Method Article

Development and Efficacy of Enzyme-Responsive Squalene-Chidamide Nanoparticles for Pancreatic Cancer

DOI:

10.3791/69875

March 13th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This protocol details the synthesis and characterization of folic acid-modified squalene-chitosan nanoparticles, evaluates their enzyme-responsive drug release and cellular uptake in vitro, and applies them to enhance pancreatic cancer therapy via targeted delivery.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Here, we present a protocol to address the limited intratumoral penetration of small-molecule drugs caused by the dense extracellular matrix (ECM) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Prodrugs offer great potential to overcome this challenge by enhancing drug penetration and tumor-killing efficacy. Squalene (SQ), a natural precursor for cholesterol biosynthesis with excellent biosafety and biocompatibility, can improve the membrane compatibility of hydrophilic drugs and enhance their cellular uptake when conjugated to chemotherapeutic agents or bioactive small molecules. In this study, we developed a novel lipophilic SQ-based prodrug system: the hydrophilic anticancer drug chidamide (CHI) was conjugated to SQ via an amide bond -- a linkage responsive to pancreatin and cathepsin B (key enzymes overexpressed in the PDAC microenvironment). This conjugation yielded an amphiphilic SQ-CHI prodrug, which was further self-assembled into folate (FA)-modified nanoparticles (FA-SQ-CHI NPs). The optimized NPs exhibited a uniform hydrodynamic diameter of 173.3 ± 1.5 nm, a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.181 ± 0.18, a high drug loading capacity of 59.0% ± 0.77%, and a stable Zeta potential of -13.10 ± 0.86 mV. In vitro release studies showed that the NPs achieved 80.2% ± 4.22% cumulative drug release within 72 h in the presence of 0.25% pancreatin, while only 33%-38% release was observed in pH-adjusted buffers (pH 4.5 or 7.4) without enzymes. Cellular uptake assays confirmed that FA modification significantly enhanced intracellular delivery efficiency, with 1.8-2.3-fold higher fluorescence intensity in PDAC cells (PSN-1 and CFPAC-1) compared to non-targeted NPs at 12-24 h. The current protocol provides a comprehensive methodology for the synthesis and characterization of the prodrug, in vitro evaluation of enzyme-responsive release kinetics, and comparative analyses of therapeutic efficacy and tissue penetration, highlighting the nanocarrier's core advantages of targeted delivery, high drug loading, and enzyme-triggered controlled release.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant tumor of the digestive tract, with an incidence rate nearly equal to its mortality rate, and a 5-year survival rate of only 8%-9%1. A complex tumor microenvironment (TME) is the hallmark feature of PDAC2. It is primarily composed of an abnormal extracellular matrix (ECM), activated cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and a profoundly immunosuppressive cellular milieu. The PDAC ECM is rich in type I collagen. Both its altered content and abnormal architecture promote tumor progression and are associated with poor prognosis3. CAFs are the most abundant stromal cells and consist of functionally distinct subtypes, such as matrix-producing myCAFs and inflammatory iCAFs, which exhibit phenotypic plasticity4.

Immunologically, the PDAC TME is dominated by pro-tumor myeloid cells. Anti-tumor lymphocytes are scarce or dysfunctional. Mature B lymphocytes also contribute to immunosuppression3,4. Collectively, these components establish multiple therapeutic barriers. The dense stroma, characterized by high interstitial fluid pressure, creates a significant penetration barrier that severely impedes the delivery of therapeutic agents into the deep tumor regions, thereby substantially limiting the clinical efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs5. Consequently, developing drug delivery systems capable of overcoming this stromal barrier and penetrating deeply into pancreatic tumor tissue is critically important.

