All animal procedures described here must be conducted in accordance with institutional animal ethics guidelines and approved by IACUC. All procedures must follow the principles of the 3Rs—Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement—and must be performed by trained personnel.
1. Subcutaneous injection

Figure 1. Subcutaneous injection in mice.
2. Intraperitoneal injection

Figure 2. The landmarks for intraperitoneal injection in mice.
3. Intramuscular injection

Figure 3. Intramuscular injection into the gluteal muscle in rats.
4. Intravenous injection utilizing the tail vein

Figure 4. Tail vein injection in mice.
Key Terms and Definitions
As many of the test compounds that are utilized in biomedical research are novel substances that are not commercially available, proper substance preparation is vital. Fundamental concerns of sterility, viscosity, and physiologic compatibility of the formulation of the test compound and the medium or vehicle in which it is dissolved/suspended must be addressed. A dosing solution, whether given enterally or parenterally, must be physiologically buffered to the proper pH for the compound to be properly absorbed and to prevent tissue injury. The viscosity of a solution may be the determining factor in the route of injection. A substance that is too thick to pass through the small-gauge needle required for the commonly used injection sites in a mouse may require reformulation for oral administration. All solutions that are to be injected parenterally must be sterile to prevent introducing pathogens into the animal.
Needle selection for injections is based on the route of administration, the viscosity of the solution, and the size of the animal. In general, the smallest gauge feasible to administer the solution should be chosen; this is usually 22-30 gauge in the mouse and 20-25 gauge for the rat. The syringe to be selected is again the smallest possible with the correct graduations needed for accurate dosing.
There are several routes for parenteral injections. For the purpose of this video, the most commonly used routes (subcutaneous [SQ], intraperitoneal [IP], intravenous [IV], and intramuscular [IM]) are discussed. Other injection techniques, such as intradermal (ID), footpad injections, intranasal, and intravenous via the tail vein, are covered in a different video.
The absorption rate varies based on the compound’s solubility and the route of administration. Generally, absorption occurs fastest with intravenous delivery, followed by intraperitoneal and intramuscular administration. Although an IP injection is considered parenteral administration, the absorption mechanism is actually more similar to oral dosing. Subcutaneous dosing is a convenient way to administer a large volume of fluid. The absorption rate is slower than other routes, providing a sustained effect. The choice of the route is an essential component of the experimental protocol.
Subcutaneous administration places the materials between the skin layers and the muscle, into a virtual space created by lifting the skin. This allows for the safe injection of larger volumes, as the fluid is absorbed slowly and the excess fluid is quickly excreted via the kidneys. This avoids fluid overload and pulmonary edema, which can result from large volumes being injected intravenously. The needle selected should be the smallest size possible that will allow for the viscosity of the material injected, generally a 22-30 gauge needle for mice and a 22-25 gauge needle for rats. Injection volumes range from 0.1 ml to 0.5 ml for mice and 0.1 ml to 1.0 ml for rats, per injection site.
The IP route is commonly used in rodents because it can be used for the delivery of larger volumes than an IV or IM route. However, the absorption of material that is administered IP is significantly slower than an IM or IV route. Substances administered with this method are thought to be subjected to hepatic metabolism prior to entering the bloodstream. Again, the needle selected should be the smallest size possible that will allow for the viscosity of the material injected, generally a 22-30 gauge needle for mice and a 22-25 gauge needle for rats. For mice, injection volumes range from 0.05 ml to 1.0 ml per injection based on the size of the mouse. For rats, the range is 0.1 ml to 1.5 ml per injection site.
IM injections, although commonly used in larger animals, have minimal uses in mice and rats due to their small muscle mass. Improper or repeated injection in the muscle can cause nerve damage, resulting in paralysis or muscle necrosis. The needle selected should be the smallest size possible that will allow for the viscosity of the material injected, generally 27-30 gauge. For mice, injection volumes range from 0.01 ml to a maximum of 0.05ml per injection site for the gluteal muscle. Injection volumes for the gastrocnemius have a maximum of 0.05 ml. In contrast, rat injection volumes range from 0.01 ml to a maximum of 0.3 ml per injection site for the gluteal muscle. Injection volumes for the gastrocnemius have a maximum of 0.1 ml.
