Here, we present an assessment protocol of a heterotopically implanted heart after normothermic ex situ preservation in the rat model.
Heart transplantation is the most effective therapy for end-stage heart failure. Despite the improvements in therapeutic approaches and interventions, the number of heart failure patients waiting for transplantation is still increasing. The normothermic ex situ preservation technique has been established as a comparable method to the conventional static cold storage technique. The main advantage of this technique is that donor hearts can be preserved for up to 12 h in a physiologic condition. Moreover, this technique allows resuscitation of the donor hearts after circulatory death and applies required pharmacologic interventions to improve donor function after implantation. Numerous animal models have been established to improve normothermic ex situ preservation techniques and eliminate preservation-related complications. Although large animal models are easy to handle compared to small animal models, it is costly and challenging. We present a rat model of normothermic ex situ donor heart preservation followed by heterotopic abdominal transplantation. This model is relatively cheap and can be accomplished by a single experimenter.
Heart transplantation remains the sole viable therapy for refractory heart failure1,2,3,4. Despite a steady rise in the number of patients in need of heart transplantation, a proportional increase in the availability of donor organs has not been observed5. To address this issue, novel approaches for preserving donor hearts have been developed with the goal of improving the challenges and increasing the availability of donors6,7,8,9.
Normothermic ex situ heart perfusion (NESHP) using organ care system (OCS) machines has emerged as a clinical intervention1,3. This technique has been deemed a suitable alternative to the conventional static cold storage (SCS) method2,9. NESHP effectively reduces the duration of cold ischemia, diminishes metabolic demand, and facilitates optimal nutritional supply and oxygenation during the transportation of donor organs10,11. Despite the clear potential of this method to improve donor organ preservation, its clinical application and further investigation have been constrained by high costs. Therefore, preclinical animal models of NESHP are crucial for identifying key technical challenges associated with this technique12,13. Pigs and rats are the preferred animal models for preclinical studies due to their ischemic tolerance9. Although the porcine model is ideal for basic and translational research, it is limited by its high cost and the intensive labor required for care and maintenance. In contrast, rat models are less expensive and easier to handle14.
In this study, we introduce a simplified rat model of NESHP, followed by heterotopic heart transplantation, to evaluate the impact of the preservation technique on graft condition post-implantation. This model is straightforward, cost-effective, and can be executed by a single experimenter. Figure 1 shows the schematics of the procedure.
The ethical committee of the Laboratory Animal Research Center of Chonnam National University Hospital (approval no. CNU IACUC – H – 2022-36) approved all the animal experiments. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (350-450 g), used in this study received care in compliance with the guidelines for the care and use of the laboratory animals. The rats were housed in temperature-controlled rooms with a 12 h light-dark cycle, with standard food and water available.
1. Preparation
NOTE: A single experimenter can conduct all experimental procedures.
2. Donor heart preservation and blood collection
3. Ex situ perfusion
4. Implantation
Figure 1 illustrates the experimental design used in a small animal model. Figure 2 displays the modified Langendorff perfusion apparatus, which includes a small animal oxygenator. The order of anastomosis for heterotopic abdominal implantation is presented in Figure 3.
Figure 4 shows the parameters used to assess the viability of the heart during ex situ perfusion, such as lactate, potassium, and mean aortic pressure. In this study, the use of normothermic ex situ preservation decreased the total ischemic time of six successful cases to 46.2 ± 4.7 min, while the total out-of-body time was 166.2 ± 4.7 min (Figure 5). The extraction of the heart from the donor and preparation for ex situ perfusion and heterotopic transplantation required 5.8 ± 1.3 min, as shown in Figure 5. The overall success rate of the surgery was 70% and the mean anastomosis time of the six successful cases was 38.4 ± 3.4 min. In all experiments, the heart rate significantly decreased immediately after implantation, but it eventually recovered over time, as illustrated in Figure 6. The gross structure of the donor hearts was well preserved after ex situ preservation and heterotopic implantation, with no visible damages detected. However, hematoxylin-eosin staining revealed an increased number of inflammatory cells, mostly neutrophils, after 3 h of heterotopic implantation (Figure 7).