In recent years, squalene (SQ), a natural precursor for cholesterol biosynthesis, has attracted considerable attention due to its excellent biosafety and biocompatibility6. Being highly hydrophobic, SQ can be conjugated with hydrophilic drugs to form amphiphilic prodrugs, thereby improving the biocompatibility of hydrophilic small-molecule drugs with cell membranes and enhancing their cellular uptake efficiency7. Previous studies have demonstrated that SQ can be covalently conjugated with various chemotherapeutic agents, such as cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine, forming prodrug nanoparticles with high drug loading capacity, which improves drug delivery to solid tumors8,9. These properties underscore the broad application potential of SQ in drug delivery system development.

To enhance tumor targeting, this study employs folic acid (FA) as a targeting ligand. FA is a water-soluble vitamin crucial for one-carbon metabolism, biosynthesis10, redox homeostasis11, and methylation reactions12. Conjugation of FA via its carboxyl groups to the nanocarrier enables specific recognition and binding to the folate receptor (FR), followed by receptor-mediated endocytosis13. By leveraging the enhanced permeability and retention effect of tumor cells, Zheng et al.14 evaluated folate receptor α (FRα) expression in pancreatic cancer, normal pancreas, adjacent tissues, and chronic pancreatitis using Western blotting and immunohistochemistry, and analyzed its correlation with clinicopathological features. FRα was expressed in 94.7% (72/76) of pancreatic cancer cases, correlating with metastasis, but was absent in normal pancreatic tissues. FA-modified nanoparticles can selectively accumulate in FR-positive tissues, enabling molecularly targeted therapy.

Chidamide (CHI) is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that it also exhibits potent antitumor activity against solid tumors such as pancreatic and breast cancer, and can reverse drug resistance in tumor cells15,16. However, its strong hydrophilicity is associated with low penetration efficiency into the tumor microenvironment and poor distribution within solid tumor tissues, which severely limits its clinical therapeutic potential for pancreatic cancer5. Using chidamide (CHI) as a model drug, this study proposes the preparation of self-assembled nanoparticles via the conjugation of CHI with SQ and subsequent modification with FA. This strategy aims to enhance the antitumor efficacy of CHI against pancreatic cancer by overcoming its poor penetration into the tumor microenvironment and suboptimal distribution within solid tumor tissue. Furthermore, by evaluating the in vitro efficacy of CHI in pancreatic cancer cell lines, this approach is expected to significantly improve the penetration and cytotoxic effects of CHI -- a representative hydrophilic small-molecule drug -- within the pancreatic tumor microenvironment, thereby providing an experimental basis for guiding CHI-based therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Our study elaborates on the experimental procedures for preparing CHI-SQ-PEG-FA self-assembled prodrug nanoparticles for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Specifically, we describe the optimization and characterization of the preparation process for CHI-SQ-PEG-FA nanoparticles, along with in vitro drug release studies. The process involves: first, optimizing the formulation using a single-factor experimental approach and determining the optimal particle size and drug loading; second, characterizing the nanoparticles using UPLC and MTS assays; and finally, establishing an in vitro co-cultured tumor spheroid model. Using coumarin-6 (C6) as a fluorescent probe in targeted nanoparticles, we further validate the penetration and distribution of the nanoparticles within three-dimensional tumor spheroids and obtain relevant data.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