IV injection is the most effective route of substance administration, as it is introduced immediately into the circulatory system. However, with the undersized vessels available for IV dosing in the mouse, its usefulness is limited. If repeated intravenous administration is required, the use of vascular access ports or other specialized dosing equipment should be considered for the welfare of the animals. The needle selected should be the smallest size possible that will allow for the viscosity of the material injected, generally 27-30 gauge. Injection volumes range from 0.05 ml to a maximum of 0.5 ml per injection, based on the size of the mouse.
| Route | Mouse | Rat | |||
| Needle gauge (g) | Injection volume (mL) | Needle gauge (g) | Injection volume (mL) | ||
| SC | 22–30 | 0.1–1.5 | 22–25 | 0.1–3.0 | |
| IP | 22–30 | 0.05–1.0 | 20–25 | 0.1–1.5 | |
| IM | 27–30 | 0.01–0.05 (gluteal/gastrocnemius) | 25–27 | 0.01-0.3 (gluteal)
0.01-0.1 (gastrocnemius) |
|
| IV | 27–30 | 0.05–0.5 | 22–25 | 0.05–4.0 | |
Table 1. Appropriate needle gauge and injection volume range for mice and rats depending on the route.
NOTE: Appropriate needle gauge and injection volume range for mice and rats depend on species, age, and target site, and must follow institutional guidelines for approved protocols.
Questions that this video will help you answer
Substance administration is a common component of experimental protocols that utilize animals. When choosing a route of delivery, many factors must be considered, including the technical proficiency of those individuals responsible for dosing the animals, the size of the animal, the viscosity of the fluid, and the amount to be administered. Careful consideration of these factors will enhance the well-being of the animal and the overall outcome of the experiment.
Source: Kay Stewart, RVT, RLATG, CMAR; Valerie A. Schroeder, RVT, RLATG. University of Notre Dame, IN
As many research protocols require that a substance be injected into an animal, the route of delivery and the amount of the substance must be accurately determined. There are several routes of administration available in the mouse and rat. Which route to use is determined by several factors of the substance to be injected: the pH of the solution, the volume required for the desired dosage, and the viscosity of the solution. Severe tissue damage can occur if a substance is administered incorrectly. This video looks at the various restraint methods and technical details for the most commonly used injection routes.
All animal procedures described here must be conducted in accordance with institutional animal ethics guidelines and approved by IACUC. All procedures must follow the principles of the 3Rs—Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement—and must be performed by trained personnel.
1. Subcutaneous injection

Figure 1. Subcutaneous injection in mice.
2. Intraperitoneal injection

Figure 2. The landmarks for intraperitoneal injection in mice.
3. Intramuscular injection

Figure 3. Intramuscular injection into the gluteal muscle in rats.
4. Intravenous injection utilizing the tail vein

Figure 4. Tail vein injection in mice.
Key Terms and Definitions
As many of the test compounds that are utilized in biomedical research are novel substances that are not commercially available, proper substance preparation is vital. Fundamental concerns of sterility, viscosity, and physiologic compatibility of the formulation of the test compound and the medium or vehicle in which it is dissolved/suspended must be addressed. A dosing solution, whether given enterally or parenterally, must be physiologically buffered to the proper pH for the compound to be properly absorbed and to prevent tissue injury. The viscosity of a solution may be the determining factor in the route of injection. A substance that is too thick to pass through the small-gauge needle required for the commonly used injection sites in a mouse may require reformulation for oral administration. All solutions that are to be injected parenterally must be sterile to prevent introducing pathogens into the animal.
Needle selection for injections is based on the route of administration, the viscosity of the solution, and the size of the animal. In general, the smallest gauge feasible to administer the solution should be chosen; this is usually 22-30 gauge in the mouse and 20-25 gauge for the rat. The syringe to be selected is again the smallest possible with the correct graduations needed for accurate dosing.
There are several routes for parenteral injections. For the purpose of this video, the most commonly used routes (subcutaneous [SQ], intraperitoneal [IP], intravenous [IV], and intramuscular [IM]) are discussed. Other injection techniques, such as intradermal (ID), footpad injections, intranasal, and intravenous via the tail vein, are covered in a different video.
The absorption rate varies based on the compound’s solubility and the route of administration. Generally, absorption occurs fastest with intravenous delivery, followed by intraperitoneal and intramuscular administration. Although an IP injection is considered parenteral administration, the absorption mechanism is actually more similar to oral dosing. Subcutaneous dosing is a convenient way to administer a large volume of fluid. The absorption rate is slower than other routes, providing a sustained effect. The choice of the route is an essential component of the experimental protocol.
