$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Retinal detachment remains a sight-threatening condition, particularly in eyes with severe ocular trauma, multiple recurrences, or prolonged dependence on intraocular tamponade. Silicone oil is widely used as a vitreous substitute in complex vitreoretinal surgery because it provides long-term internal support; however, direct contact between silicone oil and intraocular tissues has been associated with complications such as emulsification, corneal endothelial damage, secondary glaucoma, hypotony, and long-term silicone oil dependence1. Despite their widespread clinical use, no currently available vitreous substitute fully meets the requirements for long-term anatomical support with minimal complications in complex cases.
Internationally, vitreous substitutes used in clinical practice include silicone oil, expansile gases, and emerging investigational materials such as hydrogels. Based on existing research, current mainstream vitreous substitutes each have their specific indications and limitations. Silicone oil, as a long-term tamponade agent, effectively supports the retina and maintains intraocular pressure, particularly in cases of complex retinal detachment. However, its prolonged retention may lead to complications such as emulsification, secondary glaucoma, cataract, and corneal pathologies2,3,4. Expanding gases (e.g., SF6 and C3F8) provide effective surface tension for short-term tamponade and are commonly used in pneumatic retinopexy. Nevertheless, they require patients to maintain specific postures, carry a risk of postoperative intraocular pressure elevation, and are limited due to restrictions on air travel5,6,7. Emerging hydrogels (e.g., PVA and PAA) are designed to mimic the rheological and biological functional properties of the natural vitreous, demonstrating good biocompatibility and potential as drug delivery carriers8,9,10. However, further optimization is still needed regarding their long-term in vivo stability, precise control of degradation behavior, and injectability through small-gauge needles8,11.
The Foldable Capsular Vitreous Body (FCVB), is a Class III implantable medical device developed as a novel vitreous substitute designed to address limitations associated with conventional vitreous substitutes12. The FCVB consists of a capsule, drainage tube, drainage valve, and fixation loop, fabricated as a single unit through high-temperature and high-pressure molding of medical-grade silicone polymer13. Its design is based on a computerized simulation of the vitreous cavity, allowing personalized sizing and implantation. The core mechanism of the FCVB lies in its innovative capsule design. Made of medical-grade silicone polymer and shaped based on computer simulations of the human vitreous cavity, the capsule can form a physically isolated chamber after implantation, encapsulating the filling material (such as silicone oil) to prevent direct contact with and damage to intraocular tissues such as the retina and ciliary body12. This fundamental design shift addresses issues caused by direct tissue contact in traditional silicone oil tamponade, such as emulsification, toxicity, and chronic inflammation. Based on published clinical studies, the practical implications of this design include: 1) Maintaining ocular structure and intraocular pressure: By supporting the posterior chamber space, the capsule aids in the recovery of ciliary body function and helps maintain stable intraocular pressure12; 2) Significantly reducing long-term complications: Physical isolation effectively lowers the risks associated with prolonged silicone oil retention, such as emulsification, secondary glaucoma, and corneal pathologies12; 3) Providing a new option for eye preservation in severe cases: Particularly suitable for severe post-traumatic retinal detachment, cases with multiple surgical failures, and silicone oil-dependent eyes where conventional vitreous substitutes are ineffective, the FCVB offers a novel therapeutic approach for patients who might otherwise face phthisis bulbi or enucleation12.
First introduced in clinical practice in 2012, the FCVB was recognized as one of the four major advances in global retinal detachment surgery in 201314 and was listed among China’s Top Ten Ophthalmological Achievements in 201515. The device is particularly valuable in eyes with severe trauma, recurrent detachment, silicone oil dependence, and impaired ciliary function16. Published evidence on FCVB implantation includes early experimental studies, prospective clinical case series, and systematic reviews evaluating its safety and clinical performance in complex vitreoretinal conditions12. Commonly reported endpoints include retinal reattachment status, rates of silicone oil emulsification, secondary glaucoma, corneal complications, intraocular pressure stability, and long-term globe preservation. Across these studies, FCVB implantation has been associated with lower rates of silicone oil emulsification and improved intraocular pressure stability compared with conventional silicone oil tamponade, particularly in eyes with silicone oil dependence or ciliary body dysfunction. These findings provide a growing clinical rationale for the use of FCVB in selected complex cases, while underscoring the need for standardized surgical techniques12.
This article describes a standardized, step-by-step protocol for FCVB implantation, including preoperative planning, intraoperative surgical technique, and postoperative management, to provide a reproducible instructional guide for vitreoretinal surgeons.