1. Synthesis of SQ-CHI and SQ-PEG-FA

  1. Synthesis of SQ-CHI: Weigh 120.4 mg (0.3 mmol) of 1,1',2-tris-norsqualenoic acid and dissolve it in 1 mL of N, N-Dimethylformamide (DMF). Sequentially add NHS (46 mg, 0.4 mmol) and EDCI (72 mg, 0.38 mmol) and allow the reaction to proceed for 90 min under nitrogen protection.
  2. Dissolve chidamide (58.56 mg, 0.15 mmol) in 1 mL of DMF and add it dropwise to the reaction mixture. Stir the reaction at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere for 72 h.
  3. After completion, evaporate the solvent under reduced pressure at 5-15 kPa to obtain the crude product. Purify the crude product by flash column chromatography using a gradient elution of DCM/MeOH (99:1, 99:5, 85:5).
  4. Structural verification of SQ-CHI: Place the synthesized SQ-CHI product in a glass vial and dry it under vacuum in a desiccator for 24 h. Dissolve the product in approximately 1 mL of deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) and transfer it into an NMR sample tube. Perform 1H NMR analysis to confirm the chemical structure of the product17.
  5. Synthesis of SQ-PEG-FA: Dissolve 41.12 mg of 1,1',2-tris-norsqualenoic acid in 35 µL of DMF. Sequentially add N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS,15.71mg) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDCI, 24.59 mg) to this solution.
  6. Allow the reaction to proceed for 90 min under a nitrogen atmosphere. Dissolve 20 mg of FA-PEG-NH2 in 35 µL of DMF and add it dropwise to the reaction mixture.
  7. Stir the resulting mixture at room temperature for 72 h under nitrogen. Purify the crude product with a 3 kDa MWCO ultrafiltration centrifuge tube at 5,200 x g for 30 min to remove unreacted free acid. Place the purified SQ-PEG-FA complex aqueous solution in a glass vial and pre-freeze it at -50 °C. Lyophilize the pre-frozen solution in a freeze dryer to obtain the SQ-PEG-FA complex as a lyophilized powder.

2. Structural verification of SQ-PEG-FA

  1. Place the lyophilized SQ-PEG-FA complex in a 2 mL centrifuge tube and further dry it under vacuum in a desiccator for 24 h. Dissolve the product in approximately 1 mL of deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6) and transfer it into an NMR sample tube. Perform 1H NMR analysis to confirm the chemical structure of the complex.
  2. Optimization of preparation and characterization of SQ-CHI-PEG-FA NPs
  3. Weigh 6.64 mg of SQ-CHI and dissolve it in 2 mL of absolute ethanol to prepare a 3.32 mg/mL (4.3 µM) stock solution.
  4. Add the SQ-CHI ethanolic stock solution (1, 0.2, 0.1, or 0.05 mL) dropwise to 1 mL of deionized water under stirring. Stir for 5 min, then remove ethanol by reduced-pressure evaporation. Sonicate the resulting mixture for 30 min to obtain a CHI-SQ nanoparticle suspension. Measure the hydrodynamic diameter and polydispersity index (PDI) of the nanoparticles with a Zetasizer to identify the optimal formulation18.
  5. Add 0.1 mL of the SQ-CHI ethanolic stock solution dropwise to 1 mL of deionized water after different stirring durations (0, 5, 10, or 20 min). After the respective stirring period, remove ethanol by pressure-reducing evaporation, followed by sonication for 30 min to obtain CHI-SQ nanoparticle suspensions. Measure the hydrodynamic diameter and PDI to determine the optimal stirring time.
  6. Add 0.1 mL of the SQ-CHI ethanolic stock solution dropwise to 1 mL of deionized water under stirring for 5 min. After stirring, remove ethanol by pressure-reducing evaporation. Sonicate the resulting mixture for different durations (0, 5, 20, or 30 min) to obtain CHI-SQ nanoparticle suspensions. Measure the hydrodynamic diameter and PDI to determine the optimal sonication time.
  7. Confirm the optimal conditions based on the above results. Here, the obtained volume ratio of water to stock solution = 10:1, stirring time = 5 min, and sonication time = 30 min. Repeat all experiments independently in triplicate to ensure reliability.
  8. Use the single-factor method while keeping other parameters constant. Sequentially vary the following factors to assess their impact on the particle size distribution and Zeta potential of the nanoparticles: mass ratio of components (SQ-CHI: SQ-PEG-FA = 1:0, 1:0.05, 1:0.5, 1:0.7), phase volume ratio (aqueous phase: organic phase = 1:1, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20), and sonication time (5, 15, 30, 45 min).
  9. According to the optimized protocol, mix the SQ-CHI and SQ-PEG-FA stock solutions at the determined ratio. Add this mixture dropwise into deionized water under constant stirring. Continue stirring for 5 min to ensure thorough mixing. Remove ethanol by pressure-reducing evaporation, followed by probe sonication for 30 min to yield the final CHI-SQ-PEG-FA nanoparticle suspension.
  10. Measure the hydrodynamic diameter, size distribution (PDI), and Zeta potential of the nanoparticles using dynamic light scattering with a laser particle size analyzer. Observe the morphology of the nanoparticles by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, 150,000x magnification) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, 80,000x magnification).
  11. Determination of drug loading content by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)
  12. Set the chromatographic conditions as follows: C18 column (2.1 mm x 50 mm, 1.7 µm); mobile phase: 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution - acetonitrile (75:25, v/v); detection wavelength: 258 nm; flow rate: 0.2 mL/min; column temperature: 23 °C; injection volume: 5 µL; run time: 10 min.
  13. Reconstitute the CHI-SQ-PEG-FA NP suspension and centrifuge it at 7,500 x g for 30 min. Collect the supernatant and filter it through a 0.22 µm microporous membrane. Use the resulting filtrate as the test solution. Inject and analyze the test solution under the specified chromatographic conditions. Calculate the drug loading content of the nanoparticles based on the measured CHI concentration in the filtrate.

3. In vitro drug release study

  1. Accurately pipette a 2 mL aliquot of either a freshly prepared CHI stock solution or the CHI-SQ-PEG-FA nanoparticle suspension into a dialysis bag with a molecular weight cutoff of 3 kDa.
  2. Immerse the dialysis bag in the release medium containing different concentrations of pancreatin (0%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.25%). At predetermined time intervals (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 72 h), withdraw 1 mL samples from the release medium and immediately replace them with an equal volume of pre-warmed fresh medium to maintain sink conditions.
  3. Determine the concentration of CHI in all samples using the UPLC method (chromatographic conditions as specified in section 3) and calculate the cumulative drug release.
  4. Use ammonium acetate buffer (pH 4.5) as the release medium. Accurately pipette 2 mL of the nanoparticle suspension into a dialysis bag (3 kDa). Add different activity units (0, 0.7, 1.4, 2.8 U) of Cathepsin B directly into the dialysis bag. Immerse the bag in 40 mL of release medium and incubate it in a constant temperature shaker at 37 ± 0.5 °C and 75 rpm. At the predetermined time points (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 72 h), withdraw 1 mL samples and immediately replace them with an equal volume of fresh, pre-warmed medium at the same pH to maintain system equilibrium.
  5. Filter the collected samples through a 0.22 µm microporous membrane. Analyze the filtrates by UPLC to determine the drug concentration. Calculate the cumulative release percentage of CHI and plot the drug release profiles.
  6. Accurately pipette a 2 mL aliquot of either the CHI stock solution or the CHI-SQ-PEG-FA NP suspension into a dialysis bag (3 kDa MWCO). Immerse the dialysis bag in the release medium containing different concentrations of pancreatin (0%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.25%). At the predetermined time points (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 72 h), withdraw 1 mL samples and immediately replace them with an equal volume of fresh, pre-warmed release medium to maintain sink conditions.
  7. Quantify the drug concentration in the samples by UPLC. Calculate the cumulative drug release and generate the release curves.
  8. Evaluation of nanoparticle stability in PBS
  9. Mix the CHI-SQ-PEG-FA NPs with PBS (pH 7.4) at a ratio of 1:20 (v/v). Incubate the mixture in a constant temperature shaker at 37 ± 0.5 °C and 100 rpm. Take samples at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 72, 96 h to measure the hydrodynamic diameter and Zeta potential.
  10. Cell proliferation assay by MTS method
  11. PSN-1 pancreatic cancer cells were cultured in complete RPMI-1640 medium. Cells in the logarithmic growth phase were harvested by digestion with 0.25% trypsin at 37 °C and resuspended to a density of 4-6 x 104 cells/mL in complete medium. The suspension was seeded into 96-well plates at 100 µL per well, and pre-culture them for 2 h in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator to allow for complete cell adhesion.