Subcutaneous administration places the materials between the skin layers and the muscle, into a virtual space created by lifting the skin. This allows for the safe injection of larger volumes, as the fluid is absorbed slowly and the excess fluid is quickly excreted via the kidneys. This avoids fluid overload and pulmonary edema, which can result from large volumes being injected intravenously. The needle selected should be the smallest size possible that will allow for the viscosity of the material injected, generally a 22-30 gauge needle for mice and a 22-25 gauge needle for rats. Injection volumes range from 0.1 ml to 0.5 ml for mice and 0.1 ml to 1.0 ml for rats, per injection site.
The IP route is commonly used in rodents because it can be used for the delivery of larger volumes than an IV or IM route. However, the absorption of material that is administered IP is significantly slower than an IM or IV route. Substances administered with this method are thought to be subjected to hepatic metabolism prior to entering the bloodstream. Again, the needle selected should be the smallest size possible that will allow for the viscosity of the material injected, generally a 22-30 gauge needle for mice and a 22-25 gauge needle for rats. For mice, injection volumes range from 0.05 ml to 1.0 ml per injection based on the size of the mouse. For rats, the range is 0.1 ml to 1.5 ml per injection site.
IM injections, although commonly used in larger animals, have minimal uses in mice and rats due to their small muscle mass. Improper or repeated injection in the muscle can cause nerve damage, resulting in paralysis or muscle necrosis. The needle selected should be the smallest size possible that will allow for the viscosity of the material injected, generally 27-30 gauge. For mice, injection volumes range from 0.01 ml to a maximum of 0.05ml per injection site for the gluteal muscle. Injection volumes for the gastrocnemius have a maximum of 0.05 ml. In contrast, rat injection volumes range from 0.01 ml to a maximum of 0.3 ml per injection site for the gluteal muscle. Injection volumes for the gastrocnemius have a maximum of 0.1 ml.
IV injection is the most effective route of substance administration, as it is introduced immediately into the circulatory system. However, with the undersized vessels available for IV dosing in the mouse, its usefulness is limited. If repeated intravenous administration is required, the use of vascular access ports or other specialized dosing equipment should be considered for the welfare of the animals. The needle selected should be the smallest size possible that will allow for the viscosity of the material injected, generally 27-30 gauge. Injection volumes range from 0.05 ml to a maximum of 0.5 ml per injection, based on the size of the mouse.
| Route | Mouse | Rat | |||
| Needle gauge (g) | Injection volume (mL) | Needle gauge (g) | Injection volume (mL) | ||
| SC | 22–30 | 0.1–1.5 | 22–25 | 0.1–3.0 | |
| IP | 22–30 | 0.05–1.0 | 20–25 | 0.1–1.5 | |
| IM | 27–30 | 0.01–0.05 (gluteal/gastrocnemius) | 25–27 | 0.01-0.3 (gluteal)
0.01-0.1 (gastrocnemius) | |
| IV | 27–30 | 0.05–0.5 | 22–25 | 0.05–4.0 | |
Table 1. Appropriate needle gauge and injection volume range for mice and rats depending on the route.
NOTE: Appropriate needle gauge and injection volume range for mice and rats depend on species, age, and target site, and must follow institutional guidelines for approved protocols.
Questions that this video will help you answer
Substance administration is a common component of experimental protocols that utilize animals. When choosing a route of delivery, many factors must be considered, including the technical proficiency of those individuals responsible for dosing the animals, the size of the animal, the viscosity of the fluid, and the amount to be administered. Careful consideration of these factors will enhance the well-being of the animal and the overall outcome of the experiment.
Compound administration is often an integral component of an animal study, and many factors need to be evaluated to ensure that the compound is delivered correctly and humanely.
The two principal administration routes are enteral, via the digestive tract, and parenteral, outside the digestive tract.
The main difference is that if the compound is given via the enteral route, it undergoes hepatic metabolism before entering the bloodstream.
In contrast, via any parenteral route, like intravenous or intramuscular, the substance skips this first pass through the liver, usually resulting in higher bioavailability.
In this first video of the series on compound administration, we'll start by discussing the factors affecting the choice of route of administration.
Then we'll review the most common parenteral injection methods, including subcutaneous or SC or SubQ, intraperitoneal or IP, intramuscular or IM, and intravenous or IV.
