by refining probe placement.
When all steps are performed successfully, high-quality ULM maps are achievable, as shown in Figure 7A, where a dense and well-resolved vascular network is reconstructed through a transcranial approach.

Figure 7: Reference and troubleshooting examples for ULM imaging quality in mice. Panel (A) shows a high-quality transcranial ULM microbubble (MB) density map acquired in a young adult mouse, illustrating successful vascular mapping across the full coronal plane. Panel (B) displays an example of a poor vascular signal due to microbubble extravasation or insufficient venous access, resulting in sparse MB detections. Panel (C) shows an acquisition affected by excessive animal motion, producing a blurry and non-interpretable density map. Panel (D) highlights skull-induced acoustic aberration commonly observed in older mice, visible as a shadow cone beneath the sagittal suture where no MBs are detected due to reduced signal-to-noise ratio. These examples serve as visual references for identifying and addressing common experimental artifacts in ULM imaging. Scale bar: 1mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Limitations of the method
Despite its many advantages, ULM has inherent limitations that affect its applicability. Out-of-plane vessel bias is a significant issue in 2D imaging, as vessels extending outside the imaging plane are not adequately reconstructed, leading to incomplete vascular maps. This limitation can be mitigated by transitioning to volumetric (3D) imaging approaches22, although this increases computational complexity. Intravenous catheterization challenges also pose a hurdle, especially in small animal models, where achieving consistent microbubble delivery can be technically demanding. Microbubble stability is also a limiting factor, especially during extended imaging sessions. Due to their short circulation half-life, microbubbles may require repeated bolus injections or continuous infusion protocols to maintain adequate contrast throughout the acquisition period. Motion artifacts remain a significant concern, particularly for awake subjects, where even small involuntary movements can degrade super-resolution imaging. Finally, depth penetration in ULM is inherently limited by ultrasound attenuation. While this is generally not problematic for rodent imaging at high frequencies (e.g., 15 MHz), it becomes more challenging in larger animals such as swine or non-human primates. In these cases, lower-frequency probes may be required to achieve sufficient imaging depth, but this comes at the cost of reduced spatial resolution-underscoring a key trade-off between depth and detail that must be considered when translating ULM to larger preclinical models.
Significance of ULM compared to existing methods
Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (ULM) offers substantial advantages over conventional imaging modalities, particularly in the context of microvascular imaging. Among its most notable strengths is its ability to surpass the diffraction limit of traditional ultrasound, achieving sub-diffraction imaging at spatial scales comparable to optical techniques such as two-photon microscopy. Unlike these optical methods, however, ULM provides deeper tissue penetration, allowing access to brain regions that are otherwise difficult to visualize noninvasively.
ULM also offers functional imaging capabilities, enabling the quantitative assessment of blood flow velocity, perfusion dynamics, and vascular remodeling. These features make it highly suitable for investigating both physiological processes and pathological changes in neurovascular networks. Compared to MRI and PET, ULM is more cost-effective, does not require heavy infrastructure, and avoids the use of contrast agents with known toxicity risks, relying instead on gas-filled microbubbles with favorable safety profiles.
The combination of high spatial and temporal resolution makes ULM particularly valuable for a range of research applications. It is especially powerful in studies targeting microvascular structures and deep brain nuclei, where traditional modalities often fall short. Moreover, unlike histological approaches that require tissue fixation and staining, ULM enables real-time imaging in living animals, supporting longitudinal designs and dynamic interventions such as pharmacological challenges.
Beyond static vascular mapping, ULM also enables high-resolution functional imaging by capturing cerebral blood flow dynamics with exceptional spatial and temporal precision. Recent advances have demonstrated its feasibility for whole-brain functional neuroimaging in rodents, revealing stimulus-evoked and spontaneous activity-dependent changes in blood flow at the capillary level across distributed brain networks2. This positions ULM as a powerful tool for functional studies, effectively bridging the gap between mesoscale hemodynamic imaging and neuronal activity mapping.
Usability, efficiency, and reproducibility considerations
The ULM workflow described in this protocol has been optimized for ease of implementation and reproducibility across different experimental setups. The use of commercially available components, including FDA- and EMA-approved microbubbles and standard rodent anesthesia procedures, ensures wide accessibility. In addition, the integration of the entire processing pipeline within the dedicated software (IcoLab) greatly enhances usability by automating complex steps such as microbubble localization, trajectory reconstruction, and map generation. This streamlined interface reduces the need for custom code and minimizes user intervention, supporting consistent results across users and experiments. While high-resolution ULM processing is computationally intensive, especially for long acquisitions or volumetric data, batch-processing tools and GPU acceleration significantly reduce analysis time. The protocol's modular design also supports reproducibility, allowing researchers to fine-tune acquisition and processing parameters while maintaining a robust analytical framework. The protocol also includes a dedicated section on probe positioning using IcoScan and IcoStudio, which enables users to reliably reposition the probe at the exact same imaging slice across sessions, with an accuracy of approximately 100 µm. This feature is particularly valuable for longitudinal studies, where precise spatial consistency is essential for tracking vascular changes over time. These features collectively lower the barrier to entry for new users and support the scalable deployment of ULM in both exploratory and longitudinal imaging studies.
Conclusion
This protocol presents a complete workflow for implementing Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (ULM) in rodent brain imaging, covering surgical preparation, microbubble administration, image acquisition, and high-resolution vascular mapping using a standardized acquisition and analysis platform optimized for preclinical research. ULM represents a major advance in biomedical imaging, offering super-resolution in vivo visualization of the microvasculature with unprecedented detail. Compared to existing imaging modalities, ULM provides a unique combination of high spatial resolution, functional flow quantification, and accessibility, making it especially well-suited for studies of vascular development, neurovascular coupling, and disease pathophysiology. As the technology continues to mature, ULM is poised to become a cornerstone in both preclinical research and, eventually, clinical neuroimaging applications.