The endothelium is a dynamic integrated structure that plays an important role in many physiological functions such as angiogenesis, hemostasis, inflammation, and homeostasis. The endothelium also plays an important role in pathophysiologies such as atherosclerosis, hypertension, and diabetes. Endothelial cells form the inner lining of blood and lymphatic vessels and display heterogeneity in structure and function. Various groups have evaluated the functionality of endothelial cells derived from human peripheral blood with a focus on endothelial progenitor cells derived from hematopoietic stem cells or mature blood outgrowth endothelial cells (or endothelial colony-forming cells). These cells provide an autologous resource for therapeutics and disease modeling. Xenogeneic cells may provide an alternative source of therapeutics due to their availability and homogeneity achieved by using genetically similar animals raised in similar conditions. Hence, a robust protocol for the isolation and expansion of highly proliferative blood outgrowth endothelial cells from porcine peripheral blood has been presented. These cells can be used for numerous applications such as cardiovascular tissue engineering, cell therapy, disease modeling, drug screening, studying endothelial cell biology, and in vitro co-cultures to investigate inflammatory and coagulation responses in xenotransplantation.
The endothelium is a highly complex, dynamic structure and a vital component of the vascular wall. It lines the inner surface of blood vessels to provide a physical interface between circulating blood and surrounding tissues. This heterogeneous structure is known to perform various functions such as angiogenesis, inflammation, vasoregulation, and hemostasis1,2,3,4. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells are a widely studied cell type to assess the functionality of endothelial cells. However, the patient-specific batch variability, inconsistent phenotype, and minimum splitting efficiency suggest a need to determine a cell source that could improve upon all of these features5.
Obtaining a homogenous population of primary endothelial cells can be technically challenging, and primary endothelial cells do not possess high proliferative capacity6. Hence, to study vascular regeneration and evaluate pathophysiological processes, various groups have tried to obtain and assess different types of endothelial cells derived from peripheral blood, e.g., endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) or blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOECs)6,7,8,9. The spindle-shaped early EPCs originate from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and have limited growth potency and limited angiogenic ability to produce mature endothelial cells. Furthermore, they closely resemble inflammatory monocytes. In addition, their capacity to further differentiate into functional, proliferating, mature endothelial cells is still debatable6,7,9,10. The continuous culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) can give rise to a secondary population of cells known as late-outgrowth EPCs, BOECs, or endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs)6,7,9,10. Medina et al. in 2018, acknowledged the limitations of EPCs, the ambiguity of their nomenclature, along with a general lack of concordance with many distinct cell types continuously grouped under EPCs11. In contrast, BOECs have become recognized for their role in vascular repair, health and disease, and cell therapy. Further study and therapeutic use of these cells will rely on protocols to consistently derive these cell types from circulating progenitor cells.
Primary cells such as BOECs can be used as a surrogate to obtain highly proliferative mature endothelial cells6. BOECs are phenotypically distinct from early EPCs and exhibit typical endothelial features such as cobblestone morphology and expression of adherens junctions and caveolae12. Gene profiling by Hebbel et al.13,14,15 found that BOECs or ECFCs are the true endothelial cells as they promote microvascular and large vessel formation. Thus, BOECs can be used as a tool to evaluate pathophysiological processes and genetic variation16. They are also considered an excellent cell source for cell therapy for vascular regeneration17. Hence, a standardized protocol to consistently derive these highly proliferative cells is essential.
While BOECs provide a powerful tool for studying human pathophysiological and genetic variation, a more homogenous source of BOECs may provide more robust and reliable experimental and therapeutic outcomes. Superior homogeneity can be achieved by using xenogeneic cell sources derived from genetically similar animals raised in similar conditions18. While xenogeneic cell sources are prone to eliciting a host immune response, immunomodulation strategies are being developed with the goal of generating immunocompatible animals and animal products, including cells. Pigs, in particular, are an abundant source of peripheral blood and are commonly used to study medical devices and other therapies due to anatomical and physiological similarities to humans. Hence, this study refines the protocol for the isolation and expansion of highly proliferative BOECs from porcine peripheral blood.The protocol detailed below is a straightforward and reliable method to obtain a large number of BOECs from a relatively small volume of blood. The cultures can be expanded through several passages to generate millions of cells from a single blood sample.
All animal studies were approved by the respective Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) at the Medical College of Wisconsin and Mayo Clinic.
NOTE: In this study, Yorkshire/Landrace/Duroc cross domestic pigs (Sus domesticus), male and female, 40-80 kg, 3-6 months old, were used.
1. Collection of porcine peripheral blood
2. Isolation of mononuclear cells
3. Washing and plating of cells
4. Cell culture
Morphology of the cultured cells was observed from the start of the culture until BOEC colonies were observed (Figure 1). A smaller population of adherent cells started to attach to the culture dishes and grow, while non-adherent cells were removed with culture medium changes (Figure 1B). Colonies first appeared on day 6 as a collection of endothelial-like cells proliferating radially outward from a central point (Figure 1D). As the culture progressed, cell colonies became more dense and displayed a cobblestone morphology similar to mature endothelial cells (Figure 1F). The typical endothelial cobblestone morphology provides an easy preliminary identification of BOECs using a light microscope.