Let’s begin by reviewing key considerations before any compound administration procedure.
If the preparation is not a commercially manufactured solution, it must be mixed in a laminar flow hood or biosafety cabinet and filtered.
The first step is to prepare the solution or suspension to be injected. The first key consideration for substance preparation is sterility.
To prevent introducing pathogens into the animal, it is important that the injection material, as well as the needles and syringes, are sterile.
The second consideration is physiological compatibility. A dosing solution, whether administered enterally or parenterally, must be isotonic and physiologically buffered to a suitable pH for proper absorption and to prevent tissue injury.
The third factor is the viscosity of the injection material, which plays a critical role in needle selection.
Usually, 22 to 30-gauge needles are used in parenteral administration procedures for mice and rats or in accordance with institutional guidelines. The hubs of these needles are usually color-coded for ease of identification.
If the solution can pass through more than needle size, then the smallest feasible gauge should be chosen.
The next factor is administration volume, which affects syringe selection. Similar to needles, the smallest syringe that allows accurate dosing with correct graduations should be selected.
The needle gauge and administration volume also depend on the route and the species, size, and age of the animal. Refer to the text for values related to the routes discussed in this video.
The final consideration is absorption rate, which varies by route and influences method selection.
Now, let's talk about the peculiar characteristics of the routinely employed injection methods.
SC or SubQ Injection places the material between the skin layers and the muscle in a virtual space created by lifting the skin. This allows for safe injection of larger volumes, but the absorption rate is slower than other routes, providing a more sustained effect.
During IP administration, the compound is injected directly into the peritoneal cavity. This is another common method used to deliver large volumes of solutions. Although an IP injection is considered parenteral administration, the absorption mechanism is actually more similar to oral dosing.
An IM injection delivers a compound directly into the gluteal or the gastrocnemius muscle. A substance injected IM is rapidly absorbed due to the abundant number of vessels within the muscle tissue, which might make it a preferred route in some cases.
Improper or repeated injection in the muscle can cause nerve damage, resulting in paralysis or muscle necrosis. Lastly, an IV injection into the tail vein of the animal is the most effective route of administration, as the substance is directly introduced into the circulatory system.
Now that we have discussed the background, let's learn the procedures, starting with subcutaneous injections.
In mice, use the restraint technique described in the "Proper handling and restraining techniques of rodents" video.
Gently restrain the mouse by grasping the loose skin over the shoulders to form a skin tent. Ensure that the restraint is firm enough to control movement while allowing normal breathing.
Next, place the animal on the table with the back feet resting on the surface.
To perform the injection, hold the syringe with the prepared solution and insert the needle into the base of the skin tent.
Direct the needle parallel to the body, with the bevel facing upward, to ensure smooth entry into the subcutaneous space.
Inject the solution slowly and steadily. Proper placement is typically shown by the absence of resistance and the formation of a small swelling, or bleb, under the skin.
After the injection, withdraw the needle smoothly along the same angle of insertion. Gentle pressure may be applied at the site if needed to prevent leakage.
This technique can also be used to weanling rats with appropriate adjustments for needle size.
Alternative injection sites, such as the flank where loose skin is available, may be used depending on experimental requirements.
For adult rats, the injection may be performed with or without restraint. If a restraint device is used, animals should be acclimated beforehand to minimize stress.
The injection is then performed in the same manner as described for mice, ensuring proper needle placement, controlled delivery, and minimal stress in accordance with the Refinement principle.
Next, we will learn how to perform an intraperitoneal injection.
In mice, use the two-handed restraint technique described in the "Proper handling and restraining techniques of rodents" video.
Stabilize the hindquarters by placing the tail between the third and fourth fingers or by firmly holding the skin between the remaining fingers and the base of the thumb.
Next, position the animal to expose the abdomen. Tilt the animal with its head angled downward at approximately 30 degrees to allow the abdominal organs to shift cranially.
The injection landmark can be outlined as follows: draw an imaginary horizontal line across the body at the top of the hip, from flank to flank.
Then draw the medial border, or midline, along the line where the hair grows in opposite directions.
Lastly, imagine the lateral border, which runs from the top of the hips to the prepuce in males and along the teats in females. This creates a triangular area for safe IP injection.
The needle should be angled along the line of the leg to penetrate the peritoneum, while minimizing contact with abdominal organs.
