Pin-on-disc Tribometer
Pin-on-disc Tribometer - Related Videos
09:21
Experiments on Ultrasonic Lubrication Using a Piezoelectrically-assisted Tribometer and Optical Profilometer
0 Views •
Cited by 3 •
2015
We present a protocol for using a piezoelectrically-assisted tribometer and optical profilometer to investigate the dependence of ultrasonic wear and friction reduction on linear velocity, contact pressure, and surface properties.
01:21
Euler's Formula for Pin-Ended Columns
0 Views •
2024
In structural engineering, the stability of columns under compressive axial loads is a critical consideration, described as buckling. A typical example involves a column PQ, which is pin-connected at both ends and subjected to a centric axial load F applied at one end, with a reaction force of F' = -F at the other end. Here, it is crucial to understand that when an applied load exceeds the critical load, buckling occurs as the system becomes unstable. To calculate the critical load, envision...
03:57
Transverse Fracture of the Mouse Femur with Stabilizing Pin
0 Views •
Cited by 3 •
2021
This protocol describes a method to perform fractures on adult mice and monitor the healing process.
14:33
Generation, Purification, and Characterization of Cell-invasive DISC1 Protein Species
0 Views •
Cited by 13 •
2012
The generation, purification and cell invasion of intracellular, cytoplasmic full length DISC1 protein aggresomes from cell cultures and of a labeled, multimeric recombinant DISC1 protein fragment in E. coli are described. Cell invasiveness is shown for recipient cells in cell culture and for neurons in vivo after stereotactical brain inoculation.
10:39
Reconfigurable Microfluidic Channel with Pin-discretized Sidewalls
0 Views •
2018
A microfluidic channel with deformable sidewalls offers flow control, particle handling, channel dimension customization and other reconfigurations while in use. We describe a method for fabricating a microfluidic channel with sidewalls made of an array of pins that allows their shape to change.
FAQs
Test conditions determine the contact history experienced by the pin and disc. Normal load sets the pressing force, while sliding speed and total sliding distance define how long and how rapidly the surfaces interact. Holding these variables constant enables meaningful comparisons among materials or surface treatments and helps identify changes in friction and wear.
The frictional force sensor converts resistance to sliding into a measurable record during the test. That record shows how strongly the contacting surfaces oppose motion under the selected load and speed. Because the instrument controls the contact conditions, engineers can compare friction behavior without changing the test framework for each candidate material.
Wear requires a separate assessment from friction measurement. Investigators determine material loss or examine the resulting wear track after sliding, whereas friction comes from the recorded frictional force. Keeping these outcomes distinct helps identify materials that reduce energy loss through low friction, materials that resist degradation, or candidates that perform well on both measures.
Environmental control adds context to the comparison. A test performed in a defined environment can show how a material pair, coating, lubricant, or treatment behaves under specified surroundings, while consistent conditions improve repeatability. This is important when laboratory results are used to compare alternatives for engineering surfaces and components.
Before a run, the operator selects the pin and disc materials and specifies normal load, sliding speed, sliding distance, and environment. The pin is then pressed against the rotating disc while the instrument records frictional force. After sliding, investigators assess material loss or the wear track to complete the evaluation.
These options can change how engineering surfaces respond during sliding contact. A pin-on-disc test provides a common basis for comparing their friction and wear behavior, allowing engineers to select or refine treatments that limit energy loss, improve durability, and support reliable component design. The same framework also helps evaluate competing material choices.
Measured friction and wear reveal whether a material pairing may lose energy through sliding resistance or lose material during service. Engineers can use those outcomes to compare candidate surfaces, optimize component design, and judge durability and reliability. The method therefore links controlled laboratory evidence with decisions about materials, coatings, lubricants, and surface treatments.