Figure 1: Experimental design of normothermic ex situ heart preservation with heterotopic heart transplantation. Abbreviations: BGA = blood gas analysis, CPS = cardioplegic solution. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Schematics of modified small animal ex situ heart preservation. Abbreviations: BP sensor = blood pressure sensor, CPS = cardioplegic solution. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: The order of anastomosis in heterotopic heart transplantation. (A) Schematics of donor heart position in the recipient abdomen and order of anastomosis. (B) Donor ascending aorta and recipient abdominal aorta anastomosis. (C) Donor pulmonary artery and recipient IVC anastomosis. Abbreviations: LV = left ventricle, RV = right ventricle, LA = left atrium, MPA = main pulmonary artery, IVC = inferior vena cava. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Parameters for viability assessment during ex situ perfusion. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Preservation timeline of the six successfully preserved hearts. Heart extraction and ex situ perfusion facilitation: 5.8 ± 1.3 min. Ex situ perfusion: 120 min. Implantation into the abdomen of the recipient rat: 38.4 ± 3.4 min. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: The electrophysiologic performance of the donor heart before procurement and after implantation. (A) Changes in the heart rate. Pre-harvesting, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min, 150 min, 180 min: the times after implantation. (B) Electrocardiography images before donor heart harvesting and after 3 h of implantation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Macroscopic (A-C) and microscopic (D-F) appearance of the donor heart. (A,D) Before normothermic ex situ preservation. (B,E) After normothermic ex situ preservation. (C,F) After 2 h of heterotopic implantation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Our focus in establishing this model was to replicate normothermic human heart transplantation. Non-ejecting models are the commonly preferred technique for preserving the donor heart in an ex situ environment16. While ejecting models offer many advantages in assessing cardiac function during ex situ perfusion17, they are not suitable for heterotopic transplantation models. In heterotopic transplantation, the implanted donor heart needs to overcome systolic afterload pressure created by the host heart in the recipient circulatory system, leading to a limited donor heart performance and underestimation in the assessment18. Therefore, non-ejecting models are more favorable in heterotopic transplantation. In non-ejecting models, the donor heart is perfused but doesn't support the recipient's circulation, significantly limiting the performance assessment of the heart. Morphological and molecular evaluations, such as histologic staining and blotting analysis, can be beneficial for examining donor heart conditions when functional assessments are limited. Moreover, the metabolic markers can be evaluated using advanced technologies, such as positron emission tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)19. This model can be useful in testing the long-term effectiveness of pharmacologic and genetic interventions before implantation.
Numerous research groups have developed a normothermic ex situ preservation model, which has been successfully employed for preserving porcine hearts for up to 12 h6. However, the maintenance of large animal models can be cost-prohibitive for small laboratories, as it involves substantial expenses and requires a considerable number of trained personnel. To address this issue, we propose a less expensive and technically straightforward ex situ preservation method, which involves the use of autologous blood followed by heterotopic heart transplantation. Notably, the cost of a single experiment using our model is approximately $300. Although there is no equivalent small animal model to compare the costs, the ex situ perfusion apparatus for large animals, when used once, can cost up to $30,00016.
The presented protocol demonstrates that all the experimental procedures can be performed in a stepwise manner by a single experimenter (Figure 3). The possibility of heterotopic implantation after ex situ preservation is another advantage of this model. By cannulating the descending aorta of the donor heart for ex situ perfusion, we were able to spare the ascending part without causing any damage. Furthermore, we modified the Langendorff circuit, reducing the amount of perfusion solution required to 12 mL for effective heart perfusion. The perfusion blood was obtained from the donor rat before harvesting, allowing us to preserve the heart with its own blood and avoid any immunologic reactions during preservation.
Modifications and troubleshooting
The ex situ perfusion circuit is recommended to maintain a mean afterload pressure within the range of 50-70 mmHg. The pressure is determined by various factors, including perfusion flow, coronary artery resistance, and perfusate viscosity20. Coronary arterial resistance is susceptible to fluctuations due to variations in temperature and pH, thus it is crucial to maintain these parameters within the normal range. The required perfusion flow varies for each experiment and is dependent on the necessary flow to maintain the desired perfusion pressure. Typically, a flow of 3-4 mL/min (equivalent to 5-6 rpm for our pump) is sufficient for a 350-450 g rat heart. The hematocrit level is a determinant of perfusate viscosity21. For our circuit, the optimal hematocrit range is 25% to 30%. Despite the utilization of the smallest experimental oxygenator, the large gas exchange surface area of 0.05 m2 for a perfusate volume of 12 mL can lead to evaporation and consequent fluid loss over time. This fluid loss can be rectified by the addition of distilled water as required. It is not recommended to add saline or ringer solution to the perfusate, as they can cause hypernatremia. The perfusate glucose concentration should be maintained at 100-150 mg/dL.