Insert the needle at a shallow angle into the lower abdomen, directing it toward the opposite shoulder. Advance the needle carefully to avoid excessive depth.
Before injection, gently aspirate to ensure that no blood is withdrawn, confirming correct placement.
Withdraw the needle after administration of the compound.
For rats, restrain the animal by placing one hand over the shoulders, using the thumb and forefinger to gently control the forelimbs and head.
Use the other hand to support the hindquarters, ensuring the entire body is supported.
An assistant may help stabilize the animal by holding the hind limbs and maintaining body alignment, allowing safe and accurate injection.
The next method is intramuscular injection. This route is generally not preferred in rodents due to their limited muscle mass and the risk of pain and tissue damage.
Therefore, intramuscular administration should be used only when scientifically justified and with prior approval from the IACUC.
Restraint for this technique in both mice and rats requires either two people or a restraint tube. Here, we describe the one-person method using a restraint device.
Restrain the mouse with the hind legs extended, and pull the tail to position the animal.
Next, grasp the skin of the flank at the cranial portion of the femur to extend the leg and prevent the stifle from bending. Then, position the restraint device to clear visualization of the injection site.
To identify the gluteal landmark, locate the muscle mass posterior to the femur. The bone can be palpated, and the large muscle is easily felt.
Note the midline that runs from the point of the hock to the tail. The ridge where hair grows in opposite directions is often visible.
Injections are typically made toward the lateral aspect of the midline.
The gastrocnemius is the calf muscle, and injection into this muscle is best performed from the posterior aspect.
For the gluteal muscle, insert the needle to the appropriate depth according to institutional guidelines. Avoid repositioning the syringe during injection to prevent muscle damage.
Gently aspirate; if no blood is withdrawn, inject the material slowly and steadily.
Remove the needle perpendicularly, following the same path as insertion.
For the gastrocnemius muscle, insert the needle to the appropriate depth according to institutional guidelines and inject in the same manner as for the gluteal muscle.
Because of the limited muscle mass of rodents, only a very small volume should be administered intramuscularly.
In current rodent IACUC guidance, the maximum IM volume is typically less than 0.05 -0.2 mL per site.
Lastly, let's learn how to perform an IV injection in the tail veins of rodents. The same method applies to both mice and rats.
Place the animal in an appropriately sized restrainer with the tail exposed, ensuring that breathing is not restricted and restraint time is minimized.
Warm the tail by placing it in warm water to dilate the vein.
Rotate the restraint device and position the tail so that the lateral tail veins face upward and are held under tension.
Hold the tail under slight tension without overstretching it and bend it slightly. Insert the needle bevel-up, as distally as recommended in institutional guidelines, with the needle and syringe nearly parallel to the tail.
Note that the compound ought to be injected into one of the lateral caudal tail veins located on the sides of the tail. The vessel along the ventral midline is not suitable for injection.
Advance the needle smoothly into the vein and inject the material slowly. If correctly positioned, there should be little to no resistance, and blanching should be limited to the vein.
After a successful injection, withdraw the needle smoothly and apply gentle pressure with clean gauze until hemostasis is achieved before returning the animal to its cage.
Now that you're familiar with common injection methods, let's explore their applications beyond drug delivery.
In infection studies, mice may be injected subcutaneously with pathogens, where lesion size serves as a measure of virulence.
For cell tracking studies, genetically labeled stem cells are delivered via tail vein injection, and their distribution in the brain and spinal cord is analyzed.
In muscle research, labeled myoblasts are injected intramuscularly, and bioluminescence imaging is used to assess cell engraftment.
In disease modeling, intraperitoneal injection of dimethylnitrosamine is used to induce liver fibrosis in rats for studying disease progression.
You've just watched JoVE's first installment on compound administration, discussing the commonly employed parenteral injections. Remember, the optimal delivery route is based on several factors, including the pH, volume, and viscosity of the injected solution. And each technique has advantages and disadvantages, which must be considered in relation to the experimental needs.
Chapters in this video
0:00
Overview
1:28
General Considerations for Compound Administration
3:31
Characteristics of the Different Injection Techniques
5:11
Subcutaneous Injection
7:00
Intraperitoneal Injection
9:00
Intramuscular Injection
11:03
Intravenous Injection via the Tail Vein
12:51
Applications
14:25
Summary
Videos from this collection: