This protocol provides instructions for intranasal administration of IAV and downstream analysis of mouse lung damage and associated transcriptional changes to lung cell types.
Method Article
This protocol provides instructions for intranasal administration of IAV and downstream analysis of mouse lung damage and associated transcriptional changes to lung cell types.
Viral infection causes both acute and long-term damage to the lung alveolus, the specialized tissue structure responsible for gas exchange between the cardiovascular system and the external environment. Influenza A virus (IAV) infection in mice represents a translational model for the response of the human lung to viral infection and induces both transient and persistent cell state changes in the alveolus. In some cases, aberrant cell states induced by viral injury that are not resolved over time may permanently impair the critical gas exchange function of the lung. This article demonstrates methods for intranasal infection of mice with A/PR/8/34 IAV and characterization of transient and long-lasting alterations to the cellular composition and tissue structure of damaged lungs. This model enables a detailed investigation into the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying lung repair and chronic dysfunction. This approach also offers a platform for evaluating therapeutic interventions aimed at promoting effective lung regeneration and restoring respiratory function after viral injury.
The lungs play a crucial role in supplying oxygen and nutrients to local tissues. Endothelial cells (ECs) that populate small capillary blood vessels of the lungs are essential for the proper functioning of the lung tissue, maintaining vascular integrity and efficient gas exchange1. ECs form the vascular niche and reciprocally crosstalk with other cells such as epithelial cells, immune cells, and mesenchymal cells. This contributes to the regulation of lung development and of tissue repair in response to injury or disease2.
H1N1 Influenza A virus infection is a worldwide problem3. Patients with H1N1 infection are often diagnosed with exudative diffuse alveolar damage (DAD)4. Infection with H1N1 can lead to serious lung damage and severe consequences, including pneumonia, severe acute lung injury (ALI), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)5.The damage mainly arises from the virus infecting lung epithelial cells, which prompts an excessive immune response resulting in inflammation, tissue damage, and fluid buildup in the lungs. The epithelial cells lining airways and alveoli, which are responsible for gas exchange, are thus directly harmed by the H1N1 virus, leading to disruption of the normal structure of the lung6,7. It has become clear that other cell types, although not directly infected by IAV, can become damaged in response to infection8,9. Tissue damage after influenza infection, therefore, affects all cellular compartments of the lung, and it has recently been shown that IAV infection causes both transient and persistent changes to cell state in multiple cellular compartments9. This cell plasticity in response to disease can be helpful or harmful to successful tissue repair and warrants further study.
The most adopted experimental model for studying influenza and its pathogenesis is intranasal infection of mice with influenza virus A/PR/8/3410. It is an important technique permitting the study of disease severity, mortality, and viral infectivity. Intranasal infection of mice mimics the natural infection route in humans and allows the study of both adaptive and innate immune responses against the virus. In 1934, a specific strain of the Influenza A virus "A/PR/8/34" was isolated from a patient in Puerto Rico11. This strain of influenza virus has now been mouse-adapted and no longer productively infects humans. Because of the similarities in mouse and human immune systems, mice are the most popular animal model for IAV research12. In this method, the A/PR/8/34 H1N1 strain is directly administered to mice through the nostrils, mimicking a natural infection13. It is an easy, cost-effective, and convenient method to study the effects of viral infection on host lung tissue in wild-type (WT) as well as knockout (KO) conditions. Alternative techniques have advantages and disadvantages compared to the intranasal model. Intratracheal (IT) inoculation allows accurate delivery of the virus into the lungs, but this technique does not fully mimic infection by inhalation and does not provide information on toxicity in the upper respiratory tract. IT inoculation also requires great skill to reduce the risk of tracheal injury13,14. Aerosol inhalation (AR) inoculation mimics the natural route of infection and creates a more uniform lung pathology compared to intranasal infection, but it can be difficult to maintain uniform virus concentration in the aerosol and to achieve accurate delivery of viral aerosol. Safety is also an important concern of the AR inoculation method10. Therefore, the intranasal inoculation technique of IAV administration is a crucial approach to pulmonary-focused research on the downstream effects of viral infection in tissue injury and repair. Unlike chemical or mechanical models, it provides a more realistic and less invasive way to study influenza-induced lung damage and host-pathogen interactions.
Here, we establish a reproducible method for intranasal infection of mice with Influenza A virus (A/PR/8/34) and for characterizing both the short-term and long-term cellular and structural changes in the lung alveolus that result from viral injury. Studies using this method can aid in the discovery of mechanisms of lung tissue damage and repair to identify novel therapeutic targets for lung diseases.
Working with the influenza A virus in an animal model is considered biosafety level 2 (BSL2) and animal biosafety level 2 (ABSL2). All animal procedures used to generate this data were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (Protocol #24-452). This protocol is also approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. Before beginning this protocol, it is recommended that users seek approval from their institutional animal care and use committee and institutional biosafety committee.
1. Preparation of working stock
NOTE: All work with the influenza virus should be performed on ice in a biosafety cabinet. Eject tips and anything else that contacts the virus into a container of 10% bleach. Ice buckets, pipettes, and tip boxes should be sprayed with 10% bleach solution rather than immersed. Incubate at room temperature for at least 30 min. Dispose of solid waste in a biohazard waste container and discard liquid waste down the sink, flushing with water.
2. Diluting aliquots of virus for use in intranasal infection experiments
3. Transportation of viral aliquots to animal facilities
4. Administration of IAV to mice
NOTE: Working with the influenza virus in the animal facility requires an ABSL2 safety level facility. Standard PPE includes scrubs, a disposable lab coat, two hair bonnets, double nitrile gloves, double shoe covers, protective eyewear (safety glasses), and a mask. The diluted influenza virus should be kept on ice throughout the administration protocol to avoid loss of infectivity.
5. Transportation back to the lab
6. Monitoring of mice and additional experimental procedures
7. Harvesting of lung tissue for downstream approaches
Compared to uninfected, PBS-treated mice, IAV-infected mice will demonstrate heterogeneous tissue damage (Figure 1A). Tissue damage can be quantified using a k-means clustering algorithm in MATLAB20 (Figure 1B). IAV-infected mice will begin to lose weight between 3-4 days following infection. At an ideal titer, mice will lose between 20-30% of their initial body weight, with the maximum weight loss occurring at 8-10 days post infection (dpi) (Figure 1C). By 11-12 dpi, mice should have begun to gain weight and should return to within 10-15% of their initial body weight by 14 dpi. For studies of regeneration, it is useful if most mice in the experiment lose weight and experience tissue damage but do not die. However, due to the heterogeneity in tissue damage (Figure 1A,B) and the possible variability in intranasal administration, it is normal for several mice in an experiment not to lose weight or experience tissue damage and for several mice to lose >30% body weight, resulting in euthanasia (Figure 1D). Experiments that endeavor to determine a difference in survival and weight loss between, for example, mice with KO of a particular gene and their WT controls may need to adjust the titer and dosage of IAV and will need to perform a power calculation to determine the sample size needed to detect such a difference in these two parameters.
In addition to changes to overall tissue structure and mouse health, transcriptional changes to all lung cellular compartments occur over the course of the tissue's response to damage. This includes both transient cell states that ultimately resolve as the tissue is repaired, including transitional or intermediate epithelial cell states and myeloid immune cell states, and persistent cell states that do not contribute to functional repair, including Krt5+ epithelial cells and TrkB+ endothelial cells9. For example, in the capillary endothelium of the mouse lung, a transient interferon-stimulated endothelial cell state arises at 6 dpi, characterized by high expression of interferon-stimulated genes (Figure 2A). This state resolves by 11-19 dpi (Figure 2A). An injury-induced capillary endothelial (iCAP) state arises at 11 dpi, characterized by high expression of Ntrk2 (TRKB), Sparcl1, and Bnip3 (Figure 2B). Unlike the interferon-stimulated endothelial cell state, the iCAP endothelial cell state then persists in regions of severely damaged tissue and is still present at a year post-infection (Figure 2C). Transient alveolar epithelial cell states, including alveolar transitional cells and immature alveolar type I epithelial (AT1) cell states, also arise after infection (Figure 2D). Finally, infection results in loss of many endogenous alveolar macrophages (aMAC_a) and their reconstitution from both inflammatory monocytes (iMON) and endogenous aMACs. Alveolar macrophages at 1 year post-infection have different transcriptional states (aMAC_a and aMAC_b) depending on their origin (Figure 2E)9. Transient and persistent cell states that arise following acute lung injury warrant further study, as their abnormal behavior within the niche may contribute either productively or negatively to successful tissue repair and subsequent tissue function. Single-cell RNA sequencing data have been previously published9 and are deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus as GEO: GSE262927.