It is crucial to avoid arrhythmia during perfusion as it signifies the deterioration of one or more physiological parameters of the ex situ environment10. Tachyarrhythmia or left ventricular fibrillation are commonly associated with various factors, such as electrolytic imbalance, low hematocrit, acidosis/alkalosis, hyperthermia, and excessive afterload. On the other hand, bradyarrhythmia is mainly caused by hypothermia. Lactate and potassium are the key parameters in assessing myocardial viability. Elevated lactate levels (>5 mmol/L) and hyperkalemia (>5.0 mg/dL) indicate a substantial degree of myocardial damage22.
The careful monitoring of the anesthesia dosage and breathing patterns of the recipient rat is crucial during surgical procedures. Since the animals are not ventilated, continuous administration of excessive anesthesia can lead to hypoventilation and failure. The total laparotomy and extraction of abdominal organs result in significant heat loss, which can further deteriorate the recipient's condition. Therefore, the use of a temperature controller equipped with a heating pad and temperature probe is crucial to mitigate the impact of heat loss and maintain a stable body temperature.
Critical steps
The critical stages in the surgical procedure involve the dissection of the aortic arch and MPA, aortic cannulation for ex situ perfusion, de-airing before ex situ perfusion, and de-airing before removing the clamps after implantation. These steps are highly vulnerable and are often associated with failure. However, the key to overcoming these challenges lies in identifying the appropriate technique and gaining sufficient practice. During vessel isolation in the recipient, particular attention must be paid to the right ureter, which is situated in close proximity to the IVC in the retroperitoneal space and may mimic the lymphatic duct. In the context of vein anastomosis, it is recommended to first secure the caudal end using stay sutures followed by the cranial end to prevent tearing and stenosis. This is particularly important due to the relatively fragile nature of veins in comparison to the aorta.
Limitations
The surgical procedures involved in this experiment are considerably complex, particularly when obtaining the donor heart and perfusating blood from the same animal. The functional assessments post-implantation are limited as we utilized a non-ejecting model. An ejecting model is considered to provide more advanced outcomes in an ex situ environment. However, in heterotopic transplantation, it is constrained due to the presence of a supporting host heart in the circulatory system.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by a grant B2021-0991 from the Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute and NRF-2020R1F1A1073921 from the National Research Foundation of Korea
AES active evacuation system | Smiths medical | PC-6769-51A | Utilize CO2 and excess isoflurane |
Anesthesia machine | Smiths medical | PC-8801-01A | Mixes isoflurane and oxyegn and delivers to animal |
B20 patient monitor | GE medical systems | B20 | to observe mean aortic pressure and temperature |
Homeothermic Monitoring System | Harvard apparatus | 55-7020 | To monitor and maintain animal's temperature |
Micro-1 Rat oxygenator | Dongguan Kewei medical instruments | Micro-MO | For gas exchange in the langendorff circuit |
Micropuncture introducer Set | COOK medical | G48007 | for delivering cardioplegic solution to the arch through the abdominal aorta |
Microscope | Amscope | MU1403 | For zooming surgical field (Recipient) |
Surgical loupe | SurgiTel | L2S09 | For zooming surgical field (Donor) |
Syringe pump | AMP all | SP-8800 | To deliver cardioplegic solution |
Transonic flow sensor | Transonic | ME3PXL-M5 | Perfusion circuit flow sensor |
Transonic tubing flow module | Transonic | TS410 | flow acquiring system |
Watson – Marlow pumps | Harvard apparatus | 010.6131.DAO | Peristaltic pump used for recirculate perfusate |
WBC-1510A | JEIO TECH | E03056D | Heating bath |
Sprague-Dawley rats | Samtako Bio Korea Co., Ltd., Osan City Korea | ||
Medications | |||
BioHAnce Gel Eye Drops | SENTRIX Animal care | wet ointments for eye | |
Cefazolin | JW pharmaceutical | For prophilaxis | |
Custodiol | DR, FRANZ KOHLER CHEMIE GMBH | For heart harvesting | |
Diclofenac | Myungmoon Pharm. Co. Ltd | For pain control | |
Heparin | JW pharmaceutical | Anticoagulant | |
Insulin | JW pharmaceutical | hormon therapy | |
Saline | JW pharmaceutical | For hydration therapy |