$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Baseline characteristics
The study comprised a cohort of 212 patients with COPD, divided into two groups: 47 with mucus plugs (MP) and 165 without mucus plugs (NMP). The occurrence of mucus plugs in this COPD population was found to be 28.33%. Statistical analysis, detailed in Table 1, identified significant differences between the MP and NMP groups in several key metrics. These included body mass index (BMI), the frequency of acute exacerbations (AE), prevalence of bronchiectasis and chronic rhinosinusitis, forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of pulmonary volume (FEF25–75pred%), the residual volume to total lung capacity ratio (RV/TLC), and serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), each demonstrating a P-value less than 0.05. The COPD patients in the MP group had significantly higher AE, combined bronchiectasis, sinusitis, fungal infection, and CA199 index than the NMP group (P < 0.05), and significantly lower BMI, FEF 25–75 pred%, and RV/ TLC than the NMP group (P < 0.05). Table 1 presents the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the COPD cohorts, offering a detailed, quantitative overview of the study population. This table is crucial for highlighting the clinical and physiological differences between the MP and NMP groups among COPD patients, thereby laying the groundwork for further analysis and clinical interpretation.
Univariate logistic regression analysis
To identify potential predictors of mucus plug formation, we first conducted univariate logistic regression analyses for the clinical and radiological variables described above. Several factors demonstrated associations with mucus plug presence at a P < 0.1 threshold and were therefore selected for further evaluation. This inclusive criterion helped ensure that relevant variables were not excluded prematurely. These candidate predictors were subsequently subjected to ROC analysis and multivariate logistic regression to develop the final predictive model.
ROC analysis and optimal cutoff values
In this study, mucoid impaction was defined as the dependent variable. We selected eight variables showing statistically significant differences between the MP (Mucoid impaction positive) and NMP (Mucoid impaction negative) groups for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The results of this analysis are methodically presented in Table 2. Furthermore, using ROC curve analysis, the optimal cutoff values for these variables were determined, with the findings thoroughly documented in Table 3. In this study, optimal cutoff points for variables were determined using the maximal Youden Index, as detailed in the table. Mucus plug-positive status was defined based on HRCT criteria: presence of soft-tissue density within the bronchial lumen occupying at least 50% of the airway diameter, present on at least two consecutive axial slices, and consistent with mucus rather than artifact or fluid. Cutoff values for continuous variables (e.g., FEF25–75, RV/TLC, vitamin D) were determined using ROC curve analysis. The optimal threshold for each was determined using the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity – 1), which identifies the threshold that simultaneously maximizes sensitivity and specificity. This identifies the value that maximizes sensitivity and specificity. These thresholds were used to transform variables into binary categories for multivariate logistic regression.
Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of MP
An advanced stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed, with the presence of mucus plugs as the dependent variable. The analysis used dichotomized predictors to identify independent risk factors. These findings are elaborated in Table 4. Using variables significant in the univariate analysis, the multivariate logistic regression model revealed statistically significant results. The analysis identified several independent risk factors for CT-detected mucus plugs in COPD patients. These included bronchiectasis, with an Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 13.699 (4.256, 44.1); chronic rhinosinusitis, with an OR 95% CI of 7.291 (1.867, 28.467); body mass index, with an OR 95% CI of 0.17 (0.053, 0.547); Forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of pulmonary volume predicted (FEF25–75% pred), with an OR 95% CI of 0.091 (0.027, 0.307); residual volume to total lung capacity ratio (RV/TLC), with an OR 95% CI of 0.144 (0.038, 0.541); and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels, with an OR 95% CI of 0.042 (0.011, 0.151) (P < 0.05). These findings are elaborated in Table 5.