Endothelial cell colonies are typically ready for passaging at 10-14 days of culture. At this time, the 6-well plate will typically yield ~1 million cells with percent viability of 93%-98%. During the first passage, endothelial cells will expand to yield ~6-10 million cells in a T75 flask.
To assess the morphogenesis of BOECs, the basement membrane matrix (e.g., Matrigel) was plated on 15 well angiogenesis plates at 10 µL/well and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min to allow polymerization. Passage 2 cells were seeded on basement membrane matrix-coated plates and imaged at 14 h and 24 h time points. A density of approximately 3,500 cells per well was able to form a network and tube-like structures. Tube formation was noticed within 14 h for serum free medium (EGM-2 with supplementals except for FBS) and within 24 h for complete growth medium (EGM-2 with supplements including FBS). Adding FBS may have diluted the endothelial cell-specific growth factors (e.g., VEGF) and introduced other signaling factors resulting in the delay of the tube formation process. 2D phase-contrast microscopy was used to image tube formation in serum-free medium (Figure 2A,B) and complete growth medium (Figure 2C,D). Cells in both media conditions underwent morphological differentiation and rapidly organized into extensive networks of capillary tube-like structures. These structures were composed of organized cellular cords resembling in vivo capillary networks. Furthermore, micrographs at 20x magnification illustrate the complex multicellular organization of endothelial cells and their morphological differentiation in detail. There were no morphological differences observed between the media conditions. The extensive network of capillary tube-like structures strongly suggests the differentiation of cultured cells into mature and functional endothelial cells.
BOECs were further characterized by the expression of mature endothelial cell marker CD31 or platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM1) (Figure 3A,B). BOECs showed uniform expression of CD31. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis confirmed the absence of EPCs as the cells stained negative for monocyte marker CD14 compared to the positive control group of PBMCs (Figure 3C,D).
Figure 1: Phenotype light microscopy images. The light microscopy images of cultured BOECs observed at 10x magnification on (A) day 0, (B) day 2, (C) day 4, (D) day 6, (E) day 8, and (F) after the first passage. Scale bars: 200 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Morphological differentiation and organization of passage 2 BOECs. Morphological differentiation and organization of passage 2 BOECs into capillary tube-like structures was noticed in the basement membrane matrix within 14 h for serum-free medium and within 24 h for complete growth medium. (A) Serum-free medium at 4x, (B) Serum-free medium at 20x, (C) Complete growth medium at 4x, and (D) Complete growth medium at 20x. Scale bars: 200 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Characterization of BOECs with CD31 and CD14. (A) Passage 2-3 BOECs were stained for PECAM1 using anti-CD31-FITC antibody seen in green and (B) corresponding phase-contrast microscopy images. Cells were stained in suspension, and the suspension was imaged on a microscope slide. Scale bars: 200 µm. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of BOECs with CD14-AF700 antibody compared to (D) positive control peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Positive CD14 staining shown in blue and unstained cells shown in red. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
BOECs are a powerful tool that may be used in various scientific and therapeutic approaches7,8,16. BOECs have been used to analyze EC gene expression to elucidate the key factors responsible for the development of vascular diseases and cancer5,19,20,21. BOECs have also been used in therapeutic applications such as vascular regeneration and gene delivery22,23,24. Genetically modified BOECs have been known for their antiangiogenic tumor therapeutic ability25,26. Further, the angiogenic potential of BOECs makes them excellent candidates for cellular therapies aiming at vascularization and neovascularization17,27. Even though several studies describe how to obtain BOECs from human peripheral blood6,7,8,9, the variability of human cell sources due to underlying pathophysiological and genetic variation suggests a critical need to obtain BOECs from healthy xenogenic sources9,13,18.
A detailed protocol to efficiently derive BOECs from porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells has been presented. Critical steps include processing blood samples as soon as possible and efficient harvesting of buffy coat layers after density gradient centrifugation to maximize the number of viable PBMCs going into the culture. The initial plating density and timely passaging of cells are important considerations for obtaining consistent isolation of these cell types. A starting blood volume of 100 mL provides an appropriate number of PBMCs for a single six-well plate. It should be noted that the maximum volume of blood that can be safely collected from a pig will vary with animal body weight. A suggested safe one-time maximum blood volume collection for pigs is 8 mL per kg of body weight. In addition, timely passaging of initial colonies from passage 0 to passage 1 is also essential. The cells cease to proliferate if seeding density is very low or if the cells reach confluency. As the cells become confluent, they start transforming into an elongated mesenchymal morphology and phenotype. Seeding density can also be controlled by passaging colonies into a T25 flask rather than a T75 flask. Careful consideration is required not to lose the adherent cell types during initial media change as it is very imperative to capture as many adherent cells as possible while discarding the non-adherent EPCs. This protocol produces outgrowth cell colonies in approximately 1 week.