  12. Aspirate the original culture medium. Set up a control group (blank culture medium) and multiple concentration gradients of chidamide groups (0.2, 2, 8, 10, 20, 80 pM), with three replicate wells per group. Add 100 µL of blank or drug-containing medium to each well, then transfer the cell plate to the incubator for continued culture. Treat the experimental groups with 100 µL of fresh medium containing varying concentrations (0.2, 2, 8, 10, 20, 80 pM) of SQ-PEG, free CHI, CHI-SQ-PEG NPs, or CHI-SQ-PEG-FA NPs, while the control group receives an equal volume of blank medium. After further incubation for 96 h, remove the drug-containing medium from each well.
  13. Add 20 µL of MTS working solution to each well, followed by incubation for 4 h. Shake the 96-well plate for 15 s to ensure homogeneity, and immediately measure the absorbance (A value) of each well at a wavelength of 490 nm using a microplate reader. Calculate the cell proliferation rate by subtracting the OD value of the blank group from the OD value of the drug-treated group, dividing the result by the difference between the OD value of the blank medium group and the OD value of the blank group, and then multiplying by 100.
  14. Establishment of an in vitro co-cultured tumor spheroid model
  15. Mix PSN-1 cells in the logarithmic growth phase with HPSC cells at a 2:7 ratio and seed them into ultra-low attachment 96-well plates at a density of 5,000 cells per well. After tumor spheroid formation, treat the spheroids with different nano-formulations (Coumarin 6-labeled CHI-SQ-PEG/C6 NPs and CHI-SQ-PEG-FA/C6 NPs) or DMSO (as a control) and co-incubate them for 48, 96, and 144 h to evaluate drug efficacy.
  16. Following incubation, add an equal volume of cell viability assay reagent to each well. Place the plate on an orbital shaker and shake for 15 min to ensure complete lysis, followed by incubation at room temperature in the dark for 30 min.
  17. Transfer the cell lysate to a black 96-well plate. Measure the chemiluminescence signal at a wavelength of 562 nm using a multifunctional microplate reader to quantify cell viability.
  18. Investigation of cellular uptake of nanoparticles
  19. Prepare targeted nanoparticles (CHI-SQ-PEG-FA/C6 NPs) and non-targeted nanoparticles (CHI-SQ-PEG/C6 NPs) incorporating coumarin-6 (C6) as a fluorescent probe. Routinely culture PSN-1 cells in the logarithmic growth phase for 24 h to form a monolayer. Dissolve coumarin 6 in ethanol to prepare a 200 µg/mL stock solution. Mix 10 µL of the solution with SQ-CHI and SQ-PEG-FA (or SQ-PEG) at a 1:0.7 ratio, then inject dropwise into deionized water under stirring. Stir for 5 min, remove ethanol by evaporation, and sonicate for 30 min. Finally, purify via ultrafiltration (3 kDa, 12,000 rpm, 20 min) to obtain the items.
  20. Treat the cells as follows: the experimental groups receive serum-free medium containing free C6, CHI-SQ-PEG/C6 NPs, or CHI-SQ-PEG-FA/C6 NPs (with a final CHI concentration of 5 µmol/L and a C6 concentration of 2.6 µmol/L), while the control group receives an equal volume of blank medium.
  21. After incubation for 4 h, 12 h, and 24 h, aspirate the drug-containing medium. Stain cell nuclei using 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)19.
  22. Conduct observations under a fluorescence microscope (40x, excitation wavelength Ex=360 nm, emission wavelength Em=477 nm). Assess the cellular uptake of nanoparticles by measuring the fluorescence intensity of coumarin-6.