Figure 1: Monitoring lung injury and animal health. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of lung tissue sections from a mock-infected (PBS-treated) lung on the left and an IAV-infected lung on the right. Compared to the uninjured lung, the IAV-infected lung shows heterogeneous tissue damage. Scale bars, 1 mm. (B) Using a k-means clustering algorithm in MATLAB20, tissue damage can be characterized as severe (red), damaged (green), or normal (blue). It is important to note that in the PBS-treated lung lobe on the left, airway structures are classified as "severe" due to the density and staining intensity of airway epithelial cells. However, it is still possible to easily discern the difference between PBS-treated and influenza-infected lungs given this baseline. Scale bars, 1 mm. (C) Example weight loss curve from a representative IAV infection experiment in which mouse lungs were collected at 13 days post-infection (dpi). The curve contains data from six wild-type mice, and dots represent the mean, while error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (D) Example survival curve from a representative IAV infection experiment in which mouse lungs were collected at 14 days post-infection (dpi). The curve contains data from seven wild-type mice. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Monitoring capillary endothelial cell state changes after IAV infection. (A) An interferon-stimulated EC state arises at 6 dpi that is resolved between 11-19 dpi. Reanalysis of published single-cell RNA sequencing data from mouse lungs at several different time points following influenza infection shows that the interferon module score in all capillary endothelial cell types is highest at 6 dpi. Data was reanalyzed using R, and the interferon module score is based on the expression of 87 interferon-stimulated genes within each cell type. CAP1, capillary type 1 endothelial cell; iCAP, injury-induced endothelial cell; CAP2, capillary type 2 endothelial cell; EC, endothelial cell. (B) In contrast, an injury-induced EC state characterized by expression of Ntrk2 (TRKB) arises at 11 dpi and persists up to a year post-infection. Scale bar, 500 µm. (C) Transcriptional data from single-cell RNA sequencing of lung capillary endothelial cells after influenza infection demonstrate the dynamic nature of capillary endothelial cell state during tissue repair. (D) Alveolar epithelial cells also experience cell plasticity after influenza infection. An alveolar transitional cell type arises between 6-11 dpi and is resolved by 19 dpi. An immature AT1 cell state (AT1_c) arises at 11 dpi and persists until 90 dpi. (E) After infection, many existing alveolar macrophages (aMAC_a) are lost, and an influx of inflammatory monocytes (iMON) is seen at 6 dpi. The alveolar macrophage population is reconstituted both by existing aMACs to regenerate the aMAC_a population, and by inflammatory monocytes, generating the aMAC_b population. Although both represent an alveolar macrophage state, the resulting aMACs can be distinguished transcriptionally. Graphs in (C-E) indicate the percentage of cells in each population at each time point in the longitudinal influenza infection dataset and were generated using R. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary File 1: Sample injury log, weight log, and body condition score (BCS) log for monitoring animals after influenza infection. Please click here to download this File.
Here, we have reported a convenient method of transferring the influenza virus into mice to initiate rapid and effective damage to mouse lungs and study mechanisms of both successful regeneration and dysplastic repair. We demonstrate that intranasal inoculation of A/PR/8/34 IAV can be a stress-free technique. It takes less than 2 minutes per mouse to complete inoculation after isoflurane anesthesia. It is a simple and noninvasive technique of viral inoculation that follows the natural route of infection and allows the study of the response of both the tissue and the immune system in a more physiologically relevant manner. Virus inoculated through the mouse nostrils can induce both mucosal and systemic immunity21. More importantly, the damage caused by viral infection is clearly visible in lung tissue slices stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining22 (Figure 1). A complete timeline of expected transcriptional changes in lung cell types in each compartment of the lung has been previously published9. Here, we have reanalyzed a subset of this data to demonstrate that in the capillary endothelial, alveolar epithelial, and myeloid immune compartments of the mouse lungs, transient and persistent transcriptional changes occur over the course of the response to influenza infection from uninfected mice up to a year post-infection (Figure 2).
