$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Bioassembly and bioprinting are complementary biofabrication approaches in tissue engineering that focus on constructing complex tissues and organs at the macroscale using automated technologies1,2,3,4.
Spheroids were incorporated into biofabrication as building blocks mainly for bioassembly approaches5. Spheroids are considered microtissues that reproduce interactions between cells and the surrounding tissue microenvironment in vivo. Among the cell sources used for spheroid formation, adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) stand out for their ease of isolation, long-term culture maintenance, and differentiation potential6,7,8.
Due to their intrinsic capacity to form larger aggregates, spheroids can generate more complex tissue constructs when subjected to bioassembly approaches. This fusion-driven organization enhances the regenerative and differentiation potential of stem cell spheroids9,10.
Spheroid bioassembly can be supported or even guided by biomaterials11, making this strategy suitable for scalable and automated biofabrication12,13.
Existing biofabrication strategies can be broadly categorized into scaffold-free spheroid assembly approaches and hydrogel-embedded bioprinting systems2,5,14. Scaffold-free methods rely exclusively on spontaneous cellular self-assembly and inter-spheroid fusion, leveraging intrinsic cell–cell interactions. However, because they occur without external architectural guidance or geometric confinement, these approaches exhibit reduced spatial control and lower structural predictability5,15. In contrast, hydrogel-based encapsulation approaches embed cells within bulk matrices to provide structural support and predefined architecture16,17, which may partially restrict direct cell-cell contact during early fusion stages and influence cell migration dynamics18. In this framework, printable biomaterials such as Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) present cell adhesion motifs and may function as scaffolds to facilitate spheroid bioassembly19. A 3D-printed GelMA scaffold is hypothesized to provide geometric confinement and spatial guidance for spheroids, thereby promoting controlled tissue formation through fusion into larger, structurally defined constructs. This approach aims to improve spatial control and structural reproducibility during spheroid bioassembly by combining scaffold-guided organization with spheroid fusion within a defined hydrogel architecture. However, the present workflow focuses on process standardization and structural biofabrication parameters and does not address long-term tissue maturation, functional differentiation, or large-scale automated production.
Biological standardization is essential not only to ensure reproducibility and scalability but also to preserve the functional integrity of biofabricated tissues19,20. Consequently, precise control of engineering, geometric, and structural parameters is critical, as these factors directly influence biological performance, including tissue function and maturation5,21. A standardized and reproducible biofabrication workflow is presented, encompassing the following key steps: (1) ASC monolayer culture; (2) ASC spheroid formation; (3) 3D printing of the GelMA scaffold; and (4) spheroid bioassembly (Figure 1). Within this workflow, objective quality control metrics were established, including spheroid uniformity and sphericity, printing fidelity, and scaffold shape integrity.