The protocol is highly reproducible and reliable. Expanding endothelial cell colonies are achieved in an estimated 90%-95% of cultures. Failure is typically due to lack of formation of endothelial cell colonies, meaning if at least one endothelial cell colony is formed, they will nearly always proceed to expand in culture. Sources of failure include random variability, excessive shearing of cells during blood collection, contaminating microbes in the culture, and high loss of mononuclear cells during the processing steps. After an unsuccessful culture, a second culture will typically be successful, indicating that variability between animals is not a major factor. The protocol is even successful when collecting blood immediately after euthanasia, indicating the washing steps efficiently reduce the euthanasia agents to innocuous levels.
Irrespective of the heterogeneity in the circulating blood cell population, BOECs that are very distinct from EPCs were obtained. BOECs are derived from a small subset of adherent PBMCs that lack CD14 expression. This was confirmed by the absence of CD14 staining (Figure 3C,D). The clearance of monocytic EPCs from BOEC cultures in early passages may be explained either by cell death or non-adherence. The cobblestone morphology of BOECs (Figure 1E,F) suggests a pronounced endothelial phenotype. In addition, the uniform expression of surface marker CD31 (Figure 3A) implies a homogenous population of mature endothelial cells. Further, the capillary morphogenesis of BOECs both in serum-free (Figure 2A,B) and complete growth media (Figure 2C,D) shows their inherent angiogenic capability6,8. Previous analysis of porcine BOECs generated using this protocol has shown these cells are additionally positive for von Willebrand factor expression and lectin binding28.
The abundance of PBMCs in circulating blood, from which BOECs emerge, supports the feasibility of a robust method to obtain a virtually limitless supply of therapeutic BOECs from animal sources. Once the technique is mastered, BOECs can be used for several applications, including vascular repair and regeneration, disease modeling, drug screening, and endothelial cell biology studies. Ongoing studies are needed to confirm the homogeneity of porcine BOECs and their compatibility as a therapeutic source in humans.
One limitation of this protocol is the risk of expanding endothelial cell colonies failing to generate. The failure rate is estimated to be 5%-10%, and in these instances, a second attempt is necessary. When assurance of success is important, twice the amount of blood can be collected, and the protocol can be followed in parallel to yield two independent cultures. Furthermore, our experience is limited to healthy Yorkshire/Landrace/Duroc cross domestic pigs (Sus domesticus), male and female, 40-80 kg, 3-6 months old. Success rates with other breeds, ages, and experimental conditions are unknown.
Another limitation of the protocol is that a definitive marker for BOEC phenotype does not exist. Here and in previous work28, the porcine BOECs generated from this protocol have been characterized for several BOEC markers, but the understanding of BOEC phenotype continues to evolve. BOECs are also characterized at passages 2-3 and phenotype at higher passages is unknown. An advantage of porcine BOECs compared to humans is the ready supply of pig blood, which allows for the generation of more frequent cultures and a robust supply of consistent, low passage cells.
One of the major limitations of using porcine cells in therapeutic approaches is the host immune response29. Several immunomodulation strategies are being investigated to mitigate the immunogenicity of xenogeneic cells for human transplantation, such as anti-inflammatory agents and CRISPR/Cas genetic manipulation30,31,32. More recent studies have proposed the expression of human complementary regulatory proteins (hCRPs)33 and the introduction of α1,3- galactosyltransferase deleted (GTKO)32,34 pigs. These advancements hold promise for the therapeutic application of xenogeneic cells, including porcine BOECs.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors wish to acknowledge funding from NIH/NHLBI R00 HL129068.
19 G needle | Covidien | 1188818112 | |
50 mL conical tubes | Corning | 352098 | |
6 well plate | BD Falcon | 353046 | |
60 mL syringes | Covidien | 8881560125 | |
Ammonium chloride solution (0.8%) | Stemcell Technologies | 07850 | |
Antibiotic/antimycotic solution (100x) | Gibco | 15240-062 | |
Centrifuge | Thermo Scientific | 75-253-839 | |
EGM-2 culture medium | Lonza Walkersville | CC-3162 | |
Extension tube | Hanna Pharmaceutical Supply Co. | 03382C6227 | |
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) | Atlas Biologicals | F-0500-A | |
Ficoll-Paque 1077 | Cytiva | 17144003 | Density gradient solution |
Heparin sodium injection (1,000 units/mL) | Pfizer | 00069-0058-01 | |
Human plasma fibronectin | Gibco | 33016-015 | |
Ice | N/A | N/A | |
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) | Gibco | 10010-023 | |
Pipette set | Eppendorf | 2231300004 | |
Sterile water | Gibco | 15230-162 | |
Thin pipette | Celltreat Scientific | 229280 |