4. Statistical analysis

  1. Perform all experiments with a minimum of 3 replicates to obtain the data presented in this study. Analyze statistics using GraphPad Prism Software. Present experimental data as mean ± standard error of the mean (SD), and compare between groups using Student's t test, one-way ANOVA, or Wilcoxon test where appropriate. Set the threshold for statistical significance at P < 0.05.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study successfully designed and systematically evaluated a novel targeted nanodrug delivery system -- Chidamide Squalenylation Prodrug-based Self-assembled Nanoparticles (CHI-SQ-PEG-FA NPs; Figure 1). We synthesized CHI-SQ-PEG-FA NPs (Figure 2) and systematically evaluated the effects of various parameters, including the oil-to-water phase ratio (Figure 3A), stirring duration (Figure 3B), and sonic...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study provides a practical step-by-step guide for implementing a low-waist system based on nanoparticle self-assembly. The self-assembled nanoparticles obtained in this study exhibited a regular spherical shape, good dispersion, uniform particle size, high drug loading and encapsulation efficiency, and demonstrated satisfactory stability21. A 3D tumor spheroid co-culture model (PSN-1/HPSC) was employed to evaluate nanoparticle penetration, revealing that the folic acid-modified CHI-SQ-PEG-FA ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was supported by Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation grants (LZ23H290001, LY19H280001); National Natural Science Foundation of China grants (82474338 and 82274364); Zhejiang Provincial Three Rural Areas and Nine Parties Agricultural Science and Technology Collaborator Program (2025SNJF075); as well as the Public Welfare Research Project of Huzhou Science and Technology Grand (2021GZ261); as well as the General Scientific Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department (Y202456442, 2025YKJ10).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0.25% trypsin-EDTAGibco (USA)25200072
1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI)Sigma-Aldrich (USA)E6383
2 mL cryogenic vialsCorning (USA)430488
96-well cell culture platesCorning (USA)3598
absolute ethanolChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)100092680
acetoneChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)32201-2.5L
acetonitrileTedia (USA)A998-4HPLC grade
ammonium acetateChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)10002861
anhydrous sodium sulfateSigma-Aldrich (USA)31481
biological safety cabinetThermo Fisher Scientific, USA1380, 1332, 1356
cell culture flasksCorning (USA)CLS430372
cell culture incubatorThermo Fisher Scientific, USAHERA51901126
chidamide(CHI)Shenzhen Microcore Biotech Co., Ltd. (China)purity >95%
Cytation 5 multimode microplate readerBioTek, USACYT5MV
DF-101S thermostatic magnetic heating stirrerZhengzhou Kechuang Instrument Co., Ltd., China
dichloromethaneChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)80047318
dimethyl sulfoxide(DMSO)Sigma-Aldrich (USA)D2650
dioxaneAladdin (China)D116156-5ml
DMEM mediumGibco (USA)12100046
Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS)Gibco (USA)14040141
ethyl acetateChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)10009460
ethyl etherChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)
FA2004B electronic balanceShanghai Tianmei Balance Instrument Co., Ltd., ChinaFA2004B
Fetal bovine serum(FBS)Gibco (USA)10099141C
folate-poly(ethylene glycol)-amine (FA-PEG-NH2)Shanghai Pengshu Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (China)PS2-NFA-2000
Formic acidAladdin (China)F112034HPLC grade
freeze dryerThermo Fisher Scientific, USA
human cathepsin BSigma-Aldrich (USA)SRP0289
Human pancreatic cancer cell lines (PSN-1, CFPAC-1)the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)CRL-3211, CRL-1918
human pancreatic stellate cells (HPaStec, HPSC)the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)
human trypsinSigma-Aldrich (USA)
hydrochloric acidChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)CFSR-10011008
inverted microscopeOlympus, JapanIX83
Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Medium (IMDM)Gibco (USA)12440053
IX 1000 vortex mixer Hangzhou Ruicheng Instrument Co., Ltd., ChinaIX 1000
methanolChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)M433287-10L
methanol Tedia (USA)MS1922-001HPLC grade
microcentrifuge tubes (1.5/2.0 mL)Axygen (USA)MCT-150-C
micropipettes (20, 100, and 1000 μL)Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA4642050, 4642070, 4642090
Mill-Q water purification system Millipore, USAZR0Q00800
 MTS assay kit (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium)Promega (USA)G3582
N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF)Aladdin (China)
N-bromosuccinimide (NBS)Sigma-Aldrich (USA)B81255
N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)Sigma-Aldrich (USA)56480
Optima Max ultracentrifuge Beckman, USA393490
penicillin/streptomycin solutionGibco (USA)15140-122
periodic acidSigma-Aldrich (USA)P7875
petroleum etherChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)
phenazine methosulfate(PMS)Sigma-Aldrich (USA)3180806
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)Gibco (USA)70011069
Poly(ethylene glycol)-amine (PEG-NH2)Shanghai Pengshu Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (China)PG2-AM-20k
RPMI-1640 mediumGibco (USA)31800022
silica gel powderSigma-Aldrich (USA)53698300 mesh
sodium bicarbonateSigma-Aldrich (USA)401676
sodium chlorideChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)10019318
sodium dichromate dihydrateSigma-Aldrich (USA)1.93689
SqualeneSigma-Aldrich (USA)Y0002131
sterile centrifuge tubes (15 and 50 mL)Corning (USA)430791, 430828
sulfuric acidChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)10021618
TetrahydrofuranChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. (Sinopharm)34865-4X4Lanalytical grade
ultrafiltration centrifugal tubes (molecular weight cut-off: 3.5 kDa)Beckman, USA344088

