Familiarization-test Paradigm
Familiarization-test Paradigm - Related Videos
01:29
The Familiarity Bias
0 Views •
2026
Familiarity bias is a psychological tendency in which investors prefer well-known assets and avoid unfamiliar investments, often to the detriment of their portfolios. This bias arises from an aversion to uncertainty and a fear of negative outcomes associated with lesser-known financial instruments. While investors may believe they are making safer choices, their reluctance to explore a broader range of assets can lead to suboptimal diversification and increased risk exposure.Familiarity bias...
08:42
A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2017
Electrophysiological research is an important tool for identifying biomarkers of developmental disorders, including Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), but data collection in these populations remains challenging. This work presents a familiarization protocol to accompany research that includes electroencephalography (EEG) to improve the likelihood of collecting EEG data from children with ASD.
09:15
Creating the Minimal Group Paradigm
0 Views •
2023
Source: Julian Wills & Jay Van Bavel—New York University The study of intergroup relations, such as prejudice, conflict, and discrimination, has always been a central topic in social psychology. Does discrimination stem from competition with other groups, a history of conflict, or derogatory stereotypes? Despite an abundance of real-world examples, the ingredients that lead to intergroup discrimination are often unclear. To help solve this problem, a group of psychologists created "minimal...
14:56
An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain (PPOP)
0 Views •
Cited by 107 •
2010
Diffuse noxious inhibitory control, temporal summation and wound hyperalgesia testing are demonstrated in the obstetric patient. These tests evaluate inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms of pain processing and are here utilized to evaluate endogenous analgesia at different time-points during pregnancy and the peripartum period to help reveal individual s risk for persistent pain.
06:43
The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
0 Views •
Cited by 22 •
2013
We demonstrate how an objective measure can be employed in the widely employed rubber hand illusion paradigm. This measure is obtained by modifying the well-established crossmodal congruency task. This task allows the investigation of multisensory processes which are critical for modulations of body representations as in the rubber hand illusion.
FAQs
During familiarization, declining looking, exploration, or another recorded response shows that repeated exposure has changed the subject’s behavioral response to the stimulus. The later test uses that change as a baseline: if responding differs when a novel or altered stimulus appears, the pattern can indicate that the subject retained information about the earlier stimulus and detected its difference.
The comparison separates response to the previously encountered item from response to a changed item. A difference in looking time, exploration, choice, or another behavior indicates discrimination between them, while similar responding provides less evidence that the subject detected the change. This contrast links observable behavior with recognition and novelty detection.
Presenting an altered rather than entirely new stimulus allows researchers to ask whether subjects notice a particular change after exposure. The resulting response difference can inform perceptual discrimination and cognitive processing, not merely whether an item was seen before. This makes stimulus selection central to interpreting what aspect of recognition the test measures.
Researchers can end familiarization when responses decline or after a preset exposure period. These alternatives establish the point at which the test begins and determine how much prior experience the subject receives. Keeping that rule explicit helps relate test behavior to the preceding exposure rather than treating every response difference as independent of familiarization.
First, the subject encounters the same stimulus repeatedly during familiarization. The researcher records a response such as looking time, exploration, or choice and continues until responses decline or the planned exposure ends. A subsequent test presents the familiar stimulus with a novel or altered one, allowing the responses to be compared directly.
The approach supports studies of learning, recognition, attention, and changes in cognitive processing across developmental and comparative settings. Because it relies on observable behaviors such as looking, exploration, or choice, researchers can examine these processes without requiring verbal responses. That feature makes the method useful when participants or animals cannot provide spoken reports.