Nomogram evaluation
The nomogram constructed in this study is a visual translation of the multivariate logistic regression model and serves as an individualized, interpretable risk estimation tool. Each predictor in the model is assigned a point value on a horizontal axis; these points are summed to yield a total score, which maps to a probability scale indicating the risk of mucus plug presence. This graphical interface allows clinicians to estimate patient-specific risk using routinely available clinical and imaging data. This approach follows previously validated frameworks, such as the pulmonary embolism nomogram proposed. Figure 1 depicts the column line diagram modeling, and Figure 2 displays a column-line diagram that was constructed to visualize the relative influence of predictive features in the nomogram model. Columns represent individual risk factors (e.g., bronchiectasis, CRS, BMI), while line heights indicate their contribution strength to the predicted probability of mucus plug presence. The diagram aids the interpretation of feature weightings and interactions. All values were generated from multivariate logistic regression output. No error bars or scale bars are applicable; the validation results, illustrated in Figure 3, demonstrate a significant concordance between predicted and actual occurrences of mucus plugs in COPD patients. The AUC in Figure 4 validates the model's accuracy. The pattern shown by the calibration curves in Figure 5 emphatically highlights the nomogram's reliable predictive value in a clinical setting, while Figure 6 emphasizes the accuracy of the reliability of the model through the sensitivity plot.
DATA AVAILABILITY:
All relevant raw data supporting the findings of this study have been submitted as the Supplementary Table.

Figure 1: Representative HRCT image of a COPD patient from the mucus plug-positive (MP) group demonstrating small airway mucus plug status. Yellow arrows indicate tubular soft-tissue attenuation structures occupying small airway lumens on contiguous axial slices, consistent with mucus plug formation. The image was acquired using a Siemens SOMATOM Definition AS (128-slice) CT scanner with lung window settings (width: 1,600 HU; level: −600 HU). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Nomogram for predicting CT-detected small airway mucus plugs in COPD patients. Each predictor is represented on a horizontal axis with an assigned point value. Individual scores are summed to generate a total score, which maps to the predicted probability of mucus plug presence on the output scale. Predictors included: bronchiectasis, chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), body mass index (BMI), FEF25–75%pred, RV/TLC ratio, and serum 25(OH)D levels. All values were derived from the multivariate logistic regression model. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the nomogram. The red curve demonstrates the model’s discriminatory performance in distinguishing mucus plug-positive from mucus plug-negative COPD patients. The x-axis represents the false positive rate (1 − specificity), and the y-axis represents the true positive rate (sensitivity). The diagonal reference line represents a non-discriminating classifier. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Calibration curve for internal validation of the nomogram. The x-axis represents the nomogram-predicted probability, and the y-axis represents the observed (actual) probability of mucus plug presence. Three curves are displayed: Apparent (dotted), Bias-corrected (solid), and Ideal (dashed). Bootstrap internal validation was performed with B = 1,000 repetitions (n = 212); mean absolute error = 0.035, indicating strong agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Decision curve analysis (DCA) for the nomogram. Net clinical benefit (y-axis) is plotted against a range of high-risk threshold probabilities (x-axis) for three strategies: the nomogram (red), treat-all (blue), and treat-none (black). The nomogram demonstrates superior net benefit compared with default strategies across the clinically relevant threshold range. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Bootstrap-validated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the nomogram. The black curve represents the mean ROC curve, and the red error bars indicate the variability across 1,000 bootstrap resampling iterations. The area under the curve (AUC = 0.9611; 95% CI: 0.9382–0.984) confirms the high discriminatory performance and predictive stability of the nomogram. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Variable | MP (n = 47) | NMP (n = 165) | P-value |
| Age (years) | 68 (65–78) | 69 (64–74) | 0.39 |
| Male (%) | 39 (82.98%) | 139 (84.24%) | 1 |
| Female (%) | 8 (17.02%) | 26 (15.76%) | — |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 20.76 (19.55–23.10) | 23.03 (21.90–24.51) | <0.001 |
| Disease duration (months) | 10 (5–20) | 10 (5–13) | 0.06 |
| Smoking (pack-years) | 30 (0–40) | 20 (0–40) | 0.35 |
| AE ≥2/year (%) | 17 (36.17%) | 19 (11.52%) | <0.001 |
| Respiratory failure (%) | 8 (17.02%) | 25 (15.15%) | 0.82 |
| Bronchiectasis (%) | 33 (70.21%) | 38 (23.03%) | <0.001 |
| Chronic rhinosinusitis (%) | 18 (38.30%) | 24 (14.55%) | <0.001 |
| Fungal infection (%) | 5 (10.64%) | 5 (3.03%) | 0.05 |
| FEF25–75% | 12.00 (9.40–18.71) | 19.00 (13.27–29.30) | <0.001 |
| RV/TLC (%) | 45.51 (42.85–49.25) | 48.68 (43.32–54.51) | 0.02 |
| CA199 | 26.82 (17.65–49.94) | 13.86 (10.60–20.61) | <0.001 |
| 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | 21.05 (18.49–23.40) | 25.32 (23.66–27.74) | <0.001 |
Table 1: Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the study cohort. Comparison between the mucus plug-positive (MP) and mucus plug-negative (NMP) groups. Data are presented as n (%), mean ± SD, or median (IQR) as appropriate. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; AE, acute exacerbations; FEV1%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage predicted; FEV1/FVC, FEV1-to-forced vital capacity ratio; FEF25–75%pred, forced expiratory flow at 25–75% predicted. Abbreviations; RV = residual volume; TLC = total lung capacity; RV/TLC = residual volume-to-total lung capacity ratio; IgE = immunoglobulin E; 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxyvitamin D; CA199 = carbohydrate antigen 199; FeNO = fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CaNO = conducting airway nitric oxide.
