Bland Altman Analysis
Bland Altman Analysis - Related Videos
10:26
A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2015
The goal of this study is to use magnetic resonance venography with long-circulating gadolinium-based contrast agent and direct thrombus imaging for quantitative evaluation of DVT volume in a multicenter, clinical trial setting. Inter- and intra-observer variability assessments were conducted, and reproducibility of the protocol was determined.
07:24
A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
0 Views •
Cited by 98 •
2017
This protocol describes a method to quantify upper limb performance in daily life using wrist-worn accelerometers.
07:32
Experimental Protocol of a Three-minute, All-out Arm Crank Exercise Test in Spinal-cord Injured and Able-bodied Individuals
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2017
We present a protocol to test the aerobic and anaerobic power of the upper body muscles over a duration of 3 min in able-bodied as well as in paraplegic and tetraplegic individuals. The protocol presents specific modifications in its application for upper-body exercise in individuals with or without disability.
15:04
A Neuronal and Astrocyte Co-Culture Assay for High Content Analysis of Neurotoxicity
0 Views •
Cited by 46 •
2009
This article describes a novel protocol and reagent set designed for sensitive measurement of neurotoxic effects of compounds and treatments on co-cultures of neurons and astrocytes using high content analysis. Results demonstrate that high content analysis represents an exciting novel technology for neurotoxicity assessment.
10:39
Automated Analysis of Intracellular Phenotypes of Salmonella Using ImageJ
0 Views •
Cited by 3 •
2022
Salmonella invades and replicates inside intestinal epithelial cells both in Salmonella-specific vacuoles and free in the cytosol (hyper-replication). A high-throughput fluorescence microscopy-based protocol is described here to quantify the intracellular phenotypes of Salmonella by two complementary image analyses through ImageJ, reaching single-cell resolution and scoring.
FAQs
A Bland-Altman plot can show whether discrepancies occur consistently, vary in size, or change across the measurement range. Two methods may have similar average values while still producing important differences for individual measurements. Examining paired differences against their means therefore helps distinguish overall similarity from practical agreement between methods.
Systematic bias indicates a consistent tendency for one method, instrument, or observer to differ from the other. Variability describes how widely those paired differences are distributed, while limits of agreement indicate the observed range of disagreement. Together, these features show whether differences are small and consistent enough for the intended measurement use.
Agreement should be examined across the full range of measurements, not only near the average value. Plotting differences against paired means can reveal discrepancies that become larger or otherwise change at different measurement levels. This matters because a method may appear acceptable overall yet perform differently for low, intermediate, or high measurements.
A test of average values addresses whether the methods differ in their mean results, but it does not directly show how closely individual paired measurements agree. Bland-Altman analysis focuses on differences, their variability, and their behavior across the measurement range. It therefore addresses practical agreement and potential interchangeability rather than average equality alone.
Begin with paired measurements obtained from the two methods, instruments, or observers. For each pair, calculate the difference and the corresponding mean, then plot the differences against those means. Examine the plot for systematic bias, the spread of differences, limits of agreement, and any pattern suggesting that agreement changes across the measurement range.
Researchers use this approach when evaluating whether a new device or assay could replace an established reference method, or when comparing measurements from different observers. The analysis can identify clinically important discrepancies and clarify whether results are sufficiently consistent for practical use. It supports method validation by focusing on agreement relevant to clinical measurement.
The results provide evidence about the direction and size of differences between the proposed and established methods. Researchers can consider the observed bias, variability, limits of agreement, and any range-dependent pattern alongside the clinical importance of discrepancies. This helps determine whether the methods appear practically interchangeable for the intended medical measurement.