There are several critical steps in this protocol, and appropriate troubleshooting of these steps will produce a successful experiment. A/PR/8/34 influenza virus is a mouse-adapted strain of influenza that does not productively infect humans23, but it is always important to follow all indicated safety procedures during the experiment to avoid any possibility of infection of laboratory personnel. Isoflurane anesthesia administration is a critical step to ensure the successful delivery of the virus, as mice will not inhale the virus well when they are awake. Check the breathing and monitor the mouse head movement during the procedure to ensure the virus is inoculated into both nostrils. If mice are not fully anesthetized, bubbles can be generated, which both limit inhalation of the virus and generate aerosols. Both outcomes should be avoided, and mice should be placed back on the isoflurane nose cone if any sneezing or bubbles at the nostrils are observed. Post-infection monitoring, such as measuring weight loss, body condition score, and health status, as well as providing a recovery food supplement, is also an important component of this experiment. If it is observed that mice do not lose adequate weight or do not have the expected amount of tissue damage (Figure 1), it is possible that the dose is too low; on the other hand, if many mice reach the 30% body weight loss endpoint, it is possible that the dose is too high. In either case, it is best to determine the proper dose through an empirical titer of the lot of virus using a cohort of C57BL/6 mice as we describe here.
Since influenza infection continues to be prevalent worldwide, causes severe respiratory disease, and can be fatal, understanding the process of viral infectivity and the cellular response to infection and tissue injury in the lung is of prime importance. The intranasal infection method described in this study may therefore help in the identification of important regulatory mechanisms and the development of novel therapeutic approaches for lung diseases. In addition, future applications of the technique could use a different strain of mouse-adapted influenza virus, such as X31, to determine the effects on lung tissue structure and function in the case of repetitive respiratory infections. As many people are subject to multiple respiratory infections in their lifetime, such an extension of this model could have important implications for the study of lung tissue regeneration and, therefore, for public health.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 mL tube | Fisher Scientific | 02-682-557 | |
| 100 µm cell strainer | Falcon | 352360 | |
| 15 mL conical tube | Falcon | 352196 | |
| 1x PBS | Gibc0 | 10010-023 | |
| 40 µm cell strainer | Falcon | 352340 | |
| 5 mL tube | Globe | 6101C | |
| 50 mL conical tube | Falcon | 352098 | |
| A/PR/8/34 Influenza Virus stock | ATCC | VR-95PQ | Different lots have different viral titer |
| ACK Lysis Buffer | Quality Biological | 118-156-101 | |
| Anti-TRKB Antibody | R&D Systems | AF1494 | |
| Bleach | Clorox | 10% Bleach | |
| Bovine Serum Albumin | Sigma Aldrich | A8022 | |
| CO2 Anesthesia Induction Chamber | Any | N/A | |
| Collagenase Type I | Gibco | 17100017 | |
| DAPI | Milipore Sigma | 28718-90-3 | |
| Dispase | Corning | CB-40235 | |
| Dissection tools: scissors, curved forceps, straight forceps | Any | N/A | |
| Dnase | Sigma Aldrich | 4716728001 | |
| D-PBS | Corning | 21-031-CM | |
| Ethanol | Pharmco | 111000200 | |
| Glass vials | DWK Life Sciences | 986562 | |
| Ice bucket | Any | N/A | |
| Isoflurane | Covetrus | 29404 | |
| Needles, 21–23 G | Any | N/A | |
| P20/P200 pipette | Pipetman | F144056M/F144058M, | |
| P20/P200 pipette tips | Thomas Scientific | 1159M43/1159M40 | |
| Paraformaldehyde (PFA) | Thermo Scientific | J19943-k2 | 2%PFA |
| Pipetman | Any | N/A | |
| Plastic or cardboard freezer boxes | Any | N/A | |
| Razor blade | Any | N/A | |
| Ring Stand | Any | N/A | |
| Serological pipets, 5 mL | Falcon | 357543 | |
| Slide Top Induction Mouse Isoflurane Chamber | Somni Scientific | ||
| Suture | Fisher Scientific | NC9422522 | |
| Syringe tubing and luer-locks | Any | N/A | |
| Syringe, 10 mL | Any | N/A | |
| Table Top Anesthesia Machine Isoflurane | Ohmeda | Ohmeda Isotec- 4 | Flow rate should be 2.5–3% |
| Ultra-low melting agarose | Sigma Aldrich | A5030-1G | |
| Weighing balance | OHAUS | CS200 |