| Variable | AUC | 95% CI | P-value |
| 25(OH)D | 0.826 | 0.755–0.896 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 0.737 | 0.652–0.821 | <0.001 |
| CA199 | 0.757 | 0.670–0.843 | <0.001 |
| Bronchiectasis | 0.736 | 0.651–0.820 | <0.001 |
| FEF25–75% | 0.716 | 0.632–0.800 | <0.001 |
| RV/TLC | 0.616 | 0.535–0.697 | 0.015 |
| AE | 0.623 | 0.526–0.721 | 0.01 |
| Chronic rhinosinusitis | 0.619 | 0.522–0.716 | 0.013 |
Table 2: ROC analysis results for candidate predictor variables. Area under the curve (AUC) values are presented for eight variables demonstrating statistically significant differences between the MP and NMP groups, along with 95% confidence intervals, sensitivity, and specificity.
| Variable | Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity | Youden Index |
| BMI | 21.11 | 0.842 | 0.617 | 0.459 |
| 25(OH)D | 23.06 | 0.806 | 0.745 | 0.551 |
| RV/TLC | 49.82 | 0.473 | 0.787 | 0.26 |
| FEF25–75% | 15.35 | 0.679 | 0.702 | 0.381 |
| CA199 | 17.08 | 0.809 | 0.685 | 0.494 |
| Bronchiectasis | 0.5 | 0.702 | 0.77 | 0.472 |
| AE | 0.5 | 0.362 | 0.885 | 0.247 |
| Chronic rhinosinusitis | 0.5 | 0.383 | 0.855 | 0.238 |
Table 3: Optimal cutoff values for continuous predictors. Threshold values were determined by the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity − 1) from ROC curve analysis. Variables were dichotomized at these thresholds prior to entry into multivariate logistic regression.
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | P-value |
| BMI | 0.116 | 0.056–0.239 | <0.001 |
| 25(OH)D | 0.082 | 0.039–0.177 | <0.001 |
| FEF25–75% | 0.201 | 0.099–0.406 | <0.001 |
| RV/TLC | 0.301 | 0.141–0.646 | 0.002 |
| CA199 | 7.109 | 3.403–14.852 | <0.001 |
| Bronchiectasis | 7.878 | 3.825–16.226 | <0.001 |
| AE | 4.354 | 2.030–9.341 | <0.001 |
| Chronic rhinosinusitis | 3.647 | 1.757–7.568 | 0.001 |
Table 4: Univariate logistic regression analysis of candidate predictors. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and corresponding P-values. Variables with P < 0.1 were selected for inclusion in the multivariate logistic regression model.
| Variable | β | OR | 95% CI | P-value |
| Bronchiectasis | 2.617 | 13.699 | 4.256–44.100 | <0.001 |
| Chronic rhinosinusitis | 1.987 | 7.291 | 1.867–28.467 | 0.004 |
| BMI | -1.771 | 0.17 | 0.053–0.547 | 0.003 |
| FEF25–75% | -2.397 | 0.091 | 0.027–0.307 | <0.001 |
| RV/TLC | -1.941 | 0.144 | 0.038–0.541 | 0.004 |
| 25(OH)D | -3.179 | 0.042 | 0.011–0.151 | <0.001 |
Table 5: Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis identifying independent risk factors for CT-detected mucus plugs. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and P-values. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.