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Wang, Y., et al. Role of the microbiome in occurrence, development and treatment of pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer. 18, 173(2019).
  2. Chen, K., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic change in tumor microenvironment during pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma malignant progression. EBioMedicine. 66, 103315(2021).
  3. Mascharak, S., et al. Desmoplastic stromal signatures predict patient outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cell Rep Med. 4 (11), 101248(2023).
  4. Fu, Y., et al. Unbiasedly decoding the tumor microenvironment with single-cell multiomics analysis in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer. 23 (1), 140(2024).
  5. Helms, E., Onate, M. K., Sherman, M. H. Fibroblast heterogeneity in the pancreatic tumor microenvironment. Cancer Discov. 10, 648-656 (2020).
  6. Navarro Chica, C. E., et al. Design and characterization of squalene-Gusperimus nanoparticles for modulation of innate immunity. Int J Pharm. 590, 119893(2020).
  7. Rodríguez-Nogales, C., et al. Squalenoylgemcitabine/edelfosine nanoassemblies: anticancer activity in pediatric cancer cells and pharmacokinetic profile in mice. Int J Pharm. 582, 119345(2020).
  8. Emamzadeh, M., et al. Dual controlled delivery of squalenoyl-gemcitabine and paclitaxel using thermo-responsive polymeric micelles for pancreatic cancer. J Mater Chem B. 6, 2230-2239 (2018).
  9. Bulanadi, J. C., et al. Biomimetic gemcitabinelipid prodrug nanoparticles for pancreatic cancer. Chemplus chem. 85, 1283-1291 (2020).
  10. Yang, H., et al. High-level 5-methyltetrahydrofolate bioproduction in bacillus subtilis by combining modular engineering and transcriptomics-guided global metabolic regulation. J Agric Food Chem. 70 (19), 5849-5859 (2022).
  11. De Santis, M. C., et al. Signaling pathways regulating redox balance in cancer metabolism. Front Oncol. 8, 126(2018).
  12. Rushing, B. R., et al. Exploratory metabolomics underscores the folate enzyme ALDH1L1 as a regulator of glycine and methylation reactions. Molecules. 27 (23), 8394(2022).
  13. Matsumura, Y., Maeda, H. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 46 (12 Pt 1), 6387-6392 (1986).
  14. Zheng, H. Expression and significance of molecular imaging marker folate receptor α in pancreatic cancer. J Shandong Uni Health Sci. 48 (3), 83-85 (2010).
  15. Zhang, N., et al. Chidamide combined with paclitaxel effectively reverses the expression of histone deacetylase in lung cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 31, 702-708 (2020).
  16. He, M., et al. Chidamide Inhibits Aerobic Metabolism to Induce Pancreatic Cancer Cell Growth Arrest by Promoting Mcl-1 Degradation. PLoS ONE. 11 (11), e0166896(2017).
  17. Chen, Q. B., et al. Extraction and Structural Characterization of Squalene from Siraitia grosvenorii Seeds. Guangxi Zhiwu. 26 (6), 687-689 (2006).
  18. Xu, M. Y., et al. Application Study of Nano Laser Particle Size Analyzer in Silica Sol Particle Size Testing. Diamond Abrasives Eng. 35 (02), 55-58 (2015).
  19. Shen, Z., et al. Study on the binding characteristics of 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to DNA. Acta Biophysica Sinica. (03), 352-356 (1991).
  20. Mahajan, R. R., et al. Oral Administration of Neratinib Maleate-Loaded Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles: Optimization, Physical Characterization, and In Vivo Evaluation. Pharmaceutics. 17 (2), 221(2025).
  21. Ouyang, P., Lu, Y. Research progress on dispersion stability of nanoparticles in lubricating oil. Appl Chem Ind. 51 (6), 1843-1847 (2022).
  22. Xiao, S., et al. Development and application of folic acid-conjugated starch nanoparticles as a tumor-targeting drug delivery carrier. Chin Sci Bull. 51 (10), 1151-1155 (2006).
  23. Song, Y., Shi, W., Chen, W. Fluorescent carbon nanodots conjugated with folic acid for distinguishing folate-receptor-positive cancer cells from normal cells. J Mater Chem. 22 (25), 12568-12573 (2012).
  24. Tie, Y., et al. Targeting folate receptor β positive tumor-associated macrophages in lung cancer with a folate-modified liposomal complex. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 5, 6(2020).
  25. Li, C., et al. Small molecule nanodrug assembled of dual-anticancer drug conjugate for synergetic cancer metastasis therapy. Bioconjug Chem. 29, 3495-3502 (2018).
  26. Dormont, F., et al. Squalene-based multidrug nanoparticles for improved mitigation of uncontrolled inflammation in rodents. Sci Adv. 6, eaaz5466(2020).
  27. Jiang, W., et al. Intravenous delivery of enzalutamide based on high drug loading multifunctional graphene oxide nanoparticles for castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 18, 50(2020).
  28. Yong, T. Y. Exocytosis of porous silicon nanoparticles and their application in deep tumor penetration and cancer stem cell therapy. [Doctoral dissertation]. , Huazhong Univ Sci Technol. (2017).
  29. Bulanadi, J. C., et al. Biomimetic gemcitabine lipid prodrug nanoparticles for pancreatic cancer. ChemPlusChem. 85, 1283-1291 (2020).
  30. Zhang, W., et al. Prodrug-like acetylmannosamine modified liposomes loaded with arsenic trioxide for the treatment of orthotopic glioma in mice. J Pharm Sci. 109, 2861-2873 (2020).
  31. Fan, X. X., et al. ROS-responsive berberine polymeric micelles effectively suppressed the inflammation of rheumatoid arthritis by targeting mitochondria. Nano-Micro Lett. 12, 76(2020).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Enzyme Responsive NanoparticlesSqualene Chidamide ProdrugPancreatic CancerExtracellular MatrixDrug PenetrationFolate Modified NanoparticlesControlled Drug ReleaseCellular UptakeTumor TargetingProdrug Synthesis

Related Articles